Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Why Are Mormons So Fucking Homophobic?

Posted by on Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:15 AM

Because, Alice Dreger argues, the Mormon "lifestyle" pumps out more gay boys while the Mormon religion pumps those gay boys full of self-hatred.

So if you are a man, the farther down the reproductive chain you were in terms of male fetuses inhabiting your biological mother’s womb, the greater the chance you are gay. Blanchard estimates this effect accounts for the sexual orientation of somewhere around 15-29% of gay men.

Why on earth would this happen? That’s not at all clear, but the researchers who have looked at this phenomenon think it may involve some kind of immunological response a woman’s body exhibits to carrying male fetuses, a response whose effect on male fetuses grows stronger with each successive male-fetus pregnancy. This etiology remains theoretical. But the effect does not. In spite of the long-running “gene-gay versus turned-gay” discussions of homosexuality, we have far better data evidencing womb-gayness than we do gene-gayness or turned-gayness.

So what does this have to do with Mormons? Well, given the relatively large size of Mormon families, on average, it is highly likely that gay men are relatively more common among Mormons than among the general population, where family size is, on average, smaller. It’s not just that each Mormon family would have, on average, more sons than the average American family; it’s that the population of Mormons would include more gay men per capita than the general American population. Hmmm….

Put that fact together with a study that purported to show that men who are homophobic are more likely to be sexually aroused to homosexual stimuli….and another purporting to show that homophobic men are more likely to be aggressive towards gay men…and imagine, in turn, that gay (Mormon) men who are forced to be closeted are more likely to become homophobic….

Well, it’s just hard not to wonder if the Mormon declaration of war over Prop. 8 doesn’t have a little something to do with womb-gayness.

Read Dreger's entire post here.

 

Comments (44) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
That's what homophobic MEANS -- men who fear homosexuality IN THEMSELVES. That's why it's so stupid when they say stuff like "well, I'm not AFRAID of homosexuals, but...." No one ever said you were, sunshine.
Posted by Fnarf on December 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM
2
One also wonders if generations of forcing gay men to marry and father children wouldn't also tend to increase the incidence of "gay genes" in subsequent generations.
Posted by flamingbanjo on December 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM
3
Oooh. You know who else has a lot of kids? The Duggars. #18 is on the way (wtf), and I can't wait til all those adorable little boys come out.
Posted by They're like rabbits! on December 4, 2008 at 10:39 AM
4
Hmmm... What other large institution frowns on "unnatural means" of birth control and seems to have intrinsically disordered views on homosexuality?
Posted by dn on December 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM
5
I love this theory.
Posted by Julie in Chicago on December 4, 2008 at 11:05 AM
6
I think a lawyer might call the premise of the piece's title "assuming facts not in evidence"; which is to say, other than Dan and his fan-boys who are still buttsore over Prop 8 who says Mormons are (more) 'homophobic'?
Mormons are not unique, but take a back seat to no one, in believing that homosexual behavior is destructive to the individual who practices it, to the loved ones of said individual and to a society which fosters it.
However Mormons believe the same of pornography, adultery, pre-marital sex, gambling, abortion etc etc.
And Mormons have at various times been encouraged by the Church to participate in civic discourse and attempt to influence the outcome of referendums on many of those topics (gambling, pornography, abortion)
West Coast homosexual activist seem to believe the Mormon Church sprang from the ether in October and exists just to frustrate Gays.
It is closer to the truth to observe that Dan has become an obsessively compulsive 24-7 outed Mormon hater than that Mormons have any particular interest; positive, negative or secret; in homosexuals.
Mormons might argue that homosexuals started the Prop 8 unpleasantness by attempting to alter the definition of marriage.
Dan and his boys will favor themselves when the move on to their next compulsion.
I suspect Mormons already have moved on.
Posted by Put YOUR Name Here on December 4, 2008 at 11:10 AM
7
makes you wonder how many of those hot mormon boys on missions are gay..
Posted by apres_moi on December 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM
8
Though I don't believe in God, this totally convinces me of Karma.
Posted by Andy Niable on December 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM
9
(While yer beating up on the Mormons, Dan, you might want to save some ironic, schadenfreudian vitriol for Catholics, who have some pretty large families as well...)
Posted by Andy Niable on December 4, 2008 at 11:24 AM
10
You really need to look into who is publishing this stuff before you give it credibility.

http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/alice-dreg…
http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/ray-blanch…
http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/human-biod…
Posted by W.T. Foxtrot on December 4, 2008 at 11:25 AM
11
5
oooooooh Julieeee!!
can I feel you up?
please?
I have a weakness for slutty skanks.
pleeeease?
Posted by Saxby Chambliss on December 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM
12
@10
Wow. What a freakshow.
Posted by chad on December 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM
13
@11: Go feel your mother up again, jackass.
Posted by Matthew on December 4, 2008 at 11:30 AM
14
13
Matthew!
Is that you?!
How the hell have you been, you old dickhead?
Posted by Saxby Chambliss on December 4, 2008 at 11:37 AM
15
We all know that God rewards homophobic communities with especially large numbers of gay children. This theory suggests a mechanism, doesn't it?
Posted by Rob on December 4, 2008 at 11:40 AM
16
Seriously, OUT the mormon church, just like OutRage! did with the Anglican church in UK. Might hurt a bit at first, but will be a good move in the long run.
Posted by BT on December 4, 2008 at 11:44 AM
17
It sound like a natural way to prevent over population to me.
Posted by Mike in Renton on December 4, 2008 at 11:45 AM
18
So eventually there should be a fundamentalist gay church of latter day saints in which older gay men have harems of multiple younger gay "husbands"
Posted by Urgutha Forka on December 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM
19
Fnarf for the win @1.

The vast and overwhelming majority of those railing against homosexuality are themselves closeted gays.

Real men don't really care that much - just less competition (if male) or more hot threesomes (if female).

Seriously, that's the general attitude out there - I grew up where most guys thought that way.
Posted by Will in Seattle on December 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM
20
Feh, my mom had four children, all male, and none of us are gay.

Curmudgeons, bi-polars, drunks, and tweakers (in order of birth), yes, but no 'mos.
Posted by COMTE on December 4, 2008 at 12:05 PM
21
@ 17

Natural selection doesn't select for individuals that sacrifice themselves or their children for reasons of "over-population", because the ones who cheat (breed) will do better.
Posted by STJA on December 4, 2008 at 12:19 PM
22
I've always thought all the latently homosexual bigots can't be fully explained by them trying to overcompensate and cover up for their secret desires, by being anti-gay. I'm betting there's a portion of them for which, the homophobic religion/family/society they grow up in is making it so taboo that that makes it fun.
Posted by Karey on December 4, 2008 at 12:20 PM
23
@20: Whew--dodged THAT bullet!
Posted by rob on December 4, 2008 at 12:24 PM
24
It's what I've always said. Loud mouth homophobes who like to attack out, gay men are jealous. Just plain jealous. They would love to wrap their lips around a dick and it drives them mad with jealousy that someone does it and doesn't hate themselves for doing it. J-E-A-L-O-U-S
Posted by Vince on December 4, 2008 at 12:26 PM
25
Fact: every born-a-mormon i know in Seattle is a gay man. save 1 convert who has 5 kids.
Posted by Max Solomon on December 4, 2008 at 12:29 PM
26
@2, "gay genes"? have seen no science pointing to such. seen science pointing to "epigenetic" and intrauterine environment as possible causes. also, just off the top of my head, wouldn't mo's be present in populations in different concentrations if it was genetic, ie: running in families, more prevalent among certain ethnicities/geographic locations?
Posted by ellarosa on December 4, 2008 at 1:15 PM
27
@26: I wrote on this question, reviewing some recent papers.

http://dearscience.org/2008/06/25/wait-w…
Posted by Jonathan Golob on December 4, 2008 at 1:22 PM
28
@26: Golob beat me to it. That link is worth reading, btw. And I considered adding "hypothetical" or some other qualifier to "gay genes" but I figured the quotes would cover it.
Posted by flamingbanjo on December 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM
29
@24....you're sooo right!
Posted by jimmy on December 4, 2008 at 2:03 PM
30
Andy @9 has a good point. I wonder what Dan's birth order is... :>
Posted by Julie in Chicago on December 4, 2008 at 2:09 PM
31
Regarding the statement in #6:

"Mormons might argue that homosexuals started the Prop 8 unpleasantness by attempting to alter the definition of marriage."

This "redefine definition of marriage" notion is hogwash. The California constitution did not change (before Prop 8 passed); same-gender marriage *always* was legal there. The California Supreme Court just forced the government to comply with the Constitution. It is the yes-on-8 people that redefined marriage, causing the state to interfere with (some) religions -- which is supposed to be unconstitutional. We'll see what the California Supreme Court says about that in a few months. It's clear what the California legislature thinks - repeal 8. http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/12…
Posted by re-re-definition on December 4, 2008 at 3:47 PM
32
My dad is the oldest of 4 boys. Number 3, my uncle, is gay. Guess my granny's womb got a little allergic to testosterone around 1960 and thus we have Uncle Eugene. Not that this "proves" anything, but just to counteract @20's point.
Posted by LAH on December 4, 2008 at 3:48 PM
33
There's some filmmaker guy who said growing up Mormon was fairly good preparation for gay life. You're not supposed to hang around with girls anyway, and when you're 18, you get to go and live overseas and share a bedroom with another 18 y.o. guy...
Posted by banjoboy on December 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM
34
@ COMTE #20,

But if your mother had had a fifth son, he would have been gayer than Libberace and she would've been relieved she had one "normal" child. At least if my mother is to be believed, that would have been what happened.
Posted by Y.F. on December 4, 2008 at 5:38 PM
35
@31
California VOTERS by a wide margin declared marriage to be between man and woman.
A single judge threw out the will of 10 million voters and substituted his personal prejudice.
The VOTERS reaffirmed their will in Prop 8.
You pick and choose who you will listen to and take one judge who agrees with you over the clearly stated two-time decision of the entire state populace.
You'll forgive us if we don't see your position as one on the moral or legal high ground but rather in a cesspool of self serving shit.
Posted by wash this on December 4, 2008 at 5:41 PM
36
The hypocrites are only hurting themselves.
Posted by Eric on December 4, 2008 at 7:53 PM
37
Oooh, I love me some Dreger. I miss college.
Posted by Ariel on December 4, 2008 at 7:59 PM
38
"California VOTERS by a wide margin declared marriage to be between man and woman."

Uh huh. And if civil liberties were left to the voters, many minorities would be disadvantaged.

I think you have it backwards. Democracy is not the end goal, liberty is. The best way to defend inalienable rights against the tyranny of the majority is with a representative government with checks and balances.

Democracy in and of itself is not a virtue: It is the best tool for the job, most of the time.

I don't really care if teh gayz can't get married in the Mormon Church. (Neither can I. No big.) I do care that they seem to think that it's appropriate to have the law not apply to some citizens.

Separate but equal is neither.
Posted by Lee Gibson on December 4, 2008 at 9:07 PM
39
Obviously the people of California are too STUPID to govern themselves.
They need a homosexual Judge to throw out their laws and tell them what to do. I think they call that dictatorship in other places.
Posted by Your Name Here on December 5, 2008 at 1:31 AM
40
Perfect reason for the film industry to move to Canada, I mean, if it hadn't already.
Julie, according to Dan's writing he is indeed a third son. (Or did your bird emoticon mean you already knew that? I am so old.)
Posted by pat on December 5, 2008 at 3:21 AM
41
@ 19 22 24
I always heard it was the otherway around, your typical bitter bitching gay was deep down a frustrated washed up Mormon wannabe.
Posted by ...that's just what I heard... on December 5, 2008 at 10:22 AM
42
@32 - there's the gay 'gene! *get* it??!? BWA haha!

okay, the k chronicles already did that joke, but it was begging to be said.

i read a very compelling argument that maternal stress was a greater predictor of gay-ness than any other factor, including birth order. i wish i could remember the source, it was really interesting, because when i applied it anecdotally to mothers of people i know who are gay, it seemed to work out. and of course, under the theorem above, the more kids a gal has - ever babysit four kids at once? try it sometime - the more stress she is *likely* to be under, though it was only prolonged, unalleviated stress that was a factor, not single incidents of stress even if strung together.

lots of kids doesn't equal prolonged stress for every mom - some women genuinely want large families, love being pregnant, and enjoy the baby stage even when they have older kids to care for; my mum is like that. but if you interview ones who don't, it's interesting to count up the number of gay kids they have.

@30 - dan is #3 of 4
Posted by happyhedonist on December 6, 2008 at 1:30 PM
43
because their dirty sex makes god send hurricanes!
Posted by Ian Wallace on December 21, 2008 at 3:03 PM
Bear Claw 44
Mormons are not HOMOPHOBIC!
Mormons Loves the sinner but hates the sin.
All acts of Sexual sins are not permitted by God for he said that there is no excuse for sin and that is what repentance is for. We all sin in one way or another but there are different degrees of sin RE: Murder is not as bad as Stealing and they have have different outcomes and punishments by God.

Homosexual activity is indeed an abomination in the sight of God and everyone will stand before him and account for what they have done in their lives for good or for evil and only each and every one of us is in control of their eternal destiny not any Church or Government. We only have ourselves to blame if we inherit the kingdom of Hell not some Church or another person.

The LDS Church teaches Doctrine that has been restored to the earth once again by a living Prophet not just a man.
Latter Day doctrines are given to our Mordern day Prophet to guide everyone on Earth on how to return to our Father in Heaven not to harass anyone.
If there is an evil law then most Churches will fight against it.

If Homosexuals want to sin then they should do it in the privacy of their own homes and leave it out of politics and quit hitting on people in public to go to bed with ya.

Those who oppose the LDS Church are the ones that do not have the proper or complete knowledge of the Lords Gospel Doctrine and their feelings and hate is divinely directed by Satan who is the father of all lies, Contentions Hatered and Deception.
Satan is deceiving millions by Liberalism and is taking them by the hand and gently leading them gently into hell.

Like it or not or believe it or not, we all will stand before God all mighty and answer to him why did we think the way we did, spoke the things we did, and done the things we done. We will not only answer for the sins of commission but for our sins of omission. Why we didnt read study and pray regarding the scriptures.

In all honesty, have you actually got down on your knees and asked God if what is in the scriptures if they are true or not? I bet most of you have not.
I bet most of you glanced at the scriptures and put them back on the shelf walking away with the I already believe what I want to believe because harry down the street told me all about it or the internet preached anti Mormonism and that was fine with you. Well, that wont wash when you stand before God and tell him "well thats what so and so told me" or "Thats what I read in a book or it was on the computer." When the Lord asks if you read and studied the Holy Bible and the Book of Mormon and you cant lie and you say NO, he will ask you why? Where are you going to be and where are you going to stand before him?

I am a High Priest in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and I am not homophobic but I am against the practice and Laws of such.
I just had a 29 year old son to die of AIDS on the 8th of Sept.. and I knew his friends and loved them all.

I have several relatives and friends that are Gay and Lesbians and we love each other and respect each others views about such practices.

Yes I have taught the truth about Homosexual Sins to those in need of this education and some have repented and changed their ways and gave their heart and soul to God.
This is what is meant in the scriptures about line upon line and precept upon precept. Learn, repent and forsake the sin and move on and learn more and repeat the process.
Their is no growth without spititual opposition and God knows and expects this. He has made it very possible to be cleansed of your sins and give you a clean slate if you desire this.
There is a way back to our father in heaven and he loves you, the LDS Church loves you and is there to help all not condemn you, and Christ loves you and thats why he died on the cross so all may repent and comeback to our father in heaven through him.

Christ bled from every pore for every sin that was ever committed or will be committed and by every sould that has ever lived.
Not to take full advantage of this is slapping him in the face Christ said for those who don't be obedient to the commandments and follow him they will suffer the pain that he did and for those who follow him and receive the saving ordnances that he put here won't.

Your choice.

Keith Haynes
PO Box 326
Carlsborg, WA. 98324
email: khaynes_sr@wavecable.com
More...
Posted by Bear Claw http://www.projectrecords.com on December 1, 2009 at 5:28 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy