Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

More Americans Want to Legalize Pot

Posted by on Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:01 PM

Remember the poll-watchers at FiveThirtyEight.com? After following the presidential election—the number stands for the 538 electoral votes that were up for grabs—they're lending their skills to less pressing matters: like what people think about marijuana.

In a meta-analysis of three recent polls, FiveThirtyEight finds that Americans are increasingly friendly to legalizing pot. Here's a butt-plug-resembling graph that shows where Americans have stood on the issue over the last few decades:

e83e/1235526179-pot_graph_538.jpg

We want to legalize pot more than ever. But FiveThirtyEight offers a couple caveats:

Firstly, although support for legalization has grown, it remains the minority position. Secondly, although there has been a long, slow-moving upward trend in favor of legalization since roughly 1992, there is no guarantee that public sentiment will continue to move in that direction: support for legalization had grown to about 30 percent in the mid 1970s before dropping significantly during the Just Say No years of the 1980s.

Agreed. The majority of Americans are far from chanting for legalization, but, realistically, that's the wrong question—should we leeeeeegalize marijuana?—to ask. I've spoken to lots of middle-of-the-road folks who think arresting people for smoking pot is wasteful and wrong, but they oppose legalizing marijuana "because it's illegal" (which is the sort of circular logic that makes you wonder if humans are devolving as species). But I understand where they're coming from. Drugs are harshly prohibited, so the idea of just legalizing pot all willy nilly is pretty terrifying to a lot of parents. All these questions arise: Would pot be sold next to Snickers bars in the candy store, handed out with milk in the lunch line, placed like prizes in the bottom of Cracker Jacks boxes? Jesus, no legalization for me, thanks.

More realistically, the most lax rules for pot would be similar to alcohol: standards for quality and potency, mechanisms for licensing dealers, and minimum age requirements for consumers, etc. But—seriously—we are not about to drop the entire war on pot and start taxing it overnight. So the fact that only a minority of people say they "want to legalize pot" right now is a moot point.

The question for people is whether they would support decriminalizing marijuana. This is a locally attainable, easily implemented policy that makes penalties less harsh but keeps pot against the rules. It's still bad, mkay? Police can take the stash, give folks a ticket, etc. Just last November, Massachusetts decriminalized pot—the penalty for possessing an ounce is now only a $100 fine—with 65 percent of the electorate voting for it. Pot smokers aren't going to the slammer, kids aren't smoking dope in the lunch line; no legalization required. So the question that would better elicit where America stands on illicit pot is this: Would you support decriminalizing marijuana for adult personal use, so that police could not arrest people for possessing it but instead issue them a fine like a parking ticket?

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I thought you proved that smoking marijuana caused gay bashing.
Posted by gillsans on February 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM
2
causes sorry.
Posted by gillsans on February 24, 2009 at 7:57 PM
3
That graph looks like a buttplug!
Posted by nixor on February 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM
4
I get that you're being realistic here and all, but this is a really good time for people to start flexing their brains on exactly how we could go for full legalization. we are in the middle of an economic crisis (CRI-sis), not a momentary downturn in the economy. if the government is going to continue to hand out cash as a way to stimulate the economy, we need to be ready to come up with new sources of revenue to pay for all this shit so we don't just wind up mortgaging our futures. at this point in history, I can't think of a better opportunity to push for fully regulated, taxed, legalization of marijuana as a way to offset that gap in revenue. I know not everyone will be for it at first, but this is the kind of drastic measure that these weird times call for. it makes me uncomfortable to say it, but to not support legalization and taxation would be un-American. ugh. yeah, not comfortable with that at all, but it's true.

honestly Dominic, I'm kinda disppointed in this piece.
Posted by Lee on February 24, 2009 at 8:18 PM
5
Man, I should get a new buttplug.
Posted by stimulus package on February 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM
6
Maybe we should think about decriminalizing buttplugs before we think about decriminalizing pot. Remember, when buttplugs are outlawed, only outlaws will have buttplugs.
Posted by Chris down in The Couv on February 24, 2009 at 9:51 PM
7
The problem with decriminalization is that it just makes criminals even richer. Have some courage. Washington has recently passed referendums to keep a gas tax, give the right to die, and elects democrats for governor and the senate by wide margins. We have a solid system of state control for a controlled substance and plenty of libertarian types throughout the state. Be bold. Legalize, tax, and regulate.
Posted by Gabe Global on February 24, 2009 at 11:29 PM
8
heh heh butt plug!
Posted by PedestrianMe on February 25, 2009 at 12:25 AM
9
Sell it at WSLCB stores.

Problem solved.

Treat it the same way we do gateway drugs like alcohol, which kills far more people, is far more addictive, and much more dangerous.
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 25, 2009 at 12:41 AM
10
Jeannie Hale was a big supporter of I-75 (and gay marriage).

Posted by There's more to being a progressive than density on February 25, 2009 at 1:31 AM
11
Pot being illegal is so stupid. Teenagers will get high with anything if they wanted to get high. Glue, choking each other, etc.
Posted by kuribo on February 25, 2009 at 5:45 AM
12
Funny - It's taken having a teenage son for me to realize that whether or not marijuana is illegal isn't the dominant factor in whether a teenager son smokes pot or not.
Posted by cracked on February 25, 2009 at 6:47 AM
13
Or to put it another way - I'm more explicitly for legalization now than I was before I had kids. Then my views were sort of abstract because I already hadn't smoked for years.
Posted by cracked on February 25, 2009 at 6:49 AM
14
My only concern is that I don't want potheads driving. I would legalize possession at home only. Allow everyone to grow X amount of marijuana at a time. Sell seed, not weed.
Posted by Used to inhale, don't care to any more on February 25, 2009 at 7:57 AM
15
What exactly is preventing groups like NORML from paying some lawyers to write up a proposal for a realistic framework to legalize and regulate marijuana?

If we had such a proposal, we could counter all the pot-in-the-lunch-line crap with real answers - "Look," we'd say, "Nobody wants to let your kid just go buy weed like candy. It'd be kept under lock and key and only sold to adults who present ID, just like alcohol and tobacco." That would be a huge gain for the pro-pot side.

In addition, legal marijuana could be grown on Washington farms, with the revenue going to Washington businesses. Revenue from decriminalized marijuana - where does that go, exactly? House-grows in east King County? Canadian smugglers? Public-land growers hiding in state parks? The Mexican drug lords beheading each other and anybody who gets in their way? Does anybody really know? No. Even if possession of small amounts is decriminalized, production and distribution will still be heavily criminalized, so only criminals will profit from the upsurge in use.
Posted by Greg on February 25, 2009 at 9:49 AM
16
By "More Americans" what Mr Holden meant was people in the Castro or WeHo or morally corrupt Massachusetts, cause no real American family supports this, even when used with the debunked its the same as alcohol argument.
Posted by Loveschild on February 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM
17
Does anyone else think that the weed sold by stores if legalized would be a sad variation of the weed you buy from your neighbor who painstakingly uses hydroponics and other expensive gear to grow the most beautiful, crystal dense nugs you've ever tasted?
Posted by support privately-owned businesses on February 25, 2009 at 1:22 PM
18
@16, the election demonstrated that real Americans aren't the kind of voting bloc they used to be. Time for the concerns of fake americans to finally be heard.
Posted by to boldly split on February 25, 2009 at 6:23 PM
19
pot needs to be legal so us POTHEADS can smoke freely without being stopped by the police and paying stupid fines the goverment needs to wake up and see that we can save the ecomony and the police and dea can catch the real criminals meth,herion,crack,dealers.and those perves in the world.LEAVE US POTHEADS ALONE ALL WE WANT IS TO SMOKE POT FREELY LEAGALIZE POT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by mary jane on August 13, 2009 at 8:02 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy