Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Lunchtime Quickie

Posted by Kelly O on Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM

I can't tell if this is one of those classic "feel-good" segments, or just absolutely sad. Man spends over $6000 a month on cat food and donuts for his 500+ cats at Caboodle RanchWhere Cats Aren't Treated Like Animals!

Do cats really need donuts and a Walmart?

RNC Lawsuits Filed

Posted by Brendan Kiley on Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:48 AM

Journalists and protesters who felt unduly smacked around at the Republican National Convention have begun filing their lawsuits, accusing police officers of wrongful imprisonment, excessive force, intimidation, battery, and, in one case, repeatedly tasering a man without cause.

Attorney Ted Dooley filed seven suits representing eight people last week and said the chaos and police violence in St. Paul last September was "unlike anything I'd ever seen."

70bb/1236212093-2839004612_11743060e3.jpg

His clients say they were peaceably protesting/journalizing and complied with all police instructions, but were still tackled, battered, arrested, detained, shot at close range with projectiles, and/or tasered. One client, Michelle Gross, says she was singled out for a strip-search in front of several men simply to humiliate her.

Another, Michael Whalen, was hosting members of Eyewitness Video (a group that documents police behavior during protests) when his home was raided. That warrant listed, among other reasons for the raid, that Whalen had co-owned a bookstore, that he received large boxes in the mail (turned out to be vegan pamphlets), and that he "had supported Irish independence twenty years ago."

Whalen's complaint alleges that police simply wanted to "punish plaintiff for his exercise of freedom of speech and association with journalists known to document police abuses."

The St. Paul police, Dooley says, were taking "heavy suggestions" about the RNC tactics from Homeland Security and the FBI, resulting in an uncharacteristically heavy-handed approach to the protests. "There's a document that's floating around," he says, "a Homeland Security document on how to 'do' protests that was copied almost page-for-page for the RNC '08 in St. Paul." Dooley also says St. Paul had at least 106 law enforcement agencies "on tap" to come help with the protests.

Defendants in the suits include individual officers and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

"I was just talking to a guy from the New York Times," he said. He was at the Republican National Convention in New York in 2004 and said this was much, much worse."

(Relive the RNC, with preemptive raids, pepper spray, Dan goosing beauty queens and/or Anderson Cooper, the wrap-up, and a whole lotta Slog posts. Photo from Flickr.)

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Re: Just For the Record...

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Lordy, you can spend years talking about your affection for Golden Retrievers, but you mention that a matted, one-eyed dog at the pound is a mangy beast and the Golden Retriever Society of America is up your ass about it. For the record, I'm all smitten with Seattle's trend of six-story residential development. It's swell. I've had my proverbial tongue circling the proverbial butthole of six-story residential development on Slog for years. I've even defended some of the worst of it. These projects can’t have every fine detail we want and remain affordable—granite ain’t cheap and slavery is gauche. But sometimes it's needlessly hideous when something appealing could be built for the same price. And other times I write posts that are a liiiittle absurd—like ones that compare sketches of buildings to "unripe starfruit."

Just For the Record...

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:23 PM

The Stranger is generally pro six-story residential buildings. We don't like ugly ones, or proposed ones that take out a city block and then aren't built, but we did fight to raise height restrictions on Broadway.

End-Time Tea Leaves from Inside the P-I

Posted by Eli Sanders on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:25 PM

With Hearst still being quiet and cryptic about the official last day for the printed Seattle Post-Intelligencer, reporters at the paper are resorting to reading tea leaves and hoping that after two months of anxiety the end will at least be swift. One P-I staffer, in an e-mail to me today, wrote:

If you want to characterize the feeling around here, it's 'Put us out of our misery already.'

Two other staffers told me that the deadline for special stories that will run in the last print edition has been moved up to this Friday. That, plus another visit this week from Ken Riddick, Hearst's vice president for digital media, and a planned visit next week by some Hearst new-media types ("to look at our equipment," said one P-I reporter) has people inside the P-I headquarters wondering if the end is coming sooner than March 18, the date that many have fixated on in the absence of a clear timeline from Hearst.

However, with Denver's Rocky Mountain News having been shuttered with only one-day's notice last week by the E.W. Scripps Company, it could be that those deadline-changing P-I editors just want to be on the safe side.

P-I writer Mike Lewis, who's working on one of the last-edition articles, confirmed that his deadline was recently moved up but cautioned: “Either someone knows something, or someone is just worried about something and they want to be able to have a decent final paper."

He added: "I think that after 137 years, having a decent final paper is something worth placing a value on.”

Review: Killzone 2

Posted by Sam Machkovech on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:12 PM

I'm typically a tyrant about big-ticket rehash video games—hyped sequels, tried-and-true formulas that stay the course—but a lot of people assume that's what all video games are, anyway, and virtual comfort food has its merits. March sees the release of a few big games like this, and I'll post looks at Street Fighter IV and Halo Wars in the next couple of days. For now, let's look at the latest PlayStation 3 game to desensitize us into murdering dudes with bloodshot eyes.

f5cd/1236218561-killzone2.jpg

In Killzone 2, you're running and gunning in first-person, combining the hefty, “realistic” control of Call of Duty with sci-fi macho-man nonsense—if Gears of War were darker and even more generic, I guess. Bunch of guys in weird helmets hate humans, but they're pretty human-like, and someone is ordering you to kill them, even though the person giving those orders might be one of the bad guys. And yet, no sign of Keanu Reeves. Whatever.

Even though the game's plot targets Red Bull-drinking man-children, I really want to like Killzone 2's basic experience, or at least its attempts to refine squad-based killin' games. KZ2 makes you feel like you're running around real, war-torn environments, rather than blatant “go-this-way” corridors in most other games. It has a notable variety of routes and vertical sprawl to kill off that feeling of running from point A to point B. Its squads of enemies are generally tactical and intelligently aware of what you're doing. And, on top of art direction that does “gritty” without looking like mud, the game's tech is pretty top-notch, though the impressive bits are usually more subtle things like smokescreens. Those shits are hard to code.

But they make it way too tedious to kill in a zone that is advertised for its killing. Nitpick time: First-person control with a gamepad already feels awkward enough, but KZ2's joysticks suffer from a massive “dead zone”—unlike similar games, you have to push these sticks a third of the way before aiming begins. Combine that with a super-slow aim speed and a bizarre delay on recognizing your joystick taps, and good luck lining up a clean shot on a bunch of uber-tactical freak enemies. Also, if you want to duck behind something and fire, you have to perform a goddamned ritual: first, hold down a shoulder trigger button to crouch. Then, hold upward on the left joystick to peek from cover. Then, click down on the right joystick to steady your aim. Afterward, jump five times on a DDR pad. Can't the game automate this? If a dude with glowing eyes is coming at me with a rifle and I'm standing behind a barrel or a big rock, why wouldn't my default decision be to hide my fucking heart behind it?

Online killin' fares better, at least. The eight online levels are just as massive and memorable, feeling like natural environments and making the most of vertical space. The CoD-style unlock system tilts a little more to the hardcore, forcing lots of work for new abilities and weapons, but even my impatient ass found it fun to work my way up its ladder. Most online fights revolve around a rotating objective system that is light years more fun than what Resistance 2 attempted. As far as controls, online-only games nix the crappy duck-and-cover mechanic, and while the joystick still sucks, at least everybody else is suffering from the same thing.

But I can't soundly approve KZ2 online, either. I hopped into games with a certain bald nerd on Monday night, and he went into great detail this morning about how much of a pain it was to join an online game together. The short version: It took us 30 minutes to trick KZ2 into letting us kill on the same team, and that was after we'd already gone through the effort of starting an in-game “clan.” Ugh. Still feel unclean. Oh, and those in-game crashes he bitched about are no joke.

I refuse to play this game's single-player mode again—the aim issues made me break my “don't play games that make you angry” rule too many times—but I might go back online when Sony gets around to fixing it.

March of the Six-Story Residential Buildings

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Defying the laws of economics as we know them, developers proceed with—and even introduce new—plans to build around Seattle. The designs are more humble. They are apartments and not the luxury condos that we saw a few years ago. And, my, are they ever attractive. Look at this masterpiece proposed on 13th Avenue and East Pine Street that really says "welcome home."

faf6/1236215742-13th_and_pine.jpg

What a glorious example of everything architecture aspires to be. I'm ready for more.

Here's one of the latest drawings for the building slated to replace B & O Espresso on East Olive Way. I can't tell you how much I like it. But I go into some detail over here.

62c8/1236215794-b___o_building.jpg

And finally—moving quickly now, sweetie—a rough proposal for a new building on lower Queen Anne. This is the old QFC site.

2e30/1236215766-100_republican.jpg

Like an unripe starfruit, we cannot yet feast our eyes in the sweetness of the finished design. End snark.

All three buildings are up for design review tonight. Information about the meetings, in their respective order above, are here, here, and here.

Color Me Pinko

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:09 PM

Moby Lives points us to this story, from the conservative Boston Herald, of a Mainer who is selling a Noam Chomsky coloring book for five bucks.

"I have all these photographs of Chomsky. I hoped to someday publish them in a photo book," said Leisner.

In the meantime, however, he found an application in which the color is drained from photos to leave a coloring-book look. He circulated the coloring books among like-minded thinkers and got a positive response.

Next on the list will be a coloring book featuring [Howard] Zinn, a decorated World War II veteran whose views turned radical as he observed the civil rights struggle and Vietnam War while a college professor.

Later, Leisner said he may do a Noam Chomsky comic book, featuring quotes from various talks over the years.

I love the comments on the story:

Libralism is a mental disorder. This is like encouraging kids to continue to believe in Santa, unicorns and the tooth fairy beyond 8-9 years old.

and especially:

Cool! Color in Bill Ayers setting a bomb! And Che executing dissenters. What color was Mao's Little Red Book? Whoops, answered my own question!

5th Avenue's New Season

Posted by Brendan Kiley on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM

They just announced the lineup. Notable:

Bart Sher's Tony-magnet production of South Pacific, a world premiere of Catch Me if You Can, and Leonard Bernstein's Candide, with its cinematic-overture-to-end-all-cinematic-overtures:


Candide's contributing-writer list has to be the most distinguished in the history of musical theater: Richard Wilbur, John Latouche, Dorothy Parker, Lillian Hellman, Stephen Sondheim, and Leonard Bernstein.

The other, not-quite-as-exciting shows: Legally Blond: the Musical, Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, Irving Berlin's White Christmas, and On the Town, another one by Bernstein (inspired by Fancy Free, the jazzy ballet about rambunctious boys by Jerome Robbins).

Some love for Robbins and a review of Fancy Free, at Pacific Northwest Ballet last summer, is here.

And a loving, illuminating remembrance of Bernstein, by Alex Ross, is here.

Dear Jill Pellettieri at Slate:

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Did you really need 700 words to tell the world that you don't like reusing your fucking hotel sheets?

(And before you commenters start calling me an ecofascist, let me note that the commenters at Slate agree with me.)

Seattle Police Shut Down Speakeasy In Maple Leaf

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Seattle Police have shut down an underground bar and blues club being run out of a house in Maple Leaf.

On February 28th, Police stopped by a house in the 7600 block of 5th ave NE after receiving reports about an unlicensed bar. According to a police report, officers found a group of about 25 men and women drinking. "The group was well behaved and none displayed signs of obvious intoxication," the report says.

Police contacted a 20-year-old man who was pouring drinks and asked him if he was running the operation for profit. The man told police he'd been running the bar for a few months with his roommates but was only doing it so he could practice his bartending skills.

"It wasn’t really about the money at all," says 20-year-old Nick. "People would donate their own liquor. Adults would bring their own liquor and I would make drinks."

Nick says he's been fascinated by bartending ever since he worked as a server at the Spaghetti Factory a few years ago and began pouring drinks at house parties in January, which often featured live blues bands or DJs spinning old blues albums on vinyl. It’s not something where I’m trying to get people wasted or get minors drunk," Nick says, adding that his specialty drink is the Bluesnick, a mixture of dark rum, pineapple, cranberry and grapefruit juices with a splash of 151.

Following the police bust, officers made Nick pour out 12 bottles of liquor but he says he hasn't received notification about any charges. "I’m an eagle scout, I’m not trying to do anything wrong," Nick says. "[The officers] said the court just might drop it, which is what I’m hoping for."

According to Washington State Liquor Control spokeswoman Anne Radford, the penalty for selling liquor without a license is $5,000 fine and/or a year in jail.

Woman Calls Police 500 Times Over Neighbours Nightclub

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:19 PM

From the department of “man bites dog,” we bring you the story of a woman apparently using excessive force on police. She has called 911 “once or twice every night” for the past 21 months to complain about noise coming from Neighbours, a gay dance club that has operated on Broadway since the early 1980s. Her calls began in June 2007, when she moved into a low-income, partially subsidized apartment building at East Pine Street and Broadway, on the same block as the dance club. The most recent complaint on record, made at 2 a.m. last Friday night, summoned the police.

The responding officer notes in a report that the woman “calls nightly to complain about music from this club…. She is the only person who calls to complain. She has told officers in the past that she wants to close this club down and will call as many times as it takes to accomplish this.”

The woman, a 56-year-old retired nurse who asked not to be named, denies that she is trying to shut down the club. “I would call the police once or twice every night,” she confirms, sitting in her one-bedroom apartment, which looks south onto the roof of Neighbours and toward First Hill. It smells strongly of her two medium-sized dogs. “I’m an old rock ‘n roll queen from way back when, and if it was just music I was hearing, it would be fine,” she says. “But what we hear is bass and bass only. And it has been so loud in the past that the windows rattle.” She says drunken throngs in the alley are also noisy.

As a solution, the woman proposes that Neighbours close by 2 a.m. (the dance club is open until 3 a.m. on Thursdays and until 4 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays). She also thinks club security should usher people in the alley down to Pike Street, away from her building.

The woman acknowledges that police resources are limited, but says that police asked her to call 911 to deal with "noise, prostitutions or drug dealing," she says.

John Kmetz, who has managed Neighbours’ sound and lighting system for the past 15 years, says that the club tried to address noise concerns in mid-January by installing sound insulation on the ceiling, covering skylights, and capping the sound system’s volume. “This place has been here for 27 years and she just moved in here,” he says. “I think she shouldn’t be complaining."

“Clearly the noise ordinance is not in effect or else the city would be fining Neighbours $1000 a week,” the woman says.

But the city noise ordinance, which passed in December 2007, only penalizes bars and clubs amplifying noise that is "plainly audible" from inside nearby buildings. However, the police report from last Friday says, “There was not enough noise coming from the club for a violation.” The officer adds: “I could faintly hear the sound of music coming from far off but I could not determine if it was coming from the club. Passing vehicular and pedestrian traffic was much louder.”

Lashunda Perez, a resident of the building, says, “When I moved in, they told me that it gets loud on the weekends. It’s not very disturbing to me.”

For the Ladies

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM

venus_perennial.jpg

I love it when a blog has a mission. Erotica Cover Watch is a blog written by a lady who can't believe that 99% of all erotica book covers—even the covers intended for straight women—strictly feature women.

In erotica, as we know, because straight men are potential consumers they become the only consumers. And because straight men are (apparently) terrified of seeing cock - or let’s face it a man’s arm - the men on erotica covers get hidden behind doors.

Apparently, they've only found two all-men covers. This post is all about how she can't even identify the part of a man on the cover at left. Maybe one day this blog won't be necessary. Until then, she'll show dirty photos of men on Man-Candy Mondays. Keep up the good fight.

What Do These Five Things Have in Common? Part III

Posted by Christopher Frizzelle on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:57 PM

6a15/1236210616-018_heizer.jpg

2ba6/1236210639-021_webb.jpg

fde6/1236210676-012_dion.jpg

3156/1236210701-013_bruch.jpg

ed2a/1236210735-07_krafft.jpg

The same thing that these things and these things have in common: they are, according to Jen Graves, among the 25 greatest works of art ever made in Seattle. The full list is here. Making a list like this is an impossible task; everyone's list is bound to be different. To see alternate lists by nine members of Seattle's art establishment—curators, museum directors, historians, art dealers—click here.

Paul Constant Watches the Watchmen

Posted by Lindy West on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM

8c82/1236210117-watchmen.jpg

It just went up today, and there's already a little argument brewing about Paul Constant's review of Watchmen.

From the review:

Watchmen made it impossible for almost anyone to write a great superhero comic book for nearly two decades afterward. Using clever satire and well-placed logic, it deconstructed the superhero genre in such a profound way that the best writers are just starting to shake off Watchmen's influence now. For this to be a truly great adaptation, it would have to render every other superhero movie silly and small in comparison. It decidedly does not.

