Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Notes from the Unemployment Line

Posted by Eli Sanders on Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM

Working as a part-time porn production assistant isn't what "Chastity," 27, really wants to do. But it pays better than software technical writing, which is what she was doing before the great recession hit, and it helps her stay afloat as she wrangles with the unemployment office and tries to find other work. Still, it's causing her a good deal of internal angst.

Chastity3.jpgThis weekend we had our biggest shoot to date—five couples before a studio audience. In such a situation, I try harder than usual to keep my emotional distance from our models and lock down my natural curiosity about their backgrounds or their interest in the industry, mostly because I'm not sharing much about myself, either.

I love to hear about personal lives when it comes up in conversation, however. I chatted briefly with Jenny, a pretty college-age girl who I hadn’t worked with before. She came to us through another girl who modeled with us a few weeks ago. Jenny was doing it half for fun, half for money; so far she had only done nude photos once before. She rambled on about how she had a friend who liked to take “crazy pictures” of her, but “not with [her] clothes off or anything like that” and laughed while she struck an America’s Next Top Model-style leonine pose. My heart kinda broke. By the end of the evening, she had gotten naked on stage and given another man a blowjob in front of a hollering audience.

Most surprising to me is that the some of the girls who do this work very regularly seem to have their fuses blown out, sexually. There isn’t much they won’t do, but they never orgasm. Not really, anyway—and they’ll cheerfully announce this fact when the cameras aren’t rolling. Nor do they frequently have sex at home. For those who actively choose sex work, this creeping sexual numbness seems to me the greatest tragedy of this way of making money. The loss of my desire would provoke a fundamental shift in my character—my sexuality is my sixth sense. The sensual and the erotic make up a considerable portion of my interior life: they are private—to put them on display would be to capitalize on my most fragile and vulnerable self. The irony, however, is that for me to work in this business, I have to be a little numb, too.

The camera provides a substantial shield. I focus on what I see on my little screen, rather than what is just a few feet in front of me. I do periodically find scenes to be exceptionally hot, but just holding the camera denatures the eroticism, reducing it to a series of mechanics as I angle for the right shot. I—and the camera—are a merely a conduit for the masturbatory fantasies of R’s paying customers. This weekend, however, I stood physically between the subject and viewer. For the first time in my porn career, I felt a bit like I was part of the show. R had the luxury of wearing the headphones and standing behind the tripod; I got the hand-held and the position crawling around on the floor. At critical moments audience members laughed or cheered—and at even more critical moments—grunted, groaned or sighed.

It was an interesting weekend, and I have been struggling with whether to block it out altogether or to think-write-think-write-think-write as I try to evaluate my mixed feelings over this whole affair. I quite like R, I like working for him, I like many of our models, I even like some of the people from the audience I met over the weekend, but I can’t shake the conviction that pornography is exploitation, however much everyone involved insists it isn’t. As long as it remains the last viable resort for a young woman, I don’t know how it can be anything else, and I don’t know how I can be anything other than complicit in Jenny’s eventual sexual anesthesis.

Chastity

Have an unemployment story to share? Write to jobless@thestranger.com.

Photo by Kelly O

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (51) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This is not an unemployment story.
Posted by levide on February 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM
2
More importantly, how can I be a part of this live studio audience?
Posted by @ on February 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM
3
Just remember the take home message, by consuming p40n, you are contributing to emotional numbness and lack of real orgasms.

Nuff said.

So, when is anyone going to talk about the teen sex slave prostitution ring busted in Seattle that may or may not have been advertising in a certain mag's pages ...?
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM
4
Chastity, your writing is beautiful.
Posted by writer mom on February 24, 2009 at 10:37 AM
5
Countdown until Chastity goes before the camera....
Posted by tiktok on February 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM
6
That's not where nipples go.
Posted by mandy on February 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM
7
The lady is right.
Pornography is harmful to everyone it touches and steals something from their souls.
Healthy sexuality is one of the greatest joys in life, pornography cheapens and coarsens it and robs it of it's vitality.
Posted by Love lifts, lust degrades on February 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM
8
I liked Chastity's story, but any job where you don't want to be but need money and can't find any other work could be considered exploitative... McDonalds employees, Wal-mart employees, etc.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM
9
@7 Yup.
Posted by Nuff already on February 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM
10
i will make Jenny come.
Posted by Jesus Fucking Christ on February 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM
11
Wow, that's some heavy shit. Although this isn't technically about unemployment (she has a job, just not the job she wants), I've really enjoyed reading what she's written.

Posted by Hernandez on February 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM
12
You got that right @7.
Posted by Mr Obvious on February 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM
13
Chasity-leaving aside for a moment the irony of your nom de plume , have you considered going back to school for sociology, poly sci, womans studies, etc?

Your critical perspective and writing skills are a rare combo, and perhaps the world would benefit from your applying them to something with a greater potential to shift paradigms that technical writing?

I'm a recovering SOC major myself, currently working in high tech and hating it, but there's a current in your writing that I REALLY enjoy. Keep it up.
Posted by Randy Beaver on February 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM
14
Porn is like dating. You put yourself out there and you meet some fucked up horrible people that might damage you a bit, but sometimes you find good, decent people who just want to have fun and enjoy life and then it is amazing and awesome. If you can't handle a few emotional bumps & bruises and don't know how to take care of yourself, you shouldn't do it. Also if you find yourself in a bad situation, you get out of it no matter what right away.

It's only exploitation if they are under age.
Posted by zephsright on February 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM
15
I'm curious about the idea that women who are in porn lose their interest in sex. I've always thought that was a myth, but maybe not.
Posted by PJ on February 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM
16
Chastity's writing is amazing, and her letters are by far the best part of this series.
Posted by Jessica on February 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM
17
Porn is like prostitution, except less frequent and more lucrative for the parties involved. While it might be harmful, it will never go away.
Posted by Mahtli69 on February 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM
18
WTF? How'd we end up with a cavalcade of pr0n negative smut-o-phobes on the pages of America's only pr0n-sponsoring weekly? It is in no way inherently degrading, as many of the fine people who contributed to HUMP! will be quick to tell you. You may personally find it degrading, if you're the sort of person who thinks the erotic should be sealed hermetically into the bedroom. So don't do it.

The industry certainly can be exploitative, but there are relatively ethical production companies out there (Burning Angel). Let's create the conditions in which people who don't want to do sex work don't have to do it, and those who do can do so without being 'rescued' jack ass crusaders.
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM
19
*by.

One's rants are less effective when missing words.

^_^
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 11:06 AM
20
@15 - It makes sense doesn't it? Losing interest in sex is a defense mechanism. It certainly wouldn't be a good idea to establish a deep emotional connection for every dude who bangs them on camera for the day. With no interest in sex, they can do it professionally without emotional attachment.
Posted by Mahtli69 on February 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM
21
This was great to read. Really insightful and engaging.

@7 (and the rest) that commented that 'Pornography is harmful to everyone it touches and steals something from their souls,' - I find that a little far fetched. Sometimes people do it for the money, sometimes for the thrill, but you can't denounce the entire thing just because, unfortunately, the majority of people in front of the camera are probably not making the most informed decisions. You forget about an entire realm of people that are empowered by being able to hold the grubby gaze of a stranger.
Posted by Donut on February 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM
22
@20 - That could explain the loss of interest. Or, you could say that having no real emotional attachment to sex made getting into porn easy. Chicken/egg business. And we can't generalize on a sample size of ~1.
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM
23
uh, Chastity writes better than some of the Stranger staffers...
Posted by michael strangeways on February 24, 2009 at 11:18 AM
24
23
all of them
Posted by . . . truth be told on February 24, 2009 at 11:24 AM
25
That's why I only watch amateur porn... the participants are real people who are actually sexually aroused in an intimate setting, leaving out all the mass-production bullshit.

Amateur porn: If it were food, it'd be organic!™
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on February 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM
26
18
Not only is it degrading to everyone involved but the internet has extended it's reach into every home in America.
People (including kids) who would not have been consumers before now have ready access.
And the 'do-it-yourself' porn posting is extending wide into the population of young girls.
It is sad at best.
Posted by sad on February 24, 2009 at 11:29 AM
27
#5....i'm guessing "chastity" is a cow, and that's why she isn't going to be in front of the camera anytime soon.
Posted by taint on February 24, 2009 at 11:29 AM
28
@ 26

Please don't ever come to HUMP. You would be such a depressing to sit next to, clucking your tongue the whole time and probably praying to Jesus for the souls of people on the screen. Please go away and read the Seattle Weekly or something...
Posted by zephsright on February 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM
29
I call bullshit on the whole story.
Posted by Stowing Away the Time on February 24, 2009 at 11:38 AM
30
Are you paying "Chastity"? This is a work of fiction.
Posted by gillsans on February 24, 2009 at 12:17 PM
31
Like any career, it's risky to do something you love for money. Once you're part of pumping out the commercial grade shit, you quickly develop a rind of cynicism to protect your self.

Making sex is like making art, inspiring and life affirming. But once money is on the table, a lot of that is lost.
Posted by Westside forever on February 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM
32
@29 & 30 & Co.: I've met "Chastity" in person. I have copies of her driver's license, pay stubs from her former technical writing job, checks from her current porn production job, and her unemployment compensation documents.

I am confident that this is not a work of fiction.
Posted by Eli Sanders on February 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM
33
@20: Yes, I'm sure the women for the most part aren't enjoying the sex they have on camera (though I suspect the men do). But it seems reasonable to think that they, like most of us, are able to have satisfying suxual experiences off camera.
Posted by PJ on February 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM
34
Read "Coming Attractions" the best psych/soc look inside the porn world I've ever seen. Nina Hartley, who contributed heavily to the book, says that most sex performers (her term) have histories of childhood molestation and abuse. She's unclear as to why. My take (and I do sexual counselling for a living) is that they learn early from their abusers to view sex as something they do for others (e.g., because they're forced, or for attention) as opposed to something they do for themselves, and that model continues to play out in adulthood. Just my $0.02 worth.
Posted by anonymous healthcare worker on February 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM
35
Not that prostitution is the same as porn, but in Alexa Albert's (well researched & written) Brothel, about Mustang Ranch, a former prostitute theorizes what @34 said and that many sex workers grew up on military bases.
Posted by Amelia on February 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM
36
7 for the LOSE!

That said, these Chastity post are very interesting. I agree with those that like her writing & insight.

Posted by Mike in MO on February 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM
37
Ok ... to be blunt. I like porn. If it wasn't for porn, I would perhaps have no semblence of intimacy or see any boobies in my oh issolated life as a scientist, where I can almost easily go several days without actually speaking to a female.

It is what it is, and I'm actually a tall, strong, muscular attractive male.

It's also a way to take some control back for myself. I don't feel like I'm exploiting women. I also don't feel like I'm being exploited for my issolation. When it comes to sexuality, I generally put up with too much shit due to the issolation. In turn, I rarely ever take these women seriously ... lest I get tied down by some gold digger ... or I find that I'm thinking with my underappreciated dick and not my heart.

But that's my two cents ...
Posted by a male perspective on February 24, 2009 at 1:59 PM
38
more male -- i dated someone like @34's years ago...i'm guessing (unfortunately, she couldn't remember her childhood prior to 13yrs old). she was a stripper who really liked me, but didn't like sex with me/didn't want to have sex with me - something like that. it was like a regular romantic relationship except for the me/sex part. she was way into her lifestyle, in fact, she wanted to keep moving up in payscale. i hope she got rich or otherwise got it figured out.
Posted by young and dumb on February 24, 2009 at 2:23 PM
39
What's interesting is that "Chastity" is doing a job she doesn't want to for the money. The actors are also doing a job they don't want to for the money. And "Chastity" spends the whole time thinking about how exploited they are and they don't even know it?

Something here doesn't add up.
Posted by Dan on February 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM
40
i rarely run quantitative analysis at home when i can get paid for it at work.

is there something i'm missing?

sure, there is sex magic, but sex ain't Magic. it's just like everything else.
Posted by mrbanana on February 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM
41
@34 - It's also possible that people with histories of abuse are more likely to enter the sex work field because in dealing with the trauma they've been forced to demystify sex and make different value assignations around sexuality than the culture at large. Post hoc ergo propter hoc arguments tend to obscure more complicated states-of-affairs. Given that 20 to 25 percent of women in the United States are likely to experience some form of sexualized violence or trauma in their lifetimes, and that relatively few of those are social workers, we have at best an interesting correlation. Certainly not a strong causal link.
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM
42
*sex worker. ^_^ I'm a social worker. I wonder what the percentage is here.
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 2:55 PM
43
@42: Ah, that makes more sense. I was wondering if "social worker" was the euphemism all the cool kids are using these days.

So how much do I have to pay you for a happy ending?

I like the point you make, though. It's never been clear to me what the supposedly high percentage of abused women in sex work is supposed to prove. That sex work is itself abuse? There's a logical step missing from this argument.
Posted by Dan on February 24, 2009 at 2:59 PM
44
@18
I am willing to bet that the individuals contributing to the HUMP festival are doing so for reasons that more closely approach recreational than professional, which is why it's billed as an "Amateur Porn Festival"

I certainly don't believe that the sociological factors at work in that environment can be realistically applied to people who actually make a living in porn because they cannot work elsewhere.
Posted by One of these things is not like the other on February 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM
45
@ 44 - #7 made the statement that porn is inherently degrading. This, in some circles is a non-contentious statement until you bring up something like HUMP!. Peoples' instincts about amateur porn made by and for its consumers, tends to be somewhat different. HUMP! is porn. If all porn is degrading, then HUMP! is degrading. HUMP! is not degrading, therefore not all porn is degrading, modus tollens.

I agree with you that commercial porn is a different animal, and I would agree with you that much of it is non-beneficial (at best) to its actors and, to an extent, its consumers. We've just established that porn is not, of itself, degrading. So we need to look elsewhere for the problematics here. This is less about defending porn (which I will gladly do any day), but about directing our efforts toward the actual site of the problem. The pathologization of sex and sexuality in the US often makes it difficult, as the real issues are obscured by strong but generally unexamined emotional responses.
Posted by rum0r on February 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM
46
32
So, is she a cow?
Posted by taint on February 24, 2009 at 3:45 PM
47
I think it's going too far to say that all porn is exploitive. Definately some of it is. I'm facinated by sex workers, though, and I try to read as much as I can. There are some women out there, Claire Adams, Chanta Rose, Madison Young, Mistress Morganna and a lady whose name I can't remember who has a blog called "feminist stripper" who seem strong, smart, insightful and not exploited at all. I've always been really inspired by their writing. If I had the courage, I would do what they do.
Posted by Anarfea on February 24, 2009 at 3:52 PM
48
I have the same reaction whenever I watch someone working at any "last resort" job.
Posted by seandr on February 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM
49
Most porn is boring as hell but I would say if you think it is more inherently exploitative than any other crappy job you have some major puritanical hang ups.
Posted by Rhizome on February 24, 2009 at 6:47 PM
50
@ 27, 46: Mean, mean, mean. You know that there's fat chick pr0n, right?
Posted by whatevermind on February 24, 2009 at 11:00 PM
51
46

I'm pretty sure she's a homo sapiens sapiens.
Posted by Anon d'Florida on February 25, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use