Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Monday, December 1, 2008

The Other Shoe

Posted by Paul Constant on Mon, Dec 1 at 3:20 PM

Drops.

JPMorgan Chase is laying off 3,400 Washington Mutual employees in Seattle, according to spokesman Tom Kelly. That's more than 80 percent of the 4,300 people it employs in the city.

Most branch workers will keep their jobs, however.

WaMu's former headquarters city is taking the brunt of the 9,200 WaMu layoffs that JPMorgan is making nationwide. It employs about 43,200 people altogether.

This is very, very bad.

Comments (32) RSS

Showing 1-32 of 32

Add a comment

1 Generic user icon

3,400 people without jobs for Xmas. Good thing we still have Safeco.

Oh... nevermind.

Posted by six shooter on December 1, 2008 at 3:29 PM
2 Generic user icon

Bad? sure. Unexpected? No.

Posted by beef on December 1, 2008 at 3:30 PM
3 Generic user icon

I am really loving the fact that I also got laid off two weeks ago. It is a great time to be looking for a job.

Posted by someguy on December 1, 2008 at 3:30 PM
4 Generic user icon

Ooh, that's going to hurt. Each one of those jobs accounts for several more. And who owns that fancy new office tower of theirs?

Posted by Fnarf on December 1, 2008 at 3:31 PM
5 Generic user icon

I know two people who have lost their job at WaMu. I hate them both. In an odd way, this news feels good.

Posted by Cinnamon Society Blues on December 1, 2008 at 3:32 PM
6 Generic user icon

The first round of job eliminations come with a 60 day working notice, so they will be employed through 1/31. Still unemployed, but at least they'll be working through the holidays.

Posted by bettina on December 1, 2008 at 3:33 PM
7 Generic user icon

@4 : JPMC now owns the WaMu Center.

Posted by bettina on December 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM
8 Generic user icon

plus the jobs going are presumably the higher paid ones (IT, legal, Op's, etc.) while the branch ones remaining are presumably lower paying.......

q: When does one cease to work for the system?
a: Presumably after the system ceases working for the one(s).

It continues to amaze me how as we get farther and farther into this economic clusterfuck, analysts and economists continue to point to the consumer as the driver of the american economy..."2/3 of the american economy is consumer driven, consumers will save retailers, consumption is drying up..."

When was the last time any good news came out for the consumer(s)? Your wages are slipping, but we'll give you unrealistic credit options so you can keep buying, but at the same time the bankruptcy door is getting slammed shut behind you/us......this is fucked.

Posted by randy beaver on December 1, 2008 at 3:38 PM
9 Generic user icon

By all means, continue to waste 80 billion on a high density light rail system for a city that will become a virtual ghost town in five years...

Posted by Agraria Now! on December 1, 2008 at 3:40 PM
10 Generic user icon

@4, 7: Word is that Russell Investments is about to bail on Tacoma as their HQ, buy the WAMU Center off JPMC for a song, then lease back to them. Hideous for downtown Tacoma boosters if so.

Posted by tomasyalba on December 1, 2008 at 3:42 PM
11 Generic user icon

OH NO! ALMOST 1% OF OUR DOWNTOWN WORKFORCE!! ALMOST 1.8% OF OUR DOWNTOWN REVENUE!!

WOE! WOEEEEEE!

Posted by AJ on December 1, 2008 at 3:43 PM
12 Generic user icon

@10: Yes, and there are several others who merely want to lease continuous office space with their eye on WaMu's digs (or West 8th or the new Schnitzer tower).

This is a purely psychological loss.

Posted by AJ on December 1, 2008 at 3:45 PM
13 Generic user icon

About half of the Seattle employees given pink slips will stay on for a lucrative transition period (with a specified and already-communicated end-date). If they stay til the end, they're paid a retention bonus equal to the amount of time they worked in 2009, in addition to standard severance.

Not a bad proposition -- until they head out to the job market and there's no chance at finding a comparable job for at least another year.

Posted by goldenhandcuffs on December 1, 2008 at 3:46 PM
14 Generic user icon

@7, are you sure? I know that's what it says on Wikipedia. But I think they just inherited WaMu's lease. The tax records are confusing; there's no taxpayer listed for the WaMu tower portion itself, but the taxpayer for the SAM side is "1301 Second Avenue LLC", which has the same phone number as the Pine Street Group LLC, which lists the building as one of their properties.

Ominously, their website (http://www.pinest.com/wamu-sam02.html) says "WaMu leases the remaining SAM space, providing revenue for SAM". I would be very, very unhappy if the evaporation of the major tenant killed the SAM. We're talking about many millions of dollars in rents here, and god knows how much debt.

Posted by Fnarf on December 1, 2008 at 3:47 PM
15 Generic user icon

Fnarf, I'm sorry, my statement was misleading. WaMu c-owned the building with SAM. WaMu itself owned almost a million square feet of the building and leased about a quarter of a million square feet from SAM. Now the portion which WaMu owned is owned by JPMC. SAM still retains ownership over their part of the building.

Posted by bettina on December 1, 2008 at 3:52 PM
16 Generic user icon

Ah. Thanks. That's still a monster revenue hit for SAM, I'm guessing -- a quarter of a million of the most expensive square feet in the city?

Posted by Fnarf on December 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM
17 Generic user icon

Many of the laid-off workers will be on the so-called "transition team," helping merge WaMu's business into that of JPMorgan, which bought most of the bank's assets for $1.9 billion after it failed in September.

About 1,900 of the 3,400 Seattle layoffs will be part of the transition, meaning those people keep their jobs for at least a couple of months and in some cases up to a year, Kelly said. Workers on that team will receive double pay beginning Oct. 1.

They also will receive severance pay when they leave, which sources at the bank say is equal to five weeks' pay for each of an employee's first two years of service, then two weeks' pay for every year after that.

For high-ranking employees, the package is not nearly as generous as they would have received if WaMu had not failed. JPMorgan is not paying so-called "change of control" severance, which it would have paid if it had bought WaMu from shareholders rather than from the U.S. government.

Under the change-of-control agreement, hundreds of executives would have received severance that equaled one year's salary or more, depending on their rank.

Posted by from seattle times on December 1, 2008 at 3:56 PM
18 Generic user icon

On the other hand, this marks the first time in 5 years my landlord hasn't asked for a rent increase with my lease renewal.

Posted by Westlake, son! on December 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM
19 Generic user icon

In other words JPMorgan currently leases some floors above the museum. They own all the other floors up to floor 42. The lease was soon to expire and then the museum is free to fill with art or lease out.

Posted by CommonKnowledge on December 1, 2008 at 4:02 PM
20 Generic user icon

@9: Nevermind the made-up $80B figure. It's investment in things like light rail that ensure Seattle won't become a ghost town anytime soon.

Posted by tres_arboles on December 1, 2008 at 4:04 PM
21 Generic user icon

Yeah, this is a great time to be dumping ultra-high-end office space on the market. What kind of debt does SAM have as a result of this project? How optimistic were they in projecting how they'd pay it?

Posted by Fnarf on December 1, 2008 at 4:04 PM
22 Generic user icon

Yeah, SAM gave up its ownership of the land the new Four Seasons is built on, in exchange for those floors of shiny office space. Seemed like such a good idea...to Matt Griffin of the Pine Street Group...and his friends on the SAM board...at the time.

Posted by tomasyalba on December 1, 2008 at 4:07 PM
23 Generic user icon

On the plus side, maybe I'll be able to afford a condo in the city now.

Posted by Greg on December 1, 2008 at 4:09 PM
24 Generic user icon

Yes, Greg... you can buy one from one of the laid-off people from the IT or HR departments.

Posted by CommonKnowledge on December 1, 2008 at 4:13 PM
25 Generic user icon

Getting interviewed at WaMu is interesting, to say the least.

Posted by AJ on December 1, 2008 at 4:22 PM
26 Generic user icon

Killing the monorail sure helped them, didn't it.

Maybe next time they'll realize we can all switch to a credit union instead of padding their CEO and exec pay packets with multi-million dollar paydays for "hedging" (aka "gambling" in the REAL WORLD).

Posted by Will in Seattle on December 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM
27 Generic user icon

3rd avenue can breathe more freely, as Wamu Metrosexuals take their cologne drenched satin shirts to greener pastures...

Posted by Agrosexual on December 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM
28 Generic user icon

@27: They wear poufy shirts at WaMu?

Posted by rob on December 1, 2008 at 6:03 PM
29 Generic user icon

pouffy
yes
very

the descent into economic hell is underway

to all who think this is a bump, how can you be so stupid and uninformed

Posted by Dakar on December 1, 2008 at 7:42 PM
30 Generic user icon

Slog commenters who bitched about WashMut and then closed their accounts -- happy now?

Posted by All banks suck on December 2, 2008 at 12:06 AM
31 Generic user icon

#5 +1

I could care less about overpaid WaMu employees. BTW - did the CEO's house in CapHill ever sell?

Posted by diealready on December 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM
32 Generic user icon

So, are there any Seattle or Washington based baanks I can move my money to? I want to keep what little money I have at home. It's why I quit U.S. Bank and then BOA.

Posted by elswinger on December 2, 2008 at 8:00 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use