Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Today in Alleged Cultural Appropriation

Posted by David Schmader on Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM

First, this submission to I, Anonymous:

Dear group of Grey hipsters + girl: I heard you loudly congratulating yourselves for having been to the Wild Rose, and even liking it (except for your lady friend, who doesn't want "them" hitting on her). Most of us don't even really like the Rose, but you know what? THAT IS OUR ONE BAR. We have ONE. You have approximately one billion places to sit around and talk about how much better Portland is than Seattle, how much you wish you could have babies with your fixed-gear, or whatever it is you talk about when you're not laying claim to the few places that people go specifically to not see scraggly beards or otherwise smug white indie dudes. Your love of Taco Tuesdays doesn't show you're down with lesbians. It's called cultural appropriation. Please get back on your bike, and go back to Linda's.

Then, this fat, hairy, bewanged-and-bodystockinged spin on this (mildly NSFW) image, shot by Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair, which I could not love more.

f9f9/1236121145-6a00d8341c730253ef011168a3ea92970c-800wi.jpg

Back in the Clueless days, I wanted to be Alicia Silverstone so I could slow-dance with Paul Rudd. Now, I want to be Paul Rudd, so I could nuzzle a leotarded Seth Rogen, the world's dreamiest Canadian Jew. (Thanks to Towleroad for the pic.)

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (35) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
http://jezebel.com/5163547/other-ladies-…

which I could not love less. Interesting discussion of the photo in above link.
Posted by ldl on March 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
2
Ugh, that's a terrible picture.

If they'd actually gone naked, I'd have some respect for it. As it is, it comes across as stupid and chickenshit.
Posted by Robin Sparkles on March 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM
3
I want Paul Rudd to nuzzle me for the rest of eternity.
Posted by Jessica on March 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM
4
oh waa, There aren't any Black, Mexican or straight women suffrage bars neither. its called integration get over it.

Your here, your queer, your whining.
Posted by meanie on March 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
5
What's a "Grey" hipster? Is that like a "silver fox?" And, if so, do they usually travel in packs?

Also, Seth Rogan, I agree, very cute, but the dreamier Paul Rudd can nuzzle me any day...
Posted by boxofbirds on March 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
6
@1 hmmm... i didn't see the shot as the boys mocking the girls, but rather mocking the expectations. you see the guys, and think, that's silly, people shouldn't pose like that. then you see the original, and say, ah yes, people shouldn't have to pose like that. the fact that they aren't naked is what leads me to believe they aren't mocking the women specifically. the suits seem so fake and obvious. maybe i'm wrong about this, though.
Posted by infrequent on March 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM
7
ehm, what are "grey hipsters" ? is that a reference to age?
Posted by I really don't know... on March 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM
8
grey is a bar/artspace on 11th. i'm not sure it's a place where the hipsters hang out, though. unless we are defining the belltown and bridge&tunnel crowd as hipsters now.

though, i should add, everyone i've encountered at grey has always been very friendly to me. seems like a decent place, and i'm not sure why that was included as an adjective to modify the tired "hipster" insult. i'm left understand both words, in context, and still not knowing what sort of person they are actually referring to. usually hipsters - love them or hate them - are fine with all sexual orientations.
Posted by infrequent on March 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM
9
@6
I think the point would have been made better had they also been naked. As one of the comments said, and I agree, if you're going mock something, go all the way (full monty!)
Posted by ldl on March 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM
10
@2 for the Canadian win.

Seriously, show some guts.

Literally.
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM
11
@5, 7, 8

OHHHHH, wait now I get it. This person overheard these people while she was at Grey, hence the term "Grey hipsters." What she meant was "hipsters at Grey."

Posted by boxofbirds on March 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM
12
See I really want to go to the Rose more often because I love hanging with lesbians and their food is delish! But we don't because we don't have a lesbian to escort us bearded gay boys in there. We've even thought of taking out a craigslist ad that goes something like: "Two gay bears seek lovely lesbian to escort us to the Wild Rose so that we can eat their food. We will buy you beer and provide sparkling conversation. PLEASE LET US EAT at THE ROSE."

(is being totally serious)
Posted by zephsright on March 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM
13
Can we please steer the conversation towards the insufferably cunty patrons of the Wild Rose?
Posted by w7ngman on March 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM
14
Jesus Christ. And dykes wonder why they have a reputation for being bitchy.
Posted by D. Workin on March 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM
15
@4 "its [sic] called integration get over it."

Tell me what you know about struggle.
Posted by Hipster Please on March 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM
16
Should have gone naked. With that pose, the only one whose junk would be visible is Jason Segel, and he flashed his junk in Forgetting Sarah Marshall anyway.

Also, Seth Rogen is adorable, but Paul Rudd is fucking hot.
Posted by T on March 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM
17
I'd rather be Seth Rogan. Getting nuzzled by Paul Rudd, and a naked Jason Segel. Mainly Jason Segel. RAWR.
Posted by TheMisanthrope on March 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM
18
I don't recall having any problems with the service at the Wildrose when we went there a month or so ago.
Posted by Greg on March 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM
19
I will be escorting anyone who wants food to the Wild Rose, drinking the beer paid for by my friendly 'scorts, then going to Grey and hitting on every girl there. Then home to snuggle with Seth and Paul.

BEST TUESDAY EVER.
Posted by tacolover on March 3, 2009 at 4:26 PM
20
The photo would be better with just Rudd, Rogen, and Segel. First, those three are hot, cute, and adorable. Second, the staging would simply be better and would more closely mimic the Ford, Johanssen, Knightley photo.
Posted by keshmeshi on March 3, 2009 at 4:29 PM
21
I'm surprised there are bars that want to turn away patrons ... it's not like this is their most profitable year ...
Posted by Will in Seattle on March 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM
22
Dear David,

1)Too many topics in one post! Ai yi yi!
2)The boys wimped out, (also, Leibovitz/Vanity Fair) They should be nude.
3)Shouldn't that be, Thanks VANITY FAIR? You might have saw it on Towleroad, but it's Vanity Fair's picture...

Posted by michael strangeways on March 3, 2009 at 4:36 PM
23
Jesus, Jonah Hill looks exactly like a young Chris Penn.

Paul Rudd remains ageless as ever. I aspire to his eternal boyish looks.
Posted by laterite on March 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM
24
I kinda like the one in front. Yeah, I'm a bit of a chaser. Fuck you if you think that's weird.
Posted by Chris down in The Couv on March 3, 2009 at 4:55 PM
25
Hipster hatred is so over, me saying it is over is even more over.
Posted by Josh on March 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM
26
The point here is being missed. Regardless if they're hipsters or straight girls out for their Bachelorette Party, the Rose is one of a handful of places where queer women can go and be just that, queer women who love other queer women.

As the Hill becomes more and more 'straight', it's important that at least some queer-safe spaces are retained, and specifically, women safe spaces. I can't even count the number of times I've gone out to R Place and seen more heterosexual couples than queer folks.

It's not that we don't like you- just let us have our damn space!

@12-- I know I sound angry, but I'm really not and I'd totally respond to your CL ad! do it!!
Posted by Not that angry on March 3, 2009 at 6:13 PM
27
BEACHED WHALES!!!
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on March 3, 2009 at 6:35 PM
28
I like the rose! dykes are aaaaalways trash talkin it.
Posted by kt on March 3, 2009 at 6:39 PM
29
Seth Rogen is sooooo dreamy. He was awesome in Freaks and Geeks.
Posted by orly? on March 3, 2009 at 9:43 PM
30
I think the "safe space" comment is particularly valid because this group went there, but then the heterosexual woman in the group expects and loathes getting hit on by the patrons. I mean, I guess it is also a valid concern for homogeneity to create a safe space and commercial venues are the new public arenas (Not literally, but for all practical purposes, especially in North America, jesus).

So, um, people who are non-queer women, you can come but show so damn respect, and maybe we won't publicly shame you for being an ass elsewhere. Asshat!
Posted by c.d. on March 3, 2009 at 9:59 PM
31
errr, I don't know what you all are on about with the "they should be naked", isn't the whole point of the satire of the picture that they are in flesh stockings? Making fun of the nude-but-not showing anything leibovitz style...

And word to the safe spaces comments. And to anyone who might claim that it's still a safe space with a substantial number of non-queers in it, one of the most important aspects of a safe space is what @26 says, being able to go and just be queer, i.e. be comfortable in hitting on the people around you because you can assume they are queer too.
Posted by Alex Bernson on March 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM
32
this is exactly why there is only one lesbian bar in seattle - being mean to allies is bad for the community and bad for business. as a queer woman, i feel welcome in every gay-boy bar on the hill, even the eagle! get over yourselves hipster dykes.
Posted by fedup on March 4, 2009 at 8:56 AM
33
@31: But in the original, the women ARE nude. How is it making fun of Leibowitz's style to put the men in body stockings for this parody? That makes no sense. It's just a cop-out.
Posted by Propaniac on March 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM
34
@33: Wait, you know Leibovitz did the original with the nude women as well as this new one with the non-nude men, right?
Posted by Propaniac on March 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM
35
Okay. So now I've gone back and looked at the orginal cover from 2006. Is Annie Leibovitz losing her touch? How does she make Scarlett Johansson - NAKED Scarlett Johansson - look pasty and not that attractive? That is a serious problem.

Then the spoof shot. The composition is bad. What happened to the edges? Surely Vanity Fair can afford to buy a bigger backdrop. There's also that orphan foot in the bottom right corner of the frame. The addition of Jason Segel makes the arrangement of the figures awkward. I feel like with those lights and those models, I could take a better picture than that one.
Posted by Greg on March 4, 2009 at 10:35 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use