Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Re: The Packers Model

Posted by on Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM

4d39/1236116053-pi_shirt.jpgLast week I posted about the so-called "Packers Model" for potentially funding a new online news site, made up of former Seattle Post-Intelligencer staffers, after the near-certain death of the P-I's print edition later this month.

For what it's worth, an online poll of about 500 Slog readers found that most respondents would indeed pay to help fund, Packers-style, a community-owned, online-only P-I. (Or a community-owned competitor to a new Hearst-run, online-only P-I in the likely event that Hearst launches such a project after it closes the print edition.)

At the No News is Bad News forum at City Hall last Thursday there was further explanation of how this "Packers Model" might work, and now comes a wetpaint page devoted to thinking through a business plan for a "Seattle Post-Post-Intelligencer."

Skeptics and start-up savants: check it out. I'd love to know what you think of the plan-in-progress, and it sounds like the planners would too. Here's part of the thinking:

We are a group of P-I journalists. Our goal is to allow P-I reporters to continue serving Seattle as watchdogs and informing the public on such key issues as city politics, helping people navigate the current economic crisis, the environment, and education. Additionally, we intend to continue the work of recognizable writers as Robert Jamieson, Mike Lewis, Art Thiel, and many others.

In this economic climate, we believe our role to “comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable” has never been as important, and we intend to use lessons learned by a generation of community bloggers in expanding the idea of the work done by professional journalists.

Should the Seattle Post-Intelligencer close, we intend to begin a news website to fill the void left in our community. We hope that the Hearst Corporation will start a online-only P-I that performs the important role the newspaper has played in this community, but we stand ready to continue our work for the public interest.

We are currently seeking start-up funding, but are planning to start the site anyway and look for funding as we go along.

We would immediately ask the community what sort of journalism it wants in Seattle, and to support it initially through donations to our non-profit entity, the Seattle PostGlobe. In the interim, at least 20 journalists are prepared to work as a volunteers until funding is raised.

Let us know what you think of this plan. We intend to start raising money at launch to begin paying our journalists as soon as possible. We're betting that this community will want to keep us doing the work we do. Please email us at seattlepostglobe@yahoo.com with your pledges of any size, so we can get an idea of the support we can expect to receive. Please consider pledging the $250 many of you already are paying to subscribe to the paper.

Their math:

The P-I currently has 129,563 daily subscribers who pay $234 a year. Should the same number of people—whether or not they currently subscribe to the P-I—donate the cost of a subscription, annual revenue would be $30.3 million.

Illustration by Andrew Saeger

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I doubt that every daily P-I subscriber pays the full subscription price.
Posted by DOUG. on March 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM
2
Why would this work for the PI when it has not worked almost anywhere else? Even the mighty NY Times had to drop their Select service. The Wall Street Journal is the only major daily that comes to mind that actually has paying subscribers--and that's for a paper that has a narrow audience and produces news that isn't as easy to get for free elsewhere.
Posted by Westside forever on March 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM
3
I can't help but think if we try to support two newspapers in this town much longer, even if one is print and the other only online, we're going to end up with NO newspapers in this town. And that's not good for any of us.
Posted by Jane on March 3, 2009 at 2:18 PM
4
HUH? Do the folks at the PI really believe they and they alone stand between Seattle and that awful place where there are no daily newspapers? The Seattle Times comes to mind -- Sorry PI but you're not the only kids on the block. You may not like Blethen all that much --but the people on the Seattle Times staff --many once worked for the PI-- will do everything the PI did. And, yeah, just as well. And some of the PI reporters might even go work for it... And hey --maybe with one paper--there may even be enough revenue that it will survive
Posted by sreader on March 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM
5
Sorry, the Seattle Times doesn't count as a Seattle newspaper. Evidence: George W. Bush and Dino Rossi endorsements. You're better off getting Seattle news from the Spokane Spokesman-Review.
Posted by lizzie on March 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM
6
Oh please, lizzie. Just because the editorial board endorses idiots doesn't mean the reporters (or the news they write about) are worthless. That's just plain stupid.
Posted by Jane on March 3, 2009 at 2:50 PM
7
Editors can take the truth out of the best investigative reporting.
Posted by Amelia on March 3, 2009 at 4:26 PM
8
Amelia, the people who write the editorials that state the "official" position of the paper (the editorial board, e.g.) are not the same people who are editing the day-to-day news stories that are going in the paper. In my experience, the editorial board of the Times is made up of mostly conservatives (list: http://www.seattletimescompany.com/edito…), and the actual editors and reporters at the Times are mostly liberals.

The editors at the Seattle Times are not "taking the truth out" of the best investigative reporting. That's absolutely ludicrous. Jesus, for one thing, the reporters would be throwing absolute conniption fits constantly if that were the case. Trust me on that one! It doesn't take much to rile them up!
Posted by Jane on March 3, 2009 at 6:30 PM
9
I've had problems with both. Is there a third category--the people who write the headlines to your wire stories?
Posted by Amelia on March 3, 2009 at 9:39 PM
10
ELI: Last time you posted an image of that t-shirt the guy's selling, there were six comments, and *all* of them asked for info on how to buy one.

Can you provide? Thanks in advance...
Posted by frank on March 4, 2009 at 12:42 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy