According to the AP, more and more couples are staying together because they can't afford to set up separate households:
With the recession and the collapse of the housing market, more and more couples who have broken up are continuing to live under the same roof, according to judges and divorce lawyers. Some are waiting for housing prices to rebound; some are trying to get back on their feet financially.The phenomenon is being felt around the country but most keenly in areas hit harder by foreclosure, such as the Sun Belt. [...]
Sometimes the financial implications of a divorce are so grim that a couple whose marriage is on the rocks decide to give it another try.
Kent Peterson, a longtime divorce mediator in Wayzata, Minn., said a young couple from the Minneapolis area were moving toward separation until they got a look at all the costs involved in divorce.
Seems right to me. If marriage is primarily a financial agreement between individuals (in exchange for agreeing to share assets and financial risk, the married couple enjoys tax breaks, new financial rights, and wedding presents), why shouldn't divorce be as well?
Comments (12) RSS