Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Wrong. Way Down in the Weeds, But Still Wrong.

Posted by on Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:05 PM

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer is leaking like a sieve right now, but not all of the leakers know anything more than what they're hearing around the office—a place that's now a hothouse of rumors and speculation as the paper enters what are almost certainly its last days.

So when I heard this very same rumor yesterday—about one of the P-I's internal publishing systems, CCI, not allowing stories to be scheduled after March 8, with reporter Lewis Kamb credited with the foreboding discovery—I called Kamb. When I couldn't reach him, I checked with someone else at the P-I who was sitting at a computer with CCI up and ready to go. This other P-I reporter quickly shot down the rumor, so I didn't touch it.

Seeing that this rumor has been touched by Publicola today, I just re-checked all this CCI business with my source, who e-mails:

I have CCI open in front of me right now at 11:45 on Thursday. It's not true. The default date on my computer is March 15. The default in our system is always a week or two ahead, and is constantly changing.

To be fair, the rest of this CCI-rumor-citing post cautions against believing all the early closure talk. But on the way to doing that it states as fact something that is not actually true.

Meanwhile, the union that represents P-I employees, also hearing the same rumors and concerns about a sudden early closure, sent out an e-mail on Tuesday stating that it believes the print P-I won't be shut down before March 18.

From: Newspaper Guild-CWA

Sent: Tue 3/3/2009 5:30 PM

To: XXX@XXXX.XXX

Subject: The P-I and the future of other ventures


From Guild Administrative Officer Liz Brown:

Today I spoke with Matt Lynch, the P-I's labor relations representative, about a couple of issues people have raised in recent weeks.

The first is, why don't we have a job end date or a 30-day layoff notice?

The answer to the layoff notice is that the Reduction in Force clause of the contract, which requires notice of layoff four weeks in advance, is not in effect, under the terms of the severance agreement we signed with the employer.

As to the job end date, Lynch says everyone should assume that March 18 will be the last date of publication and the last date of work for most people Remember, the WARN Act notice said the P-I would cease publication "no sooner than March 18 and no later than April 1."

The e-mail goes on to discuss other issues, but the point, as far as the current rumors are concerned, is that the union doesn't believe the P-I will (or, legally, can) shut down its print edition before March 18. Personally, I think there are probably ways to shut down the print edition earlier if Hearst so desires. But as things stand currently: the CCI rumor isn't true, and the union isn't buying all this early closure talk.

 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Wow. Could you imagine if a real newspaper reported at length on every rumor it checked out that turned out not to be true?
Posted by who cares? on March 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM
2
Try breathing into a paper bag for a while, Eli.
Posted by Yutang on March 5, 2009 at 12:27 PM
3
Meanwhile most news media are paying attention to the Billionaires Tunnel the Senate is foisting on us and the fact it was lobbied for by Paul Allen, and that no other projects in Seattle are being funded by the Obama infrastructure funds ....

Are you sure you guys aren't over in Kirkland getting high?
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 5, 2009 at 12:52 PM
4
So, even though the rumor isn't true (and I work at the P-I so I should know), you reported it anyway. Eli, you know better than that. Give it a rest!
Posted by mediaguy on March 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM
5
Dear MediaGuy: You work at the PI so you should know? No you don't. There's a tiny in-group who might know something, and they've been told not to talk to the rest of us. So don't call out Eli for reporting. He's done a fine job on our little story. And use your name if you really work at the PI. Otherwise, I'll assume you're not only pompous and misinformed but lying.
Posted by Regina Hackett on March 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM
6
The WARN act would let Hearst cease publication as long as it continued to cut the employees paychecks until 18 March, would it not?
Posted by David Wright on March 5, 2009 at 9:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy