Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 9, 2009

Notes from the Unemployment Line

Posted by on Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Why don't some of our state's unemployed people try to get work at Washington's beleaguered unemployment benefits call center? Here's one person who's trying to do just that...

I've been out of work since October. I used to have a nice contract job at a software firm testing games. I loved my job and while it wasn't the best paying job, I was able to pay rent and eat and was happy. That's slowly coming to an end. I've been applying to administrative jobs since the end of October with no luck. I used to be able to get an admin job within a week or two, but I've been sending out about 2-3 resumes a day since the first of the year (before then it was about 1-2 a week, not realizing how stiff the competition has gotten). I've gotten one response out of all that work. The response came last week, asking if I was still interested in a position I applied for on the 22nd of Jan—but no follow up after I said yes.

I heard about all the problems at the Unemployment Office and decided to try my luck. I sent in an application on Friday, but their first round of hires won't be starting until March 1st. I'm worried I won't make rent for March.

I grew up poor and am used to getting by on very little, but I never thought I'd be worried about rent. I went to college and have experience in the Administrative and Technical fields, and can't make just $700 for rent. The past two months have been demoralizing and depressing and all I want to do is answer phones and file papers. It shouldn't be this hard.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
You are software tester, yet you couldn't find this web form:

https://fortress.wa.gov/esd/uia/icintro/…

It lets you apply for and get weekly unemployment checks.

Since I assume you made good money, you can possibly get the maximum of $500 a week (soon to be $550).

That would easily cover your $700 month rent.

So what's the problem?
Posted by World Wide Web on February 9, 2009 at 5:22 PM
2
@1: Dumbass. The author is a contractor. That means s/he doesn't qualify for unemployment benefits. Or health insurance.

Many of us are contractors, and we're getting a special kind of hosed in this downturn.
Posted by TVDinner on February 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM
3
@2, Having a "contract" job does not automatically mean it's a 1099/self-employment deal (which sucks hardcore, btw--I totally feel your pain). Usually the term "consultant" is used for 1099 jobs in the tech field.

That said, if he is eligible for unemployment benefits, it is unlikely that this game tester would even qualify for the $500/week maximum.

It's unclear whether this guy has been living solely off of savings, or whether he is/was eligible for unemployment, though. Eli, could you clarify?
Posted by lily on February 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM
4
#2: Wrong.

Contractors can get benefits. In 2001, when I was at the Unemployment office (they occasionally require you to come in and take a seminar, etc) there were plenty of Microsoft "contractors" there sipping at the public trough.

I say, drink up, you earned it!
Posted by Drink Up on February 9, 2009 at 5:49 PM
5
I got laid off of a $300,000 a year job in December and I'm collecting my unemployment check while looking for a new one (that will probably only pay half what I was making before). Some people told me they couldn't believe I filed for and was getting unemployment benefits, but the law doesn't discriminate based on earnings. Laid off is laid off. And this pays my rent now.
Posted by jobless on February 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM
6
If one temps, and the contract expires, it falls under the same category as "laid off", i.e. available for all unemployment benefits.

4 is right. 2 is wrong.

Unless there was a special reason for the termination (i.e. dude got fired) or the contract stipulated no unemployment collection after termination of contract (is that even legal?), and as long as this guy has been working in Washington state for at least 18 months, hence avoiding any need to actually call unemployment, the website should suffice.
Posted by mackro mackro on February 9, 2009 at 6:34 PM
7
Funny, I'm an out of work contract-based software tester as well. So it's not just me. Awesome.

Also: the state unemployment services are a joke as far as actually getting help from people.
Posted by brian on February 9, 2009 at 7:51 PM
8
@6: I'm a contractor, and I get shit. Of course, I'm considered self-employed, have to pay the 15% income tax, assume all the risk and get none of the payoffs.

Jesus. I was a fucking idiot when the economy was good. Now I'm a broke-ass fucking idiot with even less of a cushion than the rest of you.

Fuck.
Posted by TVDinner on February 10, 2009 at 12:41 AM
9
@ 5-I call some serious bullshit (or self control, which equates to the same thing during the Bush years) on someone making 300K a year A) living in a apt that would rent for the 2400 maximum unemployment benefit, and B) WTF did you do with cheddar, dog? I'd think you'd have to be on some serious Brewsters Millions bullshit not to stack any cheese when you are making that much!
Posted by a boy named sue on February 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
10
@5: You're greedy, and unworthy of unemployment benefits. You couldn't save ANY of that supposed $300K?? Wow. Idiot.
Posted by ican'tbelievethisschmuck! on February 10, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy