This past weekend, Robert Jamieson discovered Santarchy. The results are, as always with Jamieson, illuminating:
Usually the good folks at Seattle's Lusty Lady would be ecstatic when Santa Claus drops in.But Saturday afternoon, when about 200 giddy Santas stormed the lobby, Saint Nick's "Ho, ho, ho," left the staff thinking "Oh, no, no, no!"...
...Welcome to the wild and wacky world of "Santarchy" — "Santa" plus "anarchy" — which could be described as equal parts pub crawl, equal parts holiday celebration and a whole lot of fun.
Some commenters on the story are less than pleased.
Posted by Who is John Galt? at 12/20/08 9:40 p.m.
Whats next in the bag of tricks to keep the newspapers in print....a piece of investigative journalism on a fraternity hazing event? What a joke. No wonder newspapers across the country are failing with tripe like this seeing print. Looks like the news editor was asleep at the desk.
Posted by jem1 at 12/20/08 11:06 p.m.
The real horror is the reading public bombasted with the same lamebrain comments regarding this columnist. The same jerks wallowing in their stupid world of arrogant inanity.
It all reminds me of Charles Mudede's great piece on Jamieson and who he's writing for:
A writer writes to one person. His/her so-called audience is in fact a single soul. The specific system of words, images, rhythms, phrases that the writer molds and remolds have as their goal the most complete satisfaction of this one reader he/she has in mind. A writer without this goal—a person who reads what has been written just for him/her—does not exist. "This book's purpose," writes Ludwig Wittgenstein in the preface to Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, "is achieved if it gave pleasure to one person who read and understood it." The achievement of that purpose is at the heart of any writing act.Now that we have established this understanding (that every writer has a reader in mind), we can turn to the popular and award-winning Seattle P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson Jr. and ask: Who is his one reader?
If you haven't, you should read Charles' story.
Comments (11) RSS