Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Friday, March 6, 2009

Also Not Getting in Hearst's Online-Only Lifeboat: The P-I's Most Popular Blogger, Joseph Tartakoff

Posted by Eli Sanders on Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM

4d39/1236116053-pi_shirt.jpgAbout a month ago, I posted a leaked P-I memo that congratulated the newspaper's staff for drawing record online traffic in January (even as the P-I's print edition was facing closure). At the top of the congratulations list: Joseph Tartakoff, the 23-year-old force behind the P-I's popular Microsoft blog.

P-I staff blogs posted a record 2.8 million page views in January, with two blogs over a half-million page views for the first time ever and nine staff blogs were over 100,000 page views — also a first!

Leading all blogs — with about a quarter of that traffic — was Joe Tartakoff and the Microsoft blog. With 774,153 page views, the Microsoft blog eclipsed the previous record for any P-I blog.

This is the kind of person who Hearst would presumably want for the new, online-only P-I, which is shaping up to be a bloggy aggregator with a small breaking news team. But Tartakoff, despite being on the (growing) list of reporters who are believed to have been offered online-only jobs, isn't going to be joining any online-only P-I.

"I am not going to be part of such a venture," Tartakoff told me via e-mail. He couldn't say much else, but added this: "I will really miss the old P-I."

Which raises a question: With Hearst's offers apparently refusable, at least for some, is the company really going to be able to gather up the 20 staffers it seems to be aiming for in order to run an online-only product? One P-I reporter says it will become clear very soon, since those who were offered jobs were asked to respond quickly:

My understanding is that if not enough people said yes, they would not go ahead.

While all of this sorts out, here's something that Tartakoff's decision is recalling for me. While I was reporting this piece, I heard about how two former P-I tech writers, John Cook and Todd Bishop, pitched the Hearst hierarchy, way back in the summer of 2007, on launching an online news publication that would focus on the Northwest and essentially be built around Cook and Bishop's tech blogs—blogs that were early entrants into the local tech blogging field and had developed a certain following. Hearst wasn't interested in the concept and so Cook and Bishop left the P-I and started TechFlash ("Seattle's Technology News Source").

The easy moral of this story: Fail to appreciate the ideas and talents of your most web-savvy reporters and they'll leave you. But here's another way of looking at it: Into the void that Cook and Bishop created by their departure stepped young Joseph Tartakoff, who quickly built up a Microsoft blog that, as that leaked memo pointedly noted, "eclipsed the previous [traffic] record for any P-I blog that had been held by his predecessor, Todd Bishop."

Regina Hackett, the P-I's art critic for 27 years (and not, apparently, on the list), was talking to me a while back and used the Cook-Bishop-Tartakoff story as a sort of parable.

“That was humbling for me personally," she said, meaning the process of watching Cook and Bishop being successfully replaced with someone very young, very talented, and very web-savvy. "Who’s indispensable then?

It seems to me that Hearst is now operating with this same idea in mind. The executives think: For every person who might decline to be a part of the online-only P-I, there is, somewhere out there, either within the P-I building or without it, some young and talented individual who is willing to dive in to a new bloggy project. (And, the execs also seem to be hoping, dive in for relatively little pay.) We'll find out soon how well that works out.

Illustration by Andrew Saeger

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Have you compared your earlier projections on who Hearst will retain (something about number of comments) vs. the list recently published?
Posted by @ on March 6, 2009 at 10:18 AM
2
For what it's worth, I went to college with Joe, he lived in the same dorm I did and we had classes together. I've gotten drunk with him more times than I can remember, worked on the campus newspaper with him, eaten tons of meals with him, etc. He's as nice of a guy as he is talented. I wish him the best of luck.
Posted by Bill Jusino on March 6, 2009 at 10:32 AM
3
Yea, I read the microsoft blog very often and it will be missed.
Posted by jimbradley on March 6, 2009 at 10:54 AM
4
Oh is that who does the spin for MSFT in their blog ... maybe they can hire him now?
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 6, 2009 at 11:17 AM
5
No one is indispensable. Believe it.
Posted by mediaboy on March 6, 2009 at 11:55 AM
6
Eli,

Joe Tartakoff is a fantastic, young reporter. Having worked with him in the past, I respect his coverage. And I wish him well in his new venture.

Joe did a good job on the Microsoft blog for the four months that he ran it, growing the audience and getting some great scoops. But let's not forget that the bedrock of the Microsoft blog was built over five years through smart, aggressive beat reporting by my colleague Todd Bishop. The community was built. The audience was there. Joe continued that tradition. He did not invent it.

Starting an online community from scratch is not easy.

Todd is one of the most respected Microsoft reporters/bloggers in the country. And while what we do as journalists may be automated or replaced to some degree, I have faith that good storytelling, aggressive news reporting and smart use of technology will have a role in this new media world. (If not, we're all kind of screwed as journalists).

Good blogging -- in my mind -- is really nothing more than aggressive beat reporting. That happens on the Slog. That happens on TechCrunch. It happens on Politico. We are big believers in that concept at TechFlash.

It's truly sad that the P-I is disintegrating in this way, since some of the smartest beat reporters I've ever worked with are still there. These are journalists who told important stories in this city.

I am hopeful, however, that out of the chaos new online models will emerge that reward those journalists who dig through legal documents, sit through school board meetings and find those little nuggets of information that no one else bothers to look for.

John Cook
TechFlash.com
Posted by John Cook on March 6, 2009 at 1:16 PM
7
Agreed, Bill. If there was ever a case to show you that the people getting the short end of the economy stick can be talented and hardworking, this is it. Best of luck, Joe.
Posted by Cori Boyko on March 6, 2009 at 1:22 PM
8
No doubt Joe is good -- but let's not forget the reason Joe's blog is popular is because Todd Bishop who started that blog at the PI was able to build a huge following with his timely and spot on reporting... You can follow Todd now at TechFlash.
Posted by KrisKredit on March 6, 2009 at 2:39 PM
9
Joe's success though, as Eli astutely points out, shows that pretty much any reporter could've built up that Microsoft following over time with diligent, steady reporting.
Posted by truth, not insult on March 6, 2009 at 4:37 PM
10
The lesson here is that most reporting is fungible.
Posted by dw on March 6, 2009 at 5:02 PM
11
The bottom line on the P-I project is there isn't the ad revenue to support even this small venture. When the print shuts down, 85 percent or more of their existing advertising walks. Rates will now be based on web-only operations, not newspapers and their pass-through rates in which print subsidizes the online effort. It's DOA from the start. But someone has to do it to show how ludicrous the web-only idea really is. I would seriously like to be proved wrong. I won't. If Hearst doesn't get cold feet next week, they'll take losses out of the starting gate and shutter the operation by the end of Q3.
Posted by A.W. on March 6, 2009 at 9:26 PM
12
Makes you wonder how weeklies are holding up. I haven't picked up a paper copy of the Stranger or Weekly in over a year. I barely notice online ads. Never clicked on one unless it was by accident.
Posted by Plus I don't need a tranny escort on March 7, 2009 at 9:22 AM
13
One wonders how the Stranger and the Weekly ARE doing, financially...
Posted by Darren M. on March 8, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use