Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The Packers Model

Posted by on Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:01 PM

In just a few minutes, the Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild will convene a meeting for Seattle Post-Intelligencer employees who want to discuss "starting an online news site that can replace the P-I" after the newspaper's print edition likely closes in March.

Tonight's planning session is not to be confused with the Hearst Corporation's own planning for an online-only P-I. Until Hearst lays its online cards on the table, employee brainstorming sessions like the one tonight are officially just the crafting of a contingency plan—a potential way for laid-off P-I staffers to keep their paper alive online in the event that Hearst closes down the paper and the present online edition.

But all indications are that Hearst will launch an online-only P-I when the print edition folds, and if Hearst does this, it's a safe bet that a lot of tonight's contingency planners will not be a part of Hearst's online effort (which could require as few as 20 of the P-I's current staff of 170). Which means tonight's contingency plan could quickly morph into tomorrow's plan for a competitor.

How might this employee project, whether it becomes a future P-I competitor or the sole remaining remnant of the paper, be funded? One model under consideration is the so-called Packers Model—as in the Green Bay Packers, "the only non-profit, community-owned major league professional sports team in the United States." (A model that, I just realized, Jonathan Golob first floated here on Slog on January 9th, the same day that Hearst announced it would likely be shuttering the P-I's print edition.)

You can probably guess where the P-I employees are going with this. The idea is still embryonic, but it could involve asking members of the community—which, for the P-I's distribution area, is a huge community—to essentially purchase shares in a publicly-owned P-I. (Or, asking them to donate money to a non-profit-run P-I. Or, to something that's not technically the P-I, because Hearst decides to go ahead with its online-only plans, but is still run by many former P-I employees.)

So, help a bunch of future unemployed journalists out: Would you help fund, Packers-style, a community owned Seattle Post-Intelligencer?

Well? Would you?

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I suggested this very idea a while ago, right here on slog.

That's not to say I was the only one thinking along these lines.
Posted by Jonathan Golob on February 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM
2
we shell out money for kexp and kuow, why not another?
Posted by josh on February 24, 2009 at 6:26 PM
3
The Packers may be community owned, but I don't think they're a non-profit in the traditional 501(c)3 sense.

The Memphis Redbirds, however, AAA affiliate of the St. Louis Cardinals, are actually owned by a 501(c)3 foundation.
Posted by joykiller on February 24, 2009 at 7:00 PM
4
Only if Brett Favre, Bart Starr, and Vince Lombardi are part of the package...
Posted by The P-I building is uglier than Lambeau Field on February 24, 2009 at 8:09 PM
5
How much? I would pay up to $50/year
Posted by meks on February 24, 2009 at 8:18 PM
6
The Packers are one of the most profitable teams in the NFL. They are sort of community owned in that the public owns shares that allow them to vote at a shareholders meeting once a year. What makes the Packers unique is that any profit made by the sale of the team would go to a local VFW post. That sorta kills the motive to sell.
Posted by heywhatsit on February 24, 2009 at 9:54 PM
7
only if they bring back zippy the pinhead.
Posted by gcm on February 24, 2009 at 11:29 PM
8
So long as none of the money goes to Frank Blethen and they bring back Zippy the Pinhead, this would still be cheaper than a Billionaire Tunnel from the Gates Foundation and EMP/SFM to the Stadiums with no downtown exits.

Count me in.
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 25, 2009 at 12:43 AM
9
A significant issue lies in the very nature of the P-I. The newspaper is feisty and rattles cages in politics and in circles of power. Their readership is largely working-class. Therefore, if they are upsetting those with money to spare who will fund them?
Posted by hobuck on February 25, 2009 at 1:01 AM
10
@10: If the base is large enough, it'll work out in the wash. It's a time-honored American tradition to call up your newspaper and yell about canceling your subscription, so this really wouldn't be a new phenomenon.

@Zippy the Pinhead fans: you people are bleeding idiots.
Posted by TVDinner on February 25, 2009 at 8:12 AM
11
Heart sex yes.
Brain sex no.

If the team looks like a break from today's pi, I'd hit it
Posted by Mackro Mackro on February 25, 2009 at 8:32 AM
12
LOL. "sez"

Damn iPhone auto correct
Posted by Mackro Mackro on February 25, 2009 at 8:35 AM
13
Well...if each of the 260-odd people who said they'd chip in to buy shares of the PI bought one for $50 a year, that would net the PI a whole $13,300 for this year.

Hearst, I think we have a bid.
Posted by arts&letters on February 25, 2009 at 9:15 AM
14
That $50 a year would be about right for me. Right now, I think a community-supported newspaper is a *great* idea!

anne Gilbert
Posted by Anne Gilbert on March 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy