Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Art and Inaugurations

Posted by Jen Graves on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM

9b36/1232486966-nat_stat_hall_1.jpg
Statuary Hall

Obama's inaugural luncheon was held in Statuary Hall, which is basically a ridiculously architecturally elaborate (the Pantheon blushes and faints) museum of arcane black and white statues.

Were you wondering too what all those black and white men represent? (I'm assuming they were all men because it looked that way on TV and, well, because.) It turns out that each statue represents a state. Here's a map of the statues. Washington's statue is of a man who was "massacred by Indians." Yes.

That covers the sculpture and architecture. But what about the painting that was borrowed for the occasion?

Turns out a painting at the luncheon has been a tradition since Ronald Reagan's inauguration in 1985, when he showed this. Morning in America, sure—and cheesy and religious as hell. This is a painting that tells you to sit back and do nothing; all will happen for and to you. You're nothing but a subject. Hello, 1980s!

c3f3/1232487523-a000006f.jpg

For G.H.W., it was humility all the way (and again with the great taste—look at that godhead above the godhead!).

1a1d/1232487841-31_00001.jpg

Clinton (first term) goes with this brushy, apple-cheeked young Thomas Jefferson, which makes perfect sense for the apple-cheeked saxophonist. Clinton Two is thoroughly chastened (although he doesn't realize how chastened he's about to be) and picks a homely and lonely-looking John Adams. Adams, notably, is facing right, while Jefferson was facing left.

8b24/1232488262-31_00006.jpg

3bce/1232488308-31_00005.jpg

Wouldn't you know W comes in and blows them all away with his bad, focusless art?

011b/1232488538-2001_painting.jpg

W2 is a dramatic, ominous sublime by Bierstadt. Bush may have meant it to signify the state of post-9/11 America, but instead it clearly symbolizes his frightening presidency.

71eb/1232488757-2005_painting.jpg

Now here's Obama's choice: Thomas Hill's View of the Yosemite Valley from 1865, created in homage to Lincoln's setting aside of the Yosemite Valley and the Mariposa Grove of Giant Sequoias as a public reserve.

There's the environmental message (look at that broken-off tree trunk on the right). There's also the fact that the distance is hazy, not in an anxious way—but in the way that what's out there is an open question. The colors are fairly muted. The light source has only an oblique presence. As far as 19th-century American landscapes go, this one is pretty low-drama (no-drama Obama).

And most of all, this is a Western landscape. (Most presidencies, with the glaring exception of Reagan, feel Eastern or Southern by contrast.) This is a portrait of pioneering without much of the swagger usually associated with it. Not only are we pioneering, we're pioneering pioneering, quietly. There's a path, sort of, leading straight ahead, downhill, and into a canyon of rocks. Here we go.

22cb/1232487175-content-luncheon-painting.jpg

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Isn't that the Bierstadt hanging at SAM?
Posted by Your Name Here on January 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
2
Obama could not have kissed California's ass more... escorted by DiFi and Pelosi, and now this! Well good for him -- California is a fun state.
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on January 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM
3
If it started in 1985, it's not a goddamn tradition. More trappings of coronation. The Founding Fathers must be rolling in their graves at this antidemocratic folderol. Obama should have found a lunch counter and eaten there.
Posted by Fnarf on January 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
4
Great post...way to be topical and still stick to your beat.
Posted by schmacky on January 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM
5
Nice job reducing the description of the Marcus Whitman statue to stir up some shit. What's the point of the selective quoting and bolding?
Posted by EmilyP on January 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM
6
They're not all men! Check out WY.
Posted by ladies get statues too on January 20, 2009 at 2:37 PM
7
This was a very informative slog post. 10 points to you, Ms Graves.
Posted by jsteel2005 on January 20, 2009 at 2:45 PM
8
Was Reagan's painted by Thomas Kinkade? Blah.
Posted by keshmeshi on January 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM
9
"I'm assuming they were all men because it looked that way on TV and, well, because."

You are wrong. They aren't all men. IL, WY, CO... You could have at least clicked around a bit and checked instead of assuming.
Posted by N on January 20, 2009 at 2:52 PM
10
No, the Bierstadt at SAM is of the Pacific Coast. Bierstadt...j*** in my pants!
Posted by srsly on January 20, 2009 at 3:03 PM
11
I kinda like Dubya's Capitol painting.
Posted by DOUG. on January 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM
12
Hm. Jen, I grew up in Minnesota, and I've always had that feeling that we were looking west. There was more room, more growth, more space, and more freedom that direction. East, there were trees. And ... Wisconsin. And that boring, smothering Eastern Seaboard.

Yosemite was a place to get to, the last stop on a long journey. Could it be the same, looking west from Chicago?
Posted by STJA on January 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM
13
1) The Pantheon is not an architectural work that stands out for its frills, swirls, or decadence. The Greek tradition was balance, order, a humbler beauty. Statuary Hall falls under a different, more decadent, ornate style; an American Rococo, even. Please ignore Jen Grave's senseless, and ineloquent references to Statuary Hall being like, basically, a ridiculously architecturally elaborate museum. (hair flip)

2) Clinton and Jefferson share a likeness, not in that they were both renaissance men, but that they had rosey cheeks. How appropriate. Because everyone knows Jefferson had rosey cheeks. It, like, makes sense.

3) And then there is the "environmental message" of the singular, broken-off tree trunk (broken at the top, mind you ) in Obama's choice of the Thomas Hill painting. Ok ok, someone else can run with this....
Posted by commentz on January 20, 2009 at 3:22 PM
14
Florida's statue: John Gorrie, the man who invented the air conditioner.
Posted by lolz on January 20, 2009 at 3:24 PM
15
The Thomas Hill feels like the setting of a French classical era painting, like Homer or Socrates should be there in the foreground.

Perhaps he chose it so that he could explain why he likes it: 'El Capitan is on the left'.
Posted by kinaidos on January 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM
16
in 1990 the State of Kansas replaced some old guy with a newer old guy; Eisenhower. I think Washington State should ditch Marcus Whitman. Apparently he was kilt by indians.
Posted by Drawmark on January 20, 2009 at 3:48 PM
17
Someone above mentioned the Wyoming statue is a female and likewise the Illinois statue is of a female (Frances E. Willard). Perhaps there are even more...
Posted by John on January 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM
18
Marcus fucking Whitman?! "All my plans require time and distance" Marcus fuckin' Whitman?

Ohhh man. That is so bad.
Posted by gnossos on January 20, 2009 at 10:34 PM
19
Great post, Jen.
@13, "The Pantheon blushes and faints", I assume, at having its basic form made a vehicle for ornate decoration. Also, it's in Rome.
Posted by Eric F on January 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Add a comment

Most Commented on Slog

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use