Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Need an Almost-New Corporate Jet?

Posted by on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Starbucks is attempting to sell the executive chariot it purchased last month, reports Cityfile. But just driving it off the lot will cost them millions: Starbucks bought the 19-seat Gulfstream 550 for an estimated $45 million, but the don't-lay-off-people-and-buy luxury-jets market may pay only about $30 million. Behold its in-flight glory:

987c/1233176198-corporate_jet.jpg

According to a sales brochure (.pdf), it only landed 15 times. In other words, that jet cost Starbucks one million dollars per flight. Even worse, the brochure says that the cabin provides no espresso on board—only a "single coffee maker."

UPDATE: The Seattle Times reports Starbucks just announced 6,000 layoffs and 300 store closures.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
that is a sexy jet
Posted by Westside forever on January 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM
2
I've never understood the corporate jet. Chartering a jet for groups of employees sometimes makes sense, but owning one just seems like a money hole, and a status symbol no one has been impressed with since the 70s.

If money isn't an option, I'd rather fly first class. It'd still be cheaper.
Posted by Dougsf on January 28, 2009 at 1:15 PM
3
And they're not putting it on eBay because...why? Are the stupid or something?
Posted by elenchos on January 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM
4
the assholes can't make decent coffee either
Posted by Seattle is screwed to the wall on January 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM
5
It may have only landed 15 times, but who knows how many times it has taken off?
Posted by minderbender on January 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM
6
Psst. Schultz sez 350 more immediate layoffs at HQ, 6,000 more worldwide this year. Hard to keep up with, innit?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/bu…
Posted by tomasyalba on January 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM
7
@2, Do you think CEO's are willing to sit in first class with all the middle managers? And have some rubes taking their family to Disneyland brush by them? You need to read up on the values of white people some more.
Posted by pie on January 28, 2009 at 1:35 PM
8
I think they couldn't find a jet that allowed them to burn the coffee by roasting it with jet fuel.

CEOs should be stuffed into the luggage compartment on a case by case basis, after being strip searched.
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 28, 2009 at 1:40 PM
9
@8
I disagree... CEO's should be shot out of a cannon to their destination.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on January 28, 2009 at 1:53 PM
10
Did the article mention what happened to the exec who instigated and approved this purchase? That must have been a pretty sight. You bought a WHAT?

Executive jets are more about total freedom of routes and departure times than executive luxury. Let's say you need to fly a team to Torino or Melbourne on a moment's notice; commercial flights aren't going to get you there no matter how much money you're willing to spend. And private jets enplane and deplane in minutes, not hours.
Posted by Fnarf on January 28, 2009 at 1:56 PM
11
Why don't they just do like the old Bomber Gas Station down in Milwaukie, OR and install the thing on top of one of their locations? (the Denny & Summit $B would be ideal) It would definitely draw the curious, and probably improve in-store sales tremendously.

'course, $45 mm IS a little steep for a marketing gimmick, but then, what else are they going to be able to use it for?
Posted by COMTE on January 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM
12
Ok, the reason for corporate jets. Lets assume it costs $500/hour to operate. Your overpaid executive cost you $700/hour. If the jet can save your company an hour of the executive's time by not sitting with us cattle at the airline waiting room(s), then its a money saver.

Better yet, don't pay those assholes $700/hour.
Posted by Tom on January 28, 2009 at 2:04 PM
13
Oooh, shiny!
Posted by Napoleon XIV on January 28, 2009 at 2:07 PM
14
umm-if they paid 45 mil. for it and got 15 landings- then they paid 3 mil. per flight.
Even at the cheapo price it's 2 mil. per flight.
Maybe it's math like that that lead us to the place we are now.
Posted by BakerB on January 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM
15
#10 - I think that's how these things are ever justified, but I have a hard time believing that's a necessary component of doing business, even at the Fortune 500 CEO level. If anything, there's a lifestyle built around unreasonable expectations, held purely for the sake of a certain lifestyle... if that makes sense. I do, however, now know the proper term for the act of boarding a plane.

I'm actually acquaintances with a family that owns their own jet similar to that (not acquaintance enough to ever see the inside of it) - when they're not using it, it gets rented out for charter. The whole things seems to make sense, in a way that doesn't entirely make sense to me at all.
Posted by Dougsf on January 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM
16
#14 - they're assuming to recoup $30mm of the purchase price.
Posted by Dougsf on January 28, 2009 at 2:10 PM
17
I'm going to predict that Starbucks declares Chapter 11 within two years
Posted by just predictin' on January 28, 2009 at 2:25 PM
18
@15 You wrote, "If anything, there's a lifestyle built around unreasonable expectations, held purely for the sake of a certain lifestyle... if that makes sense."

That makes sense and explains much about the CEO class in corporate culture. It explains how the failed Merrill Lynch CEO could have spent over a $1 million renovating his office (including a $70,000 toilet) just months before they sold out to BOA, when he was most certainly aware that major change was on the horizon. Among many other examples that don't see nearly as much publicity.
Posted by tres_arboles on January 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM
19
@ 14) If they bought it for $45 million and sell it for $30 million--a $15 million loss on 15 flights--that's a cost of $1 million per flight.
Posted by Dominic Holden on January 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM
20
@9 - cannons create global warming.

But it would make an awesome vid ....
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM
21
Comte @11:

Yeah, that idea worked so well for Club Lagoon, didn't it?
Posted by HL on January 28, 2009 at 3:21 PM
22
Flying cock and balls.
Posted by CEOs have tiny penises on January 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM
23
@3 despite the sarah palin yay i sold things on ebay concept, it's not necessarily the best idea to sell an item of high value on ebay. and this is coming from someone who's been selling on ebay for 8 years, loves ebay, and has even periodically survived entirely on sales from an ebay store.

the thing about ebay is that their fees are a percentage of your sales. specifically, for items over $1,000, it's "8.75% of the initial $25.00 ($2.19), plus 3.50% of the initial $25.01 - $1,000.00 ($34.12), plus 1.50% of the remaining closing value balance($1000.01 - closing value)"

for inexpensive items, the fee is a drop in the bucket compared to the profit you make. but for pricy items, a small percentage can add up. i really wouldn't want to pay $450,000+ or more in ebay fees.



Posted by kimberley d on January 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy