Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Kindling for the Flames of Discontent

Posted by on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:01 PM

There's a problem with the Kindle 2.0's new audio book option, in which a computerized voice can read the text if you choose.

17de/1234295845-robovsmnky.jpgSome publishers and agents expressed concern over a new, experimental feature that reads text aloud with a computer-generated voice.

"They don't have the right to read a book out loud," said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. "That's an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law."

An Amazon spokesman noted the text-reading feature depends on text-to-speech technology, and that listeners won't confuse it with the audiobook experience. Amazon owns Audible, a leading audiobook provider.

I've only listened to a few audio books in my life—here's one of them—and most of them would probably have been improved by having a dispassionate computerized voice read the text aloud.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Speaking of computerized voices...

To Paul Aiken: I have altered our arrangement. Pray I do not alter it any further.

Posted by lusk on February 10, 2009 at 3:13 PM
2
If Colbert does a side by side comparison of his Audio Book and the Kindle voice, someone owes me $5.
Posted by stinkbug on February 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM
3
You need to broaden your experience with audio books, then. A good narrator can make it a great experience. There are some audio books that are better than reading the printed page.
Posted by JC on February 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM
4
I agree with JC: Some narrators elevate the story and others kill it on the spot. Neil Gaiman does a fantastic job with his books and having Lenny Henry do Anansi Boys was a brilliant move (and is better than the book somehow). Yiddish Policeman's Union was also really good and anything Stephen Fry does is worth listening to.
Posted by Chris B on February 10, 2009 at 3:20 PM
5
I am eagerly anticipating the audiobook for John Hodgman's latest.
Posted by another Andy on February 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM
6
How about a link to the site that excerpt came from?
Posted by rjh on February 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM
7
More proof that current copyright law is broken and harmful.
Posted by Greg on February 10, 2009 at 3:38 PM
8
@7: agreed; the complaint comes across as whiny and asinine - the voice option is more than likely for the benefit of the sight impaired. and to a lesser degree, Robot Americans.
Posted by yelahneb on February 10, 2009 at 3:44 PM
9
Some of my best experiences were in hearing David Brin and William Gibson read their works aloud.

A computerized voice ... nah. Except for George Bush's memoirs ...
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 10, 2009 at 3:55 PM
10
Anansi Boys is a perfect example. Whenever I know someone who wants to read that, I recommend the audio book, and it's been agreed that it was actually better than reading it.

Same thing with David Sedaris. Listening to him tell his stories is much better than just reading them.
Posted by JC on February 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM
11
Being able to read a book aloud is an accessibility issue, people with literacy or disabilities concerns should still have access even if it is prohibited by copyright.

Purchasing a book should give you the right to read it aloud as long as it is not a commercial pubic performance.

Copyright law need some major hacking to keep it out of the way of innovation.

Posted by Sarterus on February 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM
12
They have the right.

Reading a book by automated means is a mechanical reproduction (which they have licensed) and not a derivative work.
Posted by StC on February 10, 2009 at 4:25 PM
13
You know, if we just reduced copyright to 17 years basic plus a renewable extension for further 17 years during the life of the human author, none of this would be a problem.

But right now something written during WW II can be copyright until 2050 even if the author died after assigning rights during combat in WW II ... and that is just plain wrong.
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM
14
Asshole alert, Paul must be having a constipation day.

Paul,

you are an asshole sometimes. I love reading and I love audiobooks (which I constantly call books on tape though I am inevitably listening to a CD or MP3.) Listen to Cambell Scott read The Shining, listen to the cast of characters read A Long Way Down. There are tons of great reading of audiobooks. I love to listen to a particular Pride and Prejudice on audiobook over and over (my library also has an excruciatingly horrible one.)

Pull the fucking stick out of your asshole. Paul, I hate you sometimes, but thanks for the book recommendations.

Posted by clearlyhere on February 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM
15
Those were the books I could remember off the top of my head. Don't go for stars that read unless they are known for their vocal prowess. I would imagine listening to Morgan Freeman would be a good thing.

Audiobooks make being an opera singer bareable. The hours in the car are much more pleasurable listening a good or great book.
Posted by clearlyhere on February 11, 2009 at 8:37 AM
16
MAC-MIL-LAN AU-DI-O PRE-SENTS: THE AU-TO-BI-O-GRA-PHY OF STE-PHEN HAW-KING. READ FOR YOU BY KIN-DLE TWO...
Posted by T-Bone on February 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM
17
"They don't have the right to read a book out loud," said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. "That's an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law."

1. This will make bedtime stories not much fun.

2. Last year was the 32nd anniversary of the Kurzweil Reading Machine, which liberated blind folks from having to wait for someone to read to them, or record a book for them. The horse Aiken is trying to corral is long out of the barn.

Posted by Give it up, Aiken on February 11, 2009 at 9:48 AM
18
As others have pointed out, there's no copyright infringement made by a machine which reads a work aloud. A version of the book being read aloud is a copyrightable derivative work. So you'd be infringing on the publisher's copyright by recording your Kindle reading aloud and selling that recording, but I kinda doubt that's going to come up often.

Also, William S Borroughs reading Naked Lunch is well worth a listen.
Posted by dwight moody on February 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM
19
Read, damn idiots!
Posted by chuck on February 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy