I'm still trying to figure out what the meth addict had to do with the story about Wamu's piss poor loan practices. Yes, he worked there, but it doesn't sound like anything would've been different if he was stone cold sober.
Posted by
Mahtli69 on December 29, 2008 at 11:23 AM
After reading this article, all I could think was that Mr. Killinger should be coerced by court order to return every single penny he received during his tenure as WaMu's CEO. If the court is too chicken to do it everything he owns should be burned, smashed, or stolen by an angry mob.
My Plan B is messy, dangerous and illegal but I think the end of enforcing accountability justifies the means.
Posted by
east coaster on December 29, 2008 at 11:31 AM
Killinger got paid to take a big risk by replacing banking practices with speculation. Now that the bet is sour, the buck may stop (evaporate?) with Killinger, but a host of co-conspirators in and out of WAMU have something to answer for, no? Talk about systemic.
Posted by
tomasyalba on December 29, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Sure... it was an article about poor judgment and a frenzied money grab, I think the meth thing is relevant. Then again I'm assuming he threw things and yelled "SELL, SELL, SELL!!!" a lot.
Comments (9) RSS