The other finalist, the voice bubbles, is horrible as well. To be honest, I don't like the winner either. I'd pick these guys to do my corporate identity maybe but for politics they're boobs. It's cheese, and it didn't contribute to his win.
Are you kidding me? Fnarf, most of the time I think you're smarter than my professors and more logical than a Vulcan, but the final logo is incredible and did a lot for Obama. There's just about no image that could scream "the future is coming and it is BRIGHT" than that American-flag/sunrise/O logo. The other two are absolutely awful.
Posted by
SeaExile on December 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM
I'm a fan of the final design. The O as a sun coming up over a field creates an association with a new dawn in politics, and the softer color palette subliminally associates Obama with a less extreme political stance- both great, yet subtle design choices.
Posted by
UNPAID COMMENTER on December 16, 2008 at 10:13 AM
@3: Douche? What? The guys seems thoughtful and reasonable. What was douchey about him? If anything, he was a bore.
The final logo was smart and worked and I agree with @4 that Fnarf misses this one. The logo helped the campaign. It explained a lot in a simple way and was visionary enough, yet traditional enough.
Are you folks all in marketing? The final logo was indeed designed to create those "visionary" feelings in people who have been trained to respond to that kind of sledgehammer marketing effect, but in reality? It's just a logo. Yeah, yeah, sunrise, hope, road to the future, yadda yadda. I GET IT. But it doesn't mean anything.
I think the way the final logo succeeded is that it worked as a quick identifier of Obama, kind of like how you see the CBS eye or a target, you think of the brands attached to those symbols. I agree with Fnarf, the ideas behind the logo are pure cheese, but it was enough of a success just that if you saw that logo, you'd think of the man it symbolized. Did McCain have a logo? If he did, I'm forgetting it, but I saw that O on a ton of pumpkins, spray-painted stencils, etc.
The world is divided a lot of ways, but the clearest line to me has always been between people who get the importance of good graphic design, and those who don't.
Posted by
Grant Cogswell on December 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I "almost" like the logo. One thing, though. Those of us old enough to remember the Reagan years also remember the famous line: "It's morning in America". That's what I always think of when I see the logo - Reagan.
Posted by
Rick in Ohio on December 16, 2008 at 4:25 PM
Ugh. For me the Obama logo has always just overwhelmingly made me feel like I'm looking at a print ad for a new pharmaceutical product or high-fiber breakfast food marketed to retirees.
And did they use the new Microsoft cleartype fonts, or does it just look like they did? So comfortably bland.
Posted by
Hoyt Clagwell on December 16, 2008 at 9:41 PM
Dangerously similar to the Bank of America logo, almost bordering on a copy. But they succeeded in making a symbol that just about everyone in America could instantly identify.
I agree that this guy is about the least energetic speaker imaginable. I LIVE for logo design, but I couldn't make it through this video.
More interesting would be an interview with the idiot who designed the yellow-on-black McCain logo. Now THAT was a disaster.
This story seems to be spreading rapidly thorough the design world and it's exciting to see that logo news is so popular. Congrats to Sol for his accomplishments. There are so many different directions that you can take with a political design such as this and he did a nice job and proved himself as a designer.
Comments (17) RSS