Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Local Zeroes

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:35 PM

local_author_md.gifThis guest blogger on Maud says that regional writers suffer the most of all when books sections in alt-weeklies close down.

Last week the big news coming out of Cooper Square was that the once-venerable Village Voice had let go yet another of its legendary contributors, Nat Hentoff. But the ever-shrinking coffers of its parent company, Village Voice Media Holdings, also claimed a victim far away from downtown Manhattan: the book section at the Nashville Scene.

The Scene’s books section was one of the best in the South, willing to take risks on new reviewers and little-known books — in 2002, Margaret Renkl, the Scene’s literary editor, gave me my first freelance gig. The section lasted a long time, given the rate at which regional outlets for literature and serious criticism are rapidly dying off: Last year the Atlanta Journal-Constitution cut its full-time book editor, Teresa Weaver, and it seems every year brings a new, potentially fatal challenge to the Oxford American, now a quarterly run under the stewardship of the University of Central Arkansas.

My first thought, of course, is that I'm really glad I don't work for VVM. But I'm of two minds about regional book reporting. Two or three times a week, I'll get a book-shaped envelope in the mail that is stamped, in giant letters, right above the address: "LOCAL AUTHOR." And almost invariably, that book is utter crap. I think regional criticism is a dangerous thing: I don't think anyone walks into a bookstore, just looks at the Northwest section, and then leaves.

One of my favorite things about having a books section is that you can talk about just about everything, from politics to philosophy to the recipes of rock stars to booklets sold in the aisles of grocery stores. Some weeks, it's the national affairs desk. other weeks, it's about local poetry, or a Seattle readings series. Which is not to say that I think you should be able to read The Stranger's books section and not tell what city it's published in. One of the most important parts of the books section is the calendar with all the dozens of events happening in bookstores and libraries all over this city. And many of our national affairs books features are timed to local readings. But I do think that regional affairs should not get special treatment simply because they're regional. I've read too many lame interviews with authors of badly drawn kid's books about geoducks (or what the fuck ever) to say that local coverage is a purely good thing. So I guess what I'm saying is that good coverage of good local books is a welcome thing. If the Scene really provided that, I'm sad that it's gone, too.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I am a little tired today which could be causing me to miss something here, but a quick read of that excerpt doesn't seem to advocate reviewing the work of local hacks or mediocre writers.
Posted by danindowntown on January 7, 2009 at 4:23 PM
2
I agree with danindowntown @1. Clay Risen wasn't saying these regional voices trumpet mediocre work. In his case, he was saying he promotes Southern lit because of all the stereotypes that prevent Southern writers from getting their fair share of media coverage and plaudits. Overall, he seemed to saying regional critics provide readers with advocates of excellent work from their areas that are overlooked by critics focusing on the national picture, which I suppose means that group of writers and books that have transcended their cultural surroundings.

If there's someone from this area or someone whose writing defines or is redefining NW lit, I'd like to know about it. It would be nice if I didn't have to wait for them to come to the attention of the New York Times to do it.

And stop being so defensive. We love you just the way you are.
Posted by joeyp on January 7, 2009 at 5:01 PM
3
Ah @1 and 2: I guess I didn't make it clear that I didn't think that Mr. Risen was saying that. But when I've read most local coverage in most of the places I've lived, it's been the case. There's a certain school of thought, in most surviving books sections, that local is automatically better and worthy of more attention. That's untrue. And that's what I meant.
Posted by Paul Constant on January 7, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use