Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, March 6, 2009

Bible Thumpers Threaten Domestic Partnership Bill

Posted by on Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM

After years of relative silence about gay-rights legislation, religious conservatives are inundating state lawmakers with demands to block this year’s domestic partnership bill. They are aggressively targeting Democratic legislators in swing districts with personal emails, passionate phone calls, and by showing up by the hundreds for legislative hearings.

“We haven’t seen an angry far-right turnout against LGBT rights legislation like this in almost a decade,” says state senator Ed Murray (D-43), the bill’s prime senate sponsor. Similar bills that extended some marriage rights to same-sex couples passed over the last two years, but this year’s domestic partnership bill would grant virtually every marriage right.

Murray and others in Olympia says it’s unclear what’s behind the upswing in conservative pressure; the emails come throughout the week, not just following Sunday sermons. Although Murray is certain the bill can pass in the state house, he’s concerned the assault is weakening the chances for the senate-version of the bill, SB 5688.

“We have gotten maybe 250 emails in opposition that are very personal in the last two weeks,” says one swing-district legislator who asked to not be named. He describes the arguments against the bill as "quite Biblical" and "heated." At a senate hearing on the bill in February, senator Darlene Fairley (D-32) noted that “a ton of people” signed up to speak. The crowd of about 250 was stacked five-to-one against the bill, Murray says.

In contrast, bill supporters are making almost no phone calls, showing up for hearings in relatively small numbers, and sending “form emails” that have little impact, several legislators and legislative assistants say. Moreover, those emails are overwhelmingly being sent to representatives of Seattle districts—who are all but certain to vote for the bill—rather than swing-district representatives who have voted for the DP bills in past years but are feeling increasing pressure from their constituents to vote against this one. “We haven’t heard from anyone in support for the last few weeks,” says the legislator from the swing district.

“For legislators who could go either way, it’s not a great message,” says Murray. “Every organization has an online email form that goes to legislators.”

Equal Rights Washington (ERW), the primary statewide grassroots group advocating for marriage equality, is behind many of those form letters. The group is also pushing Marriage Equality Day, a rally on the Capitol campus and effort to lobby legislators. The problem: It’s scheduled on March 12—the day bills need to pass out of their house of origin—which is too late.

But Josh Friedes, spokesman for ERW, says the group is doing all it can. The nonprofit has been hard hit by the economic downturn, he says, which forced the organization to lay off one of its organizers. Supporters of the bill turned out in smaller numbers to hearings because legislators asked ERW to avoid a circus. “We can easily pack rooms in the future if that is what it takes,” says Friedes. He adds that many people edit form emails but don’t change the subject line, misleading legislators into believing all the emails are the same. But Friedes points to the responsibility of supporters to pressure legislators.

“The gay rights movement is getting a little complacent because we’ve had essentially years of continued success,” says Friedes. In addition to domestic partnership bills, the legislature passed a civil-rights bill providing protection for gay, lesbian and transgender persons in 2006. “People just assumed in this forth year passing the domestic partnership expansion bill of ‘09 would be a breeze,” he says, “and that does not reflect reality.”

What needs to happen? Supporters of domestic partnership who live in swing districts—i.e., outside of Seattle—need to make personal contact with their senator and representatives. Tell them about how your same-sex relationship is lovely and you support domestic partnership rights, or say that you want your lesbian daughter to have the same rights as your straight son (or whatever is personal to you). Here’s a map of the state and Puget Sound that shows your district and links to your representatives' contact info. Call them. Send an email. Live in Seattle? Call your parents or friends who live in the suburbs and ask them to help.

 

Comments (27) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Where do the religious nuts find so much time?!? Don't they have jobs or are they employed as full-time bigots? What the hell?!
Posted by Urgutha Forka on March 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM
2
Home schooling doesn't require much time if you don't teach science.
Posted by Jesus Camp on March 6, 2009 at 11:48 AM
3
So this is no longer a clash of cultures, it's a vendetta of bigotry. The religious right has spoken out about the term "gay marriage" for a long time. Okay, now that it is no longer referred to as anything but "domestic partnership", that should solve the problem, right? Wrong. Clearly these people are bigots. They can no longer hide behind their defense of the word "marriage". They clearly hate homosexuals, and will stop at nothing to keep us down.
Posted by Jon Brock on March 6, 2009 at 11:53 AM
4
Great post, Dom. I will contact my Issaquah House and Senate reps, though they are both Republicans.

But really- fucking hell- don't we control both chambers? Any Dem who votes against this bill needs to be told and KNOW that they will get an automatic primary challenge next time around.
Posted by Big Sven on March 6, 2009 at 12:00 PM
5
Come out with your hands up!
Posted by we have you surrounded on March 6, 2009 at 12:07 PM
6
cue the right-wing trolls .... in ...3, 2, 1....
Posted by downtown clown on March 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM
7
Dom, can you post a list of the reps that need contacting and what districts they are in so we can get the word out to our famlies that may be in there districts?
Posted by Cody Bolt on March 6, 2009 at 12:18 PM
8
Dominic, it would be super helpful if you would list the bill number here, so we can make sure our emails all track to the right cause. Thanks!
Posted by lily on March 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM
9
This sort of post serves the cause well. Keep this topic on the radar for at least another week, Dominic. The Slog has room amongst some of the less pressing issues, like, say... bacon?

I'm going to send personal emails to my Kitsap public servants. I'm straight as a ruler and happily married, but I see this as an issue of taxation without representation, not to mention separation of church and state (or lack thereof).

Queers pay the same taxes I do. I think they deserve the same rights and privileges as any other American on this topic. It's not my business who they fall in love with. Nor is it the government's.

Churches, on the other hand... They should shut the hell up and enjoy their tax-free status. I resent their intrusion into this topic, which is clearly one of legislation.
Posted by Lenny on March 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM
10
#4, it might be worth your time since Pflug crossed the aisle to vote for the DP expansion last time. I could easily see her waffling back to the other side now that she doesn't have to face voters for three years. Voters represented by the other pro-DP Republicans need to make sure they don't lose those important crossovers: Dale Brandland (42nd LD), Curtis King (14th LD), and Maureen Walsh (16th LD). Given that Walsh has signed on as a cosponsor for the actual marriage equality bill I doubt she's in danger of switching, but the others might.

The senators who truly need to be aggressively courted are the swing Democrats who chickened out on the last bill. Many of them aren't even electorally-endangered yet still opposed it. These are the Senate Democrats who voted against the last domestic partnership expansion:

1. Paull Shin (21st LD) - reliably liberal vote on everything but DPs in a safe district
2. Marilyn Rasmussen (2nd LD) - lost reelection
3. Jim Kastama (25th LD) - voted for the first DP bill but not the 2nd, might switch back now that he's been reelected
4. Brian Hatfield (19th LD) - conservative Democrat, but both House reps voted for the bill and are otherwise conservative Democrats
5. Tim Sheldon (35th LD) - lost cause
6. Jim Hargrove (24th LD) - lost cause

Rep. Mark Miloscia also voted against it despite being consistently reelected by huge margins in the 30th. He could easily absorb any electoral repercussions in voting for it, but he's more of a social-conservative populist and I suspect his votes against domestic partnerships are genuine rather than electorally-expedient.
Posted by TMW on March 6, 2009 at 12:43 PM
11
@ 8) The senate-version of the bill is SB 5688. And I've updated the post with a link, too.
Posted by Dominic Holden on March 6, 2009 at 12:51 PM
12
Things to do:

1. Change your FB status so your relatives see.
2. Directly email them and ask.
3. Phone them and ask.
4. Send nice postcard of Seattle and ask.

Repeat as needed.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 6, 2009 at 1:16 PM
13
Prop 8 and now this.
It is all crashing down.
I thought under Obama
things would be better.
But they are not.
They are not...
Posted by I miss W on March 6, 2009 at 1:18 PM
14
@13:

Don't despair; the dying beast always fights hardest after it's backed itself into a corner from which it can't escape.
Posted by Progress Is Inevitable - But Sometimes Slow on March 6, 2009 at 1:46 PM
15
Contacting your leaders about legislation is invaluable to them when faced with groups of religious fanatics. Do it for yourself and others today!
Posted by vince on March 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM
16
Obama has screwed the pooch so badly that after another year of his incompetence, it's going to be a miracle if a Democrat can get elected dog-catcher. Ridicule the "dying beast" all you want - it's not dead and you haven't seen the last of it.
Posted by Ronald Reagan's Ghost on March 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM
17
Here is the list of Senators being targeted for calls by right-wing Faith and Freedom Network:

Dale Brandland, district 42 -- 360-786-7682
Curtis King, district 14 -- 360-786-7626
Cheryl Pfluge, district 5 -- 360-786-1999

Secondly, these Democrats will be up for election next year. Ones with an asterisk (*) by their names have one or more Republican seat mates.

