Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

It Always Happens This Way

Posted by on Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:19 AM

Down goes the first satellite dedicated to measuring carbon dioxide levels and sources...

Picture_16.png
Officials said the fairing - the part of the rocket which covers the satellite on top of the launcher - did not separate properly.

Data indicates the spacecraft crashed into the ocean near Antarctica.

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) was intended to help pinpoint the key locations on our planet's surface where CO2 is being emitted and absorbed...

Onlookers watched the launcher soar into the sky from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California at 0955 GMT on Tuesday.

...The first indication of a problem came in an announcement made by the Nasa launch commentator, George Diller.

"This is Taurus launch control. We have declared a launch contingency, meaning that we did not have a successful launch tonight," he said.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
What the hell do you mean by "It Always Happens This Way"? Quiz: What percentage of satellites fail to seperate from their housing upon reaching orbit?
Posted by Sean on February 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM
2
Bummer
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 24, 2009 at 9:51 AM
3
Mother Nature is angry.
Humans are taking credit for planet climate change.
She will destroy all your puny satellites until you acknowledge her supremacy.
Posted by The Bitch is Back on February 24, 2009 at 9:53 AM
4
"Launch contingency" means failure? This is gonna be my new favorite euphemism. I.e. the Bush administration was a "launch contingency". The McCain/Palin campaign was a "launch contingency".
Posted by Tom on February 24, 2009 at 10:02 AM
5
According to NPR, there is already another satellite in orbit with similar capabilities. It's Japanese, though.
Posted by Arsenic7 on February 24, 2009 at 10:06 AM
6
look at those GHGs pouring out of the rocket.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM
7
You vill never succeed, silly Amerikanskis, ve vill destroy all your satellites!
Posted by Karl Rove und der RNC on February 24, 2009 at 10:37 AM
8
blast off muh dik!
Posted by Charles "it's all about" Muhdik on February 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM
9
@4 - It doesn't necessarily mean failure. They have a plan, that plan has predicted contingencies for foreseeable failure modes. To have a "launch contingency" means that their mission has deviated from the plan along one of those predicted paths of failure.

I can't accept that the Bush administration or the McCain/Palin ticket had any ability to plan anything, even their own failure. If anything they are perfect examples of inability to plan for contingencies.

It does have a nice ring to it though, in its colossal understatement.
Posted by Super Jesse on February 24, 2009 at 10:56 AM
10
Well, I, uh, don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up, sir.
Posted by General Buck Turgidson on February 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM
11
In 2009 we still can't get rockets into space reliably and we're supposed to believe we put a man on the moon 40 years ago?

Yea, right!
Posted by I Got Nuthin' on February 24, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy