When I was a teenager, I was both a book nerd and a comic book geek. And so I loved the Wild Cards series, which was a series of sci-fi novels about an alien virus that kills 90% of the people it comes in contact with, turns most of the rest into monsters, and gives the rest super powers.
The Wild Card books are now 21 years old, and Bookgasm discusses the Wild Cards series today. The newest is a book called Busted Flush, and it sounds as though, like many sci-fi series, things have gotten too complex and impenetrable for their own good:
But as entertaining as it is, BUSTED FLUSH is not for the uninitiated. Those already familiar with past exploits of the aces and jokers will have an easier time keeping up with the numerous characters and events. Everyone else might want to first read INSIDE STRAIGHT or some of the background essays provided on the series website before taking on the latest addition to this unique but intricate series.
Sci-fi writers seem to forget that there's a way to write a series so that people can jump in partway through. Lots of writers—and George R. R. Martin, the Wild Cards editor, is a huge problem in this regard with his own fantasy series—make their books incredibly dense, so that there's no way to get into things without going back to the very beginning. That's not how you get people into a series of books: You get them hooked on the new one and then they go back and buy all the old stuff, if they're interested. I could totally see myself picking up up a Wild Cards book to read over a weekend sometime, just out of nostalgia, but the idea of all these decades of history that I've missed building into something I can't keep track of is probably enough to turn me off from that idea. Which is kind of a bummer. I could use some good escapist sci-fi right about now.
Even though the Song of Ice and Fire series is great, it's like you meet a character and then watch them get shit all over for 4000 pages. When they start to get up, someone comes along, shits on them, and then kills their dog in front of them.
Comments (17) RSS