Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Who's In the PI?

Posted by on Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM

There was a lot of speculation about who would stick around at the PI to produce content after the last print edition hit the streets today.

A fairly short list of names has been batted around, including Joel Connelly, Monica Guzman, Andrea James and Scott Sunde.

Well, you can also add sports columnists Art Thiel and Jim Moore, crime reporters Scott Gutierrez and Casey McNerthney, court reporter Levi Pulkkinen, political editor Chris Grygiel and cartoonist David Horsey to the list of folks sticking around at the PI.

Congrats, guys.

There may be one or two people I've left off the list. I'll update if I get any other names.

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1 Comment Pulled (OffTopic) Comment Policy
2
*yawn*

Yet another lame P-I piece.

You guys are really playing this for all it is worth aren't you?

Moving on....
Posted by Reality Check on March 17, 2009 at 12:23 PM
3
Vanessa Ho and Aubrey Cohen and photographer Josh Trujillo.
Posted by mediaboy on March 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM
4
Any other photographers?
Posted by DOUG. on March 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM
5
Not to be mean (ok, to be a little bit mean) but I would pay to NOT have to read Jim Moore.
Posted by leek on March 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM
6
I'm pretty sure you don't HAVE to read Jim Moore, or anyone else for that matter.
Posted by Fnarf on March 17, 2009 at 12:59 PM
7
god damn not jim moore. he writes articles from the viewpoint of his dog.
Posted by go to (somewhere else) guy on March 17, 2009 at 1:09 PM
8
Gosh, fnarf, thanks. I was soooo unclear on the concept til just now!
Posted by leek on March 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM
9
Really? Jim Moore made the cut? Whatever.
Posted by I Got Nuthin' on March 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM
10
what's with the congrats. These guys are SCABS!!! They are union busting SCABS!!!! Where is the Guild? What was the strike all about? Remember the nasty behaviours over the crossing of the picket lines? Would these folks have been tolerated then? Why now? These guys agreed to deals that the union would never have sanctioned. And you say "congrats"
Posted by sreader on March 17, 2009 at 1:29 PM
11
No Bill Virgin?

Or did he jump to the neocon Seattle Times?
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 17, 2009 at 1:41 PM
12
Andrew Schneider, you shall be missed. http://andrewschneiderinvestigates.com/2…
Posted by emma's bee on March 17, 2009 at 1:48 PM
13
@10. What we are witnessing is the grand hypocrisy of the "journalist" being exposed. The only thing a journalist has that an intelligent blogger does not is access to the real newsmakers, and journalists only have that because of their employer. All this talk about "you'll be sorry when we're gone!" is more of the cries for attention from a profession that thrives on calling attention to itself.

Old salts like Connelly have confused the medium with the content. They love to talk about the "deadlines" and the "smell of newsprint" and the "feel of a paper tucked under your arm.", as if the filthy piece of ink stained paper had any inherent value. It is the content that made a newspaper popular, not it's capacity to line birdcages.

"Journalistic Integrity" was pretty much always a myth, and the blogging revolution has exposed it. Would the NYT's Jason Blair have ever been caught fabricating stories if he wasn't cross-checked by "non-traditional journalists"? What about Dan Rather's "MemoGate" scandal? The list of "trusted journalists" who outright lie to their audience (Maureen Dowd), for a variety of reasons, is lengthy. If you can still get the desired praise by doing your job dishonestly, then who cares about union solidarity?
Posted by Sir Vic on March 17, 2009 at 1:50 PM
14
wasn't most of this confirmed directly yesterday in the P-I?
Posted by josh on March 17, 2009 at 2:22 PM
15
I just found out this thread is directly linked from the content aggregator known as the Seattle Times .... on their home page.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM
16
sreader: While your support and enthusiasm for labor is commendable, I'd urge you to check your facts before labeling people as scabs.

I'm not personally acquainted with every person on the list, but I know most of them as good Guild members, some of whom have served on bargaining teams and as shop stewards.

Seattlepi.com in its present from has just started and these folks have not yet been given the opportunity to decide whether to be represented.

Thanks for your support,
Yoko Kuramoto-Eidsmoe
(president, Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild)
Posted by Yoko Kuramoto-Eidsmoe on March 17, 2009 at 5:49 PM
17
So how's that strike working out for Seattle's newspaper workers, #10?
Posted by Reader on March 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM
18
Hey Will, you swore you wouldn't touch The Times. But you just couldn't stay away, could you?
Posted by Inky on March 17, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy