Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Shut Up and Let Me Appreciate the Movie Magic

Posted by Paul Constant on Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:38 PM

5790_1_sbl.JPG

Last night I saw The Magician at the Paramount. The 1926 silent film was part of Trader Joe's Silent Movie Mondays, which is, according to last night's hosts, the longest-running silent film movie series in the country. Lindy West is running a lovely review of The Magicianin this week's print edition*, so I'll leave that to her. I love going to silent movies with live musical accompaniment. It doesn't matter what kind of movie. I'm partial to slapsticky comedies with someone playing a Wurlitzer, but Murnau's Sunrise at the Triple Door for SIFF was a particular treat.

But here's the thing: Every time I go to see a silent movie in a theater, somebody stands up and makes a long and boring speech putting the movie (and often the directors and actors) into historical context beforehand. These speeches are almost never less than 15 minutes long, and I have never seen an entertaining one. One guy who tours with silent movies even sings before and after the movies, which was one of the most embarrassing moments I've ever experienced in a movie theater.

Last night, before The Magician, Dennis James, who is probably the best silent movie organist I've ever heard, basically read the director's Wikipedia entry for ten minutes. And then he took questions. The questions, especially about how he reconstructed the score for the film, were interesting, but much of the audience was so tired of being talked at that they weren't paying attention.

Here's my question: If it's so vital, why isn't this information just put into the program? The best way to make people not care about the importance of something is to lecture them about it. I think silent movies stand up on their own merits: They're charming, funny, and easy to understand regardless of the cultural and chronological gaps that exist between audience and art.

There are two more movies in this edition of Silent Movie Mondays. You should go to them. But I do recommend showing up ten minutes late so you can appreciate the film without being told why you should appreciate the film.


* Allow me to say it for you: "Derrr! Derrr! There's a print edition of The Stranger? Derr!"

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
When I went to the Buster Keaton series a few years ago, this drove me crazy. Not only did they talk endlessly (and humorlessly), but they dissected gags from the films BEFORE WE SAW THEM, effectively ruining a couple of good jokes. AND went way too far explaining the racial stereotypes we'd be seeing, implying that Keaton was a racist, when the actual occurances in the films turned out to be quite tame and actually MORE evolved than most of what went on in the era. I wish they'd make the lectures optional and either in a different venue, or AFTER the film. Trust the audience to just enjoy the freakin' movie!
Posted by Greg F. on January 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM
2
I'm going to buy some really crunchy pretzels and a loud slurpee without a lid so I can sit behind you Paul and protect you from those loud entrants ...

(burp)
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM
3
I do think it's sad that so many of his comments last night were straight out of Wikipedia (which is maybe why he "credited" somebody as his researcher), but I generally find Dennis James' intros better than the academics who sometimes show up. Damning with faint praise, I know, but at least he's a little more theatrical about it.
Posted by Ramdu on January 13, 2009 at 2:25 PM
4
Watching Portastatic provide a live score for The Unknown with Lon Chaney and Joan Crawford a couple of years ago at the Moore was an unforgettable experience. And no boring lectures!
Posted by kid icarus on January 13, 2009 at 2:47 PM
5
I think that's an "educational" component that helps draw grant monies, Paul. But regardless, it's no good. Sometimes they have a crazy woman come from the UW to free associate for 15 minutes, in which case I make sure to bring my iPod.
Posted by MvB on January 13, 2009 at 2:53 PM
6
Film nerds are all frustrated actors...give one of them a mike and a stage and it's their 15 minutes of glory.

It's the live version of a really dull audio commentary by William Friedkin on a DVD.
Posted by michael strangeways on January 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM
7
Hey, anyone got some extra plastic wrap I can put on this hard candy ...
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 13, 2009 at 3:00 PM
8
Intellectually I know there's a print edition, but apparently the Red Apple forgot for about two months. No Stranger up on the Beacon Hill. What gives? You guys have a partnership with Zipcar now?
Posted by Greg on January 13, 2009 at 4:26 PM
9
At the Hunchback of Notre Dame, two weeks ago, this woman stood up and gave a 20 minute academic paper on the historical importance of Lon Chaney. It was horrible, and I'm convinced could only be tolerated by Seattle movie audiences. Why make a movie precious and scholarly just because it's old??? Come on, people!!
Posted by hunchbacked on January 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM
10
we never do complain, do we? we just sit there and take it @9 - too polite for our own good.
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 13, 2009 at 5:27 PM
11
I agree completely with your complaints - if they're going to do a lecture they should do it after the film so that people who are interested can stick around for it, and those of us who aren't into it can leave.
Posted by robot on January 13, 2009 at 8:24 PM
12
On a slightly tangential note, I was a fan of the villain in The Magician! He intimidated others by opening his eyes very wide and flaring his nostrils; if the movie hadn't been silent, you would have heard him sniffing in order to maintain this absurd expression.

I'm now struck with the urge to sniff and raise my eyebrows at others...
Posted by arts&letters on January 14, 2009 at 12:19 AM
13
I agree with Greg F., as I saw the same show that he did. Of course these people mean well, and they are passionate about the art form, yadda yadda. That's awesome. Bully for them. But there is a time and a place for that. Nowadays, you can't go to the movies without suffering something beforehand (think of those Coke ads masquerading as trivia quizzes that you get at mainstream theaters). But those don't ruin the particular film, whereas the lectures often suck the fun out. In explaining WHY something is funny, it becomes less-so. I think giving a brief history of the film's context is great, but not a blow-by-blow account of what we are about to see.

Also, when did it become OK for Americans to just talk in normal voices during movies? Is it because most people watch movies at home, and they just...FORGET that they're not at home anymore? It's gotta stop. Sigh. But it won't.
Posted by Molly B on January 14, 2009 at 10:07 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use