Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Winning the War on Drugs

Posted by on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:44 PM

Imagine you're in charge of busting people in suburban Pittsburgh and you're trying to arrest a suspected drug trafficker who has not shown a proclivity to violence. Do you A) apprehend the suspect on the way to his car, B) conduct an undercover operation to lure him into a trap, or C) send FBI agents with guns drawn into his home with children inside before dawn without giving the cops proper body armor?

You are correct if you picked C. The suspect ran from the door—big surprise—but a woman inside who wasn't expecting visitors at 6:00 a.m. pulled a gun and fired at the pack of unfamiliar men as they barreled through her front door. Christina Korbe's shot killed FBI Special Agent Samuel Hicks and she is now charged with homicide.

"It looks like they followed all the procedures and did everything right in this case," said [FBI Agent] McCabe, who detailed the process the FBI uses to determine how to coordinate arrests. "But it wasn't the suspect they were after who is accused of shooting Agent Hicks. It was his wife. You can't plan for every possible outcome."

Christina Korbe told investigators she never heard police announce themselves and fired her .38-caliber pistol because she feared for her children's safety. She called 911 and said she "shot an intruder."

RIP, Samuel Hicks. Sorry you died a senseless, preventable death.

 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I wonder if the families of these dead law enforcement agents feel it was worth losing their loved ones in order to apprehend drug traffickers? I wonder, does anyone thinks that it's worth it?
Posted by boxofbirds on November 25, 2008 at 1:51 PM
2
in texas she'd walk. in PA? she'll do serious time.
Posted by Max Solomon on November 25, 2008 at 1:55 PM
3
link?
Posted by link on November 25, 2008 at 1:59 PM
4
Unfortunately, it's going to be a case of "he-said/she-said" with the "he" in this instance being a large cadre of LEA's who will swear up-and-down on a stack of bibles that they identified themselves before smashing down the door.

Senseless, stupid, meaningless death.

Maybe these geniuses should be required to pack army-style helmet cams to record this shit - at least then, if they're telling the truth, the recorded footage would back them up.

Which of course, is probably why they DON'T wear the cams...
Posted by COMTE on November 25, 2008 at 2:03 PM
5
If there is justice the charges would be dropped. If the cops had kicked in the door and shot and killed her AND her children, even if she were unarmed, they would walk.
Posted by elswinger on November 25, 2008 at 2:10 PM
6
These stories are SO SAD. I think they're the saddest stories on Slog. At least the tragic evil boyfriend/girlfriend/parent/stranger stories are mostly just random evil people out there. This is our GOVERNMENT.

Is there some kind of good legal fund out there for drug crimes? We need to (at least) make these armed raids STOP.
Posted by jrrrl on November 25, 2008 at 2:16 PM
7
And what if they did announce they were from the FBI? Anybody can yell "FBI!" before they kick a door down. If it's illegal to shoot somebody who claims to be from the FBI, why wouldn't every armed robber just yell "FBI" before they charged in with guns blazing?

You're right, this kind of thing is insane. It springs from an occupying army mentality. It's not necessary, it's not good law enforcement, it leads to preventable deaths and it further alienates people from their government.
Posted by flamingbanjo on November 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM
8
Yes indeed... drugs have won the war on drugs.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on November 25, 2008 at 2:24 PM
9
"We identified ourselves"

You came in when you knew the residents were asleep. Why did you do that?

"To suprise them."

So they were surpised?

"Well, some lady with a pistol took a shot at a half dozen paramilitary police and told 911 someone was breaking into her house, so I'd say yeah, we surprised the shit out of them."
Posted by dwight moody on November 25, 2008 at 2:29 PM
10
And guns. I blame guns too.
Posted by elenchos on November 25, 2008 at 2:34 PM
11
This has to stop. Government agents can not abruptly and violently raid family homes and expect anything less than a violent defense of the family.

How does this end?
Posted by DawginExile on November 25, 2008 at 2:35 PM
12
...better him than her. Good shootin!

Posted by War? On drugs? on November 25, 2008 at 2:39 PM
13
I was talking about the Southcenter shooting to a couple of the nursing assistants here from Africa and they both shook their heads. "You have too much freedom in this country," one of them said. I wonder what they will say when I tell them this story.
Posted by elswinger on November 25, 2008 at 3:39 PM
14
@7:

That's probably true, theoretically at least. But the identification is basically a CYA tactic, and if the defense in this case could establish reasonable doubt in the minds of a jury that they didn't take that step, then there would be pretty good justification to argue for self-defense in the shooting.
Posted by COMTE on November 25, 2008 at 3:39 PM
15
This is why we seriously need to defund the Sherrif's department at King county.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM
16
@2 "in [sic] texas she'd walk"? Dude, WTF?

We all know that here in the shadow of the Texas School Cook Suppository Building she'd more likely than not be riddled with .223 80 grain FMJ slugs. Same shit got used on Anwar Sadat. Tiny little hole goin' in and dessert plate goin out!

And if she somehow survived the righteous wrath of our boys in blue tactical, she'd get popped by a CI in a hat before her trial.

And if she somehow managed to survive that, the People would go after her with all the zeal they seem to reserve for cop killers.

That's justice Texas-style.

Shoot a cop here, run like hell. You think you might just be about to get buckled, eat a bullet.

There are far far too few people who see shooting an armed police officer for any reason to be a mitigating factor as it should be rather than an aggravating factor.
Posted by The Maxx on November 25, 2008 at 5:40 PM
17
THIS IS WHAT OUR TAX MONEY GOES TO? clap, clap, slap.
Posted by bahhumbug on November 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM
18
The WHOLE FAMILY LIVED??? The FBI didn't even shoot the family's pets?
Posted by Amelia on November 25, 2008 at 8:12 PM
19
@18 - they're waiting until the fuss dies down to do that, Amelia.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 25, 2008 at 8:31 PM
20
Wow.

I've been reading about Ryan Frederick - similar situation except it sounds like he was set up by a police informant who confused his Japanese Maple plants for marijuana.

Similar home invasion, similar defensive strategy, similar result, similar bullshit from the officials....
Posted by wtf on November 25, 2008 at 10:00 PM
21
I love how this story puts an ironic twist on the conservative ideal of the gun-toting citizen protecting her home and family from a criminal by shooting them.
Posted by east coaster on November 25, 2008 at 10:23 PM
22
This story is simultaneously horrible and awesome. It's horrible because it ends with a tragic and preventable death. It's awesome because it blows TWO conservative motifs out of the water.
Posted by east coaster on November 25, 2008 at 10:26 PM
23

She is lucky in one respect: if it was the City of Pittsburgh police, she would have left her house horizontally.

BTW, jackass, the husband has multiple VIOLENT priors including ag assault on a law enforcement officer. Do some research next time.
Posted by cabo on December 13, 2008 at 5:05 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy