Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Bettie Page

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:08 PM

RIP.

bettie_page_pinup_10.jpgBettie Page, a legendary pinup girl whose photographs in the nude, in bondage and in naughty-but-nice poses appeared in men’s magazines and private stashes across America in the 1950s and set the stage for the sexual revolution of the rebellious ’60s, died Thursday in Los Angeles. She was 85.

Viaduct Options Narrowed to Two—But Don't Believe It

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:44 PM

The state, city, and county have narrowed the options for replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct to two: a six-lane surface/transit plan, and a new elevated viaduct.

I'll have more to say about these options tomorrow, but it's worth noting now that House speaker Frank Chopp's proposal—a six-lane elevated highway enclosed by walls and flanked by (unfunded, hypothetical) shops, windows, and facades—isn't off the table. The options announced tonight are only advisory, and the state legislature (of which Chopp is perhaps the most powerful member) can still revisit them, adding or eliminating options. Given Chopp's determination to have his proposal taken seriously despite business, governmental, and environmental-community opposition, I think it's safe to say it's far from dead.

Sherman Alexie Book Banned in Oregon Schools

Posted by Sam Machkovech on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:53 PM

Crook County removes book from schools after parent complains:

"I don't think it should be for anybody," [outraged parent Hank Moss] said. "I think it's trash. I don't think a 50-year-old ought to read it."

Get that quote on the jacket, stat.

(h/t Fark)

Do You Like Pajamas? Do You Like Men?

Posted by Lindy West on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM

pajamamen.jpg

You should really go see The Pajama Men. Really. You should.

I reviewed their show in this week's theater section:

It's conceptual and weird ("You have any siblings?" "Yeah, I got one. Half brother. Half sister"), silly and creepy ("Some people say beauty's only skin deep. But if that's true, you must be made totally out of skin"), lowbrow and highbrow and smart and dirty and sometimes sweet—all whipped up into a froth somewhere between sketch and improv.

You won't regret it. It is delightful. I might even go again.

The Perfect Gift for the Lover of Irony on Your Christmas List

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:22 PM

Slog tipper Jeanine says

"Browsing at Anthropologie to kill some time, I spotted a major WTF: A faux handmade Christmas ornament labelled "Shop Local."

3101269758_ea54eb671a.jpg

(You can find the photo at Jeanine's Flickrstream, here.)

Jeanine continues:


The tag states "Made in India." It is sold at a national chain retail store. How did this perfect irony make it past the mega-corp filter and onto the store floor, I wonder?

I wonder how many of these have sold. I bet a lot. Many thanks to Jeanine.

And a side note: My least favorite customers when I worked at Borders were the ones who would buy Adbusters from Borders faithfully every month.

eBook Roundup

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:54 PM

t6227.jpgIn case you were wondering, here is a very thorough review of all the different ebooks available on the iPhone.

Also, is the Nintendo DS going to be the next big e-reading platform?

And, lastly, here is a way to send highlighted text from your Mac to your Kindle.

An Aggrieved Fan of the Killers Universal Music Group Employee Emails Eric Grandy an Angry Letter

Posted by Christopher Frizzelle on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM

What Grandy wrote in Up & Comings:

So, the Killers are Mormons, and the Mormons funneled shitloads of money into passing California's anti-gay-marriage amendment, Proposition 8. Of course, it would be unfair to dismiss the Killers just because of the actions of their bigoted, crazy-talking church (Did you know Jesus Christ visited America's Wild West? It's true!). It would be plenty fair, though, to dismiss the band because their few great singles are now two full albums behind them ("When You Were Young" was just okay). Their latest, Day & Age, was produced by Les Rythmes Digitales/Jacques Lu Cont/Thin White Duke mastermind Stuart Price, so it sounds sharp enough, but it's just more new-wave rehash, lazy rock, and radio-ready power balladry—well worth boycotting solely on its own merits.

The angry letter this prompted is here. (Last word in said letter: "hate.")

Great Minds Think Exactly the Same

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:04 PM

istockphoto_1535790_i_agree.jpgThis is going to do nothing but slightly slow the collapse of both of these newspapers:

In the Dallas and Fort Worth daily newspapers, there will no longer be separate reviews of many cultural organizations and events. The two city papers, the Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, have begun running the same review by the same writer. It's the latest development in what has been a series of cutbacks affecting area arts reporting and reviewing. With newspapers across the country facing serous financial problems, maintaining an individual, local critic's voice is no longer a priority, even when the arts in question are locally based.

Don't they see? If the same reviews run in both papers, it makes both papers look worse. Without a distinct critical voice, they're both just going to be AP reprint organs with (I'll presume) slightly different editorial slants. And they will go out of business because they will both not matter equally.

Jason Osgood

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:02 PM

Former candidate for Secretary of State, anti-black-box-voting activist, and erstwhile candidate for King County Elections Director, has dropped out and endorsed current elections director Sherril Huff (who just got in the race last week, a story I broke on Slog on Thursday). Washblog has the scoop.

(I Love Those) Fucking Activists

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM

In last week’s paper, I wrote about a meeting held by Allyship, a local queer-rights group, about saving gay spaces—such as bars, apartments, and community centers—which have all been disappearing from Capitol Hill as rents skyrocket. It’s an interesting topic, and Allyship deserves applause for bringing it up and bringing together folks of all ages, races, etc.

But I was a little strident in my report. Rather than give the group a blowjob for pioneering great work and pointing out that they would be taking future steps and that a few quiet people in the audience were quite reasonable—which would have been a dull-ass article—I said Allyship should put a lid on the interminable babble about “oppression” and “privilege” that dominated the meeting. It’s not that oppression, privilege, prejudice, race, and homophobia aren’t part of gentrification. They are. But maybe it was that I grew up attending predominantly black schools in the Central District and going to an overwhelmingly black church where we talked much of social injustice. Then I worked on drug policy and criminal justice reform, and talked about racial inequities some more. And I’m fucking sick of talking about it, especially in the context of gentrification.

The impact of the real-estate market on queer housing and space—we get it, rooted in social inequity, we get it—is a math problem... a math problem solvable in Seattle much more easily than conquering institutional oppression. But, because I was glib and because I mocked Scott Winn for starting the meeting by asking the group to acknowledge the Duwamish people who were the first people gentrified out of Seattle (seriously), I knew that someone would be upset at me in the comments of my article. And recently, someone posting as Scott Winn—probably Scott—posted this retort:

The article was also no surprise after seeing how Holden carried himself as a panelist. From referring to his new neighbors in the Central Area as “crack dealers” to his short-sighted vision of what is possible by asserting that gentrification caused by development will always exist, he made clear that he was no friend to communities of color. Important to note, Holden silenced what represented half of the forum: a focus on the history of racial gentrification in Seattle, and resistance to it. This erasure, while not surprising, is sadly typical of many white liberals who have not addressed their privilege.

As for my recognition of the Duwamish Nation, it was sad and racist that Holden chose to ridicule me for it.

I’m sure I’ll never appreciate my privilege as a white man. I’m an oppressor. And it was mean to make fun of Scott for acknowledging the Duwamish Nation. But I take umbrage with one thing. I called the “crack dealers” in front of my house “crack dealers” because they’re actually selling crack. (Perhaps Scott could reconsider his assumptions that crack dealers are people of color.) I live on 21st and Union, right next to the Union Market convenience store. It’s no secret to anyone what’s happening on that corner. The guys wait in front of the store or on my steps, wait for a car to pull up, walk over, exchange a small bag containing some off-white lumps for some green pieces of paper, and then the car drives off. My white neighbors, black neighbors, Asian neighbors, gay neighbors, and African American housemates have all agreed: those are crack dealers.

Also, while I said that land values will increase in a growing city—gentrifying some districts—I also made the point that we can do plenty of things to keep residents in their neighborhoods. I listed six ways to do that. Call those options short-sighted, but a long-range vision for challenging oppression won’t help get a better deal on incentive zoning, the Pike-Pine rezone, light-rail design—the things that will actually preserve these gay spaces now. Working toward those goals, which I admire Allyship for doing, is worthwhile. But talking about oppression—or claiming people who sell crack aren't crack dealers—is what drives practical people away from activism.

Look Who's Coming to Slog Happy

Posted by Megan Seling on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:54 PM

presents_.jpg

Presents! Good shit too, like Lost Season 4 on DVD, some books that Paul promises don't suck, and PORN! Because every gift exchange has to have porn.

And I know you all love Paul and me very much, but we're not the only folks from editorial who'll be there. Christopher Frizzelle, Lindy West, Jen Graves, David Schmader, and Eric Grandy, are just a few confirmed guests.

Why else will this be the Slog Happy to end all Slog Happys (Happies?)? Let me just say... CHICKEN. FRIED. BACON.

See you at the Twilight Exit (2051 E Madison St) at 6 pm tonight!

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:33 PM

An email exchange...

This will probably sound like a completely stupid question to you, but I am honestly torn about how to handle this situation.

I am a gay man (who is fairly new to sleeping with men) in a somewhat new relationship with a bottom who only wants to have sex bareback. When he first broached the subject I told him that I wouldn't do it until he got tested and that he needed to promise me that he wouldn't have bareback sex with anyone else. A month later, he got tested and as he's negative, he is now pressuring me to stick it in him bare.

I keep telling him that it freaks me out. He keeps telling me that tops can't get HIV from bottoms. (I don't think this is true, but I do think it's pretty rare.) And he says he won't have sex with anyone else. I like this guy quite a bit and I really want this relationship to work and I feel like I need to trust him when he says that he got tested and that he won't cheat on me. Am I a complete idiot to do so and have bareback sex with him?

Confused And In Need

how long have you been seeing this guy? how much do you know about his character and what he does with this time when you're not together?

you can get HIV topping someone. not as easy, true, but it happens.

if he was asking you to do this without asking about YOUR hiv status, Confused, i'd say he's a bad risk.

dan

We've only been dating a couple of months. And he's constantly asking me when I was tested last and if I've slept with anyone else since (I have been and I haven't slept with anyone else), and he won't let me come inside of him, so it's not like he's unafraid.

For the most part, I feel like I can trust him. I've asked him repeatedly to not endanger my life and he says he won't, but since I've only known him a couple of months, there is a small worm of doubt, you know?

I cyberstalk him on Manhunt and he's still on there quite a bit, but he tells me that he's not sleeping with anyone else and I want to believe him.

Should I ask for exclusivity before I go through with this? Part of me feels like an absolute fool, but the bigger part of me feels like if this relationship is going to work (and I really want it to), that I need to show him I can trust him. Right?

does he want this relationship to work?

if he does, he'll wait. this isn't something you should do with someone you barely know—and after a couple of months, you can only barely know him. step back: he's putting you under a lot of pressure to do something that you're clearly not comfortable with. that is a BAD SIGN. and the fact that he's always on manhunt? another terrible sign.

don't do it. tell him that this is something you're willing to do after you've been together—and exclusive—for a YEAR. if he balks, walk.

Ok. You're absolutely right. Thank you.

SPD's War on (Alleged) Jack Shacks Continues!

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:24 PM

pb.jpg

Seattle VICE detectives—apparently more determined than ever to rub out prostitution—have busted another massage parlor for allegedly promoting prostitution.

On November 5th, Police raided the Global Health Center—at 3316 NE 125th St—and seized appointment books and several business licenses. Police also arrested the business's manager, Haoran Pu.

In July, police received a tip about possible prostitution at the Global Healing Center. Officers searched Craigslist for ads related to the business and found two, promising "The #1 Asian Angel Massage."

Undercover VICE detectives began visiting the business in August and, according to an affidavit, one detective was offered a $60 massage and told that he could get a handjob from a 47-year-old Asian woman working at the business for an additional $30.

Police kept the business under surveillance until November when an undercover officer returned to the Global center and asked for a massage and a handjob. Global's owner told the officer that the "masseuse" who gives handjobs was unavailable, but noted that the business takes L&I Claims.

L&I says they have not received any requests for payment from the Global Health Center.

Last month, SPD VICE detectives raided a Madison Park spa and federal charges were brought against the owners of several Seattle-area tanning salons for allegedly running a prostitution ring. In September, Police also raided a spa on Aurora Avenue which was allegedly being run as a brothel.

SPD spokesman Sean Whitcomb says despite the apparent focus on spas, tanning salons and massage parlors for prostitution investigations, the department isn't specifically targeting any one type of business. "I don’t think it’s necessarily fair to say there’s an emphasis on one particular brand of prostitution," he says. "We look for where crime is. If we have any reports about where crime is, we’re certainly going to check it out."

Look out, massage parlors of ill repute. SPD is on to you and you may not be in for a happy ending.

Fuck It

Posted by Rod Blagojevich on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:12 PM

Attention fuckers calling on me to step down: Fuck. You.. (For real.)

Seriously Washington Times and all 50 Democratic senators and President-fucking-Elect Obama: You want me to step down? For fucking free?

Fuck that. I'll step down as governor for $500,000.
I'll step down wearing a French maid's outfit for $750,000.
Shit, for $25,000, I'll wrestle anyone live on Pay Per View.
For $10,000, I'll shave my head, and for an additional $5,000, I'll eat the hair.

Don't fuck with me. A governorship is a fucking valuable thing. You just don't give it away for nothing.

Fake-Reading Is Sexy

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM

fakebook.jpgSteven's Lighthouse points to a BBC report many of you will find wincingly familiar:

"Nearly half of all men and one-third of women have lied about what they have read to try to impress friends or potential partners, a survey suggests. Men were most likely to do this to appear intellectual or romantic, found the poll of 1,500 people by Populus for the [UK] National Year of Reading campaign. The men polled said they would be most impressed by women who read news websites, Shakespeare or song lyrics. Women said men should have read Nelson Mandela's biography or Shakespeare. Among the 1,500 who took part in the research were 864 teenagers"

High City Salaries: Maybe Not Such a Bad Thing

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:03 PM

As the Seattle Times reported this morning, the city council is cool to Mayor Greg Nickels's proposal to bump up the pay ranges of the city's top executives, increasing their top potential pay much as 37 percent—an increase Nickels says is necessary to keep them from leaving for other jobs.

"In both good and bad economic times, taxpayers expect city government to be well run," said Karin Zaugg Black, a spokeswoman for the mayor. "Part of having a well-run city government is attracting and retaining top-quality directors."

The council's culture, civil rights, personnel and health committee declined to even consider the proposal, citing the bad economy and the fact that many at the bottom of the city's pay scale can barely afford to pay the rent. The mayor's proposal would have increased Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske's and utilities director Chuck Clarke's salaries from $188,315 and $187,314, respectively, to a maximum of $232,213, and would have increased City Light director Jorge Carrasco's salary, already the highest in the city, from $225,000 to a maximum of $308,888. The council has twice rejected similar increases, in 2006 and 2007.

Most city staff are getting a 4.5 percent raise in 2009.

Despite my own vast wealth, I'm certainly sympathetic to the plight of those at the bottom of the pay scale. However, Nickels has a point. Top officials can be recruited away from their government jobs by other cities or by opportunities in the private sector; if they're doing a good job (a question I'm not getting into here—except to say that if they aren't earning it, the council and mayor ought to show them the door), then they need to receive a competitive salary. In Chicago, the police chief makes $300,000, while in San Francisco, the assistant police chief makes $257,000. Overall, the mayor's office estimates that all three positions are underpaid by 8 to 13 percent compared to similar positions in other cities; the mayor's office says they'll provide more details on how they arrived at that number later this afternoon. If that is true, there's certainly a compelling argument for raising top executives' pay ranges to be in line with what their counterparts are making in other cities.

As it happens, I'm currently reading the book "Sleepwalking Through History: America In the Reagan Years" by Haynes Johnson. As salaries fell and workers were told to "do more with less," he writes,

The value of public service was further lowered. Not only were the burdens of the job greater, but the rewards were diminishing. By Reagan's last year in office, rank-and-file pay had fallen 24 percent behind the private sector. It was even more severe at the highest ranks of the career service, where pay lagged 40 percent behind comparable private renumeration. ...

Within federal ranks the turnover rate increased rapidly. Of the Senior Executive Service (SES), which comprises the highest-ranking federal managers, 40 percent ended their government careers between 197 and 1983. In four more years those numbers had nearly doubled. The civil service Merit Systems Protection Board, concerned over the numbers of top people leaving the federal government, surveyed 1,500 members of SES who had resigned rather than retire in that first four-year period. Of these, 90 percent said they left federal service for higher-paying private sector jobs. Of those responding to another survey, 80 percent were concerned to a "great" or "considerable" extent about morale among career employees. Toward the end of the Reagan administration a survey of 1,364 senior federal managers still working in the government... found that 61 percent would not recommend a federal career for young people.

I'm not suggesting that recently recruited police officers should pity Gil Kerlikowske for having to tighten his sizable belt; nor am I suggesting that Nick Licata, who heads the personnel committee that rejected the mayor's proposal, is Ronald Reagan. But the city does need to consider that part of attracting and retaining the best talent is paying them enough that they aren't tempted to abandon ship, because uncommitted leaders at the top produce bad morale in the ranks.

Did Someone Say Awesome Stuff?

Posted by Lindy West on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:42 PM

I SAID IT! It was me. I said it. Now answer the question. Do you or do you not like awesome stuff? ANSWER THE QUESTION. If you truly do not like awesome stuff, I have no quarrel with you, o grumpy ladies and fellows across the land. However, if, as I suspect, you DO like awesome stuff, then what the fuck are you doing not bidding on Strangercrombie items at this very moment!? You are confused, I think, about what day it is. It is Thursday. Tomorrow is Friday. TOMORROW IS YOUR FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO PROCURE AWESOME STUFF!!!

3.jpg

(And help children.) For instance:

Sole Repair Party! I want this for my birthday party next year. Perhaps, if you don't like awesome stuff (we covered this earlier—are you paying attention?), you should instead buy it for me! Except don't, because that would be creepy.

You and all the hot ladies and hunks in your orbit can party like crazy in the elegant space at Sole Repair on Capitol Hill. Package includes room rental and full staff. A $1,500 VALUE! OPENING BID: $1.99!

Or how about So You've Learned to Read, which buys you the expertise of Paul Constant, who has literally read every book ever written (FACTS, PEOPLE! I deal in facts!). Plus, other things!

This package for the bookish and reclusive includes two tickets to My Avatar in the Hugo Literary Series (featuring Christa Bell, Vikram Chandra, Jennifer Finney Boylan, and the Maldives), and $100 shopping sprees at Bailey Coy Books and University Book Store. Plus $50 gift certificates to Elliott Bay Book Company and Third Place Books, and a $25 gift certificate to Fremont Place Books. Plus careful and loving book-shopping advice from Stranger books editor Paul Constant (if you like). PRICELESS! OPENING BID: $1.99!

Or the Narcissist Package, for all the yous out there who are interested in you, you, you.

Got a band? A business? A message you want to send to the world? Dumb Eyes will design and print 1,000 double-sided, full-color flyers (courtesy of United Reprographics); 150 one-inch buttons, and a webpage devoted to whatever you want. To add to your burgeoning narcissism: You get your own two-hour evening show on Hollow Earth Radio—make sounds, play songs, speak in your own invented language, cuss (the freeform online-radio market can handle it)—for one night. And Jones Soda will give you 12 coupons for cases of customizable bottles (12 bottles per). Force your guests to down a liter of beautiful you! Not included: advice on how to deal with your new fame. PRICELESS! OPENING BID: $1.99!

Or, you can donate $20 and get an extremely sexy and alluring Stranger tote bag, OR you can donate $50 and get a bunch of photos of people who have been mean to you on the internet bound into a calendar! Or you can donate whatever you want and get warm special feelings inside. Just click this button:

Do you feel it? Do you feel the warm special feelings? That's Strangercrombie. Or maybe you peed your pants. Just kidding, it was me. I peed your pants.

Win a Date with Tilson!

Posted by Kelly O on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:22 PM

Tilson, from local band Yee Ole Saturday Knights just announced that whatever $$ his Strangercrombie Cooking Class raises, well, being the charitable charmer that he is, he will match that amount, doubling the money for Treehouse.

Other musician packages include local hot shots PWRFL Power, Throw Me the Statue, Truckasaurus, and Calvin Johnson, just to name a few.

You have until tomorrow at 5:00 pm to bid-bid-buy. Go!

Question for the Day

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM

genderaffected.jpg

Also Reading Tonight

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:00 PM

25141705.JPGDammit! This is a much better event than all those readings I listed this morning:


Third Place Lake Forest Park
Jonathan Evison with ALL ABOUT LULU
Thursday December 11 at 7:00 pm

Not only a reading but also an Appalachian Wedding Buffet!
On the menu: lil smokeys, mini corndogs, pigs in a blanket, twinkies, and hohos. People will be adjourning to Jonathan's favorite dive bar afterwords.

Evison's first novel, All About Lulu, is a novel about a young man growing up in a family of bodybuilders. He becomes obsessed with his step-sister, Lulu, and spends a good long time lusting after her. It's a kind of early John Irving-esque novel, and I mean that in the best possible way.

If I wasn't going to Slog Happy, I'd be going to this, and you should think about going to this one, too. Evison is a Bainbridge author who's got tons of ideas—I think he's already working on his third novel, even though his second has yet to be published—and I have no doubt he's going to be a big damn deal someday soon. I've never met another author more eager to meet and talk to everyone. He just seems to really enjoy people. Which is weird for a novelist, but a welcome change. If you can't make the reading, pick up Lulu. It's a really great debut novel by a small press that's doing great work.

Many apologies to Third Place Books and mammoth apologies to both Jonathan Evison and you, the innocent Slog reader.

So Much for Those Stickers

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Remember those "Obama Quit, So Can I" stickers? Well, it looks like he didn't, so maybe you can't...

obama_smoking.jpgAppearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press” programme, interviewer Tom Brokaw told Mr Obama he had ducked answering the question during an interview last month with ABC’s Barbara Walters. Noting that the White House was a no-smoking zone, Brokaw asked Mr Obama, “Have you stopped smoking?”

“I have,” Mr Obama replied, smiling broadly. “What I said was that there are times where I have fallen off the wagon.”

“Wait a minute,” Brokaw interjected, “that means you haven’t stopped.”

Fair enough,” Mr Obama said. “What I would say is that I have done a terrific job under the circumstances of making myself much healthier. You will not see any violations of these rules in the White House.”

This isn't to say that Obama can't quit. But if he doesn't by next month, the paparazzi will go nuts taking pictures of him in the White House Rose Garden.

Netflix Mon Amour: The Boston Strangler

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:41 PM

51AHANJGP0L._SL500.jpgSo the other night, I got the 1968 movie The Boston Strangler in the mail from Netflix. I don't remember putting the movie in my queue, but I know it must've been forever ago. I think I may have read a magazine sidebar about good serial killer movies, way back when Zodiac came out. Strangler is not a perfect movie—it's got that weird, let-it-all-hang-out 60s-70s pacing, for one thing—but it's a sad reminder of how unimaginative most studio movies are today.

There's all kinds of camera play here; multiple angles are shown on the screen at once, a couple of freaky scene changes happen where a person's body becomes a portal into the next scene, and there's some downright expressionistic tricks with light and color and editing. And I don't know if I've seen Tony Curtis in anything but embarrassingly earnest talk show appearances in a very long time, but he's super creepy-great as Albert DeSalvo, the serial killer who had all of Boston on edge in the early 60s. It's enough to make one wish that someone could convince Tom Cruise to play a mass murderer. Like Curtis's DeSalvo, I bet it'd turn out to be the role of a lifetime.

The movie doesn't really seem to have a perspective; it switches back and forth from the cops to the killer, like it's not exactly sure who it wants to follow, but everything comes together in a big way for the finish, which is a great ending for a true crime movie. I prefer Zodiac, but Strangler is a great, creepy story that clearly informed some of what Fincher was doing with Zodiac. This YouTube clip doesn't demonstrate fully how crazy the visuals can get, but if you like the clip, you'll probably love the movie:

The Stranger Is Expanding Our Circulation on the Eastside

Posted by Christopher Frizzelle on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:40 PM

It's not always easy to find a copy of the print edition of The Stranger in Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, and Redmond. But we're expanding our distribution to those areas. We've got some ideas, but we want to know from you, too: Where do our readers in Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, and Redmond think we should put Stranger boxes?

The Future of Local Media

Posted by Eli Sanders on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM

This has been bouncing around since it aired last Friday, but I don't think it's been linked on Slog yet.

Here you will find leaders of the city's big-four word-makers talking to the Seattle Channel about who's going to survive, and how they'll do it, in a rapidly-changing, economically-challenging media environment.

The cast: David Boardman, Executive Editor of The Seattle Times; David McCumber, Managing Editor of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer; David Brewster, Publisher of Crosscut; and Tim Keck, Publisher of this here Stranger.

Most interesting thing, in my opinion: How resigned Boardman and McCumber seem about the inevitable, and perhaps just-around-the-corner, disappearance of one of their papers. In the long sweep of intra-media talk here in Seattle, that's somewhat new.

The Tallest Building in Seattle

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:27 PM

I'll believe this when I see it:

burj_dubai_tower.jpg A developer who said he hopes to partner with the Trump Organization of New York on a strikingly tall marquee two-tower condo project in downtown Seattle said he's in serious negotiations to purchase a site for it.

Spencer Alpert of Alpert International said the project would be built in phases, possibly starting in three to five years.

The first tower may rise to 82 stories, higher than Seattle's tallest building, the 76-story Columbia Center, and would include upscale offices and condos, retail and a private club, he said.

“We're able to build a real marquee (project) that would change the Seattle skyline — something that would stand out in the Seattle skyline, but improve on what exists today,” Alpert said.

In this economy, four-to-six story residential construction is barely inching forward; condo towers, the ones that haven't broken ground, are on hold; and new office buildings, depending on how many hundreds of thousands of square feet are freed by Washington Mutual's evacuation, aren't getting built any time soon. So this Trump building—tall, ambitious, and office oriented—is banana-dream pie in the sky.

Via the DJC. Image is of the Burj Dubai Tower.

@SEAshows

The Stranger's Twitter Feed of Seattle Shows
  • Loading Tweets
    loading

Follow @SEAshows
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use