Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Seattle Times, in "Survival" Mode, Will Ask for Help From Union Employees and Lenders

Posted by Eli Sanders on Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:20 AM

This e-mail just went out to Seattle Times employees. It's from Alayne Fardella, Senior Vice President for Business Operations for The Seattle Times Company, and it provides yet another sign of the punishing financial situation the Times is currently facing:

Date: February 4, 2009

To: All Seattle Times Employees

From: Alayne Fardella

Re: Labor Update


I want to let you know about an important step we are taking to help respond to our ongoing financial challenges.

Yesterday, we held a meeting with the administrative officers and business agents of the 11 bargaining units representing affiliated employees of The Seattle Times. The purpose of this meeting was to provide them with a deeper understanding of what the company is facing, what we are doing in order to sustain the organization, and to ask for the participation of our affiliated employees in getting us through these hard times. Frank Blethen and Carolyn Kelly along with several members of SOC spoke candidly about our current circumstances.

The overarching message was one of survival. We are doing everything we can to get through this economic tsunami. To do so, we need significant contributions from all of our employees, both affiliated and unaffiliated. The union leadership clearly understands our situation and expressed willingness to help us work through these next difficult years. We are appreciative of their support, your support and that of our community. We will also be seeking help and support from our lenders.

The e-mail goes on to ask for a 12-percent reduction in payroll and benefits expenses from every unionized employee group, but it doesn't dictate how this reduction will (or should) be achieved. It's not hard to figure out the likely possibilities, though: fewer employees, furloughs for the current employees, or reductions in work hours. The rest of the e-mail is in the jump.

Recently, unaffiliated employees participated in the pension accrual freeze and the furlough program. When those announcements were made in December, we indicated that we would be asking affiliated employees to also contribute. Today’s meeting was the beginning of that process.

We are asking that each employee group contribute savings equal to approximately 12% of their payroll and benefits expense. Given the demands of our daily commitment to readers and advertisers, and the wide variety of functions we perform, the way in which each group achieves this target will vary.

The urgency of the situation we are facing requires us to seek these concessions now rather than waiting for a new round of contract negotiations. We simply cannot afford to delay.

The challenges at hand, and the need for swift action, come as no surprise to anyone. We are hopeful that the contributions we began discussing yesterday will help stave off more severe measures, but there are no guarantees.

While these are difficult times, it is important to remember that challenging financial circumstances are not unique to The Seattle Times. Each day brings a new story about one of our newspaper industry colleagues, not to mention the daily reports of layoffs happening locally and nationally in the broader economy.

Next Steps

We understand union representatives may want to more closely examine our financial statements. If so, we provided each business agent with a copy of our standard confidentiality agreement to sign.

We are working to schedule meetings with the unions over the next weeks because we need to move forward swiftly.

Together, we share common goals — the preservation of jobs and the survival of The Seattle Times into the future. These are tough times to be sure - but we are tough people and I know we can all work together to sustain our organization through these difficult days.

I will continue to provide periodic updates. At any time, please do not hesitate to contact your manager, department head, Martin Hammond or me with questions.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I love my daily newspaper, but a broken business model is a broken business model.

Vaya con dios, Seattle Times.
Posted by Rotten666 on February 4, 2009 at 9:27 AM
2
Makes sense in principle: crappier pay and benefits are better than no job at all.
Posted by Greg on February 4, 2009 at 9:28 AM
3
Dante's lost 10th Circle of Hell is named "Fardella".
Posted by DOUG. on February 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM
4
Does this mean that Lynne Varner still hasn't started dancing and opening the champagne? Poor woman.
Posted by stinkbug on February 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM
5
Rotten666,

That same business model applies to The Stranger as well. Regardless of their slog activity (which btw, has gone down over the past couple years) print advertising is the driving economic force behind print publishing.

So what is your point?
Posted by Paul in Ballard on February 4, 2009 at 9:59 AM
6
Survival mode = deathspin mode
Posted by Ziggity on February 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM
7
The Newspaper Guild and the other unions should say "fuck you, no deal" unless the Times releases all its financial information and makes it public.

Not all newspapers are failing, and not all of them have a "failed business model." But I suspect that the Times does, and it starts with Frank Blethen's incompetence and mismanagement. That's why Blethen wants his financial dealings to be kept secret at all costs.

I remain confident that the Seattle area could support a daily newspaper. But first Frank Blethen and his stupid children need to go.

A public airing of his abominable business decisions, aided and abetted by a sycophantic management (yeah, YOU, Fardella), half of whom could disappear tomorrow and never be missed, would go a long way toward explaining why Washington's largest newspaper is circling the drain.

A new buyer, a drastically slimmed down management, and a hard core of journalists, ad reps, circulation reps and drivers, mailers, and pressmen (yeah, at UNION scale, bitches!) could make a go of it.

But the unions will cave, as they always have, because they have been steadily infiltrated by chickenshit management suckups over the years, and have allowed those suckups to divide them when they should have been standing together.
Posted by ivan on February 4, 2009 at 10:07 AM
8
So, um, when does this survival mode include cancelling the owners private jets and choppers?
Posted by Will in Seattle on February 4, 2009 at 10:29 AM
9
Pretty soon only Trustafarians will be able to afford careers in journalism.
Posted by Sad Day on February 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM
10
The point was I was making a comment in the comments section, Dickhead. And I would hardly compare the stranger to the Times.
Posted by Rotten666 on February 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM
11
@7
yeah
Or the Guild could just cut out the middle man, make a dildo of itself and fuck itself in the A$$.
Either way they're screwed.
Posted by uh! on February 4, 2009 at 10:43 AM
12
This the day that keeps on giving.
Posted by AJ on February 4, 2009 at 10:43 AM
13
10
'cause they employ actual journalist at the Times.
Posted by hey- my dog wrote this post! on February 4, 2009 at 10:44 AM
14
What the fuck does "economic tsunami" mean? A looming wave of economics? Rising waters of economics? God, they deserve to go down, just for that.
Posted by EmilyP on February 4, 2009 at 10:56 AM
15
Alayne Fardella COULD set an example by giving back her $40K+ raise.
Posted by Hip O'Crit on February 4, 2009 at 11:13 AM
16
Ivan you sound like a bitter ex time worker who got shit canned with a shitty settlement. Your a bitter old fat man
Posted by Ivansmom on February 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM
17
@8: So, um, Will -- are you just talking out of your ass again?
Posted by rjh on February 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM
18
Anyone got a million to lend the Times? I don't think they pay me enough to cover the First Right of Refusal check that Hearst isn't paying them this year...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/bu…
Posted by mmc on February 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM
19
@15: Amen. It's impossible to even consider her plea knowing she has received significant salary increases & bonuses each year.
Posted by Former Employee on February 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM
20
Ivan is fat and bitter, but he's also right!
Posted by so true on February 4, 2009 at 11:57 AM
21
@ 16:

Shitty settlement? You poor dumb fucking fool. If I was allowed to tell you the size of my settlement, you would envy me.

If you knew how much it cost Blethen to get rid of me when I could have been making money for him instead, you would not have displayed your bedrock stupidity for the world to see. That was only one of his abominable business decisions.

I am neither fat nor bitter. I have gladly kissed journalism goodbye after almost 40 years in it. I post these opinions for the benefit of my brothers and sisters at the Times who still have hopes for their craft.
Posted by ivan on February 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM
22
Burn!
Posted by Rotten666 on February 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM
23
I also used to work at The Times and Ivan is absolutely correct, Ivansmom. I too walked out with a very generous payout.

That doesn't make up for Frank Blethen's incompetence, ego or annoying habit of keeping his mouth-breathing spawn off the government dole. Nor does it make Alayne "Cruella" Fardella the embodiment of warmth or honesty, but it sure makes it easier to pay rent and keep the cat in kibble.
Posted by Been there, glad I'm not anymore on February 4, 2009 at 6:09 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use