Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Tip Toland: Melt, The Figure in Clay

Posted by Jen Graves on Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM

Walk into the back room of Tip Toland's exhibition at the Bellevue Arts Museum, where the walls are pitch-black, and there's a naked old woman lying on her side on the floor, her back to the entrance.

IMG_5768.JPG

It's impossible to stand over her. One is compelled to drop to a squat, where this is the view.

IMG_5766.JPG

And then it is impossible not to move closer.
IMG_5764.JPG

This woman is not alive. She is a work of art. She is called Milk for the Butter Thief and made of stoneware, paint, and pastel; her hair is sheep's wool. It is tempting to say, rather than "not alive," that this woman is not real, but she is. She has unbelievable presence. Docents at the gallery say that visitors—especially women—stand over her and cry.

Yes. Coming across this woman is surely one of the great Northwest museum moments of 2008-2009. Nothing is beautified, but everything about her is beautiful. The way her nipple is submerged in her own sagging flesh; the gently prayerful position of the hands; the twin hollows in the cheek and the hip; labia barely appearing between her legs on her back side. She is as alive as deathly. She could be the only object on display at Bellevue Arts Museum right now. She could carry an entire museum on her sleeping weight.

The whole exhibition, called Melt, The Figure in Clay, contains six figures made between 2007 and 2008 by the artist, who herself is a slender older woman (age 58) who often uses her own body in her work. (Here is a double self-portrait sculpture and also a photograph of the artist working on front of her other sculptures-in-progress; the sculpture of the man with the spread legs in the photograph, called Death Is Like Taking Off a Tight Shoe and made in 2005, is a jolt every time I see it.) I shortlisted her for a Genius Award in 2007. When she's on, the art is ferocious. Nothing else I've seen quite touches Milk for the Butter Thief, but Toland regularly produces incredibly brave, terribly skilled, and utterly unacademic work. (Hyperrealist sculptors like Ron Mueck and Duane Hanson seem gimmicky and coldly theoretical, respectively, by comparison.)

Pulse is a naked woman on a moving swing. (Here is my video of her.) She is unnerving—ecstatic and robotic at once. Her dentures are real, listed on the wall label. In a way she is over the top. But there's also something about her that makes you, uncomfortably, take her completely seriously.

IMG_5774.JPG
Toland's subjects are the very old and the very young, subjects that are commonly sentimentalized. And Toland can be unpleasantly sentimental, too. A young boy with his hands down his pants and an old man playing a child's violin at BAM are so sweet that they veer almost into kitsch; they aren't half the works of the others in the exhibition. But ultimately Toland is redeemed—by a strange young girl with ancient-looking eyes wearing big red wax lips and waiting awkwardly to go off the diving board; or by the gray-toned bust of an old woman preparing to dive into the water, her otherwise dead-looking skin marked by only one point of color: a red dot on her forehead. (This last sculpture also brings to mind black-and-white photography, and punctures the predictable way it gets associated with what's old.)

IMG_5779.JPG

Toland's sculptures are a reassurance to those who are made uncomfortable by skill in art. Skill can be obnoxious; it can be shallow. But great skill is invisible. And at that point, where Toland's working with Milk for the Butter Thief, all the world falls away from the art as you look at it. There is nothing else.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Hmmm...kind of a Duane Hanson rip-off, isn't it, Jen?
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on January 15, 2009 at 4:51 PM
2
Jube, that was my exact thought the minute I looked at this.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty on January 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM
3
You sold me, I'm going to the BAM asap to see this exhibit.
Posted by Carollani on January 15, 2009 at 5:11 PM
4
"Toland's sculptures are a reassurance to those who are made uncomfortable by skill in art."

And this is why I don't understand art.
Posted by matt; on January 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM
5
Reminds me a lot of Ron Mueck's work
Posted by Al on January 15, 2009 at 5:53 PM
6
"Skill can be obnoxious; it can be shallow. But great skill is invisible. "

That rings so true to me. And yet I want to say it is false. As an artist who admires one example of skill in one moment, and scorns another the next, without really knowing why- it is strange to see my prejudice and conflict captured so casually by your words.
Posted by erp on January 15, 2009 at 6:05 PM
7
i think that's my boyfrinds's mom.....my future mother in law naked for the world to see
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on January 15, 2009 at 6:29 PM
8
@1,2,5 - Your comments allude to a lot of snobbery and not much else.
Posted by Soupytwist on January 15, 2009 at 7:21 PM
9
@8, actually, Soupytwist, my comment speaks to my discomfort with the impression that Jen's idolizing this work and it does not seem a significant enough departure from work I've seen before.

Jen has the right to love any art she chooses to love. I have the right to disagree, I would hope, without some churlish peanut gallerist tossing empty shells at me with their salty little comment fingers.

Good day to you.
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on January 15, 2009 at 7:36 PM
10
@9 - Hmm, you seem to be ignoring the fact that Jen mentions the artists in question in her article.

And that you're a snob.
Posted by Soupytwist on January 15, 2009 at 8:04 PM
11
Hey, that old lady is my Mom! No, seriously, she is. She's been friends w/ Tip Toland for some time now and has been a graphic artist herself all her life (she's been focusing on stone sculpting for the past 20 years or so). She's more fun to meet in person, though, quite a lady. Isn't life interesting?
Posted by Rob Green on January 15, 2009 at 8:30 PM
12
@1:
Did Rembrandt rip off da Vinci? Did the Stones rip off the Beatles? You speak as if novelty is the only mark of quality in art. And you're arrogant about it too.

Definitely snobbery.
Posted by hmm on January 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM
13
Tip Toland rocks!! hooray for the recognition!!
Posted by yay! on January 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM
14
@11:

She sounds like a fascinating woman. Thanks for sharing this.
Posted by John on January 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM
15
@8, 10 & 12 -- OK, Mrs. Toland. I think your daughter is great -- and gosh-darned if van Rijn and that Jagger kid aren't thieves -- but she's not more interesting than others who've been there, done that, even if the medium differs among them.

And while Jen certainly does mention Mueck and Hanson in the article, it's to assert their inferiority to your daughter. An inferiority I don't think they've earned. So I'm still consistent in my logic and not sure what your point was by citing their mention.

I bet you make great great cookies, and thanks for your thoughts!
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on January 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM
16
Go on mama Green make the world a beautiful crazy honest brave place, go on mama green you just hit me square in the chest and I am loving it! Let me go look some more...
Posted by Queesha on January 15, 2009 at 10:51 PM
17
Jubilation, I don't think you're a snob. I think you're an idiot. And the shallowness of your reading indicates that while you like to pretend at being a snob, you haven't actually gone to the show in question.
Posted by emily on January 15, 2009 at 10:54 PM
18
@15 -- JTT, I don't think you are an idiot and you are probably not a snob, but I would question your use of the term "rip off" here. Anyone who does realistic, warts-and-all figure sculptures is going to get the comparison to Hanson, but there's a whole genre of that type of sculpture out there these days and we shouldn't write it all off just because it has a precedent. If you are interested in this would encourage you to take a close look at the work of these two artists -- real life versions, not photos. I think you would find that the essence of the Toland work is not appropriated from Hanson. Though the narrative of art history has been written around the innovators, I don't beleive it's necessary to break new ground to make great art.
Posted by yuiop on January 15, 2009 at 11:29 PM
19
was this posted after the Pamela Anderson post on purpose?
Posted by Mammies on January 16, 2009 at 12:02 AM
20
@18, thanks for that. You certainly have a point and I'd be ridiculous not to at least consider it. And yes, rip-off WAS too strong (one gets a little animated in comments sometimes...).

Let me try to be clear -- my overarching reaction to this post is that, to my eye, the quality, message, and intrinsic artistic value of this work is no greater than that of preceding artists. That does not preclude its potential to be breathtaking...it merely means that I don't get the heaps of praise Jen's offering up. And this has never been about Jen's right to feel that way, or her chops as a critic. It's a simple disagreement.

@17, I said you made good cookies. Can't you give me a break?
Posted by Jubilation T. Cornball on January 16, 2009 at 4:40 AM
21
This is beautiful, and you write beautifully about it.
Posted by Christy O on January 16, 2009 at 6:31 AM
22
@20 - I don't know why you assume all the comments who agree with me ARE me. They aren't.

Multiple people disagree with you! I know, as a snob, that you have a hard time accepting that, but it's the truth.
Posted by Soupytwist on January 16, 2009 at 10:27 AM
23
@ Jubilation: Duane Hanson? You mean because Toland and he each work with realistic portrayals of human figures? How hasty and daft! I don't see many ways these two artists could be more different. The concepts, the sentiments, the effects on the viewer, the way the pieces function in a space..... I like both of these artists, but would never think that one could stand in for the other. I can't wait to see this show!
Posted by gettingtoknowyoubetter on January 19, 2009 at 5:37 PM
24
I like the fact that someone here called someone else "churlish".
Posted by funny on January 22, 2009 at 9:45 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use