Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

A Note to Our Readers

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:40 AM

A couple of months ago, I left a QFC with a bottle of wine that I had failed to pay for.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (245) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Thank You. I am done here.
Posted by Red Red Wine on March 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM
2
I'm sorry you had to post this, Erica.

I got busted for shoplifting once, too -- a can of Drum cigarette tobacco, from Pay'n'Save in the U District. 40 hours community service at the YMCA. It's no big deal. You'll get over it.

The apes demanding blood here won't, but they have issues that can't really be addressed here.
Posted by Fnarf on March 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM
3
We still like you, Erica. *hugs*
Posted by lizzie on March 18, 2009 at 11:45 AM
4
yeah, i got busted for shoplifting once too.

when i was 8.
Posted by taint on March 18, 2009 at 11:46 AM
5
Oh, Erica, you sometimes come off as pompous, self righteous, and you got busted for shop lifting. For this I respect you, but Erica, a dangling preposition?
Posted by Rob in Baltimore on March 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM
6
Wait, did she get busted, or what? I mean, stealing is one thing, but getting caught is embarrassing.
Posted by You you you you on March 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM
7
It doesn't have anything to do with liking or not liking Erica, Lizzie.
Posted by Fnarf on March 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM
8
I'm also sorry you had to post this. The last two days of troll bullshit made Slog nearly unbearable. Fuck those assholes (or was it a solitary asshole?)
Posted by Queen of Sleaze on March 18, 2009 at 11:47 AM
9
Happens to the best of us.

I remember one time a friend and I were shopping and were so engrossed in conversation she spaced that she had also picked up a small item.

About half a block after leaving the store, she clued in and we went back and returned it.

We're all human.

And I doubt @1 is really finished.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 18, 2009 at 11:48 AM
10
OK, this is a bit half-assed.

Did you "fail to pay for it" as in you got distracted and walked out? I did that once with a gallon of milk, totally not on purpose. Got in my car and drove home. Free Milk!

Or did you "fail to pay for it" as in you tried to steal it and failed in a humiliating fashion? Which never has happened to me, because back when I used to shoplift, I was good at it.

If you're offering some sort of public statement, you really ought to STATE something, not just vaguely imply something or other.

And now it's time to listen to some Jane's Addiction.
Posted by dwight moody on March 18, 2009 at 11:49 AM
11
Dangling prepositions are completely fine and in many cases (like this one) vastly preferable to the still alternative: "for which I had failed to pay" is putrid.
Posted by Fnarf on March 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM
12
@ 5:

Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put!
Posted by Winston Churchill on March 18, 2009 at 11:51 AM
13
Fnarf, I like you too. *sweaty hugs*
Posted by lizzie on March 18, 2009 at 11:51 AM
14
It's OK as long as you took public transportation to the store, and did not ride a fixie, nor drove a Zipcar.
Posted by Internal Combustion is the real criminal here on March 18, 2009 at 11:52 AM
15
I'm still convinced the trolling was the work of one or two people.
Posted by JC on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM
16
I walked out of Rite Aid once with a Christmas tape under my chin. Once I realized I had it there, I ran back in and apologized profusely to the first employee I could find, (a tall skinny kid with red hair, and bad acne... though I probably figured it was freckles at the time) and begged him not to arrest me.
Posted by Lily Fluffbottom on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM
17
Seriously, EVERYBODY has some sort of skeleton in their closet, including the smugly sanctimonious mouth-breathers who've plagued us recently. And I'd bet dollars to donut-holes a lot of their's are far, far worse than this. But, of course, they're all anonymous-coward fucktards who don't have the ball sacks to open themselves up to the same sort of picayune public pillorying you've had to endure from them.

It's done. Over. Move on, and learn from the mistake.
Posted by COMTE on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM
18
@Winston Churchill for the very big grammar win.
Posted by snargent pepper on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM
19
Is "failing" the same thing as "forgeting"? Regardless, I still think you're great, ECB.
Posted by PJ on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM
20
No big deal. We all make mistakes.

That said, I can't see how or why this is anyone's business but yours.
Posted by Original Andrew on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM
21
We now return you to our regularly scheduled circle jerk in which all of the regular commentors get to abuse this space as their own little chear squad for their beloved Stranger.

Posted by Jeff on March 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM
22
I mean "forgetting."
Posted by PJ on March 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM
23
So is this an apology?
Cause I didn't see the word 'sorry'.
And if it's just a statement of fact what's the point?
Posted by SLOG ain't a confessional on March 18, 2009 at 11:57 AM
24
You know, the "uproar" over this the last couple days was less about the actual "crime" and more about the faux-transparency the Stranger operates under. You're not media newbies, so you should know how to deal with such a matter directly (to get ahead of the story), rather than issue a statement like this way after the fact.
Posted by abcd on March 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM
25

@ 21

Your lips feel great wrapped around my thick kahk, Jeff!
Posted by Original Andrew on March 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM
26
Fnarf, I'm not really a grammar Nazi. (Just look at my contributions for proof of that.) I just wanted to be the first to nitpick, find something wrong with this post.
Posted by Rob in Baltimore on March 18, 2009 at 12:01 PM
27
My use of dangling prepositions (in speech, not writing) used to bug the shit out of my roommate in college. She was from the south, and her rationale was that it was much less common there. I'm from the Midwest, where no one batted an eyelash at things like "do you want to come with?"

Dangling Prepositions. More interesting than this whole Erica thing.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on March 18, 2009 at 12:01 PM
28
@24, who the fuck ever promised you "transparency"?
Posted by Fnarf on March 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM
29
I agree this is not a big deal. Those who are judging Erica had better not even so much a ever smoked a joint or jaywalked.
Posted by Heather on March 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM
30
@23: she owes you an apology for what, exactly? Do you own that QFC? Cuz if not then STFU.
Posted by c to the andice on March 18, 2009 at 12:07 PM
31
Please, cover up those dangling prepositions.

And, no, transparent tape will not suffice.

Ever.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 18, 2009 at 12:07 PM
32
agreed with #10. This is ridiculous ECB. Your word play here makes it sound like it just slipped your mind that you pocketed a bottle of wine.

Please.

You stole. Own it.
Posted by akbar fazil on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM
33
wait, someone wants an apology? an apology?? really???

you shouldn't have even posted this, erica. assholes will always be assholes. you should never try to placate assholes.
Posted by brandon on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM
34
@24, They're not newbies, but they are amateurs.
Posted by Charlie T. on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM
35
@24 'Cajun style'
Posted by james carville on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM
36
When I was a teenager, we used to have competitions to see who could steal the most expensive bottle of wine from the Safeway on 15th and John or the Safeway on Broadway. We would consume our high class booty in either Volunteer Park or at the Denny family plot in the cemetery. As a result, my friends and I gained an appreciation for fine wines that continues to this day, about thirty years later.
Posted by worf on March 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM
37
That is not an apology on my part, FYI.
Posted by worf on March 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM
38
I thought you guys hired writers here?

I mean, there is some serious self-effacing comedy gold here and it's been squandered because some egos were hurt.

If a real writer had found themselves in this predicament, I would have enjoyed reading the essay that explained it all and put it in a perspective. It would have been touching, funny, and humanizing.

Instead, the Slog has produced this two-line denouement.
Shameful. Worse than Charles Mudede's movie reviews.

Perhaps now we can get back to the inside-jokes about bacon.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM
39
@10 and @24 For the win

Erica this is half assed and you damn well know it.

You as a journalist know damn well how to write an appropriate response. You have no remorse in this action of theft.

The lame ass regulars here who have "supported" you and your actions have a huge double standard in conduct.

Erica you left this post ambiguous as to your remorse and culpability. Go back and edit/add to it, and provide us all the logic you used when making the decision to steal the bottle. Don't fluff over the real facts.

Like was said above, SLOG should have done much better damage control over your fuck up. You should be ashamed for not taking responsibility for your actions, and then covering them up until public furor made you crawl out of your hole.

Once a thief, always a thief. There is a statistical probability that you will do it again. The mental deficiency that you suffer from predisposes you to doing it again and again.

Getting a slap on the wrist and some petty public service punishment and then coming here and not disclosing the details surrounding the crime don't bode well for your liklihood of repeat offending.
Posted by Inquiring minds want to know on March 18, 2009 at 12:18 PM
40
A person who will steal
will fudge the facts in a story.
Posted by dishonesty is not cool on March 18, 2009 at 12:21 PM
41
On the plus side, people, let's all give a warm round of applause to the staff that methodically "moderated" the forums in an attempt to keep things from getting to this point.

That must have been a thankless job and, evidently, required working around the clock.

Those moderators (could they have been unpaid interns?) deserve a bottle of something nice for their troubles and dedication to the cause.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM
42
Are you kidding me??? You stole it. thats it. You are not to be trusted.
Posted by cafepuppy on March 18, 2009 at 12:27 PM
43
@39: shut up.

The last few days of trolling were kind of funny at first, but it's gotten old. stop it.
Posted by guy on March 18, 2009 at 12:27 PM
44
39 If you demand such transperency in all thing slog then start using a name. It can be any name but, as long as you use a different BS joke name every time, you loss the right to complain about accountability.

as you say "You should be ashamed for not taking responsibility for your actions"
Posted by Kip Waddle on March 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM
45
Dear Inquiring minds, please permit me to answer in defense of "dare i say indefensible?"

As a former grocery worker of 25 plus years... a couple of things come to mind when it comes to leaving the store without a receipt.

One of the big ones is insurance.

Excuses, lame ass or otherwise fall under a couple of catagorical nuances from internal security memorandoms and private public corporate policy.

One of which is...

Never try a slip and fall accident when the night crew is aware that the power scrubber has been boosted before the sherriff shows up with a warrant.

Another may be... in the tactless exemplification of tunnel
vision, nuclear medicine technocrats and spoof genre alienators in cg animation metaphors leave room for imbalanced and highly personal transferrance of schedule manipulation.

Finally... if you want to research metaphysics...

attend the debate in Ballard on Satan coming to your "Nightline" programming soon.

Or not.

Just stay at home and watch the out takes instead.

You see dear inquiring mind,

aside fom monumental locality advertising issues with death marches and chanting and idol worshipping screaming bands of youth and plots of very small real estate holes with your possible future location to be alienated by war, oppression and way to many hormones to effectrively handle the spit before you look to the corner bus stop protection plans... oh wait a minute...

do you have spit and hormones when your planted six feet under...?
Posted by daniel on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM
46
Ohhh and btw to the other SLOG writers...

Note that in the "A Note To Our Readers" posts, almost everyone is talking about a theft they did WHEN THEY WERE KIDS

Or are we to believe that they youthful indiscretions of Staffers is the equivalent indiscretion of a SLOG senior staffer in their 30's?

The half assed lame replies from the other staffers are pathetic btw
Posted by Confidential to SLOG Staffers on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM
47
Dear fudgers....

Stealing is allowed in Baseball.Check out the rule book.

And another thing....

the free quart of Ice Cream you get from little complaints, whines and bitching to the front end manager at the grocery store isn't called a gratuity, it's called a bribe.

Now, go home and do your homework.
Posted by daniel on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM
48
Good god people @ 42, 40 and 39 (especially 39) - statistical probability?? How do you poo with your butts puckered so?
Posted by Karla on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM
49
@28: And thus dies truth.
Posted by Jigae on March 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM
50
I attended a Tupperware party in Kent nine years ago.
Ten years ago I read a Dean C. Koontz novel to see if he lived up to his bestseller status.
When I was seven I took seven dollars from my aunt's purse.
Posted by Not the 2nd coming of Jesus on March 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM
51
Spare us from responsibility queens who think they can lecture others about being responsible. Something must be lacking in you own lives. I'll bet you go around saying such trite nonsense as "the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior." Get the fuck over yourselves.
Posted by Scofflaw Enabler on March 18, 2009 at 12:36 PM
52
Just blame it on the patriarchy.
Posted by Easy enough. on March 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM
53
so, I don't have time to read all 50 or so comments here, so I apologize if this sentiment has been expressed already...

See Erica, that wasn't so hard, was it?

Also, "failed to pay"??!!? WTF does that mean? As a "journalist", would you accept that statement from the subject of a story?

Finally, I too have shoplifted & got caught. I was 13. I "failed to pay" for a Metallica cassette (Ride The Lightning I think).
Posted by Mike in MO on March 18, 2009 at 12:41 PM
54
We have to believe in holding bloggers to some level of journalistic ethics because like it or not, they *are* the news media now. Are the PI online writers that much different than Stranger editors, in terms of what they do and what they produce?
Posted by Jigae on March 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM
55
This post is now in the "Most Commented" section.
Check out how many other posts in that list were dedicated to THIS topic, rather than the actual headline.
If an otherwise unengaged staff member (who no longer has to "moderate" the comments) took the time to cut-and-paste comments relevant to THIS topic, this comment would probably be comment #1,132.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM
56
Good luck with all your credit card debt and that whole garnished wages thing! YEOWCH, no wonder you needed a drink!
Posted by *rollseyes* on March 18, 2009 at 12:44 PM
57
At the Ben Franklin in Libby, MT in the early 1980s I stuffed Snake-Eyes down my pants and walked out the door, back to my grandmother's house. I still have that goddamm ninja too.
Posted by ecb stole my heart on March 18, 2009 at 12:45 PM
58
I'm sorry you had to post this in response to some ridiculous troll. It really is none of our business. I'd rather see you delete trollspam than respond to it, but it's your blog, not mine.
Posted by Superfrankenstein on March 18, 2009 at 12:48 PM
59
I stole 5 seconds of your life by making you read this. Oh, and about all that downloaded music...
Posted by smade on March 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM
60
Normally, I would say that this matter is between Erica, the QFC and the judicial system.

But there have been so many over-the-top postings on this issue, that I am tempted to go steal (or fail to pay for, if you will) a bottle of wine myself, just to be in solidarity with Erica against all those who apparently have nothing better to do than to obsess over this truly stupid topic.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay on March 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM
61
I stole not one, but two, carpets from outside of Leilani Lanes. I'd do it again if possible. They kick ass.
Posted by heywhatsit on March 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM
62
Attention whiners of the "why so late" variety:

Erica probably couldn't comment on this until AFTER her plea thing.

DURR!
Posted by Bob Loblaw's Law Blog on March 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM
63
I steal babies and eat them. What's the big deal?

I don't like Erica's writing, and from what I get from her writing, I wouldn't like her in person in the least (but I am not writing off being pleasantly suprised) but the recent witch hunt has been pretty fucking retarded, not something that a smal potatos "local celebrity" deserves in the least.

She rides a high horse and her stances on certain topics are biased on Limbaugh/O'reilly levels, so feel free to crucify her there, but her personal life, which we know little about (and is frankly none of our business) should be left alone unless she gets to the point of infamy of the other two aforementioned blowhrds.
Posted by Joh on March 18, 2009 at 1:04 PM
64
I find it interesting that none of my favorite Slog editors have written "A Note to Our Readers" yet. I assume the stragglers just haven't had a chance to write one, but it does make we wonder if these were editorially-mandated or simply done out of support.
Posted by Jigae on March 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM
65
you've also written a number of stories w/o researching them, and left even more opinions in the same columns w/o noticing your own hypocrisy. glad you got caught; hope you find a way to learn how to be a journalist.
Posted by wilbur@work on March 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM
66
It was drinking glasses from different pubs, while living in Europe.
Posted by kim in portland on March 18, 2009 at 1:10 PM
67
I wish you guys had titled this series, "A Note to Some of Our Dumbass Readers Who Care About Such Meaningless Shit"

meanwhile, the other 98% of us could care less.

Also, it's a bad precedent to feed the Sock Puppets...they're like Gremlins and they are never satisfied.
Posted by michael strangeways on March 18, 2009 at 1:10 PM
68
"had failed to pay for"

Did you fail, forget, or filch?

To police: forget
To friends: fail
To self: filch
Posted by ECB's conscious on March 18, 2009 at 1:15 PM
69
Huh?
Posted by Hannah on March 18, 2009 at 1:20 PM
70
Erica,

I'm sorry you had to post this and I don't think it's going to make the trolls go away.

With that said, I loved the following "A Note To Our Readers" posts. Kudos to the staff of The Stranger for that.

For the record, I'm the worst person of all. When I was in my early 20s and in the army as a Chaplain Assistant, I reallocated cheap ass communion wine (and various other snacks) so my friends and I could party. I also fucked a boy on the altar of the Four Chaplains' Memorial Chapel in Fort Lewis, something I still brag about to this day (see?).

Finally, I agree with Karla@48, you trolls are some sanctimonious butt clenching sphincters. How do you managed to do #2?
Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM
71
I am amazed! I never understood why people spent so much time reading SLOG (or The Stranger, for that matter) and now I see why. It's like reading a script for a really boring Springer episode.

1. Every post on this subject seems to fit under the "troll" category, including this one (what the fuck does that mean? I was the last person to know what "lmao" meant.)

2. If you want news written by decent writers who aren't pushing personal agendas, stop reading blogs and local rags. That's what they're around for.

3. Employed adults stealing ANYTHING is pathetic and sad. This woman has troubles far beyond her inability to "apologize" (no need) or truly own up to her crime (yes, it's a crime.)

Anyway, thanks for making my first trip to SLOG a super fun one!
Posted by Brand New Blogger on March 18, 2009 at 1:23 PM
72
This has to be close to a SLOG record Erica! Congrats! What would you say? We've had around 200 posts today about YOU!

I bet your ego has been satisfied for now?

No rebuttal?

The bigger question is... will you ever be able to post normal threads again? I tend to think not..

Your credibility has been forever tarnished.
Posted by elenchos on March 18, 2009 at 1:25 PM
73
How do you "fail to pay"? was it in your cart, or in your purse/messenger bag/backpack?

Intent is different than oversight.
Posted by Max Solomon on March 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM
74
@elenchos - It's sad to me that I'd rather see something from Will than from you now. Your "credibility is tarnished" crap really only applies to the people who didn't like her anyway and have an axe to grind. Those who don't will be fine.

You are a tool, get over yourself, and move on. I hear the Weakly Reader needs viewers.

Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 1:30 PM
75
As a professional adult, I would go out to lunch on occasion with my co-workers to the Red Robin by the old Seattle library (is that still there?)(the RR, not the library)(well, the library’s not there, either, I suppose.)(or at least not the same one.) Every time we went, I’d ask the wait staff if I could keep my basket. They’d look around, or stammer that they didn’t think so. I’d push. They’d inevitably respond that if I could get it out the door, it was mine. I’d hold it up or put it on my head while walking out the door. I was never stopped. I have a lovely collection of red baskets I have no idea what to do with now.

Was that stealing?
Posted by Allyn on March 18, 2009 at 1:32 PM
76
What is it about hypocrisy that is so entertaining AND predictable at the same time?

A holier-than-thou attitude and deceit are forever intertwined. ECB and Rush Limbaugh are essentially the same person.
Posted by Yutang on March 18, 2009 at 1:35 PM
77
I collect Rainier Beer paraphernalia, so a few weeks ago I noticed a nice collectible piece of neon ($395 starting bid on ebay) in the window of some house in the u-district. That weekend I came back and originally was just going to smash out the window and grab the neon, but realized more than likely I'd smash the neon also. So instead I broke the glass in the door and let myself in, unplugged the Rainier sign and walked back out. Sorry!
Posted by pls don't trace my IP on March 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM
78
Go steal a "chariot" you sanctimonious hypocritical cunt.
Posted by ECB = retarded anti-white liberal whitey white on March 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM
79
"I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky."

ECB's non-statement is right up there with that little gem in the history of non-denials/non-apologies.

PS - I think shoplifting is actually a much bigger disqualifying black mark in public life than having consensual sex with someone of legal age, but a lie is a lie is a lie is a lie.

PPS - Most employers would fire someone in a similar situation, as this does go to the heart of ECB - and yes - the Stranger's credibility (such as it was).

Posted by LMAO on March 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM
80
@76: Get off elenchos's back -- comparing him to Will in Seattle is ludicrous.
Posted by Jigae on March 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM
81
I still say that no one owes anyone anything in the way of an apology. More fitting might be an actual defense of why it's okay to write about private mishaps of folks from other local media but not okay when the person's on your own staff.

For once, my status as a total dork serves me well--I can comment on this topic, since my shoplifting experience amounts to this: At a deli with a friend and her mom when I was around 7 years old, I took a crouton from the salad bar even though I hadn't gotten the salad bar entree! I felt so guilty that I borrowed a nickel from her mom and left it on the counter as a payment.

Posted by leek on March 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
82
Stealing from a store is not a "private mishap", partially because it happens in public.
Posted by ECB = hypocrite and liar and thief on March 18, 2009 at 1:44 PM
83
Idiots.

(Not you, staff.)
Posted by STJA on March 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM
84
I meant "mishaps in one's private life," duh.
Posted by leek on March 18, 2009 at 1:52 PM
85
Jegae@82 - I can't help it, they're both annoying and aggravating. Right now elenchos is worse because of his pure ECB hatred and loathing (he probably can't help his comments either, poor dear), but as soon as the topic moves on Will will say something idiotic and misinformed and I'm sure it'll flip again.

Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM
86
I'm sorry you had to give in to the assbag pseudonym-using craven no-life trolls for the sake of Slog commenting, ECB. No matter what I might think about this issue, it's a shame to see people acting like such fuckheads get their way.
Posted by balderdash on March 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM
87
@81 - Bullshit that "most employers" would fire someone in a similar situation. Bullshit. In a professional environment, there is no way that someone would be fired for this or any other extremely minor crime (parking tickets? jaywalking? trespassing?).
Posted by Julie in Eugene on March 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM
88
It's an even greater shame when people adults act like fuckheads and steal private property... but most of you commie fags don't like private property so you better give away your Prius and your skinnyleg black jeans to the next homeless shitass begging junkie you see on Cap Hill!
Posted by eat shit and die on March 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM
89
@91 - I'd ask to have some of what you're having, but it obviously turned you into an assholish fuck. I'll pass.
Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM
90
Arg, fine, I'll be that guy. What started this? It's bugging me. Did someone eyeball ECB pilfering wine and demanded she 'fess up? Or what?
Posted by ? on March 18, 2009 at 2:09 PM
91
My guess is that over the last 48 hours something like 80% of the snippy little three-line comments that have come in were all written by at most two people. It's really a lot of time sent bashing at the keyboard; their fingers must be sore. Hopefully when the economy recovers a little those one or two people will have jobs again, and SLOG will become readable again.
Posted by Eric from Boulder on March 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM
92
#89 Comment deleted for "Sock Puppetry?"

Are you serious?
First, anybody who posts something poorly-received is a "troll."
Then they're a "sock puppet."
What next? I still like "terrorist" because that term has a proven track-record for ad-hominem effectiveness.

I could give a rat's ass about a bottle of wine. It's this peurile "moderating" that got my attention. Seriously, Slog, you've been reduced to the conspiratorial antics of a high-school yearbook committee. And by what?

Ah yes, trolls, that's right. They're in league with the sock puppets.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM
93
@94 But how did the wine theft come up in the first place? It's mentioned in comments that were posted 24 hours before this one. I'm sick of looking around for the root cause. I feel like I'm deciphering the Moron Da Vinci Code here.
Posted by ? on March 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM
94
@94: No -- there's a lot of different people -- well, at the very least somewhere in the neighborhood of ten. People are upset by this.

This is why we need commenter login -- then no one on either side of a debate can start shouting "sock puppet."
Posted by Jigae on March 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM
95
Regarding my post #10: I'm not asking for an apology. Simply a less weaselly statement. This post was like Clinton's "I didn't inhale."
Posted by dwight moody on March 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM
96
100 Posts! Woo hoo!

Congrats ECB! Now just imagine if you really would have posted 2 paragraphs worth of explanation for the "why" of your actions.

Please humor us and give us the scoop?

Just think.. a few more posts and this thread will be #1 most commented above Dan running for Mayor!

Sweet.
Posted by Former Reformed Troll, Ecce Homo on March 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM
97
I feel old
Posted by like, 100 years old..... on March 18, 2009 at 2:29 PM
98
The most disturbing revelation here is that fnarf used to roll his own cigarettes.

I wonder if he buys ready-mades now. If not, unfiltered cigarettes are the fast track to lung cancer.
Posted by Zig Zag Man on March 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM
99
OK, I am all caught up:
http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweek…

Erica, I'll buy you a bottle of wine.

Everybody else: I once smashed a store window in the middle of the night to steal porn mags. Fuck you!
Posted by ? on March 18, 2009 at 2:32 PM
100
I did not realize this until now that the word 'Troll' means someone who disagrees with me and dares to say so.
Posted by Yutang on March 18, 2009 at 2:39 PM
101
Dan Savage is the one doing all this "moderating."

You see, every comment that gets deleted DOESN'T count towards the "Most Commented" count...
Thus, with a "Deleted: Off Topic" here and a "Deleted: Sock Puppetry" there, the comment count keeps getting truncated by small amounts...

All because Dan Savage will NOT be dethroned from the #1 "Most Commented" spot...

Erica may need to go punch a baby in the face for the kind of exposure needed to take on Dan.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM
102
I shot and killed a white businessman and then raped his white wife. Fuck you haters!
Posted by Nat Turner Worshipper on March 18, 2009 at 2:41 PM
103
Having seen Bottle Shock, I was able to locate this portrait of ECB:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/atweed/3073…
Posted by Vinnie Rosso on March 18, 2009 at 2:42 PM
104
Wow, all this attention over a shoplifted bottle of cheap wine?

How's the view from those glass houses, judgmental ones? Yeesh.
Posted by Eva Hopkins on March 18, 2009 at 2:44 PM
105
You bet I'm judgmental... I don't steal stuff.

You steal anything from my store and you go to jail, period.
Posted by GROW THE FUCK UP on March 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM
106
@95 - Sock Puppetry is when someone comments using the name of another, established commenter, or a writer, or other well-known name that is not theirs. It has nothing to do with the content.
Posted by Anthony Hecht on March 18, 2009 at 2:53 PM
107
Sort of like a certain local tv news reader who is much ballyhooed by Slog for "failing to pay for" things?

To "fail" implies an attempt to succeed, and thus a conscious decision.

Translation: "I stole a bottle of wine and got caught. - ECB"

How fucking humiliating, considering your age and position in the community...
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on March 18, 2009 at 2:59 PM
108
#76, should I be surprised that the people that don't have an axe to grind with EBC and don't think her credibility is tarnished are the same thieving fuckheads that are posting their "hey look, I'm also an asshole" comments and posts to the front page?

Look, the stories about how you stole a pack of gum when you were 8 are cute. Full grown adults stealing alcohol from someone else's neighborhood economy is just sad. I understand personality disorders can't be helped, so if you can't help being a worthless sack and overall negative contribution to society, at least do it in your own neighborhood and don't drive up my goddamn prices.

This theft and numerous other thefts that she no doubt got away with, her hilariously SAD amount of parking tickets (which, lame as I sound right now, probably did nothing but inconvenience others and make the roads less safe), and willingness to fuck over someone else's Zipcar reservation, AND nerve to whine about the consequences are just a small number of examples of what well-reasoned folks like elenchos have known for quite some time: ECB is a selfish--possibly narcissistic--bitter woman with a severe sense of entitlement, not to mention a complete hack with no business having a platform where someone that doesn't know any better might take her hatchet jobs seriously.

But don't worry fanboys and fangirls, she didn't steal, she just left without paying. Once.
Posted by My name is John Daker on March 18, 2009 at 3:10 PM
109
Hi Erica!!!! You didn't mean to not pay right?? Otherwise that would be stealing. Once I almost forget to pay for tampoons at RITEAiD, OMG How. Totally. Embarassing. But I remembered before I walked out so it was no biggie.

Anyways I can't beleive all these people are accusing you of stealing something as DUMB as a cheap bottle of wine. As. IF. That is so sweet though how everyone at the Stranger stole something when they were kids. What a show of SUPPORT! What'd you do honey, forget it in your bag? But adults stealing, that's bad.
Posted by caphillizzie on March 18, 2009 at 3:12 PM
110
I only question why you stole a $9 bottle instead of something decent. It really brings into question your judgement and taste, which is the most disturbing part of this whole story since no one expects a high moral standard from the City's most depraved print outlet.
Posted by Hell in a Bucket, People, That's Where We're Headed on March 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM
111
@108:

You bet I'm judgmental... I don't steal stuff.

You steal anything from my store and you go to jail, period.


thanks for the morals lesson you douchbag big tough enforcer of law and order, you. you sure told us there, Pops.
great! now no one ever is gonna swipe anything ever again anywhere because you so forcefully made your important opinion known on some stupid blog.

and then you tell other people to grow-up , sheesh. pathetic.
Posted by watching COPS probably gives you a hard-on too on March 18, 2009 at 3:22 PM
112
@111 Exactly.

The vast majority of shoplifting is not detected. It costs businesses a very significant amount of money, both if lost sales and increased costs for inventory and security.

Erica is, in all likelihood, a serial shoplifter who has done this many, many times before getting caught. It is highly unlikely her first attempt would be with wine at a grocery store.

The Stranger's editors and other writers showing their "solidarity" with an admitted shoplifter is just sad. Advertisers should take serious offense to this. I don't spend my extremely limited ad dollars on the Stranger so that the editor, Christopher Frizzelle and Dan Savage can make a mockery of my business on a blog. They should try surviving as a small business in this economy and then think about how funny it is to excuse shoplifters, make a big joke of it by equating a thirty-something year old senior news writer stealing wine from a grocery store with a kid picking a neighbor's carrots.

I expected an apology. I will certainly reconsider spending ad dollars on The Stranger if this is the attitude they take toward illegal activity that harms my business and the economy at large.
Posted by Severely Pissed Small Business Owner on March 18, 2009 at 3:22 PM
113
@114 - go jack off to your Che Guevara poster.
Posted by Steal from me = go to jail or get shot, your choice on March 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM
114
1 I'm a small business owner in the retail market.
2 I budget a small percentage each year that I know I will lose to shoplifting.
3 Right now I am barely making my rent.
Posted by Smoked Salmon Lover on March 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM
115
@114 Obviously you are too much a failure in life to even imagine having a store of your own. Someone expresses the opinion that shoplifting is bad, and the best you can do is call them "Pops" and a "douchebag."

That's funny from a commentator. But from the people who run this publication and write for it - Dan, Christopher, Jonathan, Charles, etc. - you should be ASHAMED and EMBARRASSED by your oh-so-casual dismissal and tacit acceptance of a colleague who shoplifts. By sharing your own stories as if they're morally equivalent (in some cases, they're just as bad) you damage your own credibility and the reputation of the business you work for.

I guess that makes me a "Pops" Well don't forget it's the hard-working "Pops" in this city that pay your fucking salaries by buying ads in your paper. You guys should be ashamed. I understand what The Stranger does but condoning shoplifting among your senior staff crosses the line. I will certainly do my part to draw attention to this within the business community.
Posted by "Pops" on March 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM
116
Wow. Just catching up with this now. No time to read the preceding 100+ posts, but dang, ECB... Scrolling through all the Notes to the Readers to get here, and then finding your post of this morning -- I'm surprised to say I have tears in my eyes. It must be great to work in a place that has your back like this -- I'm being sincere, no snark implied nor intended. Yep, everybody makes mistakes, that aint the thing.. Your post of 11:40 IS the thing, and it's wonderful and thank you.... And your coworkers seem like a pretty good bunch, too, as it happens....

Posted by merry on March 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM
117
@118:
"Someone expresses the opinion that shoplifting is bad, and the best you can do is call them "Pops" and a "douchebag."

I think his/her point is stupid, and he/she is making it in the comments section of a stupid blog. (Sorry Slog, luv ya, but it is all pointless wankery).

That comment mildly offended me and I mildly(yeah, honestly that was mild) expressed my opinion, to which you didn't like and **news flash** none of it means a fucking thing the the real order of things.

god, perspective people, it's not that important.

now go have a glass of wine.
Posted by it's gonna be ok on March 18, 2009 at 3:51 PM
118
A few years ago, back when Red Hook had just come out with their Long Hammer IPA, I was at Finn's with some friends. We were having a good time. I bought a pint of the Long Hammer and I loved that it came in an etched Red Hook glass. It was a really nice glass, I thought. After I finished my beer, I stuffed a napkin into the glass to soak up the dampness and hid the glass inside my jacket. I stole that glass.

Finn's, I'm sorry. I shouldn't have stolen your glass. I knew it was wrong. If you don't want to serve me any more, that's your right. But I hope that you can forgive me.
Posted by Greg on March 18, 2009 at 3:51 PM
119
@111 - You're right, you do sound lame right now.
Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM
120
The bigger issue here is not the theft. The issue is that if the Seattle Weekly or Joel Connelly had done anything remotely like this, and either publication would not even *talk* about it, the Slog/Stranger would be all over it.

Hell, Didn't you guys do a piece about John in the Morning possibly giving more airtime to bands he had a stake in or something..(my memory isn't that great and I have like 5 seconds to post this comment)

So the issue with the trolls is that if anyone else in the world had done this you'd be all up in their shit ("why are they denying this, why won't they talk to the media, why is the publication mum on everything"). Erica is the NEWS EDITOR. At the very least, when the Weekly blog broke the story, she could have said "I am currently under investigation and cannot speak about actions that may or may not have occured on this day XXXX, I will discuss it after my court preceedings" or something to that effect.

But no, there was this cloak and dagger deleting of comments, and ignoring the issue. And now this? It's after your hearing, you can at least talk about it. Maybe it would help for you to talk about your experience? I don't know the details, and I really don't care. The only problem is the double standard in journalism where *you* don't want your personal life out there, but if Joel Connelly was caught with a HOOKER or something, you wouldn't stop the aggressive invasion of his private life. And you all know it. So why should commenters be any less mean than you would be?

Posted by Original Monique on March 18, 2009 at 4:00 PM
121
@115 & 118 - Those are mighty heavy sabres you're rattling. You might want to put them down before you cut yourself.
Posted by Donolectic on March 18, 2009 at 4:01 PM
122
Also, one of the jobs I have had was to catch shoplifters/employee thefts in an army base overseas. I do know the difference between kids shoplifting, adults shoplifting, first time shoplifters, accidental shoplifters and habitual shoplifters. Those are all very different categories.

I am not sure what category that Erica falls under (with the exception of child) but what others stated above is wrong. Just because you are older doesn't mean you are a habitual shoplifter.

I know it's hard on people when they are caught shoplifting, I had to charge many, many people. And shoplifting is a huge deal to businesses (they call it 'shrink'), it can eat up to 30% of your profits. However, employee theft is about $10 for every $1 shoplifted. If you have employees, watch them more than the customers. Your return will be much greater.
Posted by Original Monique on March 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM
123
This is not the first time that ECB has done this. She is a habitual shoplifter and should be prosecuted.
Posted by girlscout312 on March 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM
124
@126 - How do you know? You write with such certainty; do you have her tailed everywhere she goes?
Posted by Allyn on March 18, 2009 at 4:26 PM
125
Erica contributes to a feminist blog called Shakesville. It's at shakespearessister.blogspot.com.

If you read the blog FAQs, the founder says contributors, "in moments of failure, apologize when we fuck up."
Posted by drei streifen on March 18, 2009 at 4:34 PM
126
Did you fail to pay for it on purpose?

Did you try to pay for it, but it just didn't quite work out?

Or did you fail at stealing it? Well, we know you failed at stealing it. Doesn't this job pay you enough?
Posted by very bad homo on March 18, 2009 at 4:34 PM
127
This went over well.
Posted by Baconcat on March 18, 2009 at 4:38 PM
128
This is beginning to feel like a fund-drive, where they get down to the last bit, closing in on the goal.

The goal here is to bump Dan Savage from #1 Most Commented.

Dan's post says "Look at me! I want attention and comments!"

Erica's post, on the other hand, meekly whispers "Don't look at me. I've had enough of this. I hate you. All of you. Give me your worst. I can take it."

This is the Slog. It's not a bowl of goldfish you can feed what you want. It's a stream infested with piranha, that eat whatever's tastiest.

So get on it, Sloggers. We're closing in.

Then maybe we can all get back to bitching about foie gras and pretentious art.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM
129
#122, I'm sorry that pointing out the very real consequences of shoplifting from my community and allowing a hack like ECB to have a platform sounds lame. Sorry for you, that is.
Posted by My name is John Daker on March 18, 2009 at 4:53 PM
130
@131:
so you're saying she is trying to steal his thunder(bird)?

and he is angry like a pitbull or at least a maddog 20/20.

what was the name where the raise the foie gras, wasn't boones farm was it?

lets take a nighttrain down south and find out.

Posted by yeah those were some cheap wine jokes, smelly ones on March 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM
131
It's not the crime. It's the cover-up.

The bottle of wine? Whatever...

The deletion of posts, the silence on the topic, the insatiable "trolls," the subterfuge of the "sock-puppets."

Oh, and the big show of solidarity where EVERYONE'S a thief!!! What member of the staff thought THAT would be brilliant?

Sanctimony! Treachery! Hypocrisy! Other big dramatic words!
THIS has been epic.

Thank you, Slog. I love you. I hate you. I still love you when I say I hate you.
Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 5:16 PM
132
Not one question about the Vintage or Vinyard? I expected snobier judgements from the Sloggers.
Posted by Zander on March 18, 2009 at 5:17 PM
133
Seriously, I'm not ECB's biggest fan, but this is fracking ridiculous. It's a cheap bottle of wine people. QFC is not going out of business. It doesn't affect the Stranger's credibility (insert joke here). It was just ECB being dumb.

From reading the comments, I assure you that everyone in this thread is dumb at one time or another.

ECB, I'm pretty sure I'm within easy walking distance of the QFC in question (near 15th and Dravus?). Send me an e-mail sometime, I'll buy you a bottle of cheap wine just for having had to put up with this bullshit.
Posted by supergp on March 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM
134
Typical Stranger schlock. They pry into everyone else\\\'s lives and hang their dirty laundry for all to see. Then the second it\\\'s one of their own, it\\\'s suddenly move along, nothing to see here.

What a proud day this is for the Stranger. This even trumps the Marlee Ginter goat-blowing fiasco.
Posted by No, officer, that\'s not a jug of Gallo in my purse on March 18, 2009 at 6:06 PM
135
In my adolescent psychology class today, the topic was conduct disorder and socially deviant behaviour. We took an informal poll - who in the class (this is an upper-division psychology class at a university in BC, by the way), had stolen or shoplifted before? About 2/3 of people there raised their hands (and those were just the ones willing to admit it in front of a forensic psychologist prof). According to him, that's right in line with the general population. Congratulations, ECB, you're in the majority.
Posted by kay on March 18, 2009 at 6:09 PM
136
@138 well according to Michael Strangeways, that is impossible. EVERYONE has stolen something at some point, according to him, so 1/3 are lying.

It's impossible for people with weak morals, like Michael, to even imagine that some us have never stolen anything.

I have never stolen anything. Period.
Posted by not even wine on March 18, 2009 at 6:16 PM
137
I'll share a bottle of wine with ECB anyday.
Posted by charlie k on March 18, 2009 at 6:18 PM
138
I like ECB, and I generally agree with many of her views. But learning this little tidbit about her, after reading her copious and sanctimonious rants about the evils of Portland's Sam Adams ... I mean, come on. He lied about having legal sex (that we know of), and you admit to an illegal (albeit a super minor, and I find hardly troubling) act. He leads the public (of Portland), you inform the public (of Seattle). It's a smidge hypocritical.

And that's the black eye that I find in all of this. I hope you make it through this OK, and also that the experience informs the judgments you make of other people in the future.
Posted by Partly Cloudy on March 18, 2009 at 6:43 PM
139
No officer,
that isn't a bottle of wine;
I'm just glad to see you...
Posted by that kind of girl on March 18, 2009 at 6:50 PM
140
Yes! Most commented on the SLOG!!! Eat it, Dan Savage!!!

TWO goddamn lines of kind-of, not-really, just-kidding admission of "I stole a bottle of wine..."

BEATS out two goddamn PAGES (or thereabouts) of kind-of, not-really, just-kidding "I'm running for mayor."

Awesome!!! Erica WHO? Goddamn, you got some LOYAL readers now, girl!

This has GOT to be the most relevant the Slog has been since the election.

Posted by Lenny on March 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM
141
I had to get to @ 142 before I found the second thought that entered my mind.

My first thought was ... Winona Ryder?

A very exciting NONstory this is.
Posted by former tri-state on March 18, 2009 at 7:16 PM
142
She stole a bottle of "Nine Buck Career Fuck Up"

I haven't shoplifted since I was 10.
Posted by Tricyclic on March 18, 2009 at 7:17 PM
143
@145, i think she stole a bottle of "nine buck promotion at the stranger".

i'm stealing glances RIGHT NOW.
Posted by if the weekly pulled this shit, ECB would be all over it on March 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM
144
fuck all you sanctimonious ass pigs... the STRANGER is not a news organization
Posted by fag on March 18, 2009 at 9:11 PM
145
thank god
Posted by fag on March 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM
146
It was a blustery fall afternoon at Hogwarts and Hermione Granger sat in the Gryffindor common with only a crackling fire to keep her company. Upon hearing footsteps coming from the boys' tower she quickly glanced up from her copy of Zublin's Advanced Potions, hoping to find Harry or Ron.

"’Afternoon Hermione!" Neville Longbottom said, nearly tripping on the last few steps of the spiral staircase.

"Oh, hello Neville" Hermione snapped. "You haven't seen Harry or Ron up there have you? I've been looking for them all day!"

"Yeah, they've been huddled up in Ron's bed with the curtains drawn for hours!" Neville said, dumbfounded "I tried to peak in once to see what they were doing, but they shouted something about not wrecking their secret light sensitive spells. I didn't want to be a bother, so I came back down here."

"Light sensitive spells?" Hermione said to herself, "Those boys could never master such advanced magic. Something fishy is going on here!"

She quickly pulled out her charms textbook and began to rapidly search the index. The combination of heat from the fireplace and intensity of study soon created a seductive glow around Hermione's young face. Soon, the perspiration spread through her underarms, neck and chest, highlighting key areas of her uniform.

"You're looking... hot" Neville murmured from the oversized armchair next to Hermione.

"Yeah, I probably shouldn't be sitting so close to this fire" She said.

Hermione stuffed her papers into her bag and walked over to the couch across from Neville.

"Oh no" He replied, moving to the empty seat next to Hermione. "I didn't mean temperature"

"Um, thanks" She gushed, "I've been using a new lotion. I think it really brings out the summers mist in my skin, don't you?"

"I don't know," He said, looking into her eyes "I've never tasted a summers mist before"

Neville quickly leaned in and kissed her on the lips. Hermione did not protest, and had soon undone the top three buttons of her blouse.

Neville slowly pulled out his wand and said “Displayus mammarium!"

The remainder of Hermione's shirt suddenly split open, exposing her young chest to the fall air. Neville smiled with delight and quickly pressed his face against her bare skin. Hermione felt waves of ecstasy as Neville slowly and carefully licked both of her protruding nipples.

“I feel like a Hungarian Horntail” Neville whispered into Hermione’s ear “And I need to find a cave to...”

“Hermione! Neville!” Ron interrupted from the top of the stairs. “What are you two doing? Oh bugger, we’ll have to get new furniture!”

“You would say that, you old faggot!” Hermione laughed.

She writhed with pleasure on an old persian rug while Neville carefully pulled down her white cotton panties. Ron stared, open mouthed.

“I… but… how did you know?” Ron sputtered

“Let’s just say it’s clear to all of us that you two are doing more than talking during those 45 minute ‘bathroom breaks’ at lunch” Neville said, wiping Hermione’s residue from the side of his mouth.

“Bloody hell, does this mean Harry and I are a couple?” Ron said, slinking into an empty chair near the fire.

“One thing’s for sure” Hermione replied, “You’re a couple of huffle puffs!”
More...
Posted by internet hate machine on March 18, 2009 at 9:33 PM
147
With the brain power in Seattle, you would think that people might draw the logical conclusion that Erica said what she said under the advice and guidance of an attorney. In fact, probably more than one, probably her own and probably one for the paper.

Comparing underage sex with a minor BY A POLITICIAN with this just shows your personal bias.

As for the myriad "small business owners," here's a scene:

***meeting of local chamber of commerce***

SMO #1: People, we have a situation here. I want everyone to withdraw their advertising from the Stranger. The editor is a thief and they encourage shoplifting!
SMO #2: Really? Can you tell me more?
SMO #1: She was arrested for stealing a bottle of wine and the paper did not put it on the front page!
SMO #2: *scratching head* okay, yeah, um, you know, 50% of my walk-in business comes from a Stranger ad, so I'm really going to need more than this before I pull my ads from them. Plus, I've advertised for so long, I get a great rate.
SMO #1: It is a matter of principle!
SMO #2: Principle ain't paying my rent, buddy.
SMO #3: No, I want to hear more about it. What happened?
SMO #1: She did NOT apologize. SHe posted a statement that said that she walked out with a bottle of wine without paying for it.
SMO #3: And?
SMO #1: That's Just It! She did not say anything else!
SMO #3: Right, I get that, and shoplifting sucks, but it's not like they did some series about how easy it was to shoplift, or wrote some article that was supposed to be ironic that talked about how cool shoplifting was - did they?
SMO #1: No, but there was no transparency!
SMO #2: How did this even get in the paper?
SMO #1: Someone leaked it.
SMO #2: Yeah, okay, I'm still not getting why I should stop advertising in the one paper that actually gets me business.

::the end:::
More...
Posted by Jimmy Breslin on March 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM
148
Bozhe moi!

I am directly responsible for the single largest mass extermination in human history, roughly 43,000,000 of my comrades were murdered because of my paranoia and insatiable appetite for power.

But, against this Ericanovna, I am what you call "an amateur" for truly, leaving a grocery store having failed to pay for a single bottle of wine will completely erase my crimes from the books of history! From this day forth, until the end of time, whenever one looks in these books under the heading of "Worst Human Being - Ever!" no longer will they see my grim visage, but instead, they will cower in fear and disgust at the face of this devil's daughter of Western Capitalist decadence!
Posted by Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili (AKA Joseph Stalin) on March 18, 2009 at 9:56 PM
149
Seriously, Erica, you know the score with what you did and I really don't need to add anything about that.

But I am far more amazed at the Sloggers who are actually kissing your ass after this. I mean, WHAT. You fuckers have the moral code of a crackhead.

I don't hate hipsters, but I hate how hypocritically stupid they are.
Posted by Gomez on March 18, 2009 at 10:22 PM
150
It is a moral curiosity that you stole a $9 bottle of wine. Why the cheap stuff? If I was going to take the risk of stealing a bottle of wine, I'd at least pick out a nicer bottle. You know ... same risk, greater reward?
Posted by Mahtli69 on March 18, 2009 at 10:36 PM
151
@150 The known facts thus far do not show that the politician in question had sex with a minor.
Posted by Partly Cloudy on March 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM
152
They do, however, support the fact the he's a dumbass thinking with his dick. Hmmm, similar to a dumbass thinking about a potential wine buzz?
Posted by Partly Cloudy on March 18, 2009 at 10:38 PM
153
The $9 bottle of wine is most telling. It means that the theft was justified, because you know, the bottle of wine only cost the Kroger corporation about $2 after they were done fucking over the producers. Stealing a more expensive bottle of wine would be crass, but a $2 bottle of wine? They have it coming.
Posted by Share the Joy on March 18, 2009 at 11:03 PM
154
mmm... wine.
Posted by ams on March 19, 2009 at 12:24 AM
155
Weee...look at me ....I am # 158!

Oh, shit I forgot to post some asshole comment to make me feel better about my sad little life.
Posted by The Worthless Troll on March 19, 2009 at 12:33 AM
156
I'm sad this didn't break the 200 comment barrier. I blame all the posts with the same title adjacent to it. Made it look like a glitch in RSS readers.
Posted by Westlake, son! on March 19, 2009 at 1:27 AM
157
ECB's posts are almost always thought-provoking and I find I agree with her most of the time. Also, she is cute. This wine thing? Meh... If anything, I dig her even more as a result. I wish she'd been better able to laugh about it, because it is some minor, minor shit despite the trollage.
Posted by eric (the other one) on March 19, 2009 at 4:26 AM
158
Given Erica\\\'s vocal hatred of \\\"yuppies\\\", property owners, car owners and generally anyone that makes over $30K a year, I\\\'m not surprised by this at all. She feels that, as a poor writer for an alt-weekly, she\\\'s entitled to it. After all, QFC is a corporate giant, so fuck \\\'em. She probably genuinely feels that she DESERVES that bottle of wine, just like she genuinely feels that she shouldn\\\'t have to pay parking tickets or debt.

Erica, honey, listen up. No one forced you to live an impoverished life as a \\\"reporter\\\" for a \\\"newspaper\\\". You made that decision yourself. If you\\\'re poor and unhappy, why not get down off your cross and do something about it, like get a real job making a decent salary so that you can actually pay for things like cheap bottles of wine. Then again, your persecution complex probably won\\\'t let you, right?
Posted by Therapy might help, too on March 19, 2009 at 7:10 AM
159
@ 108: I don't steal. I don't encourage or endorse stealing. So I don't have to worry about what you'd do to me if I who stole from your store. Wasn't the point. I run a tiny, 3-person business that sets up @ conventions, & have caught people red-handed trying to walk off with a comic book/tee-shirt/action figures. Theft costs money & hurts small business badly. It's true.

What I was amazed by, as I alluded to in my comment about glass houses, is HOW MUCH online bloodlust this one incident has incurred. It reminds me of flame wars from the early BBS/irc days. An opinionated poster turns out to have an Achilles heel & everyone goes nuts.

Listen, I'm not from Seattle, so I freely cop to not knowing the general dynamic discussed here, of how she'd write/has written about other public figure's private failings. If she's a hypocrite that is unfortunate for her.

However, from the amount of venom being flung at this woman, you'd think she murdered a tiny fuzzy black & white puppy while screaming about hating the US of A live on camera for the morning news. Clearly she had a rough moment; she got caught; she probably wasn't allowed to talk about it until she dealt with the legal end of things. Maybe she's had oustanding fiscal issues she hasn't dealt with thoroughly. Maybe she'll talk about it in a future column. Maybe not. Right now it'd likely just be giving all these scandalized people more to freak out about.

The Stranger's reporting seems to me to be sometimes-serious, sometimes satire: kind of Daily-show-ish. Since that show has seen its credibility rise, the standards to which writers & hosts of that satiric nature have been held, is also gonna rise as those news outlets cover more actual news.

Still. That's a whole lotta hell to raise over a bottle of wine.
More...
Posted by Eva Hopkins on March 19, 2009 at 7:28 AM
160
Shoplifting looks bad on background checks, too. And nearly every employer is doing them. They figure if you steal from a store, you're going to steal from them. Some of you people sneering that it's "no big deal and everyone does it" might want to consider hiring Erica for her next job.
Posted by H.R. Person on March 19, 2009 at 7:38 AM
161
Wow. My internet goes out and I miss the best shit storm of the year so far.

Me and the wife shoplift from Ikea every time we go. We're monsters, I know. ECB, your response was glib and sanctimonious. I'm not going to judge you though. Its bad enough that you will NEVER live this down. That sucks but you reap what you so.

You know what sucks? That the moderators censored the accusations for...what, a week?

Let me say that again. The staff of the Stranger censored the Slog to protect the reputation of one employee.

So Dan....what the fuck gives?
Posted by Rotten666 on March 19, 2009 at 8:43 AM
162
164 comments? Really?

BUMP...
Posted by Lawks A Lordy on March 19, 2009 at 9:21 AM
163
How sad is it that I have more respect for Jim Cramer than I do for Erica Barnett?
Posted by clint on March 19, 2009 at 11:05 AM
164
Considering that ECB is the person who knows the facts the best, and yet her report was so bare and unconvincing ... it makes me wonder how jilted the rest of her work has been.
Yes, there is a link directly between this post and her credibility on other stories.
That said, I hope everything works out in the end for her. Seems to have her heart in the right spot.
Posted by rutabaga pie on March 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM
165
Slog/The Stranger is nothing but a bunch of naive reality-denying buttfuckers who would let black gangsters rape and kill them, because otherwise they might be accused of being "racist".
Posted by and it couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch on March 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM
166
The best comment on this whole post, and perhaps what everyone should be asking:

"A person who will steal will fudge the facts in a story."
Posted by josh on March 19, 2009 at 12:28 PM
167
@162 I think it's stories like this:

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

...that get people worked up. I don't think her Chariot blog was "sometimes-serious, sometimes satire." It's hateful (Ie "I hate you") and ironic ("but it's still no reason to think any of us would steal it").
Posted by Jason on March 19, 2009 at 12:39 PM
168
I don't expect all of the people who write the news, police my streets, supervise me at work or vice versa, or who are the president of my country to have lily white pasts. People are fallible. They have lapses of judgment. They tell little lies, they steal pens from work, they put sick day on the time sheet when they just don't want to take another vacation day, they shoplift from QFC, they smoke some weed. One indiscretion does not a life choice make. I am sure ECB will NEVER shoplift again. You've all saved her from a life of hard crime, I'm sure.

If you have an expectation of squeaky clean morality in your journalists, that's your choice. But that is not where the bar is set at the Stranger/Slog. The best part is, there is an incredibly easy way for you to never have to subject yourself to ECB again. Go elsewhere. Myself, I'll judge her by the quality of her work.

Look, trolls, you've all had your say -- several hundred times -- now take your holier than thou attitudes about a PERSON a fallible PERSON, shove them firmly up your behind and waddle away. The moment has passed. Move on. If you want to continue your crusade, host your own blog. It's free. May I suggest ECBsBottleofWine.blogspot.com? There, the hard work is done!
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 19, 2009 at 1:22 PM
169
@171:
Troll: One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument


People having a contradictory and valid opinion does not makes them Trolls. Shoplifting is at the very least illegal and to the vast majority of people immoral.
Posted by Jigae on March 19, 2009 at 1:58 PM
170
@172: And it was valid several days ago. Not any more. Troll.
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM
171
ECB is a nanny-statist do-gooder sanctimonious smug smarmy scold. She should fit in with Seattle wonderfully! Commies don't like private property of free enterprise so it is only natural that so many of the scum that live in that shithole of Seattle are defending this bitch.
Posted by kill yourself now on March 19, 2009 at 2:15 PM
172
@174: Soooo.... why are you here? What does reading the Stranger/Slog do for you other than piss you off? Here's a great way for you to feel a lot better about life: don't point your browser here. The Great Slog Hijacking of 2009 is not going to change all of us left-wing, wine stealing, nanny-stateists into good republicans. So save money on blood pressure meds -- go be with people who think like you do. Or form a cogent argument. I love REAL discussion that makes me think. You do not make me think. You make me laugh.
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 19, 2009 at 2:25 PM
173
MEAT MEAT MEAT MEAT MEAT

STEAL WINE TO GO WITH THAT MEAT

MMMM

VEGGIES HAVE FEELINGS TOO
Posted by LAME on March 19, 2009 at 2:27 PM
174
Guess that QFC won't be on your list today, huh Erica?
Posted by Kroger LOVES Shoplifters!! on March 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM
175
Wine listings? Sorry I had to do it. Is this exclusively your new beat? Probably a good idea...you get yourself laughed out of City Hall. Tell us the details Erica and all will go away....
Posted by "Why I did it" by ECB on March 19, 2009 at 2:33 PM
176
Enough of the tools supporting you being a petty thief.

It's not okay, you're not forgiven.

I am certain that the shopkeepers will keep a better eye on you now that they know your game.
Posted by Paulinballard on March 19, 2009 at 2:36 PM
177
Honestly, Erica should have just said what happened, that she feels awful about it and hell, even try to laugh about it, make a joke etc. It would show that she is human, screwed up, is sorry and maby show some humor about it.

But that oportunity has long since been missed. Remember when Johnny Carson was arrested for DUI? That was the funny and classy way of handling public embarassment.
Posted by Cato the Younger on March 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM
178
Cracker Jack: Loved your post @171. Thanks!
Posted by Partly Cloudy on March 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM
179
175 - I am here because I am a SADIST and I love to TORTURE people like you. Eat shit, you are an idiot for supporting this nanny-state smarmy bitch.
Posted by go fuck yourself after you eat shit on March 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM
180
And it is fucking hilarious that you think I am a Republican! As if only Republicans are anti-stealing!!!! No wonder Seattle is so hopelessly fucked up.
Posted by not a republican, not a democrat, don't fit in your lil box on March 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM
181
And it is fucking hilarious that you think I am a Republican! As if only Republicans are anti-stealing!!!! No wonder Seattle is so hopelessly fucked up.
Posted by not republican, not democrat, don't fit in your little box on March 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM
182
It is hilarious you think I'm a Republican. That just shows how close-minded you Seattle shits are... as if the only people who are anti-stealing are Republicans. No wonder Seattle is so hopelessly fucked up, full of wimps and junkies.
Posted by not republican, not democrat, don't fit in your little box on March 19, 2009 at 3:02 PM
183
You all look really stupid in those tattoos, toothpick-leg black jeans and those douchey Dumbo-style earlobe plugs. What a bunch of conformists.
Posted by Cap Hill Hipster Uniform on March 19, 2009 at 3:11 PM
184
@175: I know this is a useless debate, but if you're so troubled by people who disagree with you, why don't you "go start a blog" and then institute comment restriction to registered and approved users. Then you can assure you never have to read something you dislike or disagree with.

I'm not saying I'm a frequent commenter, but I read most of the threads and I see your name very rarely -- How are you claiming some sort of OG Slog commenter authority?
Posted by Jigae on March 19, 2009 at 3:39 PM
185
@132 - Wow, you are SO WITTY. Did you come up with that one yourself?

@139 - You've never taken a pen home from work? Ever?

@152 - Gomez, you're so cute when you're being sanctimonius.

@166 - Very.

@176 - When they do, will you be out with your little stick so you can shake it at her?

@183 - Jigae is not a troll.
Posted by Donolectic on March 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM
186
I think it would rock if ECB did a hard hitting story on those shoplifting diversion classes they make kids go through ... she could so provide a perspective that most of us, who don't steal shit from stores, couldn't.
Posted by Kids and Ericas need one positive adult in their lives on March 19, 2009 at 8:05 PM
187
ECB: Whoever it was that you pissed off so much, it seems that you have cost far more of their time and energy than this incident has cost of yours. Wrong or right, I think you've won.
Posted by Lee on March 19, 2009 at 8:16 PM
188
@188, taking a pen from work is the same as taking a bottle of wine from a grocery store? Ah...think you are stretching that a little bit don't you?

Maybe if Erica was not such a sanctimonious bitch towards people that don't agree with her various views perhaps they would show her more understanding.

ECB! You reap what you sow! So start reaping! Oh yeah, don’t expect “City Inside Out” to be calling you to appear on one of their panels anytime soon.
Posted by The Stranger Deserved This on March 19, 2009 at 8:56 PM
189
On our way to 200, where this belongs.
Posted by rutabaga pie on March 19, 2009 at 9:01 PM
190
@192: +1
Posted by Lee on March 19, 2009 at 9:10 PM
191
We love you Erica. You're a great reporter.

This was a mistake, but only clueless losers would be as worked up about it as some of the commenters here seem to be.

I promise to read TWICE as many of your stories.
Posted by ECB still rocks socks on March 19, 2009 at 9:39 PM
192
@191 - In other words, you don't believe that all stealing is a sin deserving of the utmost in public self-flagellation. Perhaps you should get your shaky moral compass checked.
Posted by Donolectic on March 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM
193
Doing my best to bring this up to 200.

I think being a self righteous, judgmental prig is a far greater crime than stealing a nine dollar bottle of wine from a supermarket. All of us, myself included, have at least one incident in their past, maybe illegal, maybe not, that we are not proud of. A great man once said "Let the one who is without sin cast the first stone".
Posted by RainMan on March 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM
194
People... Fellow Slog readers.
This has been the most entertaining the Slog has been since the election.
Thank you. It has been engaging and thrilling.

I'm not sure I believe this was the result of some large anti-ECB conspiracy.

I just can't believe this was all the result of one person. Or even one person directing some cabal of trolls and sock-puppets.

More like a horde of copy-cats.

You know how some writers have a lot of FANS? Evidently, this young lady had a lot of the opposite. Going back and reading some of the articles posted, one can maybe see why.

I dunno... what do you think? I only been reading for a few months.
A mastermind pulling the strings of a bunch of troll puppets?
Or just a feeding frenzy because it was a slow news day?
Posted by Lenny on March 20, 2009 at 12:05 AM
195
Oh, hey. Another question...

How involved was the staff, what with all that moderating and deleting stuff?

I bet that was a pretty DIVISIVE issue around the office! Awkward moments at the coffee pot.

You think this was an inside job? Hard to say who might have been the brains behind it all.

Posted by Lenny on March 20, 2009 at 12:09 AM
196
though it would have been funny if it was a ploy to drive up attention to the theme of this weeks print edition, http://www.thestranger.com/binary/336c/C…
Economic Survival Guide indeed.

it's all connected man..... woah.
Posted by Stranger Illuminatus DaVinci National Treasure Code Trilogy on March 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM
197
200
Posted by Really?! on March 20, 2009 at 3:23 AM
198
@187 - Jigae: I'm not troubled by people who disagree with me. I'm troubled that Slog, which used to be a mostly lighthearted blog with some serious thought and fun snark thrown in, has had an influx of really hateful people. People whose total presence on Slog is trolling. All they can do is say racist things to Mudede, call ECB a bitch (before this even started) and generally act in a way counter to the culture that existed here. It's not intelligent debate, it's anonymous, juvenile blogsturbation.

I don't want to start my own blog because the writers here are far better than I, have a wider net to find interesting tidbits and I appreciate most of the regular commenters here, even if I vehemently disagree with them, because they actually put THOUGHT behind their replies. I suggested that those who wanted to continue pillorying ECB get their own blog because their insistence of making everything here about the one issue is off-topic and getting old. Did I really mean it or think they'd take me up on it? No, because if they did, they'd be shouting at the moon and no one would listen or care and that's not what they want.

As far as my OG Slog commenter authority, I have none. I've been around several few years and posted under other names -- this one has caught on and I like it. I just would like the people who have no real interest in dialogue -- who just want to continue kicking dead horses to accompany the corpse to the glue factory and let the rest of us be able to have on-topic, grown-up (if sarcastic) discourse.

Oh, and Donolectic @191: No, I do not believe that ALL stealing is deserving of the utmost in public self-flagellation. My moral outrage meter doesn't have a black/white setting. Someone stealing a bottle of wine from a store doesn't get my panties in a bunch as much as, say, someone stealing a car. I don't approve of what she did, but I won't condemn her and I won't demand the end of her career. It makes me wonder what some of the loudest protesters in this uproar have hidden in their closet that they so badly want everyone to look the other direction. It's like the closet cases that scream so loudly about the evil gays.

Check out this video, it's an interesting talk about our shaky moral compasses: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/dan_a…
More...
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 20, 2009 at 6:22 AM
199
Maybe this is why Erica hates shopping bags so much, they make shoplifting easier to detect.
Posted by Stupid White Man on March 20, 2009 at 6:23 AM
200
Hi mom!
Posted by Lord Summerisle on March 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM
201
What a lame statement. If it was accidental you would have stated so. You stole it. Have the guts to admit it. You so sanctimoniously judge people and make rash statements about them without doing any research or hearing their side of the issue. Give us a break. I hope this makes you into a more balanced writer and that one day you'll actually graduate to becoming a reporter.
Posted by give us a break on March 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM
202

There is not enough information here.

And considering ECB's attitude toward Sam Adams' indiscretions, I sincerely hope someone investigates this further, exposes her crimes, and berates her with exactly the same amount of restraint and sensitivity that she showed Adams.

For reals.
Posted by I have been tired of her self-righteousness for a long time. on March 20, 2009 at 1:37 PM
203
Holy fuck! How did I miss this thread?

I just want to point out that people made fun of ECB and Charles long before they trolls arrived. They write in styles that invite controversy. And ECB supported Clinton, which resulted in abuse far more vile than anything we've seen in the last few days. But the hecklers were regulars who stood by their statements by using consistent sigs.
Posted by Big Sven on March 20, 2009 at 1:40 PM
204
So, there was supposed to be a hearing on March 17, right? What happened at the hearing? Could we get some actual news and not this lame blame-avoiding statement?

I will not lie: It feels good to see ECB come down a peg.

After her shrill and holier-than-thou reaction to the Sam Adams situation, she deserves this and oh-so-much more. I hope she had as good a night with her $8.99 bottle of wine as Adams had with Beau Breedlove. (Oh, hmmm, and which one of them broke the law? Hmmmm?)
Posted by More information, please. on March 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM
205
Erica has no moral compass. She just charges off bullishly in random directions, mistaking her clumsy momentum for something meaningful. What kind of person brags about being a “former” vegan and then tries to tell vegetarians what to think about animal suffering? A shoplifter, does, I suppose. Thank goodness for the Page Down key.
Posted by Cyclist on March 20, 2009 at 2:04 PM
206
209!
Posted by Get off the stage Erica! YOU S U C K ! on March 20, 2009 at 2:54 PM
207
let's be gay fags and buttfuck in our shitty poop holes
Posted by Gay Homo Fag Poop Butt Fuck! on March 20, 2009 at 4:05 PM
208
free beer tastes 3.14 times better than beer paid for. How about wine?
Posted by sevent5cent on March 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM
209
Gosh, I'm glad some other folks finally picked up on the Sam Adams meme. Thanks! She totally went off on him for lying about something that, as far as we know, was legal sex. ECB, I love ya. I like your writing. I generally agree with most of your views. But your Sam Adams rants were kinda crazy. And in light of this indiscretion by you, totally casts it all in a new light.

Good luck getting through this ... and please treat other humans with minor failings with a bit less indignation in the future.

BTW, I also was a Hillary supporter, and I was a bit bummed when it was clear she was toast. But I gladly ripped down my Hillary posters and the Hillary bumper sticker on my car ... and soon replaced them with "LGBT for Obama" stickers and posters. Hooray for his recent UN decision! And please keep it coming!
Posted by Partly Cloudy on March 20, 2009 at 6:57 PM
210
For those of us who you have trashed in this paper without even a phone call to check for truth it is like Xmas, Hanukah and Kwanza all rolled up into a beautiful way to begin Spring.
Posted by Slarue on March 20, 2009 at 7:20 PM
211
Why, Erica?
Posted by axel on March 20, 2009 at 7:54 PM
212
can we all show up at the hearing then?

i'll bring the wine!
Posted by San Davage Mudayday Inc on March 20, 2009 at 8:22 PM
213
Erica C. Barnett is a pathetic hypocrite. She had a hissyfit at Nicole Brodeur over the semantics of what drives someone to rape, but then when her own colleague wrote an idiotic post defending an alleged sex offender, she cowered in the background, with only a tiny comment to contradict him.

Compare this:
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

to this:
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

Savage's round up the troops and circle the wagons approach is even more pathetic. Together he and ECB have turned the Stranger and Slog into a toilet bowl.
Posted by The Marlee Ginter Excellence in Journalism Awards Committee on March 20, 2009 at 10:18 PM
214
I bet Savage is having a fit that his name isn't at the top of the most commented list. Boo hoo hoo, sad day.
Posted by Dan is a Mean Girl on March 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM
215
Monica Guzman would never steal.
Posted by Justin on March 21, 2009 at 12:54 AM
216
Very telling that no Stranger staff has responded except to tell us what "bad things" they did when they were kids. Not adult journalists, but kids.

ECB, it could be forgiven and finished if you'd come completely clean. Otherwise, sorry, the Stranger is damaged goods and always will be because of this. The integrity hit is irreparable otherwise, and as a journalist I can tell you ALL you have to go on is your integrity. Remember the goat fucker episode? Her integrity is trashed.
Posted by Reporter on March 21, 2009 at 9:46 AM
217
@219, integrity pretty much got shown the door the day they made Savage editor.

There have been a number of things where Stranger writers showed a complete lack of integrity or professionalism, and the only response from Savage and his lapdogs is to 1) offer up a snarky non-pology (Brendan Kiley is particularly adept at this), 2) complete silence or 3) circle the wagons, as it's been said.

There are still some awesome writers at the Stranger and Slog - David Schmader, Lindy West, Jen Graves, Megan Seling, which is why I come back here, and the old-time crew was by and large awesome (Annie, Amy Kate, etc.).

Savage craves attention too much to be an "editor". Dominic is okay, but parrots his editor too much. ECB is just a joke. She was a battlefield promotion after Feit left. She writes hack pieces full of misinformation, and her shrill tone is too much to bear. If she spent half the time looking in the mirror as she does ripping apart other local journalists, she might get somewhere, but she's obviously not getting the direction or mentoring that she needs, which is no surprise, considering the clown that's in charge. I mean, look at the glee over trashing local repoter Vanessa Ho and getting her name linked to "Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack" in Google. Savage just about wet himself when he accomplished that. Says a lot, doesn't it?
Posted by Miss the old Stranger :( on March 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM
218
"Failed to pay for"? Do you mean you stole it or that you wandered out of the store oblivious? Let's call a spade a spade, shall we? Then we can discuss the octuplets.
Posted by Clam on March 21, 2009 at 2:11 PM
219
When I was in college, we were required to do a little volunteer work for one of our classes. I chose the Toy Rescue Mission. On my last day of mandatory philanthropy, I spotted an old, beat up ukulele. It was blue with funky red flowers. When I left that day, I did so with an absurd ukulele-shaped lump under my shirt.

I stole from needy children.

I've never regretted it. I love that ukulele more than any of those kids could have.
Posted by Ger Kilmer. on March 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM
220
" Stranger is damaged goods "

Yes, because before shoplifting charge it was a hot bed of quality, pulitzer quality journalism.

Please, the Stranger is a jerk off matt for Cap Hill hipsters. They make most of their money advertising prostitutes.
Posted by Shoplifter on March 21, 2009 at 5:50 PM
221

I'd rather read a piece about what it's like to get caught being a thief, than a vague one-liner that's meant not to admit guilt, but that everyone sees through.

(Sorry for ending in a preposition, but if ECB can, then so can I.)

Also, Erica: Apologize to Sam Adams. NOW.
Posted by The loudest scolds = the biggest hypocrites (always) on March 21, 2009 at 6:18 PM
222
221

Is there a Special Olympics event for Wine Purchasing?
Posted by Hey! I forgot to pay! So, I'm a Retard!! on March 21, 2009 at 7:15 PM
223
Common reasons why people shoplift/steal:

* To express feelings of anger, revenge, or entitlement
* To fill a sense of emptiness due to grief or loss
* To try to make life seem fair
* As a thrill or high to escape problems, numb feelings, or ease depression

http://www.shopliftersanonymous.com/supp…
Posted by You should get help on March 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM
224
@226:

*Stupidity.
Posted by Clarity on March 22, 2009 at 6:46 AM
225
I find it astounding that anybody spends this much time "watchdogging" slog.

I also find it ironic that the people shrieking most loudly about this non-news by implication a) consider Ms. Barnett important, b) consider the Stranger important, c) consider themselves crusaders for some kind of truth, much like the apparent chorus of Mudede-haters, who obviously take a lot of time out of their own lives to follow his every post and decry his failings as a human being.

If you buy the notion that our reporters must be paragons of virtue in order to be able to do their jobs, then it follows that you people who are trying to "expose" Ms. Barnett and are crying for her blood should also disclose your identities and confess to any past crimes in order for the rest of us to assess your credibility. You also have an impossibly idealistic view of the journalistic profession.

Seriously, seeing that you spend so much time on this insignificant, small-minded crusade is depressing. Have some human dignity, for pete's sake.
Posted by Mike on March 22, 2009 at 10:02 AM
226
@228, no one here is under any delusion that Stranger writers are "paragons of virtue". But if wine thief Erica Barnett wants to root around in others' dirty laundry and parade it around the town square, while at the same time leading a life of petty crime that she and her editor subsequently try to cover up, and when that fails make light of, then people are going to call them on it. If the Stranger is going to demand transparency and virtuous, objective reporting from others, then readers can demand the same of the Stranger. If the Stranger doesn't want any of this feedback, then easy, either 1) stop blogging and stick to the print edition or 2) turn off the comments. If they do indeed want feedback, well then, they're going to get it.
Posted by rrrrrreeeeeeddddd wiiiiiiiinnnne on March 22, 2009 at 10:43 AM
227
@229 Well said.

Erica brought this on herself by being A) a humorless, moralizing, self-important scold who delights in trumpeting the failings of others, and B) a failure herself.
Posted by I'd rather bone Breedlove than pilfer cheap wine. on March 22, 2009 at 11:17 AM
228
See, you make "feedback" sound constructive here, like something that they could read, process, and use to influence the way they do things in the future.

But the way you've been presenting it is anything but constructive. Screaming your point over and over again isn't feedback, it's time-wasting irritation. It makes you seem not like a rational person, but like an alarmingly obsessed partisan with a personal axe to grind.

"If the Stranger is going to demand transparency and virtuous, objective reporting from others, then readers can demand the same of the Stranger."

I haven't seen any of your many, many, many tiresome comments demand that at all.

"If the Stranger doesn't want any of this feedback, then easy, either 1) stop blogging and stick to the print edition or 2) turn off the comments."

Or 3) eliminate bylines, so that people who can't distinguish between journalistic integrity and civic integrity don't have any room to grandstand over the behavior of their journalists, whose job description doesn't have anything to do with past crimes.

What's more, if you think every journalist who has committed a crime should be drummed out of the profession, then you'd see an enormous reduction in the number of journalists.
Posted by Mike on March 22, 2009 at 11:26 AM
229
Dear Dan,

I'm in a relationship with a newspaper that's been going on for about 14 years. It's an on-again, off-again thing, but lately things have taken a turn for the worse. You see, my newspaper used to be all smart, snarky and sexy. It was a great alternative to the local mainstream media, covered important topics, and had some top-notch writers. But for the past couple of years, I don't know, I'm just not that into it anymore. You see, instead of going the extra mile to get good information, my newspaper now just throws together hack pieces full of misinformation. The tone has gotten so shrill I have to plug my ears sometimes. And worst of all, there's a new level of personal meanness and character smearing against other local notables going on. The post are more flippant than ever, and clearly geared to start flamewars in the never-ending search for comments and site hits. Integrity seems to have been shown the door. And to top it all off, my newspaper has totally given up on personal hygiene. I feel like I've invested a fair amount in this relationship, but I find that my newspaper has become a skulking, negative rag, and I'm not sure there's anything worth salvaging. What do you think, is there anything worth saving, or is it time to accept facts and move on?

Sign me-
Posted by Shoplifters Looting Others' Goods on March 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
230
232
Did you have a point to make?
Posted by Dan Savage on March 22, 2009 at 6:00 PM
231
@231

Mike, where were you when Erica was screaming her head off about Sam Adams?

Posted by Adams = legal/moral, ECB = illegal/immoral on March 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM
232
@233, come ON, my eight-year-old niece comes up with snappier retorts than that.
Posted by You can do better than that on March 22, 2009 at 6:23 PM
233
Regarding @232: these douchenozzles will say *anything.* Sometimes they pretend to be concerned for LGBT fairness, sometimes for America's financial security, sometimes for journalistic standards. But it's never in response to anything that's been said earlier it the thread (unless it's a word for word parody where they change a noun or two), they never sign with a consistent handle (or they only post once per thread,) so they never dialog.

DON'T PRETEND YOU'RE HERE TO DISCUSS ANYTHING, YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES.
Posted by Big Sven on March 22, 2009 at 7:33 PM
234
Nice language, 236. I hope you don't eat with that mouth.

P.S. This is the Internet, and it is SRS BSNS.
Posted by This is a Display Name on March 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM
235
big sven, there's more to life than slog. get over yourself. you're addicted to the internet.
Posted by rutabaga pie on March 22, 2009 at 9:21 PM
236

Is someone getting Erica the help she needs to overcome being a kelptomaniac and an alcoholic? (Only then can she work on the extreme bitchiness.)
Posted by Give a girl a hand up. on March 23, 2009 at 6:12 AM
237
Typical of a marxist/communist posing as liberal...Comrade Obama would welcome such disregard for the laws... as we have seen thus far into his epic failure as a POTUS...

Save America shoot a liberal
Posted by Obamaisaracist on March 23, 2009 at 11:48 AM
238

I want more information about what "failed to pay for" means.

Where were you holding the wine?

Just in your hand? Or did you put it in a bag? Or under your coat? Or someplace more interesting?

Details, please, so we can figure out what really happened.
Posted by Peter C on March 23, 2009 at 12:40 PM
239
So we're never going to get a straight answer to this until we petition for public records, huh? And you all will go on as if it didn't happen.

Journalistic integrity 0, hiding the truth 1. Your rep is permanently trashed.
Posted by Clarity on March 23, 2009 at 5:12 PM
240
@242, this is the Stranger, and that sound you hear is a broom sweeping this under a rug.
Posted by Sweep, sweep, sweep on March 23, 2009 at 9:17 PM
241
Yeah, I got busted for shoplifting too... When I was 8. I learned my lesson with a good scare from the security guards at the five and dime.

It's no surprise that someone with lefty arrogance like Erica, grew up to be an adult without ever learning the lesson.
Posted by JKB on March 23, 2009 at 11:01 PM
242
Erica--
Your "rap sheet" is growing.
How about all those parking tickets you failed to pay to the City of Seattle?
KLEPTO ERICA...or KRIMINAL ERICA

Neither one is good.
Posted by Erica's Conscience on March 24, 2009 at 1:03 AM
243
Wow, an idiot and a common thief. How special.
Posted by TTTCOTTH on March 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM
244
I find some signs of Erica's essential integrity in her one-line admission -- just think of all the lies she managed to restrain herself from writing:

1) I'm sorry
2) I regret taking something that wasn't mine
3) It was all a mistake -- I didn't mean to do it
4) I've never done anything like this before
5) ... or at least since I was a kid ...
6) I won't do it again
7) I don't think the store owes me anything
8) I don't think an evil corporation like QFC deserves theft
9) I'll use this experience to become a better person
10) I'll embrace the community service as an opportunity give back

there must be many more...
Posted by slogless in seattle on March 24, 2009 at 3:27 PM
245
Hey you guys - cut Erica some slack. It's not like she grew up in a wealthy Houston suburb, in a large house, in a white middle-class family, and then went on to college (paid for by mums and dadders?). She's had to claw her way up to where she is. At the very least, the world owes her a bottle of wine.
Posted by White guilt is a heavy burden on March 24, 2009 at 7:28 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use