And in the comments:

I completely disagree Paul. I have not read the comic, so as a regular viewer I felt that the movie ran at a pretty deep level throughout. The audience seemed to be completely enthralled for the whole movie, and the dialogue (some which was directly quoted from the comic, I was told) was great.

This review isn't going to change the fact that I am going to see the movie and more then likely love it. When one doesn't fit with the other can't you just take them seperately?

Paul, your film review fails because you fault it for being a movie and not a comic. This is the trick of reviewing an adaptation, and I was hoping for a review of the movie. *sigh*

Jump in here.

Re: Carving Up the P-I Carcass

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:33 PM

About the non-profit, community-supported model for some resurrected chunk of the P-I, KK asks in comments:

I don't understand. If Pro Publica and crosscut.com already exist but are struggling, how is this going to work? What is it exactly that are they going to do differently?

I've been wondering the same thing.

Maybe This Year Washington State Will Get Out of the Business of Promoting Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Unplanned Pregnancies and Unprotected Anal Sex Among High School Students

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:22 PM

And it's about time.

The Washington Senate approved a measure Wednesday to end the requirement that the state Department of Health apply for abstinence-only sex education grants.... The measure allows the state to apply for sex education grants for programs that are medically and scientifically accurate, which can include programs advocating abstinence, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and the prevention of unintended pregnancies.

The state Senate approved the same bill last year, but the state House killed it—because, um, last year's Democratic super majority in the House supported sex education that wasn't medically and scientifically accurate. Here's hoping this year's Democratic super majority backs medically accurate, scientifically sound, and comprehensive sex ed that includes information about abstinence. But abstinence-only sex education has to go.

Campaign Finance Update

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:17 PM

This year's crowded city council races are expected to get more crowded still. What that means—in a year when donors aren't giving to city races, or are giving less, because of the economy—is that most of the money that is out there is going to go to just a few people, leaving the remaining candidates to pick up the crumbs.

It's early yet, so this isn't gospel, but the candidates I expect to see raise serious cash—based on their name recognition, endorsements, and fundraising so far—are attorney Sally Bagshaw, son-of-Charley Jordan Royer, low-income advocate/organizer David Bloom, and Sierra Club leader Mike O'Brien. Bagshaw and Royer have both been in and around city politics for a long time; Bloom will be able to muster support from the Nick Licata crowd (much more so, obviously, if Licata changes his mind and decides not to run for reelection), and O'Brien is a powerhouse of the environmental community. All have shown an ability to raise a lot of money quickly, and all—save Royer and Bagshaw, who are running for different seats—are pulling on very different funding pools.

For example, digging into the campaign-finance reports and endorsement lists, Bagshaw's contributors (she's raised $6,300) and endorsers include a lot of old-school Seattle politico types — folks like former Seattle mayor Wes Uhlman (who maxed out at $700), former city council member Sue Donaldson (who gave $200) and numerous current elected officials, including County Council members Dow Constantine and Julia Patterson and state representatives Scott White and Jamie Pedersen. In contrast, Bloom's list (he's raised $16,836) includes housing and social-justice types like community activist Cindy Domingo (who gave $100), Bloom's Seattle Displacement Coalition co-founder, John Fox ($150), longtime downtown social worker Joe Martin ($200), former Seattle HUD director Bob Santos ($200) and Trinity United Methodist Church pastor and Tent City advocate Rich Lang ($250). Meanwhile, although O'Brien's list of financial supporters remains brief, it includes Northwest Energy Coalition director Sara Patton ($100) and Vulcan VP Chris Purcell ($375). And Royer's, like Bagshaw's, (he's raised $8,190) includes old-Seattle political types like former mayor Paul Schell ($200), ex-City Light chief Gary Zarker ($150), and, of course, Royer's father ($700). Of those four, Bagshaw's the only one in the red, with a deficit of about $15,000.

Of course, it's way too early to count anyone out. James Donaldson—whose campaign name, "TEAM Donaldson," stands for "Together Each Achieves More"—has pulled in $14,000 for his campaign for either city council or mayor, much of it from companies like Port Blakely Tree Farms, Windermere Real Estate, and insurance company Tyrisco, Inc. However, he's spent more than that, leaving him with a $1,000 deficit. Jessie Israel—one of only two women, including Bagshaw, running for council so far—has pulled in just over $6,400, with about $1,000 on hand. The remaining candidates, excepting incumbents, have all raised less than $5,000—except for third-time candidate Robert Rosencrantz, who gave himself $10,000 but is nearly $20,000 in the hole, thanks in part to a $5,000 (!) expenditure to speech coach Michael Shadow.

The next batch of campaign finance reports come out March 10.

Carving up the P-I Carcass

Posted by Eli Sanders on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM

Following up on our Slog discussion yesterday about the so-called Packers Model for "saving" the P-I (start here and follow the links backward), Sandeep Kaushik points toward an idea that he thinks has a better chance of working.

It's an idea that I've heard rumblings about, too, but one that he beat me to confirming:

Several higher-ups at the P-I are in the “formative stages” of creating a non-profit news entity, primarily focused on investigative journalism covering the Western states, which would be funded by foundations and other major donors.

The model for such a site is Pro Publica, which bills itself as “an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest.” Pro Publica, which began publishing last June, is led by Paul Steiger, a former managing editor of the Wall Street Journal, and is largely funded by grants from several major foundations. The site produces investigative reports for its own web site, and those pieces are also shopped around to print newspapers and magazines...

The effort, if it gets off the ground, would provide a landing place for most of the P-I’s investigative reporters, such as double-Pulitzer Prize winners Eric Nalder and Andy Schneider, and could include high-profile P-I columnists like Joel Connelly. McCumber cautioned that it was too early to tell who might write for such a venture, but added that the site, if it moves forward, will likely include both narrative and investigative voices, including some not currently on the P-I staff.

This fits with the broader picture that I'm seeing. The discussion shouldn't be so much about "saving" the P-I or not saving the P-I. Fact is, the P-I as people know and remember it is done. For good. Completely finished.

The discussion should instead be rooted in what is actually about to happen, which is the carving up of the carcass of a fallen dinosaur.

Hearst is likely to take the brand name, the web address, and a few smart and cheap staffers (and maybe some more expensive staffers with recognizable names, too) and launch a new, experimental incarnation of the P-I's web site. Certain other P-I staffers, led by Kery Murakami, seem likely to take their experience and abilities and try to make a run at some sort of community-funded online journalism enterprise, perhaps based on the Packers Model. And still other
P-I staffers—the heavyweights on the investigative team plus certain journalistic stars—are working on launching yet another online-only venture based on the Pro Publica model.

Broadly speaking: the young and the web savvy will go one way, the mid-career and Pulitzer-less will go another way, the journalistic stars will go a third way, many others will simply go into new careers or extended unemployment, and in the end, nothing will be left but a spinning globe above the bones of a rented office space with an exceptionally nice view.

Tomorrow's Showdown in California

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM

The California Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow before deciding what to do about Prop 8—declare it unconstitutional and toss the results of the November vote?—and then deciding what to do about the 18,000 same-sex couples who married in California before Prop 8 was approved. Let 'em stay married? Divorce 'em en masse? The court will have 90 days to issue a ruling, but the LA Times reports that the decision could come as soon as tomorrow afternoon. Both houses of the California state legislature have passed resolutions calling on the court to toss Prop 8—as the court has done in the past:

[State Sen. Mark] Leno compared passage of Proposition 8 with public reaction in 1964 to a new state fair-housing law. Voters tried to reverse the law by approving an initiative that gave people a right to discriminate against racial minorities when renting or selling a home.

The state Supreme Court in 1966 struck down the initiative, which had been endorsed by aspiring gubernatorial candidate Ronald Reagan.

Yes, the court would be overturning the will of the people if it struck down Prop 8--but sometimes the people are wrong, as was the case in 1966, and the courts are there in part to protect the rights of minorities from the "will of the people." The Bill of Rights was crafted to prevent majorities from ruling in all cases. And majorities in the United States once willed that women be denied the vote and that interracial marriage be banned and that blacks were property and that the Japanese should be interned for the duration of WWII and on and on. When it comes to minority rights majorities of Americans have been wrong about so much that a greater degree of scrutiny should fall on any policy that enjoys majority support in this country.

The hearing starts tomorrow at 9 AM and goes to noon. It'll be streamed live here.

Modern Toilet

Posted by Bethany Jean Clement on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:29 PM

Truly in the vast pageant that is modern life, there is something for everyone, including a restaurant for those who would like to eat food out of a toilet while sitting on a toilet.

dbc5/1236205807-2197464360_f55bc2806a.jpg

Slog tipper Suzanne: Thanks for sharing.

Photo by Kevin Lau from flickr.

UPDATE: Gold Star Comment obviously goes to the very first commenter, Vince:

And for dessert, urinal cakes all around!

Building Peace

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Hillary, do not waste your time with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The solutions to the problem can not be found in diplomacy but in architecture.
95d8/1236198887-bridge-building.jpg

Architecture student Viktor Ramos has a brilliant idea that may be the key to the Israel-Palestinian Gordian Knot: Instead of building grim walls or tunnels, create livable bridges so two states can live together, superposed.

Even the sheep appear to be happy with this fantastic solution.

Who Reads the Watchmen?

Posted by Jonathan Golob on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM

watchmen.jpg
I just did, finishing the entire novel last night. As reputed, it's a masterpiece. I wish I had read it in childhood, at the height of the Cold War, when it was written.

One line particularly resonated with me, distilling a premise down to a phrase suitable for the motto of the (then and also now) Republican party: "God [is] real and he's American." Watchmen is just as sharp a critique of neo-conservatism, the Palins, McCains, Limbaughs and Ws of the world, as it is of Reaganism and Thatcherism.

In my mind, this fictional story settles comfortably next to RFK's non-fiction memoir Thirteen Days, dark and light visions of the same nihilistic Cold War era. The fiction required humanity's salvation, at atrocious cost, from outside super beings (or humans who anoint themselves as super beings); the non-fiction, the peaceful resolution of the promised horror in the chop of the Caribbean sea, demonstrates salvation from within.

1736/1236200527-cubanmissilecrisis.jpg

Swirling close to the surface of the novel, for me, was the insanity of mutually assured destruction.

The idea is a game. If both sides cooperate, we both win a little. If both defect, we all lose everything. The insanity comes from assigning value when one side defects while the other cooperates.

Is it really desirable for one side, our side, to successfully annihilate the other? What would victory, in the context of large-scale nuclear war against the Soviet Union mean? What would victory in Vietnam—a continued fever dream of American conservatism to this day--look like? The novel explicitly depicts the last, with it the implicit destruction of the Vietnamese people by our private, American, God.

Watchmen is less dated, in our post-Cold War era, than it should be. The ideas explored within are equally applicable to our present predicaments: What would victory in Iraq have looked like? What if the neoconservatives were correct? What would such a world look and feel like? How would the meaning of liberty and freedom change if we could successfully make the Iraqi's love us by pointing a gun?

With this load to bear, the movie cannot help but be terrible. I'll watch it anyways.

The Real Palin

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Remember this?

a22b/1236200247-apalin.jpg

Well, here is the real person.

726e/1236200450-mudede11.jpg
She's about the same age as Palin.

Millions of Reasons to Decriminalize Marijuana

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM

The state is spending a whopping $16,008,360 a year prosecuting and jailing people for possession of marijuana for personal use, according a new report by the ACLU of Washington. The figure is based on a fiscal note, released last week by the Washington State Office of Financial Management, regarding a bill in the state senate to decriminalize marijuana. Over 11,000 people were arrested for pot possession in Washington in 2007.

The bill, which would reduce the penalty for possessing 40 grams or less of pot to a $100 infraction, would also generate $973,600 of revenue for the state and direct $590,000 into a criminal justice treatment account.

When the bill was introduced in January, the ACLU of Washington, which is supporting the bill, conservatively estimated that the states spends $7.5 million on enforcing pot possession crimes. Sponsored by Jeanne Kohl Welles (D-36), the bill is currently in the rules committee. I'm waiting to hear back from Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown (D-3), who sits on the rules committee, to find out if and when the bill will be passed on to the senate floor. It has until March 12 to be voted out of the senate.

@SEAshows

The Stranger's Twitter Feed of Seattle Shows
  • Loading Tweets
    loading

Follow @SEAshows
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use