... in my lab:
Human heart cells beat under a microscope. They started out as embryonic stem cells.“The work that we're doing is to try to regenerate the heart after a heart attack. We've been able to take stem cells and turn them into human heart muscles in a dish and we've learned how to make the cells survive after we transplant them," said Chuck Murry, MD, PhD, University of Washington.
Embryonic cells are the only kind of stem cells that do that. But the work has been slowed due to federal restrictions. Dr. Murry is hopeful that will change soon.
Hi Nina! Hi Kareen!
Updated, because I loved this when I came upon it eight long, long, long years ago:
Bush Finds Error In Fermilab Calculations
Former French president Jacques Chirac was rushed to hospital after being mauled by his own 'clinically depressed' pet dog.Look at the dog in the car. Look at its black and stupid eyes. It is only matter of time before it bites its master, the former president of France.The 76-year-old statesman was savaged by his white Maltese dog - which suffers from frenzied fits and is being treated with anti-depressants.
The animal, named Sumo, had become increasingly violent over the past years and was prone to making 'vicious, unprovoked attacks', Chirac's wife Bernadette said.
President Barack Obama took the advice of constitutional lawyers and retook the oath of office Wednesday that Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed the first time around.Roberts re-administered the oath privately Wednesday evening at 7:30 in the White House Map Room. White House counsel Greg Craig said Obama took the oath from Roberts again out of an "abundance of caution."
Maybe—though I doubt it—this will shush those zealous right-wing conspiracy theorists with a blog and even those zealous right-wing conspiracy theorists with a television network:
In more oath-related news, Obama looked annoyed this afternoon when Biden made a joke at the expense of Chief Justice John Roberts for flubbing the oath the first time.
Obamalincoln's up on Capitol Hill.

Just Out, Portland's gay newspaper, just called on Sam Adams, Portland's gay mayor, to resign for fucking an 18 year-old and lying about it instead of, you know, bragging about it. Just Out's call for Adams' head comes on top of the Oregonian and Portland Tribune's previous calls for Adams to resign. But what does Slog think?
Sam Adams, mayor of Portland...
This Slog poll, like all Slog polls, is tamper-proof, scientific, and legally binding.
A lot of people have called Obama's speech "underwhelming," which, after watching it twice more, I understand: To me, most of Obama's speeches are overwhelming. In contrast, I thought his speech yesterday was nearly perfect. Although I came of voting age in the era of Clinton—which is to say, the last time people of my political persuasion really got behind a political leader—the hero-worship around Obama has always turned me off. The idea of worshiping a politician isn't just unpalatable to me, it's foreign; I can admire political leaders—I admire Obama—but I know they'll always let me down. Pleasing everybody all the time is not a part of the politician's job description.
I've always been a little cold to Obama because I feel he's never really acknowledged this—never owned his own fallibility, the fact that he will inevitably let his followers down. His speeches have always been too soaring, too capital-H historical, too full of crowd-pleasing flourishes and fillips, for my taste. Unlike the chanting, worshipful crowds, I wasn't looking for a "climactic moment"; as far as I'm concerned, "plain language"—the type of rhetoric Eli referred to as "middle-brow"—is exactly what yesterday's occasion called for. The notes Obama struck yesterday—we are a nation humbled, my predecessor has done harm to America but we will not be broken, change requires work and responsibility—were exactly the ones I wanted to hear at this moment in history.
This was my favorite part:
We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less.
It has not been the path for the faint-hearted, for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame.
Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor — who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.
For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life. For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West, endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.
For us, they fought and died in places Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sahn.
Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.
This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions — that time has surely passed.
Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.
...it's just, you know, an observation.
I was talking to some avowed homosexuals last night and we all agreed that we were 1. thrilled to bits about our new president... but slightly disappointed that the gays didn't get a shout-out during the inauguration yesterday. But no one was so disappointed that it ruined the day for anyone. It was a great fucking day regardless. But, um, everyone else got a shout out—the black man, the red man, the yellow man, the mellow man. Just not the gay man. And considering that the gays got a shout out from Obama when he won the nomination, and a shout out from Obama when he won the election, and a shout out from Obama when he kicked off the inaugural festivities on Sunday, the omission of a shout out to the gays from the inauguration itself seemed conspicuous.
But no one was all that upset by the omission; again, it didn't spoil the day for anyone and any feathers ruffled by the lack of a shout out—and the inclusion of Rick Warren—were smoothed over when WhiteHouse.gov went live and we all saw the prominent play gay rights got on "The Agenda" section of the website.
"Still," one of my homosexual friends emailed me this morning, "it would've been great if the awesome black preacher at the end had added us to his list: 'Where black won't be asked to step back; where brown can stick around; where yellow can be mellow; where the red man can get ahead, man; where gay can stay; where white will embrace what's right.' Just four more words. Wouldn't that have been amazing?"
Yes, it would've been amazing. But you know what will be even more amazing? Obama delivering on his agenda for gay and lesbian civil rights. He's president now. We don't need anymore shout-outs. We need results. We want—what's that word again? Oh, yeah: change.
I am heartily impressed that David Rees, the Get Your War On guy, seems to have gone through with his promise to end the strip on Bush's last day in office. If only we could have somehow convinced Bil Keane (or whoever is doing Family Circus now) to do the same thing.

Here's an interview with Rees. The changing face of comedy in the new administration continues.
What?!
Thanks, Mary.

The dress and jacket were fabulous—the 3/4th sleeves, the lace, and the color fashion-checked the Kennedy era flawlessly. She looked both elegant and sunny (counterbalancing his speech full of dark-and-stormy imagery), and that cut is very, very right for her figure. Shoes and gloves: perfect accent color, oddball but not screamingly bright like the Republican ladies seem to favor. I read that the gloves were J. Crew, and someone was dinging her for the shoes/gloves not matching perfectly, to which I say: She's not a goddamn Barbie doll AND we're in a recession, people.
I haven't looked too closely at the evening gown, but it seemed unfortunately reminiscent of Bjork's terrible swan-dress. Also that neckline is asymmetrical in a bad way, making her look lopsided rather than possessed of a Grecian-style elegance.
But former guest-Slogger, local costumer extraordinaire, &etc. It's Mark Mitchell knows better than I:
I didn't pay a whole lot of attention to the clothes, but agree with all of your points. Including the shoes/gloves not matching, which I noticed and appreciated. I liked that she chose Isabel Toledo, who has never gotten the recognition she deserves. I couldn't have liked the color and fabric more, but thought it was a little dressy with the jeweled neckline. I would have preferred something less sparkly. Also, the chiffon bow at the waistline of the dress was pretty, but flapped annoyingly while we anxiously waited for those Texan Terrorists to get on the helicopter. But those are small points. She looked amazing and appropriate and happy.The party dress was a disappointment to me, but not in a horrible way. Just a missed opportunity. It was too little girly for her womanly shape, and wasn't Jason Wu (the designer) originally a designer of DOLL DRESSES? I would have loved to seen her in a bolder color, and you are correct about the bodice. It wasn't flattering and there was something almost bandage-y about the shoulder strap. I didn't get a Bjork swan vibe, though.
But none of it comes close to how cool it was to see them walking down the street yesterday, and how I teared up reading the NYT's reportage of the President's first day of work just now, and how great it feels to simply type the title "President" instead of my usual way of substituting "that asshole who tried to kill our country and should thank Heaven we don't stone him in the public square" or some such.
I love America.
Amen, It's Mark Mitchell. I cried tears of joy at least four times yesterday.
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images; more photos and commentary here, where it is also revealed that the jeweled neckline is actually a brooch.
Caroline this time, according to the NYPOST.
Caroline Kennedy has told Gov. David Paterson that she is withdrawing her name from consideration to replace outgoing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the U.S. Senate, The Post has learned.Kennedy cited "personal reasons," according to sources. Her stunning move comes as sources revealed that Paterson had intended to appoint her to the now-vacant seat today.
Title: Barack and Michelle Do WHAT Together?!
The lack of immediate correction is one thing; the idea that this action is "with one another," though, that's really something. Is it like a race?
The Stranger Election Control Board tells you how to vote in this strange special election, right over here.
From the Seattle Times, this morning:

From the Seattle Times, this afternoon:

Adams has adamantly denied having sex with a former city intern, Beau Breedlove before Breedlove turned 18. This is a huge factor in the story—second only to the fact that Adams lied to the public about the relationship. The Seattle Times apparently saw no need for a correction.
Remember the fighter-jet-art controversy? Well, tonight there'll be another public discussion about art at a light rail station—this time about the art at the future UW station—at 7 pm at MOHAI. According to the press release,
Artist Leo Saul Berk has been commissioned to create an original artwork suitable for an institution of higher education and a world-class research facility, and that addresses the enormous scale of the 110 feet underground station.
I don't know exactly what he's got planned, but at left is the image Sound Transit provided and here's some of his other work.
I AM CARL, THE ALMIGHTY BRAIN OF SLOG. MERE MORTALS CANNOT BEGIN TO APPROACH MY POWER. BE AFRAID, DAN SAVAGE—BE VERY, VERY AFRAID.
Sorry, but there's still nothing all that funny to report from the bus full of comedians. Close, but certainly no exploding cigar: Somewhere south of New Jersey, one of the bus-riding comedians read aloud from some sort of wireless device news that President Obama—President Obama! first time I've written that! feels lovely!—news that President Obama had signed an executive order that will force a change in lobbyist behavior. Then another comedian, a white guy, analyzed: "That's sorta like saying, 'Stop watcha doin, cause I'ma bout to ruin, the image and the style that you're used to..."
But where was I? Oh yeah. We in the ticketed area had just been ordered to take our seats, and the standing masses outside had good-naturedly heckled us, and we had heckled ourselves, too, and then we dutifully sat down to watch the inauguration ceremony.
I really loved this interplay between the world of the crowd and the world of the privileged. When now-former president George W. Bush was introduced, the crowd on the Mall sang: Na na na na, na na na na, hey, hey, hey, goodbye. And the polite people with tickets—because, for the most part, one does not get tickets to watch the inauguration up close without having conformed to a certain sort of decorum for most of his or her life, and thus most all of these ticketed people were trying to behave extremely properly—these polite people with tickets just did not know what to do. A scattered few sang along. But the rest smiled quietly, or scowled loudly. When, later, Bush walked onto the podium, the Mall crowd welcomed him into the cold air with more than a million boos. By then, something had broken down in the proper sections of the proper section, and the ticketed people booed right along with them.

Dennis Evans's The Physician (The Alchemist) (2008), encaustic and mixed media on canvas, 60 by 48 by 5 inches
At Woodside/Braseth Gallery. (Gallery site here.)
I have tried repeatedly to warm up to Dennis Evans's strict, perfectionist paintings of systems of knowledge, but they drive me away every time.
From the Mail:
Sexy, sexy Slog readers! It's that time of year again:

Here's the Flickr pool of sexiness! Get in there and paddle around, then shove someone incredibly hot in!
I'm still getting texts from Barack. Yesterday they were practical. I was told at one point that it was too late to take a certain route to the Mall, and that I should take 14th instead. Although I was 3,000 miles away, it was thoughtful of him to mention it. After the speech, I received a message encouraging me to discourage trampling:
Barack Obama is now the 44th President of the United States. Please stay & watch the parade on the jumbotrons. Encourage your neighbors to exit the Mall slowly.
Later in the afternoon I received this:
Reply to this msg w/your wishes for President Obama. Text photos of your event to 202-503-6207 for on-air use. Terms at ...
I did not text any wishes and am not sure whether I was supposed to send the sort of wishes one might describe as "best" or "warm," or the sort that are more like "here's what I wish you would do." In any case, I like these texts.
Neighborhood activists are crusading to rescue a one-story, black wooden building at East Olive Way and Boylston Avenue East—home to B & O Espresso for 33 years—from being demolished for a new apartment building. Tonight they will amass an army at a meeting in Seattle Central Community College, where the developer will unveil his plans for the site. “I called the college and requested a larger room,” says Mike Bush, who lives a half-block east of the threatened building and is an organizer of the Capitol Hill Organization Insuring Cultural Equity. Using its website, the group has gathered over 1,400 petition letters to present to the city’s Department of Planning and development (DPD), pleading to preserve the 1923 structure. “I would like to see the building remain as a permanent fixture in the neighborhood,” he says.

But the building lacks architectural zing. “It’s part of the culture of the neighborhood,” Bush explains. He wants to save it as a charming neighborhood anchor. Moreover, he dreads whatever would replace it. “It is just going to be another huge monolithic ugly structure.”
However, the strategy to save the building through petition and outcry is flawed: DPD couldn’t block the project even if it wanted to. The department doesn’t designate landmarks; the landmark preservation board does that. And, Bush acknowledges, the building lacks the architectural prominence or historical significance to quality as a landmark. “We really don’t have a lot of leg to stand on,” he says. And despite the web-generated petitions collected by Bush, Bruce Rips, a DPD planner who oversees the proposed building for the city, says only one person has called him about the project.
Meanwhile, Bush’s wife and member of CHOICE, Sally Knodell, suggests the city needs a “new type of landmark designation that allows for architecture that has significant socio-cultural value.”
I agree with Knodell—we should designate certain buildings as landmarks if they fall short of architectural phenomena but do provide something especially unique. For instance, some of the masonry warehouses in the Pike-Pine neighborhood would be ideal: They contain uncommonly large spaces and together they form a district of historical arts and nightlife uses. But the B & O building is extremely average, houses a bland restaurant, and designwise stands alone.
The same compulsion that drives the notion that we have the right to paint our houses with rainbows and pink triangles—and neighbors have to suck it up—also grants a building’s owner to cover up those rainbows: or even tear down the building. There must be compelling public interest to supercede a person’s right to do what they want with their own stuff. The B & O building—despite the fact that the B & O has been lovely—doesn’t meet that bar, nor should it.
John Stoner, who bought the property 12 years ago, plans to build a six-story, 75-unit apartment building on the site. In a drawing submitted to the city, he even uses the "B & O" name on the building. “I think that it currently isn’t used for its highest and best use, and I think the proposed development will improve the quality of the neighborhood,” he says. He hopes to begin construction within two or three years, and he wants B & O to return when the new building is complete.
But that may not be possible, says B & O Espresso’s owner, Majed Lukatah. While going on hiatus during construction, he says, “I don’t know if my customers would wait for me to come back.” Lukatah is also skeptical that he can still open a second location on Broadway—which could serve as a substitute location while the B & O is closed—even though he has already obtained the permits. Banks won’t offer him a loan to remodel the space, he says. Moving into the new building would be cost prohibitive, as market rates for new buildings are typically double what he pays now.
Stoner says that, while he hopes B & O could return to the new building, he won't offer any rent control to ensure the B & O's return. “I don’t think we ever have over the years made the assurance that it would be anything other than market rate after [a tenant's] current lease has expired,” he says.
The meeting begins at 8:00 p.m. tonight in room 4106 at Seattle Central Community College.
A bill to be introduced in the state legislature would make it a crime to kill or seriously injure a person with a car while violating a traffic law—a response to the killing of City Council aide Tatsuo Nakata by driver Ephraim Schwartz, who struck Nakata in a crosswalk while talking on his cell phone.
Last year, the King County Superior Court overturned a city ordinance that made killing or injuring someone while breaking traffic laws a gross misdemeanor, arguing that state law bars cities from criminalizing traffic infractions except in a few specific situations, such as when a driver has been drinking. The legislation would add violating traffic laws to that list. The new crime would be known as "assault by vehicle," to distinguish it from vehicular assault, a felony.
"The problem we're trying to address is that there's a big gap between a civil infraction"—a traffic ticket—"and a felony," says City Attorney Tom Carr, who's pushing for the legislation. "It's my view that if you speed regularly through school zones and 99 percent of the time nothing happens, but one percent of the time you seriously injure somebody, that should be more serious" than a mere traffic violation, Carr says.
The bill, which could be introduced by state Sen. Joe McDermott, D-34, is also supported by the Cascade Bicycle Club. David Hiller, advocacy director for the Club, says the legislation "makes the penalty more closely fit the crime. It increases the level of responsibility for people who drive." Hiller says opposition to the bill has come from both privacy advocates (who don't want evidence from red-light cameras to be used in criminal cases) and some legislators, who feel, as drivers, that "there but for the grace of God go I," Hiller says.
McDermott has not yet returned a call for comment about the legislation.