Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, February 5, 2009

As the Print P-I Faces Closure, Record Web Traffic for the Online Edition

Posted by Eli Sanders on Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:40 PM

A Seattle Post-Intelligencer writer with a strong interest in finding a buyer for his newspaper sends over some noteworthy stats. One could definitely read them as an enticement for some wealthy civic do-gooder to step up and purchase the P-I from Hearst. But I also read these stats as one more piece of evidence suggesting that Hearst would be a little crazy not to make a run at some sort of web-only P-I after the print edition's likely demise in early March. (And, I further read this e-mail as a reminder of the dizzying number of blogs the P-I has thrown at the wall lately—with some, obviously, sticking.)

But enough of that. Let's do the numbers:

From: Smith, Don

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:05 PM

To: XXXX

Subject: January Traffic sets P-I record!


P-I staff blogs posted a record 2.8 million page views in January, with two blogs over a half-million page views for the first time ever and nine staff blogs were over 100,000 page views — also a first!

Leading all blogs — with about a quarter of that traffic — was Joe Tartakoff and the Microsoft blog. With 774,153 page views, the Microsoft blog eclipsed the previous record for any P-I blog that had been held by his predecessor, Todd Bishop. But Todd's high, 764,388 page views in June 2008, came mostly on the strength of a single post which had external links. That post, about a Bill Gates e-mail, got 472,405 page views and was one of two posts that got over 20,000 page views that month. Joe's record-setting pace, by contrast, included not a single post with more than 50,000 page views, but 11 posts that got more than 20,000. That's a strong, steady readership.

The Seattle 911 blog, with Casey McNerthney and the breaking news crew, topped a half-million page views for the second time in its brief eight-month history. Again, that's a strong, steady audience. The Big Blog drew 210,712, Huskies Football got 171,873, Aerospace was 140,242, Football 112,784 and Seattle Politics 110,657 — all in familiar six-digit territory showing loyal, steady followings.

New to the 100,000-plus circle this month were Devouring sEATtle, at 112,186 and Seattle Sports (Royal Brougham's Baby), which drew 100,922 page views in its first month.

All of that, and much more, led to record traffic, up more than a third over a month ago and 115 percent ahead of a year ago.

Thanks for all that work! (Complete stats for January Staff blogs are attached).

Don Smith

UPDATE: And hey, since we're showing you theirs, we'll show you ours too. For the month of January Slog had 1.58 million page views—less than the total page views for all the P-I blogs added together, but far more than any individual P-I blog.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Meanwhile, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. lost $6.4 billion. It's all over every "real" news site out there.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty on February 5, 2009 at 4:58 PM
2
Of course the PI's web traffic is up. They're about to shut down their print edition, which has put them in the limelight since the announcement. Please are heading to the website to see what's going on.

And, of course the Microsoft blog got record traffic. Msoft just announced it's first ever mass layoffs, again, driving traffic to Msoft blogs to see what's going on.

This is no different than everybody suddenly buying print editions the day after Obama's nomination, etc. It is not evidence of either a print or online turnaround, just a normal cycle of traffic based on what is currently hot news.

Yawn.
Posted by JJM on February 5, 2009 at 5:09 PM
3
Do they share the pageviews for the actual paper? Is most of the online value of the P-I (or the Stranger, for that matter) in a few high-traffic blogs?
Posted by josh on February 5, 2009 at 5:09 PM
4
The P-I's food blog is named "Devouring sEATtle." Ouch.
Posted by tomasyalba on February 5, 2009 at 5:18 PM
5
the question for all of these stats is how they're measured. Are they from a reputable 3rd party service such as Google Analytics, or are they internally measured from robot-filled server logs. Inquiring minds want to know...
Posted by scott on February 5, 2009 at 5:27 PM
6
Do you guys realize that, after the PI and Seattle Times both fold, The Stranger will be the "newspaper of record" in Seattle?
Posted by Simac on February 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM
7
@5 - Speaking for The Stranger, we use Google Analytics to get these numbers.
Posted by Anthony Hecht on February 5, 2009 at 5:52 PM
8
If you want more pageviews just shorten the Slog page, seriously you have to scroll through dozens of screens to get to the "older entries" link, but that's only counted as one pageview.

Web analytics can be tweaked with just some small changes and newspapers tend to generate a lot of pageviews by their structure.

Front page (pv) - click on story (pv) - back to front page (pv) - click on another story (pv)....and so on.
Posted by pageviewboy on February 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM
9
1.58 million page views is really just 158 people hitting refresh 10,000 times each.
Posted by DOUG. on February 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM
10
In the bad old days people used to talk about "hits", calls to the web server. But it was silly because you could take a page, break it up into different elements, and increase your "hits" by 10x or 20x with the exact same traffic.

How many unique users do you have, that's a lot more telling (although again, highly inaccurate because of cookie deletion and so on).
Posted by pageviewboy on February 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM
11
Uh, am I the only one to notice their site has been glitchy as all fuck for the last month? Maybe the record is all the impatient people triple clicking to get to the articles.

PS- (and SLOG writers might want to take note here) page views are ephemeral- without quality content "same store sales" will decline.

Lot's of people apparently clicked lots of PI posts but that doesn't mean they will come back. Lot's of people look at car wrecks but most won't pay to be in one!
Posted by troll_toll on February 5, 2009 at 8:29 PM
12
The P-I has been excelling itself lately, making me even more nauseated by the idea of having to read Blethen's thing there.
Posted by Amelia on February 5, 2009 at 8:57 PM
13
To be fair, I viewed the Slog about .58 million times in January, so don't get all high and mighty.
Posted by elswinger on February 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM
14
most of the comments on the pi's site in stories about their closure are gleeful about the pi going out of business
Posted by bye bye pi on February 5, 2009 at 10:39 PM
15
I wonder how many of those hits came from this guy:

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
Posted by G-g-g-google botttt on February 5, 2009 at 11:12 PM
16
Google Analytics and most of the web analytics tools out there today use javascript, and spiders and bots don't typically run it.

So no, Googlebot traffic won't count in your numbers.
Posted by pageviewboy on February 6, 2009 at 2:19 AM
17
Ok, I use analog 6.0

It uses 'c' so it runs fast.
Posted by Gnu Guru on February 6, 2009 at 7:01 AM
18
How much of the increase in pageviews is due to a larger number of people out of work?? If you're not working, you have more time to peruse articles online.

I've seen the same radical increase of traffic on Twitter, too.
Posted by arts&letters on February 6, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use