Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Today in E-books

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Is Apple planning an e-book reader? (Probably not, but they will probably make ebooks much easier to read on their future devices, and they might begin selling books in the iTunes store.)

Also, Symtio is an ebook content and commerce platform. There's a good interview with the vice president of the company here. Right now, the company is dealing almost exclusively with Christian books, but there's talk about partnering with independent bookstores who will then sell cards with codes to download digital copies of books.

I've talked with several authors who say that the thing that would save independent bookstores was if, when you bought a hard copy of a book, you also received a digital copy. The Symtio VP seems to have a good idea of making accessibility the main thing:

There seems to be too much focus on formats and niches right now, and that’s fostering the ability for some retailers to take control of markets and pricing. I believe the focus needs to center on how we can make digital books and digital media as convenient, accessible, and interesting for consumers as possible.

Digital consumers want their files to work on their devices of choice. It’s likely that DRM and closed systems stymie the ease-of-use factor and diminish the overall consumer experience. Moving toward an open system is what’s going to improve adoption and really deliver on the most important factor, which is convenience.

The person who really figures this out will make a lot of money. (Well, a lot of money for the publishing industry.)

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Y'know, I was reading some trashy paperbacks recently, and I was thinking about the last time there was a major revolution in bookselling formats, namely, trashy paperbacks. Not the giant things you see today, but mass-market-sized Ballantines and Dells and Fawcett Crests.

I think that's what size the perfect e-book reader should be. Smaller than a kindle, bigger than in iPod. Fits in your jacket pocket. And thin, too, of course, like an old Travis McGee by John D. McDonald, not a brick like Tom Clancy.

And, like mass-market paperbacks, you ought to be able to buy the data anywhere. Online, sure, but also a kiosk at the airport, unless they make the online shop available everywhere like the Kindle claims to.

Then they need to start taking advantage of their almost-infinite back catalogs, and make all kinds of copyrighted stuff from the past hundred years instantly available.
Posted by Fnarf on March 11, 2009 at 1:26 PM
2
iPhone - phone - texts - music - e-mail - camera - YouTube - streaming radio - pictures - games - apps - web browsing - facebook - myspace - twitter - weather - color - audiobooks = eBook reader.
Posted by yet somehow the kindle costs almost $200 more on March 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM
3
The Kindle costs more because you can read the screen without going blind, the software actually works, and the battery doesn't go dead every half hour. Sometimes specialized uses make sense.
Posted by Fnarf on March 11, 2009 at 1:39 PM
4
It makes sense if you want to sell about 13 Kindles instead of over 5 million iPhones.
Posted by commenter #2 on March 11, 2009 at 1:43 PM
5
The Kindle actually costs FAR, FAR LESS than an Iphone if you think about it, because the Iphone is basically a razor -- they're not selling you the handle, they're selling you the blades, in the form of your $100 a month to AT&T (out of which they get kickbacks). So out of the box a Kindle costs $400, an Iphone $200 -- but a year later, the Kindle owner has paid $400, the Iphone user $1400 (or whatever the actual numbers are, I don't own either). That $200 price is artificially low to tempt you into the long-term contract, just like Verizon and T-Mobil will give you a pretty good phone for free if you sign.

But Iphone users are sheep and don't understand math, so they carry on saying stuff like "the Kindle costs so much more" even though it's not true. The truth is, the Iphone costs way, way more, in part because it does many more different things -- but the one thing that Kindle does, the Iphone can't even touch.

The Kindle is a serious, if imperfect, e-book reader now. The Iphone is not serious, and will never be, without some kind of miracle improvement in software, screen, and battery -- improvements that will keep Kindle ahead of them too.
Posted by Fnarf on March 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM
6
WTF? It's a phone... of course you pay a monthly fee. Get a $150 iPod Touch that runs Kindle software, many other ebooks, free wifi, and has no other charges. The Kindle charges for books and even newspaper and BLOG subscriptions - isn't that the Schick model? Newspapers and blogs are free on the iPhone and iPod Touch.

PS Posting this from my toy iPhone
Posted by commenter #2 on March 11, 2009 at 2:44 PM
7
Right -- you can do other stuff with an Iphone. But as an ebook reader, it sucks donkey dick. I've seen the screenshots. And blogs? It's not for blogs. Nobody buys a Kindle to read blogs. You buy it to read BOOKS, and books are not free -- not good ones, not the ones that the publishing industry depends upon. And people want to read those books on a screen that works. Iphone's doesn't; it looks TERRIBLE in comparison, and you have to be tethered to a wall outlet. Eink is not optional on any viable ebook reader.
Posted by Fnarf on March 11, 2009 at 2:50 PM
8
Veering away from the iPhone/Kindle war . . .

I like the idea of getting a digital copy with a physical purchase from a bookstore. I'd probably buy a lot more physical books if I wasn't stuck reading them (and storing) them in book form. It would allow me to support local merchants and to share books with my friends.

The mp3 downloads that come with some vinyl purchases have tipped some of my purchases from online stores to local ones. I can see the same trick working for books.
Posted by An Interested Party on March 11, 2009 at 3:50 PM
9
Until they cost $5 and have no monthly charge, they're too expensive.

A library card is cheaper ...
Posted by Mr. Obvious on March 11, 2009 at 4:52 PM
10
The iPhone service fees are expensive, which is why I have an iPod Touch. I can happily read ebooks on it and do tons of other things as well. I'd love to have the camera and internet available in more places with the iPhone, but its not worth the service fees that I can't afford.
Posted by vitaminwater on March 12, 2009 at 3:04 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use