Everyone knows that Stephen King is John Updike compared to Stephenie Meyer. And any Harry Potter book is Great Expectations compared to Twilight. In a recent interview with USA Today, Stephen King pointed that out:
Both Rowling and Meyer, they’re speaking directly to young people. ... The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn. She’s not very good.
He does go on to say something relatively nice about Meyer:
People are attracted by the stories, by the pace and in the case of Stephenie Meyer, it’s very clear that she’s writing to a whole generation of girls and opening up kind of a safe joining of love and sex in those books. It’s exciting and it’s thrilling and it's not particularly threatening because they’re not overtly sexual. A lot of the physical side of it is conveyed in things like the vampire will touch her forearm or run a hand over skin, and she just flushes all hot and cold. And for girls, that’s a shorthand for all the feelings that they’re not ready to deal with yet.
And of course the Twilight fans have come out in comments to defend their High Mormon Priestess:
Stephen Kink is a pompous jerk that hasn't had a highly anticipated or celebrated book in years... he has now resorted to writing a mediocre column for Entertainment Weekly. Who made him the author of all authors to put down someone else's work? Convenient though how this comes just as he is releasing a new book himself... coincidence?
It's funny how most of the comments that defend Twilight are basically praising the book's marketing team rather than the author herself.
(Thanks to Slog tipper Marc.)
Comments (30) RSS