Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

In Regards to Poetry Being Boring

Posted by Paul Constant on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Wait a minute; first give me a minute to bask in the glory that was the shout-out to atheists in the inaugural speech.

(Sigh.)

Okay.

e1b6/1232481773-278b6698-8f54-44bd-8167-4d1304b9f28f.jpgApparently, you all didn't like Elizabeth Alexander's poem. I put the transcript of it after the jump—the breaks are almost assuredly not right—in case you couldn't hear it over the commercial-break-like elephant stampede to the bathroom or the bar that most people took the poem for.

Here's what I think: I think that it wasn't good, but I don't think that it was terribly bad. I thought her delivery was pretty bad, and that made it seem worse than it was. But the poem itself is a fair mirror of what we've seen of the incoming administration. It's a little sentimental, but it's not dramatic at all—Maya Angelou's sloppy-tearful poem from the first Clinton inauguration might as well have been a warning sign of the drama that was to come in the Clinton White House—and it understands the importance of uncelebrated work.

Which is exactly what the poem should have been: It looks like, once this necessary ceremony is done with the first part of the Obama* presidency is going to be all about service and getting directly to work, with few distractions. Things start off pretty well: The images of cutting and piercing, immediately followed by the image of sewing uniforms speaks to both the idea of repairing clothes—which is something that people should do more of, but don't do so often anymore—and restoring the image of our armed forces, which has become tattered.

Then there's a ragtag orchestra coming to life, perhaps a little shaky at first. Getting the bus, a farmer, a classroom beginning a test. A return to the thorns, and the idea that words, with a little thought, can be smoothed. And then the first quoted words of the poem are about exploration.

I think the line "Say it plain, that many have died for this day," is something that should be said at every inauguration. It heads up a section of the poem about building and work. The "figuring it out at kitchen tables" is an unfortunate direct lift from the election. The different credos—love thy neighbor, first do no harm, take only what you need—is something that should also be recited at each inauguration, but it comes from nowhere, and it builds into the part of the poem about love, which is exactly when it becomes a generic inaugural poem. It doesn't work at all—here is where she should have fine-tuned the music idea she created at the beginning, and tied it in to the "praise song" bit a little more.

The image of a "widening pool of light," the idea that "anything can be made"—they both are wonderful ideas that get jumbled. And then she goes back to the light, and walking forward. But instead of the music or musicians coming forward into the light, it's a song about coming forward into the light. It's too passive.

If Alexander had just stuck to the idea of Americans quietly doing their jobs, of all those workers coming together into something much bigger than the work itself—that would've been a knockout inauguration poem. It would've been something to see a poet return the ridiculously grandiose day to the people, especially the people whose jobs are so necessary that they didn't have time to stop and listen to something as inessential as, say, a poem at an inauguration. But the idea of the poem being an inaugural poem came in and messed things up. As they almost always do. B+ for effort, C for written execution, D+ for spoken delivery.

*When is my fucking spell check going to recognize "Obama?" When?

Each day we go about our business, walking past each other, catching each others' eyes or not, about to speak or speaking. All about us is noise. All about us is noise and bramble, thorn and din, each one of our ancestors on our tongues. Someone is stitching up a hem, darning a hole in a uniform, patching a tire, repairing the things in need of repair.

Someone is trying to make music somewhere with a pair of wooden spoons on an oil drum with cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.

A woman and her son wait for the bus.

A farmer considers the changing sky; A teacher says, "Take out your pencils. Begin."

We encounter each other in words, words spiny or smooth, whispered or declaimed; words to consider, reconsider.

We cross dirt roads and highways that mark the will of someone and then others who said, "I need to see what's on the other side; I know there's something better down the road."

We need to find a place where we are safe; We walk into that which we cannot yet see.

Say it plain, that many have died for this day. Sing the names of the dead who brought us here, who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges, picked the cotton and the lettuce, built brick by brick the glittering edifices they would then keep clean and work inside of.

Praise song for struggle; praise song for the day. Praise song for every hand-lettered sign; The figuring it out at kitchen tables.

Some live by "Love thy neighbor as thy self."

Others by first do no harm, or take no more than you need.

What if the mightiest word is love, love beyond marital, filial, national. Love that casts a widening pool of light. Love with no need to preempt grievance.

In today's sharp sparkle, this winter air, anything can be made, any sentence begun.

On the brink, on the brim, on the cusp — praise song for walking forward in that light.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
That headline should read either "With Regard to Poetry Being Boring" or the less euphonious "Regarding Poetry Being Boring." Not "in regards to."
Posted by Tim Appelo on January 20, 2009 at 12:06 PM
2
Yeah, that reads much better... her delivery really did it in for me.
Posted by wench on January 20, 2009 at 12:09 PM
3
Her delivery was terrible, but understandably so. She seemed pretty nervous. How many poets ever get up in front of an audience that size and deliver a brand-new work? My heart went out to her.

(confidential to Paul: right-click, then "add to dictionary.")
Posted by Levislade on January 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM
4
The poem does seem somewhat better in text form... but, that's sort of not the point. The poem was to be read at the inauguration. That was its purpose. Even if it was an excellent poem (which it was not), if the delivery was terrible (which is was), then it was a failure.
Posted by Julie in Chicago (now in Eugene) on January 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM
5
I agree with your sentiment, Paul, which is why all this ceremony turns me off. I think the last line is especially awful.
Posted by mint chocolate chip on January 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM
6
The poem was lovely. The delivery was perfectly fine. What the hell people? Not enough to complain about today?
Posted by tacomagirl on January 20, 2009 at 12:14 PM
7
How is that poets have not figured out how terrible that standard-issue, affected delivery sounds? Do they teach it in poet school or something?
Posted by Aaron Huffman on January 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM
8
Much too harsh an assessment. Yes Alexander could have been better. But hers was the ONLY testimony during the inauguration that uttered anything remotely like "What if the mightiest word is love, love beyond marital, filial, national." Except for Alexander's testimony, the tenor of the event was incredibly nationalistic: a ceremony of state religion, a ritual replacement of one "first family" with another. I am very grateful for her use of language to suggest that the highest good we can achieve is not measured or dictated by God or state.
Posted by Trevor on January 20, 2009 at 12:23 PM
9
my favorite line:
"In today's sharp sparkle, this winter air, anything can be made, any sentence begun."
Posted by maggie on January 20, 2009 at 12:29 PM
10
that was supposed to be a poem? Rev Lowry was SO poetic, perhaps we need more preachers and less poets, or maybe poets could learn from preachers how to turn a phrase and deliver the words so the people will WANT to hear!
Posted by Sarah Moon on January 20, 2009 at 12:34 PM
11
A nice piece in Salon about the near impossibility of writing an occasional poem: http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/…

Really, the only good inaugural poem was Frost's, and that wasn't written for the occasion at all.

Add to that, Alexander was clearly nervous. She's a far better writer than Angelou ever was or will be, but doesn't have the gravity in her voice that Angelou does. Angelou could have read her grocery list and it would have sounded profound (and that poem of hers wasn't much better than a grocery list).

All that said, I've read Alexander's poem a few times now and it...OK. There are some very good moments about halfway through after all the throat-clearing of the first few stanzas, but then it falls off at the end again.

Anyway, read the Salon piece. Perhaps it'll give you some more sympathy.
Posted by lopes on January 20, 2009 at 12:41 PM
12
I'm sorry, but the poem is completely, utterly terrible. It has no music, no rhythm, no life. It is a flabby parade of ideas garlanded with what the author thinks is poetic language, but which is really like frosting on a steak -- unecessary and harmful. It's a poem of ideas, but ideas don't belong in poems. It doesn't have any language in it. Stripped of the gunk, it's as banal as it is possible to be. It's shit.

And it's funny that a woman who's probably sold fewer than a thousand books in her life is appearing in this imperial theater.
Posted by Fnarf on January 20, 2009 at 12:47 PM
13
The poem was a call for healing and acceptance, something we all need and have been asking for.
..."What if the mightiest word is love, love beyond marital, filial, national.
Love that casts a widening pool of light"

Posted by Inkweary on January 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM
14
FNARF I look forward to reading YOUR next book of poems. Clearly Yale must have erred to have hired her instead of you.
Posted by Trevor on January 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM
15
A poem like that is for when you are watching the TV and need to use the bathroom. Also, technically it is not a poem. There are too many complete sentences, thus actually shoud be classified as prose.
Posted by Nitpicker in New York on January 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM
16
I can't shake this line:

"built brick by brick the glittering edifices they would then keep clean and work inside of."

Was there really no other way to word this? I'm not anal retentive so I'm not going to cry about ending the sentence with a preposition, but the way it's currently set up is so horribly clunky and distracting, especially when spoken, that it takes away from what was otherwise the most moving part of the poem ("Say it plain that many have died for this day").
Posted by Jesse on January 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM
17
Um...there is nothing--NOT ONE SINGLE THING--in the world that defines a poem as a written work without complete sentences. I don't think you read much poetry.

Nothing worse than an uninformed nitpicker.
Posted by nitpicker nitpicker on January 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM
18
@16

I couldn't agree more. She mucked up that line pretty badly. And I agree, just at the point where she was finding the good part of the poem.

(Although, to be fair, the "don't end a sentence with a preposition" rule has been all but written out of modern usage. But it was also totally unnecessary in that line.)
Posted by lopes on January 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM
19
Paul, I'm totally with you. The poem went down in flames at the word "love."
Posted by Jen Graves on January 20, 2009 at 1:07 PM
20
@3: Quite a few, quite a few . . .
Posted by my name where? on January 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM
21
I'm with @16 & @18. In fact, i was hoping reading it would improve that part, but no. That "of" is like an unexpected cymbal crash making you forget the last two lines and keeping you from hearing the next two.
Posted by W.T. Foxtrot on January 20, 2009 at 1:29 PM
22
Trevor, the fact that my poems are unbelievably horrible has nothing to do with whether the inaugural poet was any good or not. There shouldn't be poetry at the inaugural. Nor should there be PA announcements, cannon fire, or any of the other hoopla; it should be no more complicated than swearing in a new congresscritter or Prime Minister. Obama's the president, not an emperor or king. This was a coronation.
Posted by Fnarf on January 20, 2009 at 1:47 PM
23
I largely agree. My point is that in lieu of getting rid of the pomp and circumstance of an imperial presidency, that it is worth noting that the ONLY presenter who offered a subtle challenge to hero worship and nation worship was a poet.
Posted by Trevor on January 20, 2009 at 1:55 PM
24
I kind of liked the rhythm of the poem.

But it's hard to compete with the second preacher - he nailed it.
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 20, 2009 at 3:01 PM
25
Paul: I'm curious about your "basking."

I did not care for the shout-out. "Atheist" is not a dirty word, and Obama chose to define us in the negative -- what we are not, "believers."

I believe in things, just not God. Also, the list was too short. Maybe he shouted out atheists, but not Buddhists, not Wiccans, etc. etc.

Beyond that, the entire rest of the day was larded up with Christianity, from the early morning church service, to Warren praying in Jesus' name, to the recitation of the Lord's Prayer, and more.

Am I being too picky? Convince me I should "bask" along with you. I'm not.

I really hated that Warren was involved.
Posted by Andrew on January 20, 2009 at 8:22 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use