Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

$850 Billion

Posted by on Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 PM

That's the new number.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I predict Barack Obama will be the Calvin Coolidge of his generation.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d181/a…
Posted by Keep Coolly Cool Boy on December 18, 2008 at 12:02 AM
2
"no tax increases for wealthy Americans"= going back on his pledge to eliminate the Bush tax cuts
Posted by Trevor on December 18, 2008 at 12:34 AM
3
I love it. A month before Obama takes office, liberals consider him a failure. Ever wonder why Republicans keep winning? Look in the fucking mirror.
Posted by keshmeshi on December 18, 2008 at 12:40 AM
4
Here's my favorite quote from the article:

"While some economists consulted by Obama's team recommended spending of up to $1 trillion over two years, a more likely figure seems to be $850 billion. There is concern that a package that looks too large could worry financial markets, and the incoming economic team also wants to signal fiscal restraint." (Emphasis added.)

I generally agree with the majority of economists on this issue that very heavy federal spending is warranted, but I think it is worth taking a moment to step back and realize what things have come to: $850 billion in new spending without any concurrent tax increase is now considered a sign of fiscal restraint! Oh, how the tables have turned. This is going to be a bumpy ride.
Posted by honeyspider on December 18, 2008 at 12:58 AM
5
Well well well. Actual policy is soooooo boring this post only has a few comments.

Loads of comments about Obama celeb news, drama over minutiae of the primary for months and months, all the time.

But on policy, who gives a shit?

Thus proving it's been mainly a fan club of aficionados rooting for a celeb, not a serious movement for political change, that has been built. (I hope not).

Unity
Posted by PC on December 18, 2008 at 8:58 AM
6
Great comment by honeyspider @4.

I listen to these economists like Paul Krugman saying the federal government urgently needs to spend, spend, spend. And I don't discount what they say. But boy, we're in a brave new world. It's like we've gotten into this untenable, unsustainable economic situation, and the answer is to do something that is itself untenable and unsustainable.

I'll tell you this. If the projects we're spending on don't have a real long-term benefit to the economy and the environment, they're going to end up doing more harm than good.
Posted by cressona on December 18, 2008 at 9:25 AM
7
We don't have any money to spend! Keynesian economics works when you have a nation of saver and producers (like in the 30s) not a nation of spendthrifts that are already overburdened with debt!...say goodbye to the dollar. Get into gold.
Posted by Mises on December 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM
8
It will be more.

Much more.

Current predictions in the WSJ have it around $2 trillion.

Some are pegging it at $3 trillion all told.
Posted by Will in Seattle on December 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy