Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Panic at the Disco

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:26 PM

Assuming that Neighbours, Seattle’s venerable gay nightclub, survives the “Ricin Threat of 2009,” owners must still deal with the ongoing fallout of lease dispute from last summer.

In August, a family land trust that owns the dilapidated dance hall on Broadway and East Pike Street sent a letter terminating the nightclub’s lease and ordering the club to vacate the premises by the end of the month. In the letter, landlords argued that Neighbours, which has been getting gays hammered to disco and new wave since 1983, was only permitted to run a tavern, restaurant, and cabaret—not a nightclub. (More here.) Neighbours responded with a lawsuit against the owners, arguing they had a right to stay.

“The old owner was fine with us,” says Mona Elassiouti, who manages finances for Neighbours. She says after the family's primary representative died, his brother Donald Regalia took over. “The brother has different interests,” she says.

But now, four months later, the Regalia family says Neighbours hasn’t been paying rent. “We haven’t received rental payments in two months and there have been shortfalls in rental payments for two prior months,” says the Regalia's attorney, Charlie Lyman. “Unfortunately, we have been frustrated that we have requested meeting on several occasions but it hasn’t come to fruition,” he says.

“We didn’t want to sit down with someone trying to kick us out,” says Elassiouti.

As for the accusations that rent isn’t paid: “That is completely incorrect,” responds Neighbours attorney Mark Kimball. “I have looked at the accounting recently. I think we overpaid slightly and we are current on the rent.”

Rumors have swirled that the bar will be demolished for condos. But Lyman dismisses the speculation. “There is absolutely no plan in place that I know of to demolish building and put condos there that I am aware of,” he says. When asked if the Regalia family would seek to keep Neighbours in the space through the end of its lease in 2020, he said, "The answer is yes and no." He wouldn't elaborate on any specifics.

Both parties say they expect the disputes can be resolved by the end of the month. “We are planning to have a meeting regarding settlements,” says Kimball.

 

Comments (18) RSS

Add a comment Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On
1
Notice that ZOMG RICIN THREAT 2009 is a manifestation of and a result therein directly proportional to the coverage its getting.

The consensus is that the threat is bogus.

However, the Stranger continues to post about it, stir the pot, etc..

So by talking about them losing business, so compassionately, you are actually yourselves fucking over the bars.

How does it feel? Seriously, staff. Stop and think about it.

Posted by Non on January 7, 2009 at 5:35 PM
2
I've heard that several tradespeople that did work last year at neighbors, including sound and lighting and tile work, have not been paid by the owner to the tune of several tens of thousands of dollars. They've had to hire a lawyer to try and recover some of their money for labor and materials. A crappy thing to do to people in this economy, especially as the bar continues to sell liquor.
Posted by gatesballard on January 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM
3
@2, I know of a couple of vendors as well that have not been paid by Neighbors as well. I cann't say who but I do their books.
Posted by Accounting Guy on January 7, 2009 at 5:50 PM
4
@1

Non, nobody agrees with your line of thinking on this. As usual. If you can't stand to overthink and overdiscuss every tiny thing that happens, why are you here? Anyway, you know what would really freak everyone out? The Slog studiously ignoring all the commenters talking about the ricin threat and asking why the Slog is ignoring it. Also. Why are you here?
Posted by elenchos on January 7, 2009 at 5:50 PM
5
4

Even Dominic can see it happening...calling it "Ricin threat 2009"

Sure, the Stranger should have reported this just like other actual and credible Media outlets (KING, KOMO, Seattle Times, etc) treating it appropriately: they noted it and moved to the next bizarre and crazy story on the pile.

The Stranger is gratuitously garnering hits, comments, and pass-alongs (I've seen a link to Slog's "coverage" in 3 of my GMail Friends' status)

The fact is, that the FBI, local police, commentors here, and authors themselves have called this bogus and a pitiful sad attempt to drum up terror.

SOOOOOOOOO, how is the story continuing to get legs?

Elenchos, how is the story continuing to get legs?

RIGHT. HERE.

The person who sent these letters needed not an actual poison to affect the public...all he/she needed was a vehicle for it as an idea. And clearly, that vehicle continues to be driven by the Stranger.

If you can't see the oxymoronic nature of this yourself, I can't force you to.
Posted by Non on January 7, 2009 at 6:01 PM
6
"how is the story continuing to get legs?"

Because under our so-called "War on Terror", the threat is an extremely serious federal crime, bogus or not. Continued coverage until the perp/s are found is perfectly reasonable.
Posted by levide on January 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM
7
They did not want to sit down and talk with someone trying to get them out of the build? WTF. What a stupid business practice.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on January 7, 2009 at 6:27 PM
8
I absolutely agree, 6, but outside of armchair detective work (oh hay he is from London check out the "in hospital") by commentors what does the coverage succeed in doing outside of freaking the shit out of non-critical thinkers and potential patrons?
Posted by Non on January 7, 2009 at 6:28 PM
9
I don't think anybody's freaked out, Non, outside of the initial shock of the report. Quite the contrary, actually, and the speculation by commenters shows an interest in the case, and a desire to find and prosecute the responsible party or parties.
Posted by levide on January 7, 2009 at 6:36 PM
10
ugh... god save the queen and tear down that dive. the trannys and twinks will find shelter somewhere else.
Posted by tranny's and twinkies and tips, oh my! on January 7, 2009 at 6:39 PM
11
If the owners of Neighbours don't think they need paying tenants in this economy, fine. Evict them and see just how quickly another business wants to lease that space.

Same for selling to condo developers. In case Regalia hasn't noticed, Seattle has a glut of condos that nobody is buying. And I think the days of the $500K studio are over.
Posted by montex on January 7, 2009 at 6:48 PM
12
'Victimhood' is the coin of the realm in our pathetic society and milking the ricin non-story is a way for slog to build a little queer currency. It is a better story for gays than disgruntled Prop8 nuts sending white powder to the Knights of Columbus.
Posted by do we have to spell it out for you? on January 7, 2009 at 7:14 PM
13
I'm puzzled as to how there can a question of whether rent was paid or not. Does the rent vary each month? Are there checks in the Neighbours bank statement made out to the landlord for the monthly rent each month, or not? Who the fuck "thinks they overpaid slightly"?
Posted by tiktok on January 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM
14
Why Neighbours and not Neighbors? Perhaps the answer could be found in hospital.
Posted by Sherlock Homeslice on January 7, 2009 at 8:36 PM
15
14 = funniest handle I have seen in months
Posted by Rilly Tho on January 7, 2009 at 8:39 PM
16
Actually, tiktok @13, commercial leases can be very complex, and it is entirely possible that Neighbor's rent isn't fixed, like an apartment rent is. For example, it is common for a commercial tenant to pay a base rent plus a percentage of their gross or net receipts. It is also common for them to pay a percentage of the landlord's taxes, utilities, and maintenance in addition to rent, and that amount varies and isn't always known ahead of time. Alternately, sometimes the tenant pays for maintenance or improvements themselves and deduct it from the rent.

I can very easily see how Neighbors may think they are paid up and the landlord may think they are behind. Either or both of them may be correct, depending on how they are looking at the figures. This can all be straightened out by an accounting audit. Or, of course, a lawsuit if they can't agree on an audit.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on January 7, 2009 at 10:41 PM
17
DEAR GOD PLEASE NO!

If they shut down Neighbors, all the twinks will have no option other than to spill their sugary pink cocktails on the overcrowded dance floor of the Cuff Complex (formally, the HOT men's cruise bar - the Cuff.) That place has reached critical mass.

WE NEED MORE CHA CHA PALACES, NOT LESS!!!!
Posted by butterbean on January 8, 2009 at 7:06 AM
18
@11: I agree completely. Best comment of the bunch.
Posted by Momento Hoody on January 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use