Claudia Kaufman, district 47 -- 360-786-7692
Steve Hobbs, district 44 -- 360-786-7686
*Chris Marr, district 6 -- 360-7867610
Eric Oemig, district 45 -- 360-786-7672
Rodney Tom, district 48 -- 360-786-7694
*Derek Kilmer, district 26 -- 360-786-7650
*Tracey Eide, district 30 -- 360-786-7658

The following two senators are not up for reelection next year, but have Republican seat mates.

Jim Kastama, district 25 -- 360-786-7648
Mary Margaret Haugen, district 10 -- 360-786-7618

Please call these folks, whether you live in their district or not. I called all of them and only two asked if I was a constituent!

As you can see many of these folks are co-sponsors, so they should be called and thanked by us, regardless of whether they are "our" Senators or not.
Posted by JC on March 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM
18
Oh and one more reason to call. There are getting inundated by the right. Every single staffer I spoke with was just tickled pink to hear a friendly voice for a change.
Posted by JC on March 6, 2009 at 2:29 PM
19
And for those of you interested in seeing exactly what this domestic partnership bill cuts out to exist, check out the front page of fpiw.org
Posted by get the facts on March 6, 2009 at 2:59 PM
20
Get the facts,

You're a lying piece of shit. Not even the dishonest Family Policy Institute ad makes the claim that the proposed cuts are being CAUSED by the domestic partnership bill. A pretty stupid assertion seeing as how the cuts are to repair a $5 BILLION budget deficit and the FPIW's projected cost of domestic partnerships is $5 MILLION or 1% of that amount. Not to mention the assertion is bigoted, should we cease offering benefits to the spouses of Evangelicals to balance the budget? If not why not?
Posted by JC on March 6, 2009 at 5:44 PM
21
The biggest mistake the LGBT civil rights movement can make is assuming that the passage of the Domestic Partnership Bill of 2009 is a done deal. Regardless of whether or not the votes exist to pass the bill, the bill is an important vehicle to educate legislators about the lives of LGBT families and the breadth of support—gay and straight—for achieving full equality for Washington’s LGBT residents.

It is vital that persons outside Seattle in particular contact their legislators in support of the Domestic Partnership Expansion Bill of 2009. And it is equally important that everybody encourages their friends, family co-workers and neighbors to do the same. We must be constantly building our movement. And we must tell our stories. Everybody gay and straight has a story to tell! (see links below)

One of the reasons that I am confident that we can respond to the surge of activity from the radical right is that so many people have used the e-advocacy systems of Equal Rights Washington (ERW), FUSE, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the ACLU and other organizations. This is no secret, online petitions and action alerts passed from one friend to another allow us to build our lists so we can respond as needed. So despite the concerns raised in this post please do continue to spread action alerts that are sent to you by ERW and allied organizations. At the same time remember that it is important to call, visit and send hand written notes to your legislators from time to time and whenever things really heat up as they are doing now. We must build and deepen relationships with our elected leaders.

I hope Dom’s post will begin a vibrant conversation on the slog and elsewhere about the need for our community to increase our advocacy and better focus our efforts. c I know our opposition reads the SLOG as well as our friends. I will not here, therefore, telescope out the strategy and tactics we are undertaking to counter what is a very intense effort by the right to defeat the domestic partnership bill as well as stop the march toward marriage equality. Again, since this is no secret ERW does have state of the art technology that easily allows us to identify and call voters who support LGBT civil rights, so if you are interested in calling LGBT friendly voters in districts where the reactionary right is turning up the heat please either e-mail info@equalrightswashington.org or call ERW at 206-324-2570 and ask for Kate. This is a great way for folks in Seattle to help.

Below are also a few links you can use to contact your legislators if you have not already done so as well as info about Equality Day. PLEASE EDIT THE SUBJECT LINE & AT THE START OF YOUR E-MAIL TELL YOUR PERSONAL STORY.

If YOU CAN.NOT ATTEND EQUALITY DAY PLEASE USE THIS LINK

http://eqfed.org/campaign/virtual_eqday2…

IF YOU ARE ATTENDING EQUALITY DAY OR THINKING ABOUT IT PLEASE USE THIS LINK

http://eqfed.org/campaign/DP_2009

AND PLEASE REGISTER AND COME TO EQUALITY DAY. IF YOU THINK THINGS ARE NASTY NOW, JUST WAIT TILL THE MARRIAGE BILL STARTS MOVING. WE HAVE A LOT OF WORK AHEAD OF US.

http://equalrightswashington.org/events/…

Please visit the ERW website www.equalrightswashington.org regularly as we will be posting updates and of course those of you on our e-mail list, you can expect a few alerts over the next few days!

--
Joshua A. Friedes
Advocacy Director
Equal Rights Washington

W 206-324-2570
More...
Posted by Joshua Friedes on March 7, 2009 at 5:33 PM
22
Bigot- One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

Hate- Intense animosity or dislike; hatred

Examples of hate speech: queer, fag, sodomite, fudgepacker ...

Liberal- Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox or authoritarian attitudes, views or dogmas; free from bigotry.

More examples of hate speech: Bible thumper, religious nuts, religious right, right wing trolls...

Hypocrisy- The practice of professing beliefs, feelings or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

It's just an observation but the comments posted seem to display evidence of bigotry, hatred and hypocrisy. To be a true liberal we must fight the temptation to fall into bigotry. We must learn to agree to disagree.

I do not hate people who have a sexual preference different than my own any more than I could hate someone who prefers a Ford over a Chevrolet. What two consenting adults do behind closed doors is none of my business and quite frankly I'd prefer not to know. I am an American and a resident of the great State of Washington and I care deeply about the future and well being of the residents of this State. In my research on this matter I can only conclude after considerable thought the "Gay lifestyle" does not provide evidence of a healthy, viable, alternative to heterosexual marriage. And therefore I can not support gay marriage as an institution. The purpose of civil government is to protect its citizens and fortunately for us as Americans we have a process that allows decisions like these to be decided by a vote of all the people. I don't hate you but I don't agree that gay marriage is good for the future well being of Washington's citizens.



More...
Posted by Steve on March 8, 2009 at 2:25 PM
23
Only morons say "sexual preference". That donates a choice. Who would honestly choose to be a gay man in a world that hates him?
Posted by Gray Coyote on March 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM
24
"Agree to disagree" Steve-o? It's really easy to "agree to disagree" and do "research" on the "Gay Lifestyle" and make vague statements about what is a "healthy, viable alternative" when you have no experience, you risk nothing, and you have no chance of sitting at the back of the bus.

Don't try to sugarcoat your inequality speech and expect us to swallow it. If gays are denied rights, you lose nothing, you risk nothing, you gain nothing, while the LBGT community is relegated to second-class citizens with unfair taxation, questionable inheritance, lower recourse in life-and-death decisions of loved ones and a host of other painful inequities.

These are real lives Steve-o, and that's what folks like you never seem to get. We're all just extra in your little movie and you only notice the most glaring examples without looking at the average homosexual relationship, that much is plain to see. All of your speech indicates a complete ignorance of the actual situation and what's at stake for the rest of us.

But of course that doesn't matter to you. You still get a full voice in the game without risking anything personally, so why should you care about real people?
Posted by Mark on March 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM
25
23) Homosexuality is no different than any other sinful act. It is passed on up to the fourth generation (that means it's in the genes). If you truly would rather not be homosexual ("in a world that hates you" --btw, we don't hate the person); just as an alcoholic can stop drinking or a drugger stop using or a liar stop lying, or, or, or, Jesus can (and more importantly, wants) to free you --let Him be your Champion! He truly is the 'love' every human being seeks.
"Nothing can separate you from the love of Christ..." Romans 8:35-39 In other words, He will always love you, no matter what you do, don't do, who you are, are not, etc; but you will never know His love (a love that is not from this world) unless you CHOOSE (free will) to receive Him into your heart.
Posted by Kingdom Girl on March 9, 2009 at 8:07 PM
26
Looks like it passed 30-18 in the Senate. Good work everyone. Joshua Friedes, don't let this happen again where we first hear of a problem in the Stranger.
Posted by Gray Coyote on March 11, 2009 at 9:58 AM
27
Well dear, you just proved our point, in your own words acording to you and Romans 8:35-39 "Nothing can separate you from the love of Christ" OH YA UNLESS OF COURCE YOUR GAY! I must of missed that one in my Bible I will have to go back and reread it and find where it says that. I would like to ask, when did God die and leave you in charge of judging people? She Wolf
Posted by She Wolf on March 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy