
As detailed in this past week’s Bar Exam, much-loved Capitol Hill bar the Bus Stop is at last open in its new location on Olive. It looks weirdly similar to the old Bus Stop (which was on the block of Pine Street that was razed for condos but is now a parking lot) on the inside. Outside, pretty much kitty-corner, is that goddamn sign on Amante Pizza.
If you’re sitting near the windows of the new Bus Stop, your retinas will be seared with pixilated billion-candlepower graphics behind rotating messages about Amante's lunch specials, pizza by the slice (which Christopher Frizzelle says is really good), and the fact that they're hiring delivery drivers. There is not enough alcohol in the world to make it tolerable; I found myself cowering in the shadow of my friend’s insufficiently large head. (She said my face looked “lit up like a tin Christmas tree.”) Maybe the Bus Stop will bring back its red velvet curtains; meanwhile, sit away from the windows or poke your eyes out.
The sign’s been there since sometime last spring. From the Bar Exam in question: “This hate crime of signage is so bright it ought to be illegal.” Hyperbole, yes—a sign is not a hate crime—but it appears according to Seattle Municipal Land Use Code that a sign this obnoxious might actually be against the law.
From the introduction of SMC chapter 23, section 55, “Signs”:
The intent of the standards in this chapter is:
A. To encourage the design of signs that attract and invite rather than demand the public's attention, and to curb the proliferation of signs;
B. To encourage the use of signs that enhance the visual environment of the city;
C. To promote the enhancement of business and residential properties and neighborhoods by fostering the erection of signs complementary to the buildings and uses to which they relate and which are harmonious with their surroundings;
D. To protect the public interest and safety….
And from SMC 23.55.003:
The following signs shall be prohibited in all zones:
1. Flashing signs
This sign flashes. Never has a sign been more flashing. An argument could also be made that the sign does indeed “interfere with… [an] official traffic sign, signal or device,” as prohibited later in the section, since it does in fact render drivers of cars cresting Denny Way temporarily blind, dazzled by the center-of-the-sun-level awfulness.
The Department of Planning and Development has received one formal complaint about the sign. Bob Hoyos, Senior Sign/Electrical Inspector, says:
...by all practical observances it does not enhance the visual environment. But technically the sign as it stands does meet the criteria of a changeable message sign. As for the hazard to vehicle traffic approaching the sign I did contact the contractor about the requirement for light emitting restrictions as well as the dimming elements for night time operation. There is also restrictions about flashing, scrolling and the time in which one message changes to the next. I will look into the lighting issue again. I will bring up to my up line supervisor the argument relating to demanding rather than attracting attention. I can see a battle there with the sign manufacturers since this is state of the art on the present market and these signs have been showing up around the City. I will open this complaint again.
If you have feelings about that goddamn sign on Amante Pizza—and the proliferation of other such goddamn signs across our fair city, and whether they really ought to be illegal—you can call Dianne Kelso at (206) 684-5839 or email her here.
Photo of the sign by Anthony Hecht. It gives only an inkling of the goddamnedness, which increases exponentially as the sky darkens.
Lose it, Amante (though I also agree that late-night food is a much-needed commodity in Seattle. Keep that).
Also, has anyone checked how these video signs respond to rocks?
Comments (43) RSS