Slog
News & ArtsFriday, January 16, 2009
Politics / Enviro So Much for Local Control
Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:15 PM
As if the upcoming referendum on Seattle's 25-cent disposable bag fee wasn't enough, state Rep. Dean Takko of Longview (D-19) introduced legislation today that would prohibit local governments from charging a fee or tax on disposable paper or plastic shopping bags. Takko, whose district includes Weyerhaeuser's largest plant as well as several other timber and paper-products companies, has received contributions from Weyerhaeuser, Port Blakely Tree Farms, Hampton Lumber Mills, and Rayonier, Inc., an international timber corporation. The bill is cosponsored by seven other legislators, all of them from timber-producing districts.
3
They're representing the interests of their constituencies, the folks who live in their districts and work for the timber and paper companies. I don't blame them one bit. In fact, they're doing exactly what they should be doing, if you believe that your elected officials should represent your interests.
4
What do we do about this? I want the bag tax PASSED. How can I make it happen? Erica, please help.
5
If the "local controllers" governed with any brains, the "outside agitators" wouldn't be proposing this.
8
It seems like a bag fee would increase the use of paper bags, to some degree anyway. If you're paying 25 cents for a bag, you might as well ask for paper bags which are more durable and hold more stuff.
9
I'm no fan of the bag tax, but buddy from Longview ought to butt the hell out of what ought to be decisions made at the local level.
10
Can I propose legislation that would keep tax revenue local to within a county and its adjacent counties, including gas tax and sales and use tax?
11
Can I propose legislation that instructs anyone living in Longview to butt the hell out of Seattle's biznez?
At least until they clean up the stink that Longview Fibre puts out down there? Phew!
At least until they clean up the stink that Longview Fibre puts out down there? Phew!
13
Amend the bag tax so that it only applies to the counties that want it. Make it a giant pain in the ass for stores to do business and bag producers to find clients.
14
Good.
Seriously, you guys need to think of a better way to do this, such as a deposit/return scheme like Oregon uses for bottles.
(caveat - have owned paper/forestry firms in the past and worked in lumber mills in my teens and pre-teens)
Seriously, you guys need to think of a better way to do this, such as a deposit/return scheme like Oregon uses for bottles.
(caveat - have owned paper/forestry firms in the past and worked in lumber mills in my teens and pre-teens)
15
I'm becoming convinced that this Democrat supermajority we have in this state is a bunch of bullshit. More and more of them are coming out of the closet as Republicans!
!@#$
!@#$
16
It's a 20 cent fee. Not 25 cent.
And why is the timber industry interested in helping the plastic bags succeed? Aren't they competition?
And why is the timber industry interested in helping the plastic bags succeed? Aren't they competition?
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Hating People Doesn't Make Them Thinner by Jen Graves
-
Los Angeles Gay Bar Bans Bachelorette Parties Until Marriage Equality Is Attained by David Schmader
-
Fill in the Blank by Grant Brissey
-
This Reminds Me of the Great Calculator Scare of the Late '70s/Early '80s by David Schmader
-
Idiot Tries to Defend Bigoted Anti-Gay-Marriage Preacher on Anderson Cooper by Paul Constant
-
SL Letter of the Day: Putting It In by Dan Savage
-
Six Moms with Too Much Time on Their Hands and a Shitty Website Decide to Fight Gay Superheroes by Paul Constant
-
Why Mayor McGinn's Wife Canceled Her Family's Seattle Times Subscription by Eli Sanders
-
What the Hell Is Wrong With Seattle's Pride Parade? by Dominic Holden
-
Meet the UW "Swagga Suit" by David Schmader
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (16) RSS