Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Today in Bad Movie Ideas

Posted by on Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:15 PM

f6b8/1234987707-life-of-pi.jpgAng Lee is in talks to direct a film version of The Life of Pi. When he's off-key, Lee can be a huge blowhard of a director. Pi is a crappy novel by a blowhard writer that somehow was embraced as kind of a Da Vinci Code for lit snobs. The initial excitement of a tiger in a boat can only last for so long onscreen.

 

Comments (55) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Screw you Paul, I love that book and I'm not a lit snob and I hated DaVinci code.
Posted by Luckier on February 18, 2009 at 5:24 PM
2
Sometimes you can really tell when Paul the "whaa I hated this book no fair it's getting a movie!" version of you is talking versus Paul the paid critic version of you is spouting.
Posted by Oh really now on February 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM
3
It's not about the Seattle PI?
Posted by E on February 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM
4
Paul is just calling the kettle black... what a blow hard!
Posted by aptitle on February 18, 2009 at 5:32 PM
5
I enjoyed The Life of Pi when I read it a few years back. It's not something I would expend a lot of energy to search out again but it was far from terrible.
Posted by obamatron on February 18, 2009 at 5:34 PM
6
I wanna see the outtake when the "trained" tiger mauls whatever lame-o actor takes the part. Maybe Hayden Christianson?
Posted by Katy on February 18, 2009 at 5:38 PM
7
Hey Paul, tell us how your really feel.
Posted by Rotten666 on February 18, 2009 at 5:41 PM
8
Paul,
I am not a lit snob. Life of Pi is a fable for adults. Wonderful book.

Posted by CJJ on February 18, 2009 at 5:45 PM
9
Nope. You're wrong. Paul's right. Live with it.
Posted by fluteprof on February 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM
10
Wow. I actually enjoyed that book, and I'm not a lit snob what.so.ever. It's actually one I recommend to friends (it was recommended to me by a book worm).

Paul, you need to chillax a little bit. Be careful at taking things too seriously or your "Constant Reader" will turn into "Constant Hater".

Just sayin' ..
Posted by Down North on February 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM
11
Just the usual conclusion from The Stranger...

if:
a.) It's popular
and
b.) Wasn't discovered and/or particularly liked by the staffer in question

Then by definition it must be bad.

It did win the Booker Prize, which maybe should count for something...
Posted by Good Grief on February 18, 2009 at 5:51 PM
12
that's going to be a difficult book to make a movie of
Posted by Boyd main on February 18, 2009 at 5:52 PM
13
Tigers on a boat? Who needs a book, that movie writes itself! "Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherfucking tigers on this motherfucking boat!"
Posted by Movie Critic on February 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM
14
Thank you, Paul! Life of Pi was such a disappointment - you hit the nail on the head.
Posted by snargent pepper on February 18, 2009 at 5:56 PM
15
I originally bought this for my dad to read- he read it and hated it. So I decided to read it, or I tried to. I got to page 20 or so before I threw it away. I am a huge bookworm and I couldn't take it. Definitely a blowhard book- I felt like I was being preached to from page 1, and it was boring. It would be torture in a movie format.
Posted by lemonrose on February 18, 2009 at 5:58 PM
16
C'mon guys, life of pi is an allegory of the lowest order with a trick ending on the same level of "they're all actually ghosts!" or "they're all actually me!" And if you doubt Martel's blowhard quotient, please, please check out what his forthcoming book is about on wikipedia.
Posted by Hosono on February 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM
17
Huh. I actually enjoyed the book. But I cannot imagine this as a film. At all.
Posted by Balt-O-Matt on February 18, 2009 at 6:02 PM
18
I enjoyed the book, though I can certainly feel why excessive hype can make one hostile to a book one isn't inclined to like anyway. I feel the same way about Catcher in the Rye.
Posted by Beguine on February 18, 2009 at 6:08 PM
19
I know that about a year ago Jean Pierre Jeunet was supposed to be making a movie of this. I kind of enjoyed the book but agree that as a film it would be horrible. So much of it was internal.

"Day 37.... on a boat.... with a Tiger.... and we both haven't pooped or eaten in awhile... blah blah blah."
Posted by Hillzabub on February 18, 2009 at 6:11 PM
20
that book totally sucked ass and i'm glad someone else out there thinks so.
Posted by pooped my pants on February 18, 2009 at 6:16 PM
21
I didn't think it was GREAT, but I liked it. Can't imagine wanting to see the movie though.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on February 18, 2009 at 6:18 PM
22
Oh, thank god, I HATED that effing book and I'm so glad someone else thought the same. It'll probably make a better movie than a book... at least in a movie there won't be 40 pages describing a completely impossible floating electric island with monkey zappers. WTF? No, seriously. WTF?
Posted by Arboreality on February 18, 2009 at 6:23 PM
23
Paul! regardless of whether you liked it or not, there WILL be a film. perhaps by ang lee, perhaps not. i look forward to that, as it will make a nice change from those stupid girly girl movies. whinging about it won't change a thing. back to reporting on right wing blogs, pliss.
Posted by scary tyler moore on February 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM
24
On a similar note: "The Kite Runner".

discuss...
Posted by paulus on February 18, 2009 at 6:34 PM
25
Embraced as a Da Vinci Code?
Posted by Amelia on February 18, 2009 at 7:09 PM
26
Huh. Sorry to hear it, Paul, since I like reading you, but I liked Life of Pi. It *was* overhyped (especially up here in Canada) and I feared it for that, but"crappy" is one of the last words I'd use for it. The first couple of chapters were pretty slow, but I really enjoyed the rest of the story. A "popcorn" novel for people who like to read?

Calling it a "kind of Da Vinci Code" for ANYONE is much too harsh for anyone except the Da Vinci Code, as it occupies its own category of retarditude.

(And yeah, I wouldn't call myself a lit snob either. I hate most chick lit, true, but half my reading list right now is comic books about zombies.)
Posted by Gloria on February 18, 2009 at 7:43 PM
27
I liked Life of Pi, didn't love it, but thought it was a good book. I must agree that Martel is a blowhard though. Some of his blowhardiness shines through in the book, which made me hate it at times, but overall, the book wasn't that bad.
Posted by emily the haikubot on February 18, 2009 at 7:57 PM
28
I love how The Stranger is as bitter and biased as another newspaper or blog, but doesn't have the basic self reflection skills to realize it.
Posted by g@g.com on February 18, 2009 at 8:09 PM
29
Clearly the point of The Stranger is to openly declare their bitter biases, so that people can make an informed decision rather than being suckered into some point of view from a paper making a big disingenuous show of objectivity.

To contribute: Haven't read it, won't see the movie.
Posted by Fisti on February 18, 2009 at 8:16 PM
30
I love reading Paul's posts even though I agree with him, like, .05% of the time. Life of Pi is a terrific book. The movie will undoubtedly suck, but what else is new?
Posted by mkg on February 18, 2009 at 8:52 PM
31
Wait a minute..Wait a minute! I thought the whole point of that book was that there WASN'T a tiger in the boat! Crap
Posted by lit snob on February 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM
32
remember when the kid eats poop? classic moments in literature.
Posted by mr. griffith on February 18, 2009 at 9:06 PM
33
Seriously? Jeunet? Ok, now I have to read the book. I love his films.
Posted by wench on February 18, 2009 at 9:19 PM
34
Enough is enough! I have had it with this motherfucking tiger on this motherfucking boat!
Posted by Go away! 'Batin'! on February 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM
35
The book had a couple of interesting moments, but I HATED the trick ending. Lame. Wouldn't see the movie.
Posted by doublegin on February 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM
36
The book itself is too stupid to hate. It's like saying you hate those little Chick Tracts. The people who give the book to others... they're the ones that deserve your enmity.
Posted by dirge on February 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM
37
#11 Dead on! It was a great book.
Posted by Loushka on February 18, 2009 at 10:34 PM
38
24 Kite Runner...worst book of all time.

So stupid! So cliched! ...sputter, sputter.

Couldn't choke down the last 20 pages, couldn't care anymore.
Posted by reader on February 18, 2009 at 11:16 PM
39
Rudyard Kipling is a million times better, and doesn't resort to a lame deus ex machina when he paints himself into a corner.
Posted by arts&letters on February 18, 2009 at 11:30 PM
40
Uh, not a trick ending folks, but rather alternative realities: those who are cynical and view the world as it must be (according to them) and those who view the world as it might be. An interesting book, not a classic, might make an interesting movie in the right hands, Ang Lee might pull it off . . . Don't understand all the strong feelings amongst the Sloggers here . . . .
Posted by wow on February 18, 2009 at 11:32 PM
41
Good book. Not great, but much better then that unfinished mess you're working on in your mom's basement, Paul. Now Dan Brown otoh, is one horrible author.
Posted by bb on February 19, 2009 at 12:07 AM
42
Oh NO. Ang Lee rocks. This book is terrible, for the one thing that can actually carry over from a novel into film, its attitude.
Posted by Grant Cogswell on February 19, 2009 at 12:27 AM
43
@39 - amen.
Kite Runner sucked, by the way. Everything @38 said, except I did finish it. Not that that helped.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on February 19, 2009 at 12:42 AM
44
I started to read that book but couldn't bring myself to finish it. It wasn't the tiger in the boat that bored me to tears but his constant references to religion/philosophy that made him appear to be trying to hard. Yes, Martel comes across as a blowhard.

I think this novel would probably be better as a comic book.
Posted by Dalton on February 19, 2009 at 8:56 AM
45
I liked the book...just finished it a couple of weeks ago. However, it was a Swedish translation, so that may have helped.
Posted by Johnny on February 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM
46
Anybody want to take bets on which movie adaptation will suck more: The Life of Pi or The Time Traveler's Wife?
Posted by Greg on February 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM
47
Life of Pi is The Princess Bride of the third millenium...shockingly beloved.

A movie adaption would only work if they animate it...and the guy who did Waltz with Bashir should do it...
Posted by michael strangeways on February 19, 2009 at 9:54 AM
48
Yann Martel is 100 times more the writer that Paul Constant is. That is, if you actually want to give Constant the credit for being a writer.
Posted by Coolio on February 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM
49
Let's face it, Paul blows. and so does Charles. The Stranger needs some new writers OR we need a new paper.
Posted by ng53 on February 19, 2009 at 12:31 PM
50
To paraphrase Martel -- Don't wet yourself, the temporary warmth is not worth the nappy rash.
Posted by O. Kayreid on February 19, 2009 at 12:39 PM
51
What a crap novel. And he borrowed the plot from a Brazilian writer to boot. Life of Tigger might be a better film option.
Posted by Pooh on February 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM
52
I haven't read it, but Yann Martel is a huge fucking douche who believes everyone needs religion.
Posted by Sirkowski on February 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM
53
I would much rather go see Ang Lee's take on "Life of Pi" than Aaron Sorkin's upcoming film about the founding of Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=33…
Posted by GrammarCop on February 19, 2009 at 2:15 PM
54
I don't say this often, but fuck you, Paul.
Posted by snark on February 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM
55
Your mistake was *reading* Life Of Pi...I listened to it on audio with zero expectations and was completely enchanted. Audio sometimes does the trick of pacing a book properly to draw you in to that world.

Yes, sometimes the story was boring, and that was part of the experience of being lost at sea.

So was there or wasn't there a tiger on the boat? Well, was Hobbes a "real" tiger? Exactly.
Posted by anarchy burger on February 19, 2009 at 11:56 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy