Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, December 18, 2008

A Feast for Eyes

Posted by Charles Mudede on Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM

It is right to hate the dictator, but sometimes it is good to have a laugh or two at his expense.

SWAZILAND Civic groups in Swaziland launched rolling protests against Zimbabwe’s much loathed dictator, Robert Matibili Mugabe outside a football stadium in which the 84-year-old dictator was drooling over topless girls.

mswa-1.jpg
[Mugabe] feasted his eyes on bare-breasted young virgins parading in the football stadium. His eyes were firmly transfixed on the proceedings.

There is evidence of [Mugabe's] appetite for young, plum women, including his steamy extramarital affairs with the likes of his present wife, Grace, who he dated while his first wife, Sally was on her death bed.

[Mugabe] is rumoured to also have had an illicit relationship with Oppah Muchinguri as well.

His contemporary in the bush war that led to Zimbabwe's independence in 1980, Edgar Tekere clearly outlined Mugabe's love for women in his book A Lifetime of Struggle.

Let's now end our little laughter and give a little thought to the image of the young Swazi woman. Though in traditional clothes, we can well see that she is modern, urbane, a woman connected to the global images and standards of beauty. How can we see this? Why are the traditional materials unable to cover or obscure her modernity? We know for sure that if we were to go back in time to the pre-European period of this kingdom, we would find something like these clothes she is wearing but nothing like her body. That kind of body did not exist at that time. The difference can be imaged as that which exists between wild wheat and wheat developed by the techniques of industrialized agriculture.

So, we can conclude that tone, comportment, and shape are not outside of the modernizing processes. It does not simply end at the inorganic (the attire) but fills up and out the organic.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (37) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
thanks Slog, I just got fired
Posted by Anonymous on December 18, 2008 at 10:10 AM
2
Translation: BOOBIES!!
Posted by N on December 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM
3
cue:

ZOMG NSFW WARNING OMG HOWE DARE U COMPROMISE MY CRIMINAL BROWSING BEHAVIOR AT WORK I CAN ONLY LOOK AT SCANDELOUS WEBSITES IF THEY DONT HAVE TITTIES ON THEM WHILE IM SUPPOSSD TO BE DOING WERK OMG HOW DAAAAAAAAAAAAARE YOU

wow, #1 beat me to it.
Posted by Non on December 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM
4
truly, charles, NOBODY CARES.
Posted by YOU SUCK on December 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM
5
I care. Keep it up, Charles.
Posted by Charles' Cheerleader on December 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM
6
@1 and 4, the image is not penthouse, the image is national geographic.
Posted by mudede on December 18, 2008 at 10:17 AM
7
what are you, fucking retarded?

put a LINK to this, IDIOT. its the definition of NSFW!

either way-another example of random, pointless idiotic CHARLES post.

fucking stop, please.

unless you truly are retarded, and dont care that people in this city hate you.
Posted by stop writing on December 18, 2008 at 10:17 AM
8
Jesus christ people. It's just a job.
Posted by Jason Petersen on December 18, 2008 at 10:22 AM
9
I'm with @8: Charles is furiously wanking to the idea of you looking at this image. Please don't spoil the vinegar strokes for him.
Posted by Ziggity on December 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM
10
P.S. grow up Charles! Amanda Knox still won't sleep with you.
Posted by Ziggity on December 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM
11
You know, there's way more of that in the upcoming movie The Reader ... just sayin.

Plus, even though it has both genders with full frontal nudity, it's about a serious subject and Charles will enjoy the themes.
Posted by Will in Seattle on December 18, 2008 at 10:35 AM
12
"Now let us end our little laughter..."

Oh geez would you please haul yourself into the 21st century, Charles.... Do you read anything contemporary (besides porn) so you know how American English is constructed?

And I'm echoing the familiar refrain: Who cares what you think about women????
Posted by hartiepie on December 18, 2008 at 10:41 AM
13
Actually, Charles, it's not the body, it's the hair.
Posted by David on December 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM
14
its a goddamned winter wonderland outside, people! turn off your computers.

ps-9 for the win!
Posted by popeye on December 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM
15
Charles,
Huh? Charles, the photo is of a beautiful young woman exposing her breasts. I'm not lauging, I'm drooling. No more needs to be said.
Posted by lark on December 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM
16
Charles, it's strange that you consider this image "National Geographic" when the entire point of your post seems to be explaining how she is a modern woman and the product of industrialized society.
Posted by Mahtli69 on December 18, 2008 at 11:02 AM
17
PS - Strange, but not surprising, since you post T&A at every opportunity. Not that I'm complaining ...
Posted by Mahtli69 on December 18, 2008 at 11:03 AM
18
Every by Charles Muhdoodoo could easily be summed up with: "Muh dik!"
Posted by Charles MuhDik on December 18, 2008 at 11:15 AM
19
Muh Dik!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Muh Dik on December 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM
20 Comment Pulled (OffTopic) Comment Policy
21
@13 has it right. It's the makeup and the artificially straightened hair, not the body, that mark this one as modern. In other words, all the measures she takes to conform to modern beauty standards. There's nothing 'traditional' about this photo.
Posted by Ursula on December 18, 2008 at 11:26 AM
22
Do you think she is topless when she works out at the gym? She looks like she might spend some time at 24 Hour Fitness.
Posted by elswinger on December 18, 2008 at 11:36 AM
23
@19, you ignorant american. learn how to pronounce my name before you make fun of it! Moo day day.
Posted by mudede on December 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM
24
also, mudede (moo day day) means "corn that is not yet ripe." so there, you can find all sorts of ways to make fun of its meaning.
Posted by mudede on December 18, 2008 at 11:45 AM
25
i've been there. i guarantee you there is no 24 hr fitness in swaziland. and i think it's interesting this post points out the straying eyes of robert mugabe when the king of swaziland regularly takes on 14 year old virgins, to the extreme delight of their parents.
Posted by atreu on December 18, 2008 at 11:46 AM
26
huh-dik: The most important possession a nigger buck has. Used to rape white wimminz, spread venereal diseases, and create new shitlets for welfare mammies. A condom is never used on this device.
Posted by the new chuckles on December 18, 2008 at 11:51 AM
27
Charles Muhdoodoo Muhdik is hitting the bong and furiously jacking off trying to come up with his next blog post.
Posted by Muah Dick on December 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM
28
why is it is the girl was white, then it's penthouse? but if she's black, and in africa, then it's national geographic?
Posted by superyeadon on December 18, 2008 at 12:38 PM
29
I swear the last part of this post is from a similar worded post just awhile back. To me this just seems like a post for the sake of pissing people off and being able to post a woman with her breasts showing because you are obsessed with objectifying women and then following it up with a load of intellectual garbage (which like I mentioned you have posted recently almost word for word).
You seem unable to change and stopping yourself from seeming like a creep in some of your posts.
Posted by -B- on December 18, 2008 at 1:13 PM
30
Charles makes me giggle. Keep it up please.
Posted by jessica on December 18, 2008 at 1:29 PM
31
It's been said over and over, Slog is nsfw. I don't think that's going to change any time soon.
Posted by PdxRitchie on December 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM
32

There is no higher calling, or greater use, for rendering to print the labyrinthine exhortations of esoteric philosophy and sociocultural commentary than when put in humble service, expounding upon the evolution of aesthetic mores and relations of power to prurience, in endless quest for the elusive root of all truth: beauty.


Thank you, Charles.






p.s. Nice boobies too.

Posted by Timrrr on December 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM
33
Charles,

Your thesis that the organic body is also shaped by modernity is interesting, but you did not offer any argument to lead you to this conclusion.

What were bodies like before modernity? How is this Swazi woman's body different from one that existed in pre-modernity? Why do you believe bodies are different now? Less manual labor?

Please elaborate.

Thanks!
Posted by Glossy on December 18, 2008 at 10:43 PM
34
@ 28: Touche'!
Posted by Madashell on December 18, 2008 at 11:50 PM
35
Muaaaaaah Diiiiiiick!
Posted by Muh Dik on December 19, 2008 at 8:36 AM
36
@35, if only you had muh edukashun.
Posted by mudede on December 19, 2008 at 12:21 PM
37
What the hell makes you think bodies like hers didn't exist before? There's nothing unnatural or odd about the shape of her body and it could be found in the old days too. She's young! Of course she looks good! Just because she doesn't look like the saggy ladies you see in National Geographic doesn't mean she's had surgery!
Posted by east coaster on December 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use