I'm 34 now, was 21 in 1995, and therefore turned 13 in 1987. I would have found this hilarious at every age.
Also, I'd think that the programmers of such a receipt would be obligated to avoid appreviating butterscotch this way. As a writer of techinical requirements, however, I would try to make this happen as often as possible. (Do you know how easy it is to "accidentally" abbreviate assistant to "ass"? Easier than you think.)
Posted by
LogopolisMike on December 31, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Why didn't Kidd Valley do themselves one better and just print "butt shake"? Because it makes more sense, grammatically, and 13 year olds love butt shakes, duh.
The other day, my friend Jonas treated a group of us to breakfast at our fav Ballard bar. The charge on his credit card was listed as "hattie shat - $123".
Posted by
slaughterhouse on December 31, 2008 at 11:53 AM
@15 - I have that same trouble. And the problem with Analysis (unlike Associate/Assoc and Assistant/Asst) is that there's no good abbreviation. Anlys? Anlyss?
Posted by
Julie in Chicago on December 31, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Comments (26) RSS