Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, December 22, 2008

Poor Jason Statham

Posted by on Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:13 PM

Deathracedvd.jpgDeath Race, which came out this past summer, is now available on DVD. How do I know this? I know this because the studio mailed us a copy of the DVD. And I watched it. And I'm already forgetting about it.

Why does (Death Race director) Paul W.S. Anderson suck so much? His movies have zombies and explosions and all kinds of things that an action movie fan should appreciate. But they always feel so empty, so vacant. All his films feel like an action movie with all the life sucked out of it. Maybe it's because he's the photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopied action movie director. Technically, his stuff is fine. You can follow most of the fights, the car chases are competent, you know which character is talking when there's dialogue. This is actually pretty impressive for a modern-day action movie director. But there's no emotion at all. At least the 1975 Death Race 2000 had B-movie smarm going for it.

As always, the problem is not Jason Statham. One day, there will be a Statham action movie that will destroy all other action movies with its awesomeness. And he'll keep making two or three movies a year until that happens. Hell, in Death Race, Statham out-acts Joan Allen, who is clearly there for a paycheck as the evil warden/Death Race founder. But generic slop like this "good man whose wife was killed in order to get him into a prison to compete in a reality-TV-murderous-NASCAR" plot is not helping anything.

I could go on forever about the problems in this lifeless thing of a movie, but here are the two biggest problems: There is no reason why Death Race should have a love interest. It's set in a fucking prison, which is maybe the best excuse ever to not have a romantic subplot. But the generic action movie subplot called for a love interest, and so a love interest there shall be. Second, there is no good reason to make Jason Statham the victim of a frame-up. If he was a convict who actually committed a crime, the movie would at least have a kind of nasty glee to it. Instead, it's got all this righteous energy that really slows shit down. And slow is not what you want Death Race to be. There are a couple things that get 'sploded real good, but for the most part, this is completely avoidable, unless the studio sends you a copy for free, in which case you could maybe watch it when you have a cold. Otherwise, ignore this movie, unless you're the world's biggest Statham fan.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The coolest thing about Deathrace 2000, the original, was that it inspired the arcade game of the same name.

As pedestrians walked around an open field, you drove your car into them, and a 2 pixel by 2 pixel white cross would pop up.

GTA? Covered by a mile...

Posted by Dad's GTA on December 22, 2008 at 3:29 PM
2
As always, the problem is not Jason Statham. One day, there will be a Statham action movie that will destroy all other action movies with its awesomeness.


Totally agreed. I've seen Transporter, The Italian Job, and Transporter 3, and there is no action movie star in a league with Jason Statham. Granted, I'm not such an action movie fan, but there is an existential angst and a dry gallows humor about the guy that no one else can touch.

If Hollywood deserved to take itself as seriously as it does, Sacha Baron Cohen would have a Best Actor Oscar for Borat and Jason Statham would be recognized as one of the great actors of our time.
Posted by cressona on December 22, 2008 at 3:33 PM
3
I LOVE JASON STATHAM!
Even when his movies suck, he's still awesome.
Posted by Nay on December 22, 2008 at 3:36 PM
4
i will pay you $3 dollars for that screener
Posted by Gabriel on December 22, 2008 at 3:47 PM
5
They could have called this "The Driving Man" and it might have made more sense.
Posted by A on December 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM
6
you're over-analyzing it. the awesomeness of any jason statham movie is directly proportional to the amount of time he spends shirtless. add up the total time of the shirtless scenes and divide by the length of the movie. i'll tell you if it's worth watching or not.
Posted by brandon on December 22, 2008 at 3:52 PM
7
In related news, when did Sigourney Weaver get her career back? Was it Planet Earth?
Posted by w7ngman on December 22, 2008 at 4:15 PM
8
Have I ever accidentally seen this Jason Statham in anything? Man, I hope not...
Posted by ugh on December 22, 2008 at 4:15 PM
9
Love interest? If it were entitled "I Love You Phillip Morris Death Race", would be the only way a love interest would make sense.
Posted by Y.F. on December 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM
10
I really enjoyed this movie. And the love interest was hotter than the sun, so there's your perfectly good reason right there.
Posted by Paul Ramon on December 22, 2008 at 5:43 PM
11
Statham is great in The Bank Job. The movie's pretty great, too.
Posted by Kathy Fennessy on December 22, 2008 at 9:04 PM
12
@ 3 - totally agree! I could watch him forever, especially after the oiled down bare torso martial arts scene in Transporter 1 - hot and sweet, yin and yang
Posted by jackseattle on December 22, 2008 at 10:31 PM
13
Crank!!
Posted by Gloria on December 23, 2008 at 6:44 AM
14
Jason Statham is the hottest dude alive. He should always be shirtless. Death Race would have been exponentially more awesome if he was shirtless through the entire movie.
Posted by Queen of Sleaze on December 23, 2008 at 9:35 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy