Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, December 4, 2008

New Milk Knowledge

Posted by on Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:33 PM

First, Science Magazine is both impressed and disgusted by the clever chemistry behind melamine finding its way into infant formula:

A weeks-long investigation into China's tainted milk scandal has left scientists astonished by the technical sophistication of those who used melamine to adulterate food products. Chinese investigators, meanwhile, are puzzling over the precise mechanisms of exposure and toxicity in infants who developed kidney damage...

Researchers say the adulteration was nothing short of a wholesale re-engineering of milk. Weeks ago, investigators established that workers at Sanlu and at a number of milk-collection depots were diluting milk with water; they added melamine to dupe a test for determining crude protein content. "Adulteration used to be simple. What they did was very high-tech," says Chen. Researchers have since learned that the emulsifier used to suspend melamine—a compound that resists going into solution—also boosted apparent milk-fat content.

When the first melamine scandal broke in the United States, I was similarly impressed and distressed:

The killer pet food used "human-grade protein" from China which had melamine—a slightly toxic coal byproduct—mixed in to make a crappy product mimic a high-quality one. It was crafty chemistry. Melamine is a six-member ring of alternating carbons and nitrogens. The three NH2s—the amino groups—hanging off the ring chemically behave like the amino groups that hang off every amino acid in proteins. The chemical reaction that determines protein amounts in food works by detecting these amino-to-carbon bonds. The test doesn't care if the amino groups are in melamine or protein, so it gets duped....

These schemes are brilliant, employing clever chemistry and marketing—everything but manufacturing a quality product. Imagine what China's emerging businessmen and scientists could accomplish in a system that punishes cheating your customers, demands quality products, and protects intellectual property.

Next, a pleasant symbiotic relationship between breast milk, bacteria and babies in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


In order to develop properly—to grow the brain and nervous system in particular—babies need specific nutrients like foliate. Mothers cannot directly provide these nutrients, because humans lack the enzymes to generate them. Some bacteria can make these nutrients, but need a food source to do so.

Mothers make a particular collection of food molecules in breast milk, that the baby cannot directly use, to be consumed by a friendly family of bacteria. These bacteria, in turn, produce foliate and other crucial nutrients for the baby. How impressive and heartening.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
So is the shiny new 1 ppm melamine contamination limit the FDA just came up with just a convenient place to draw the line without destroying the domestic formula industry? Or is it safe?
Posted by elenchos on December 4, 2008 at 3:49 PM
2
What I don't understand is the new relatively lax standards for melamine contamination. I mean, it's pretty low, parts per million, but why is ANY allowed? It's not really "contamination"; it's not like melamine gets in there through bad processing or shipment or acid rain or whatever; it's not like insect parts in flour, which are unavoidable. The only way you get melamine in milk is if it is DELIBERATELY ADDED. And there is no conceivable reason to add it besides out and out fraud. We're basically saying "you can add poison, but not very much".

ANY detection of melamine in milk, beyond the sensitivity of the detecting method itself, should result in not just rejection of that load, but a permanent and total shutdown of that source.
Posted by Fnarf on December 4, 2008 at 3:50 PM
3
Fnarf: I'm totally with you.

My suspicion, given the pervasiveness of China as a starting source for animal feed, and industrial food products is there would be no sources, no food that is uncontaminated at this point.

We live in the era of absolute fraud, buying poison as food and returning assets back by toxic debt--another nice symmetry.

elenchos: I have no idea what a safe limit for melamine would be. To some extent, nobody knows. The science article to which I linked goes into a short discussion of that very problem.

The proposed mechanism for melamine toxicity is due to crystallization in the kidneys, when combined with other chemicals also used in the fraud.

So is 1 ppm ok? I have no idea. Is it more or less safe when emulsified? I have no idea. What else is being shoved in the fake ingredients, that might increase or decrease toxicity? I have no idea.

Scary shit, when you're dealing with people with no ethical sense at all.
Posted by Jonathan Golob on December 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM
4
Agreed with your last statement, Fnarf. I'm frankly astonished that the Chinese government, with all the power it has, hasn't put an end to this after 50000 babies were poisoned. Wouldn't you think these businessmen would be in a gulag or something? China can't even do autocracy right.
Posted by oljb on December 4, 2008 at 4:19 PM
5
Thanks for the succint explanation, Jonathan!

I'm horrified that all our human and animal food products don't have country of origin labeling yet. If you haven't already, write your representatives to ask for it. This is a serious issue.

I have been looking for a country of origin on every food product I buy for the last four years, and more and more Chinese food products are on our shelves. I will not knowingly buy any food from China. Maybe that makes me sound like a terrible person, but it's just not worth the risk to me. And I say this as an English as a second language teacher with many wonderful mainland Chinese exchange students. Oh well. Their food industries can get their ethics together if they want my business.
Posted by greendyke on December 4, 2008 at 4:29 PM
6
That mother's milk fact is fascinating. The subtlety and elegance of evolution and the way it has tied together living things is just astounding.
Posted by Westside forever on December 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM
7
Greendyke, country-of-origin can be a lie. Most "Italian" olive oil comes from Spain in huge tanker trucks. Farmed salmon from the US is frozen, shipped to China to be deboned and cut into fillets, and shipped back to the US for sale -- labeled "USA". Processed foods typically have ingredients from a dozen or more countries.
Posted by Fnarf on December 4, 2008 at 4:39 PM
8
Symbiotic relationships between host animals and bacteria are fairly common. I recently learned that kangaroos, having only one stomach and no cud, cannot digest the grass they survive on. They are wholly dependent on specialized bacteria in the caecum to digest this grass for them (as ruminants are also to a much lesser extent). Humans are full of bacteria without which we would die.
Posted by Fnarf on December 4, 2008 at 4:45 PM
9
Profit. Safety.

Choose only one (and we know which they choose)
Posted by Mel Amine on December 4, 2008 at 5:03 PM
10
You know, Jonathan, I always learn something interesting and educational from your science-y posts.
Posted by Leslie N. on December 4, 2008 at 5:45 PM
11
How long until Dan starts "every baby deserves mother's milk" titles to stories about babies with bad bacterial infections?
Posted by Tricyclic on December 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM
12
Not to be that spelling Nazi, but I think that babies need "folate," not "foliate."

(Unless they've been decorated as cabbages for some creepy Anne Geddes photoshoot.)
Posted by Mudpuppy on December 4, 2008 at 6:44 PM
13
I know it's incredibly inconvenient and ultimately not practicable, but I think citizens of the world should at least TRY to unite and boycott Chinese products. Loss of trade revenue is probably the only way to ever get through to these assholes.

Get a load of this: http://in.reuters.com/article/topNews/id…

China's fuckface rulers are threatening to boycott French products if Sarkozy goes ahead with his plan to meet with the Dalai Lama. I mean, as ifffff ..... The thought of these clowns taking down down the French economy because the President of France meets with the world's most respected spiritual leader is way beyond totally lame.

China's despotic rulers won't be content until every man, woman, child and animal on this planet is completely contaminated to death by the poisons they mix into their so-called food products, and the inconceivably vast quantities of crap they pump into the atmosphere and discharge into rivers and oceans. The most pathetic victims are their own citizens, who needless to say have no choice but to eat melamine, breathe hydrocarbons, drink polluted water and die year or even decades before their time because they are being POISONED TO DEATH!!!

China is on a messianic mission to add melamine to the entire freaking global food supply. We need to just say no to Chinese melamine-laced products AND Chinese genocide in Tibet, Mongolia and Xingjiang-Uigar. If and when the day arrives that China has become a first world nation with the world's largest, fully nuclear-equipped army, we need to be afraid. We need to be VERY AFRAID.
Posted by Mud Baby on December 4, 2008 at 9:38 PM
14
#5 I believe, but I may be wrong, that this is the fault of the WTO and Bush won't fight them. The WTO calls it protectionism. They are right, in that I would like to protect myself by not buying anything from China. In fact, except for Japan and maybe South Korea, I don't trust the quality control of any other Asian country. They don't have our best interest at heart.
Posted by elswinger on December 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM
15
I mentioned China in an International Trade discussion this evening and came home to read this. Unchecked capitalism and true democracy cannot coexist. I believe that I have a right to safe, quality products in exchange for my hard earned money. People are disturbingly indifferent to the long term effects of so many scary products. When countries compete based upon cheap goods alone consumers lose. Look at our auto industry right now: it has been offering inferior products that people wanted for ages and look where we are now. Taxpayers get to subsidize the industry's shortsightedness and mistakes. Similarly when Americans start knocking off due to China toxics induced diseases the U.S. government(ie. taxpayers)will get to subsidize their healthcare. Why are we allowing this endless flood of cheap shit into our country to be bought up by people that don't know any better? As I was safety checking my kids Halloween candy this year I happened upon Chinese made gelatin candies. Isn't U.S. made gelatin gross enough? I can't wait to see the expose in the news regarding where this Chinese gelatin is derived from, probably some type of petroleum by product not used up in the textile manufactoring process -yech!
Posted by zgirl on December 4, 2008 at 10:28 PM
16
zgirl - Nicely said. I'm not saying you do, but don't resent the sick person just because they unknowingly ate poison food from China. It's not like they were smoking.
Posted by elswinger on December 4, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy