Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Council Grills Metro Head

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM

Kevin Desmond, the general manager of Metro, just spoke to the city council about Metro's response during the snowstorm. Overall, Desmond came across as more willing to admit fault and less defensive than Grace Crunican, the director of the city's transportation department, did yesterday—appropriately, perhaps, given that Metro did a truly abysmal job at getting information to the public and providing riders with timely updates. At the very least, the lessons Metro says it has learned are the right ones: Create a plan for catastrophic weather events, get more people on the phones, and come up with a better system for getting information to the public.

Here's some of what Desmond had to say.

On customers' plight during the storm: "We deeply appreciate the patience of our customers and we also certainly understand the frustration that our customers felt… Nobody likes to wait by the curb for a very long time for buses that may or may not show up or buses that pass because they are very, very crowded. ... I know it’s very frustrating when you’re waiting for a train or bus that’s not going to show up."

On the transit agency's lack of a "snow plan" for major storms:

"We were fully prepared for [the initial storm the night of December 17]. ... We had taken our articulated trolley buses out of service and started operating on pre-established snow routes throughout the region. .... [However], during the 18th, conditions deteriorated quite quickly throughout the county. We saw quickly that morning that our articulated [long-bus] fleet began to fail and our trolley network began to fail as well. ... That morning we had over 200 buses stuck at one point in time... We then had to immediately create an ad hoc 50 percent service plan. That was not something we had pre-established or pre-planned. That then became the plan that we had operational for roughly the next seven or eight days."

On Metro's "Achilles' heel":

"About half of our fleet are either articulated [double-length, flexible] or electric trolley buses. ... Those [buses] serve Metro and this community very, very well under normal circumstances. But
during these snow events they are, in effect, an Achilles heel for the organization because they do not operate very well. ... People were saying, 'Why can't the bus run? My street is clear.' ... Trolley buses have to turn around at their terminals, and if terminal locations, which tend to be deep into communities, are not accessible, even if large portions of the route are clear we just can't operate the trolley network."

On the breakdown in communications:

"Customer and public communication... really is the biggest problem we faced in these events. And unfortunately, it’s going to continue to be a problem in future events. ... The nexus of everything that happens at Metro is our radio control center. That radio control center is completely limited by the number of radio channels available to us [four] and the number of people who can sit at those stations. We're building a new system that will dramatically increase the number of channels available, but that will not be online until 2010. [In the meantime], a coordinator can get a call on the radio and not be able to answer it for eight hours."

On "unpublished routes" and other flaws in getting information to customers:

"Our 80 percent plan includes published routes. Once we went off of that that is when we started to break down in our ability to really convey good information, because we were making up routes or portions of routes kind of on the fly. ... The web site didn’t work particularly well for what we ended up doing. Even where we had buses on routes and they were operating we still were faced with a lot of conditions we couldn’t control. ... We have some 9000 bus stops in the system and trying to get information to each and every one of those bus stops is obviously a challenge."

On the lessons Metro has learned:

"In something as dramatic as this event, we need to create, say, a 50 percent plan … [in which buses operate] only on those arterials and streets that we know... we can keep open. The tradeoff is there will be less scope of service. People will have to walk. But at least we can be confident in keeping service operational. ... [Second], improving coordination with SDOT... deploying resources directly at SDOT's facilities. [Third], augmenting staffing. We had a huge number of people that couldn't get through [Metro's phone lines] because of a busy signal. Fourth, improving our information flow. As we get our new [radio system and GPS trackers in buses, in 2010], that will make a difference, but even before then we need to improve. Our web site does not do justice to what our consumers need."

Desmond will do a similar, but "more elaborate," presentation to the King County Council next Monday, January 12, at 9:30 am.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
You know, this is why people drive cars, if it is a viable option. Who wants to rely on all these interependencies when you can just hop in your car and drive (slide) down the road?
Posted by laterite on January 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM
2
One way Metro could increase the speed and accuracy of their communications would be to set up a twitter accounts for different parts of their service area (by neighborhoods or districts or somesuch). They could tweet about any suspensions or diversions for buses in that area, and anyone following the twitterfeeds for those areas could receive the associated text messages on their phones.

Obviously this only helps those with cellphones, PDAs, laptops, etc. But it's better than nothing, and would cost both Metro and their customers next to nothing.
Posted by yelahneb on January 6, 2009 at 1:34 PM
3
One reason that Metro might be "more willing to admit fault" than the roads department is that they have more faults to admit. The roads department was operating under a directive not to use salt, to "clear" roads by compacting them, and given extremely limited equipment even to do that. I haven't heard any suggestions as to what they could have done much better within those constraints. (There are lots of suggestions that involve breaking those constraints, but that required political decisions over the heads of the operational agency.) Metro, on the other hand, could easily have done much better by means entirely within their control, e.g. providing accurate and up-to-date information on their web site.
Posted by David Wright on January 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM
4
i'm so fucking sick of metro saying "we have 9000 stops in our system so there's no way we can communicate with our passengers"

um, how about at least trying your hardest to communicate with some of your passengers? get your shit together and at least get information out to the busiest parts of the system? you know, like downtown? transit centers? sure, my little stop that serves maybe 5-6 riders per trip is not a busy stop, but the one a few blocks away picks up 4-5x as many people - how about finding a way to get updates out to places where lots of customers tend to be? i'd forgive not having informaton at all 9000 stops, but that's no fucking excuse not to have information at any stops at all.

also, how is this forehead-slapping moment any different than the metro shoulder-shrug that we got after last year's windstorm? previous years' storms?

heckuva job, desmond
Posted by Kinkos on January 6, 2009 at 1:41 PM
5
If King County had salted the roads, the buses would have operated flawlessly.

I do not blame Metro at all.

They are built for 100 available roadway.

The would have been the case if we had salted.
Posted by Mr. Salty on January 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM
6
I'm amazed by the complete failure of the trolley network. In Vancouver, almost the entire urban grid is trolley buses; they kept running (in some cases more reliably than the diesel buses), in part because they have short-turn (i.e. turn around before the terminal) trolley places at major intersections along the route.

For example, the #20 trolley route ends at the base of a steep hill in the middle of nowhere, but just before that steep hill, at a major intersection, is a place where buses can short-turn around and head back. As a result, when weather got bad here, the #20 started turning around at 54th and was able to keep running.

Not sure why more of the major trolley routes (the 43, for example) in Seattle don't have this. When I lived on Capitol Hill, it always amazed me that one of the densest parts of the city was also one of the first to lose all bus service. Goodbye numbers 10, 12, and 43.
Posted by Cow on January 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM
7
also, had metro pre-planned a bit better instead of using a 20 year old snow plan, maybe more people could have been put to work communicating with customers as opposed to running around like headless chickens cleaning up the mess that their inept management made.

someone, PLEASE throw a shoe at desmond!
Posted by Kinkos on January 6, 2009 at 1:44 PM
8
Good coverage. Hold their feet to the fire!
Posted by SeattleBrad on January 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM
9
The word "twitter" makes me want to punch the Internet so hard.
Posted by laterite on January 6, 2009 at 1:48 PM
10
mmmm metro head....
Posted by Kinkos on January 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM
11
Some of the bus stops in San Francisco have these scrolling LCD signs telling you how long to wait for the next bus. If we could install these over here, we could also use them to announce any interruptions of service. It would definitely help. No iPhone necessary.
Posted by JC on January 6, 2009 at 1:52 PM
12
@10..you beat me to it...kudos:)
Posted by julie russell on January 6, 2009 at 1:52 PM
13
tweet tweet!

GPS should have been in metro buses 10 years ago! Screw this 2010 bullshit - should be top priority now.
Posted by beef on January 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM
14
@11 I think the forthcoming Rapid Ride bus lines will have LCD displays at the stops. It would definitely be nice to see those for current Metro routes, at least at major stops and transfer points.
Posted by Hernandez on January 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM
15
Does diet coke go with grilled metro head?
Posted by Justa Guy on January 6, 2009 at 2:22 PM
16
What, they couldn't set up a system so that I could sign up to get emails or text messages for certain routes?
Posted by Mike in Renton on January 6, 2009 at 2:28 PM
17
@14 I had heard that after the trial on Aurora, Metro decided the signs were expensive and too labor intensive (both to keep display info current and to maintain) and were not going to be using them at all. Which I think is crap. I'm sure it's not cheap but it works and if it gives people that instant info they crave - so much the better. Hopefully I'm wrong and BRT will use them.

I don't understand why we can use pay stations for parking but our bus stops have to be glorified bulletin boards. Surely there's a way to adapt existing technology to create a useful bus kiosk thing that can show routes, schedules, maps, etc and be updated remotely to communicate with people at the stops.
Posted by Allie on January 6, 2009 at 2:40 PM
18
Here's what I would do:

Equip all buses with a salt spreader.

As each bus goes, it melts the road for future buses.

SALT
SALT
SALT
Posted by SALT II Treaty on January 6, 2009 at 2:50 PM
19
great piece. thanks ECB.
Posted by ho' know on January 6, 2009 at 3:24 PM
20
Reading the headline has made me hungry.
Posted by NapoleonXIV on January 6, 2009 at 4:09 PM
21
So, why didn't they run all the bus routes through the bus tunnel instead of on city streets and advertise that route?

No snow down there ...
Posted by Will in Seattle on January 6, 2009 at 4:12 PM
22
Will. There's a limit on the number and type of buses that can run through the tunnel. The fan system can't handle much in the way of diesel smoke before the air is unsafe. Also, not all the metro drivers are 'qualified' to run the tunnel. That would be a real hit or miss deal with buses running all over the place. Hope that helps.
Posted by Mike on January 6, 2009 at 8:12 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use