Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, March 16, 2009

What's Been Lost: Lewis Kamb

Posted by on Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:30 PM

4d39/1236116053-pi_shirt.jpgSeattle Post-Intelligencer staffers are describing what this city will have lost when, after tomorrow, the newspaper's print edition ceases to exist. Here's P-I reporter Lewis Kamb, wondering who will fill the void:

The P-I's closure certainly means the passing of an era for this city—and I'm not just talking about the nostalgia. A lot has been said about history dating to the Civil War, the infamous characters of newsrooms' past and the paper's iconic contribution to Seattle's skyline.

But what's really lost with the P-I is the devotion and dedication to journalism that I've seen in my decade at the paper. Truly, my colleagues under the globe, by and large, were as dedicated a crew to the whole glamorous notion of the profession's nobility as any I've seen in the movies or read about in any book.

Day in, day out, folks stayed late to file stories, make just one more phone call, read over their copy one last time, all the while missing family dinners, anniversaries, birthdays and holidays, and doing it all for a pauper's salary.

I truly believe some of the best watchdog journalism, narrative writing and commentary in the country came out of the P-I in recent years. This wasn't just puffery prettied up to win awards. This was quality, daily beat reporting, stellar photojournalism and the periodic long-term project that took on sacred cows, spoke truth to power and ferreted out corruption. This was telling stories for the powerless and voiceless. This was honest-to-God real HL Mencken, public service kind of shit—you know, "Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" ...

I can’t pretend all of what we did was gold. There was drivel. Lots of drivel, and I wrote my fair share of it. Day-after weather stories and stale holiday festival features, “news” written simply to fill space—perhaps a symptom of an industry’s out-dated business model and failure to innovative quickly enough during the rise of New Media.

But the stories I'll cherish most were timeless pieces of reportage—deft storytelling and hard-nosed, shoe-leather reporting, the kind of journalism that can be held up with honor during any era.

I’m most proud of being a part of a paper that strived to dig up and dog issues no one else in this city would touch—unpopular stories and causes other reporters ignored or were too afraid or lazy to take on.

Doing that kind of work ties your stomachs in knots. It’s shaking out public records, and cajoling and convincing sources to talk. It’s calling and calling and calling again that politician ducking comment. It’s showing up on doorsteps where you’re not wanted, and feeling the blood rush into your face as you ask questions you wouldn’t dare to ask anyone, ever—but had to, to do the job right.

It was putting your ass—and your byline—on the line, time and again, and accepting what came from it. It was waking up in a cold sweat at 3 a.m., sick with worry about whether you spelled that name right, or summarized that report correctly, or left out that word in the third graf, and then, finding yourself in the half-light of dawn desperately thumbing through a notebook or re-reporting facts in your mind, even as the morning paper thumped onto your doorstep.

It was exposing real problems that needed exposure. Stuff you had to grab up with all your journalistic might by the scruff of the neck, and yank out into the light of day for the public see in all its gory details before change could come. It was the kind of journalism that takes guts—and takes tolls.

Behind the scenes, people in this city and beyond talked about problems at the King County Sheriff's Office for years, but no one ever systematically tackled and reported anything about them. We in the media all heard rumors about Dave Reichert's rise through the ranks and the folklore surrounding some of his heroism, but no one ever took the time to collect the personnel records, or track down aging supervisors long retired and out-of-state, or convincing those still on-the-job to break their code and go on the record.

Until we did.

We took a lot shots from public officials, drew dozens of insults, ridicule and the occasional death threat, even accepted some of the bullshit that stuck to us for doing the kind of reporting you dream about in J-School—watchdog reporting that held up our end of the bargain for the public, as members of the hallowed "Fourth Estate."

And that’s what made it all worth it. Compensation came not in the weekly paycheck from the Hearst Corporation, it came in results: When six sets of human remains were identified because of our reporting. When a commission was empanelled to investigate police abuse. When lawsuits were filed, laws were passed, investigations launched because of our stories. It was then that you realized, Hey, this job matters. This bullshit job that seemingly half the time left you bitter and broke was your calling. Even as a measly, son-of-a-bitch reporter for the pissant Pee-Eye—as so many readers liked to remind us that we were every so often—your work could actually make a difference.

And it wasn’t just the investigative stuff. Primarily, it was the beat reporters who day in and day out watch-dogged Sound Transit budget overruns; attended mind-numbing school board meetings; questioned the mayor's unchallenged usurping of City Hall power; pored over campaign contribution reports; obtained hopelessly hard-to-get prison health care records; knocked on doors of reluctant witnesses to gang shootings; dug deep into potential impacts of the latest Tim Eyman initiative, rode and re-rode Metro buses overnight or waited in the rain outside of homeless shelters to find that elusive source.

Painfully boring endeavors, the sausage-making of good reporting. But all of it stuff that, in the end, can deeply matter to your neighbors, your kids, your friends, your city.

All of this may sound like a lot of self-righteous, self-aggrandizing bunk. And maybe some of it is, looking through the tinted glasses of hindsight.

But what I truly fear will be lost with the P-I is the kind of dogged scrutiny and spotlight reporting of local issues that takes guts, sourcing, time, space, patience, experience, even the backing of media lawyers, that a newspaper willing to accept its public responsibility as watchdogs and chroniclers of its community takes on.

In the P-I’s absence, I wonder if the West Seattle Blog will take up that slack? Hell, will the retooled Seattlepi.com?

Will anyone fill that void? And if no one does, where's that leave this city?

Illustration by Andrew Saeger.

 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
It won't be The Stranger. That's for goddamnned sure.
Posted by ya sure ya betcha on March 16, 2009 at 12:55 PM
2
these are all great stories, but the idea that "journalism" requires newsprint is really one for the recycle bin.
Posted by josh on March 16, 2009 at 12:59 PM
3
Media is only a canary in our coal mine.
Posted by m on March 16, 2009 at 1:07 PM
4
Where's it going to come from, then? Where's the model of the online-only news source that actually creates valuable local content, and makes enough money to pay its reporters a living wage, with health benefits and pensions and all that good stuff?

The loss of the P-I is a LOSS. They are not being replaced by anything. Their online model is a joke; it'll be gone before the paper Times is. This community will be less recorded, less understood, and less intelligent on Wednesday than it was on Tuesday.
Posted by Fnarf on March 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM
5
by the way, can we please have a moratorium on large corporations (yes, I'm looking at you, Hearst-owned-subsidiary) using the term "speak truth to power"?
Posted by grumble on March 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM
6
lewis, writing one story every two years isn't exactly dogged beat reporting. even your own colleagues would despair of you ever actually pitching in on daily stuff. "work, you bastard," they said under their breath.
Posted by schmoopie.burkulina on March 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM
7
@2
It's not that journalism needs print, it's that no other modern model does investigative reporting so well. I do think local reporting is done well in blog form, but it's not highly diseminated. When I talk about things I've read on Slog or CHS, 99% of my friends have no clue about it. And there is a loss of trustworthiness. While not fail proof, when we read a story in a paper we can trust that that person has experience and is being reviewed and fact checked. Most local blogs don't have that authority yet.
There will be a model to replace the newspaper, but it's still developing, so I fear stories will fall through the cracks and our city won't be as informed as it was.
Posted by Enigma on March 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM
8
Enigma's point is excellent.

Also"these are all great stories, but the idea that "journalism" requires newsprint is really one for the recycle bin. "

Yes, but it probably requires more than 20 reporters. Why does going from Print to Online mean a cut of 130 news staff. That's not print production staff, that's a cut of the people who create the content.

I don't get it. I suspect we'll have 20 poorly edited (and copy edited) blogs.
Posted by Steven Bradford on March 16, 2009 at 1:59 PM
9 Comment Pulled (OffTopic) Comment Policy
10
"Schmoopie":
Nobody has said any such THING under his or her breath about Lewis, who has had 10 bylines in '09 alone - most related to a story he has worked on since 2003, *while* working on other award-winning investigations.
Nothing like the collected and immortal works of Schmoopie, of course.
Posted by Marsha Milroy on March 16, 2009 at 2:19 PM
11
Sadly, SB is right @8.

This is a real cut in reporting.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 16, 2009 at 2:40 PM
12
oh marsha, marsha,
then you ain't around when the news is breaking and the working reporters scrambling. of course, he bursts into action when a contest entry is involved.
Posted by schmoopie.burkulina on March 16, 2009 at 2:46 PM
13
and marsha, if he's been working on one story since 2003, then he's even slower than we imagined before.
Posted by schmoopie.burkulina on March 16, 2009 at 2:48 PM
14
Can we get a top 10 list of unique stories the PI covered in the last year or two? I'd like to see what all the fuss is about. Someone compile a list of the best of the PI from this year and last and lets see how valuable they really were.
Posted by Paul Inverness on March 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM
Posted by Fnarf on March 16, 2009 at 3:34 PM
16
Marsha,

Ten bylines by mid-March is, I'm sorry, pathetic. Lewis Kamb does great reporting, some of the best in the city. That said, he--and most everyone else at the PI and now the Times--needs to ratchet up the productivity. There's no reason Mr. Kamb couldn't do ten bylines AND some of the feed-the-beast stories he notes need doing. Just because you do Pulitzer quality work doesn't mean you also don't need to get your ass out there and cover the St. Patrick's Day Parade. Thinking like Mr. Kamb's (and like Hector Castro, who was recently quoted as saying he likes to take two hours to write a lead) is a large part of the reason why the PI is no longer in business. It was long ago time for the journalism business to go to the mattresses, as they said in The Godfather. Instead, everyone kept ignoring economic realities and ducking tough decisions (there is, I'm sorry, no reason why the copy desk can't be outsourced with no more than three folks in-house to oversee it; the entertainment section should have been folded long ago along with the editorial page; hourly wages should have been shucked in favor of salaries and flexible work schedules--plus a whole lot more). Instead, we have folks like Mr. Kamb and his defenders who act like they're frickin' godsends working for--how did he put it--pauper's wages. Well, Lewis, there are no wages at all anymore. Seattle has lost a fine newspaper, your work included, but instead of making the tough calls and taking slow Wednesdays off to cover Seafair on Sunday, you all gazed at your collective navels and acted like prima donnas while the industry burned around you. And it's not just Lewis Kamb. It's the Newspaper Guild that foisted that crazy strike and treated management like villains. It's the editors who spent too much time in meetings. It's the publisher who wouldn't make the tough calls. It's Hearst. If a paper was launched today, it would look nothing--nothing--like the bloated organizations that the PI and Times became. The PI's demise is as tragic as it is self-inflicted and if the Times doesn't change pronto, it's going to meet the same fate.
More...
Posted by workharderworksmarter on March 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM
17
Hearst Corporation pull plug on Seattle P-I print edition, Seattle P-I publish final print edition, freak out, online-only out, SEATTLE P-I BECOME ONLINE-ONLY NEWSPAPER!

ONLINE-ONLY SEATTLE P-I WILL SMASH ONLINE-ONLY SEATTLE TIMES!

And no, I don't feel like letting it go.
Posted by The Incredible Sulk on March 16, 2009 at 3:53 PM
18
Say what? HL Mencken was a huge snob who wrote condescending commentary more than he reported anything. How did he comfort the afflicted? By making fun of rural idiots and opposing unions?
Posted by Trevor on March 16, 2009 at 4:23 PM
19
Schmoop dog: Point well taken. But just FYI, before I did projects, I was a beat reporter. As the paper's cops reporter, my byline count was surpassed by only one other staffer at the time.
Posted by Lewis K on March 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM
20
Lewis:

That you slacked once you became a star isn't necessarily your fault, but you should take ownership. How many years has it been since you covered cops (which should always be the highest byline count in a big city)? Can you honestly say that ten bylines in three-plus months is the best you can (excuse me, could) do? I love newspapers, but they can't survive the way the PI was, and the Times is, structured. So let's start a dialogue: How did you while away three months writing ten stories knowing for two of those months that the end was nigh? Instead of being an "investigative reporter," as your byline stated, you should have been a newsman, which is to say, hungry, focused--willing to work, as you say, for pauper's wages. Instead, we get this "before I did projects" crap, which suggests that somehow, somewhere along the way, you felt you had some sort of special status, that to do the humdrum somehow precluded the barnburner. That's bullshit. Let's remember here: Papers are failing because expenses are higher than revenue. You did great work, but you could have done a lot more. Whether it was heralded or not, you could have done a lot more. Instead, somehow along the way, you felt that certain stories were beneath you, which meant someone else had to do them, which meant higher labor costs, which contributed to the collapse--and you're not alone in this (managers that allowed this to happen are also complicit).

I get so angry when I read this "but I'm a prah-juchts reporter." Horseshit. You're unemployed. And so are a lot of other people. And a community has lost a great institution.

But I digress: How is it that you collected a paycheck for more than three months and produced ten bylines, with, so far as I can tell, just one significant piece that I gather you'd been working on for six years? If I'm missing something here, please correct me.
More...
Posted by workharderworksmarter on March 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM
21
Reading between the lines and feeling your pain, I wish with all my heart I could comfort you with promises that the horror, regrets, and bitterness you're feeling now will go away.

The feelings might fade a bit, but the pain, the nostalgia, the sheer frustration of losing a way of life will be with you always; it certainly has been with me. I saw the beginning of the end in the early 1990s during the trauma of Hearst's closing of The San Antonio Light. (Closing is such a soft word for an event that creates so much angst, isn't it? "Killing" somehow feels more appropriate.)

Brothers and sisters, I still have nightmares about the events that followed the death of The Light. To this day, my heart aches for the unique characters only a newsroom can produce -- people who fall through the cracks because there's really no other place quite like the time and place we shared.

I love you and share your pain.
Posted by Sleepless in Texas on March 18, 2009 at 6:06 AM
22
@19
yeah right, this guy ain't no newsman.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/403876_pi…

i'll bet while he was reporting this touching tribute you were sitting at your desk with a thumb up your ass. fuck you, wankharder
Posted by SilentBob on March 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy