A reader writes:
Eli Sanders castigates Sarah Jeglum of the UW Daily for her "complete misunderstanding of the role of a newspaper editor." This sort of commentary can only be read as comical, printed as it is in The Stranger. I have lived all over the country and in several other parts of the world, and think of The Stranger as, bar none, the most pathetic, uninspired, uninformed, polemic, snivelingly contemptuous rag I've ever laid hands on. (This includes corporate-sponsored product-comparison hotsheets like Louisville's "Velocity".)
Sanders and I agree: the role of a good free press is to "encourage informed debate". It's a pity that we live in Stranger territory, where discussions are reducible to diatribes, and if you disagree, you're an asshole. Any attentive reader has noticed the paper's general refusal to print calm, principled criticism of itself, or quiet corrections to its misinformation, or reasoned rebuttals to its illogical tirades. To get printed, one has to be as acrimonious and caustic as the paper itself, and generally willing to curse and call names (as I do here, after years of more reasonable letters which were duly ignored). This, of course, has the effect of further polarizing already-hysterical public debate, and places The Stranger among the lofty ranks of Fox and company. But it's great for circulation!
And hey, perhaps The Stranger's staff believe they are "encouraging informed debate" when ('Last Days') they print gleeful send-ups of people performing acts of hygiene in public places. Homelessness and mental illness are hilarious; the debate is rich narcissists versus everyone else. And The Stranger keeps winning, and Seattle keeps losing.
-R. Lamberth
Comments (36) RSS