Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

In Praise of Boredom

Posted by on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Lyn Gardener over at the Guardian praises performances that involve real blood, real sweat, and real tears.

She quotes Tim Etchells (of Forced Entertainment, which brought their Bloody Mess to On the Boards a few years ago): "performers 'put their bodies on the line' so that we in the audience can be 'transformed, not audiences to a spectacle but witnesses to an event.'"

Gardener goes on:

More interesting in this context are genuine durational performances of six hours or more. As exhaustion takes over, performers can no longer rely on technique or the tricks that they have learned, but simply start "being". The audience, meanwhile, becomes fogged with tiredness, and begins to experience the piece through drooping eyelids and cramped legs. In these circumstances, exhaustion may not be the enemy of interesting performance, but its best ally for both the watched and their watchers.

Which put me in mind of the hornets' nest that blew up over my very, very infrequent habit of leaving a painful production during intermission. Some commenters suggested I leave because I got bored or have a short attention span. Not so. Boredom isn't the problem. Active awfulness is.

Like Gardener, I salute performers brave enough to use boredom—it's a very, very sharp instrument and can turn on you quickly and mercilessly. If used carefully and skilfully, boredom can tenderize the audience for greater shocks to come; it is dangerous only when it is the unintended by-product of weak imagination and weak performances.

Smart performers can be a little sadistic with their audiences—he world is full of cloying bullshit. If you can get an audience to trust you, to believe that you're in control, you can do anything you want to it.

Recent examples in Seattle (some more successful than others, but all experimenting with boredom and discomfort—and shows I wouldn't have left if they were eight hours long): Forced Entertainment, Dorky Park, GATZ, Implied Violence, and High Kindergarten Performance Group.

It's the desperate, I'll-entertain-you-or-die-trying schtick that drives audiences away. The worst actors aren't the boring ones—they're the overeager, manic, obnoxious ones.

 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This version is better than the bolded one. Stop using bold.
Posted by Bold Police on February 10, 2009 at 5:03 PM
2
tldr. j/k.
Posted by Eric F on February 10, 2009 at 8:06 PM
3
If someone expected me to surrender six hours of my life to their definition of art, I'd leave at intermission too.
Posted by TVDinner on February 10, 2009 at 8:38 PM
4
Praise Jesus, someone said it.
Posted by TheAspiringCrescent on February 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM
5
@3:

That's what you'd think, huh? But all of us who saw GATZ at OTB learned differently. Even the old spoiled white people in the audience didn't leave at intermission(s). You just...couldn't.

I think the thing is, the great artists don't care if you think it's art. They probably don't care if they think it's art, either.
Posted by Miss Foxtrot on February 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM
6
Bloody Mess at OTB was the best theater I've seen in the 20 years I've lived in Seattle.
Posted by neo-realist on February 11, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy