Over the past few years, as the density debate has waxed and waned here in Seattle, there's been one argument against urban density that I've found particularly interesting: the loneliness argument.
Interesting not because I thought it was necessarily true that the architecture of density automatically creates a lot of single-dweller isolation and on-the-street urban anomie, but because this loneliness argument was one that didn't seem particularly easy to refute. It's all about personal feelings: "I feel lonely in big cities" or, "I don't feel lonely in big cities."
Where was the social science?
Well, here's some, via a New York Magazine piece on the myth of urban loneliness:
In American lore, the small town is the archetypal community, a state of grace from which city dwellers have fallen (thus capitulating to all sorts of political ills like, say, socialism). Even among die-hard New Yorkers, those who could hardly imagine a life anywhere else, you’ll find people who secretly harbor nostalgia for the small village they’ve never known.Yet the picture of cities—and New York in particular—that has been emerging from the work of social scientists is that the people living in them are actually less lonely. Rather than driving people apart, large population centers pull them together, and as a rule tend to possess greater community virtues than smaller ones. This, even though cities are consistently, overwhelmingly, places where people are more likely to live on their own.
Comments (18) RSS