Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, November 24, 2008

Citigroup Deserves to Die

Posted by on Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:21 PM

Federal regulators announced late Sunday night that the government had approved a radical plan to stabilize Citigroup in an arrangement in which the government could soak up billions of dollars in losses at the struggling bank. President Bush said on Monday that more such rescues could be arranged if they became necessary.
....
The complex rescue plan calls for the government to back about $306 billion in loans and securities and directly invest about $20 billion in Citigroup. The plan, emerging after a harrowing week in the financial markets, is the government’s third effort in three months to contain the deepening economic crisis and may presage other multibillion-dollar financial rescues.

Nominally, in my posts this would be the time where I make a nicely reasoned discussion of the negatives and positives of the latest action. I can't. I'm apoplectic—consumed with rage beyond rational thought.

Citigroup is eponymous for the sort of financial bullshit that sank all of us—the entire fucking global economy—into what is increasingly likely to be a decade- (or decades-) long period of abject misery. I. Cannot. Even. Start.

In 1998, the formation of Citigroup unilaterally ended the Depression-era Glass-Steagall act. That's right, this fucking financial monstrosity simply decided a cornerstone of American financial regulation shouldn't exist, and acted accordingly.

At a dinner in Washington in February 1998, Sandy Weill of Travelers invites Citicorp's John Reed to his hotel room at the Park Hyatt and proposes a merger. In March, Weill and Reed meet again, and at the end of two days of talks, Reed tells Weill, "Let's do it, partner!"

On April 6, 1998, Weill and Reed announce a $70 billion stock swap merging Travelers (which owned the investment house Salomon Smith Barney) and Citicorp (the parent of Citibank), to create Citigroup Inc., the world's largest financial services company, in what was the biggest corporate merger in history.

The transaction would have to work around regulations in the Glass-Steagall and Bank Holding Company acts governing the industry, which were implemented precisely to prevent this type of company: a combination of insurance underwriting, securities underwriting, and commecial banking. The merger effectively gives regulators and lawmakers three options: end these restrictions, scuttle the deal, or force the merged company to cut back on its consumer offerings by divesting any business that fails to comply with the law.

The lawmakers—led by professional Republican asshole Phil Gramm, triangularization expert Rubin and President Clinton—moved out the way.

It took a decade for the repeal of these protections to crater the economy.

And now they want a bailout. The same fucking management team, the same collection of self-important idiots.

Let me tell you something. I could pick 20 random people off the street, hand them a billion dollars each, and I'd be confident they'd create a better bank than these shitheads. And if these random men and women fucked up, I'm absolutely certain their collective mistakes would total less than $300 billion. Starting a bank, particularly an inept and greedy bank isn't that fucking hard.

In comparison, the shitty management teams running other U.S. companies—the airlines, the auto companies, the energy companies—are pure amateurs at colossal fiascoes. Even the guys who green-lit the AMC Gremlin? Better at their fucking jobs.

Citigroup attempted to cover up their losses—their own epic fuckups—through the government financed purchase of Wachovia. Only Wells Fargo's last minute bid revealed their latest deceptive depravity. The morons at Citigroup couldn't even build a headquarters successfully.

I'm heading home to Detroit in a few days for Thanksgiving, where I will witness firsthand the agonal struggles of your countrymen to feed, clothe, and house themselves—people who have done nothing but work hard, design well, and vote to care for one another. They're, we're, failing—with no bailout in sight.

Citigroup just got theirs.

Apoplectic

Updated:

Nobel Laureate Krugman agrees with me.

And here is what Robert Reich, a former Secretary of Labor, has to say:

If you had any doubt at all about the primacy of Wall Street over Main Street; the utter lack of transparency behind the biggest government giveaway in history to financial executives, and their shareholders, directors, and creditors; and the intimate connections the lie between Administrations — both Republican and Democratic — and the heavyweights on Wall Street, your doubts should be laid to rest.
...
This is not a particularly good deal for American taxpayers, but it is a marvelous deal for Citi.
....
Meanwhile, more than a million workers in the automobile industry, along with six million homeowners in danger of losing their homes, and a millions of Americans who depend on small businesses and retailers for paychecks, are getting nothing at all.

Motherfuckers!

 

Comments (31) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The biggest problem with this bailout is that the shareholders of Citibank got a huge Christmas gift from the taxpayers. Yes, save Citibank, but at the same time dilute the *hell* out of the common stock. (which is what didn't do).

And this is a HUGE Christmas gift to the senior management at Citibank that screwed up and and now seeing the value of their stock soar above what it should be.
Posted by taxpayer on November 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM
2
I would happily let citigroup perish, you reap what you sow.
However, I wish wish wish that Bank of America would suffer as well. Having dealt with both of those corporations, citibank was at least cordial and tried to be helpful. BOA were nothing but a bunch of arrogant pricks. Die BOA.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on November 24, 2008 at 1:29 PM
3
Dude, you're confusing whether citigroup deserves to die with whether its in our (yours and mine) best interest to have them stay in business.

Posted by andrew on November 24, 2008 at 1:34 PM
4
Andrew.

I'm not. In is in our interest to let *this* bank die. There is no conceivable public interest in keeping a bank like this--a hideously ill advised combination of insurance, commercial and residential banking, a brokerage and investment banking together.

It is the perfect broth for the sort of colluded derivative crap that finally imploded this year. This is a direct retread of what happened in the 1920's and will happen again and again and again if we do not rid ourselves of financial institutions like it.

Citigroup should be executed, the valuable parts sold and spun off as independent companies, the crap allowed to fail. This merger should have never happened.
Posted by Jonathan Golob on November 24, 2008 at 1:38 PM
5
I am conflicted. The deal sucks, but my student loans for next semester are coming from Citi. I kind of need them solvent at least through disbursement season for the spring term. They can fail after that because I graduate in May. And given the enormity of my student loans, I look forward to a bailout in June.
Posted by DP on November 24, 2008 at 1:40 PM
6
See what the problem with bailouts and government intervention are Golob? DO YOU GET IT NOW? DO YOU SEE WHY LETTING BUREAUCRATS DECIDE WHAT BUSINESS FAILS AND WHAT BUSINESS SURVIVE IS AN INHERENTLY DANGEROUS PATH?

FUCK.
Posted by Bellevue Ave on November 24, 2008 at 1:49 PM
7
Appeal to authority J-man? Puh-Leese.
Posted by Jesus Christ, Son of God, No Greater Authority. on November 24, 2008 at 1:57 PM
8
jonathan, i'd like to take this moment to thank you for even bothering to write about the economy at slog. except for you, it seems to be a "bummer-free zone" where the economy is concerned, except for the morning news, where it is sometimes linked, but not discussed.
Posted by ellarosa on November 24, 2008 at 2:06 PM
9
Thanks for writing about this, Mr. G. It's terrible in so many ways, but it does ineluctably prove that at this point in our economic and political history, propping up inflated asset prices throughout the financial industry trumps propping up industry. Factory owners and organized labor can let go of their illusions at least.
Posted by tomasyalba on November 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM
10
"Ineluctably." Yeesh, refresh my drink somebody.
Posted by tomasyalba on November 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM
11
ellarosa,

Thanks. Just wait until I unleash my deflationary spiral post.
Posted by Jonathan Golob on November 24, 2008 at 2:09 PM
12
What about the old fashioned, "I'm sorry honey, the answer is no"
Posted by 4f...sake on November 24, 2008 at 2:09 PM
13
Wow.

More money for the Saudis.

This is just plain stupid.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM
14
Calling citigroup "motherfuckers" is slander....

slander against motherfuckers!
Posted by hank on November 24, 2008 at 2:31 PM
15
The government is going to bail out Citigroup, but Citigroup announced today they are paying for a 20-year, $400-million naming rights deal for the Mets new stadium.

These executives need to be taken out and shot.

I will declare bankruptcy before I send Citibank a payment on my credit card.
Posted by elswinger on November 24, 2008 at 2:45 PM
16
Not paying your Citi card would be a spirited response, elswinger - but then Citibank gets to charge your account off their books and sell it to a collection agency. Not much skin off their noses, and eventually perhaps adding quite a bit more annoyance to your own life.
Posted by tomasyalba on November 24, 2008 at 3:15 PM
17
And all this happened *after* Citibank (as it was then known) lost billions of dollars in the 1980's through lending it to South American nations who were able to default on those loans. This was back when a billion dollars was still impressive. So this is like a rerun on a slightly more colossal scale.
Posted by E on November 24, 2008 at 3:25 PM
18
god, isn't it weird how the gov't is holding the automakers to higher standards than the effing banks? not like i supported bailing out detroit (especially gm--ahem), but at least they actually MAKE SOMETHING.
Posted by ellarosa on November 24, 2008 at 3:48 PM
19
@18, they made my vacation in NYC possible. Thank you Citi.
Posted by Bellevue Ave on November 24, 2008 at 4:08 PM
20
"Nobel Laureate Krugman" does not agree with you. Your post makes rather clear that you would prefer Citi to disappear. Krugman's post makes rather clear that he would not ("a bailout was necessary"). Your beefs are with Citi's sins way back in the Clinton administration -- for Krugman an idyllic time in which nothing bad ever happened. Krugman's beefs are with the details of the bailout package.
Posted by David Wright on November 24, 2008 at 4:09 PM
21
Fuck yeah! Well put Mr. Golob.
Posted by Sub-prima on November 24, 2008 at 4:11 PM
22
If any of the Citibank execs receive any bonus at all this year, I may have to single-handedly kidnap and slowly torture each and every one of them.

You're welcome!
Posted by freshnycman on November 24, 2008 at 4:58 PM
23
Am I the only one upset about the Mets deal? Citi will stop giving to charity to save a couple bucks but they are still spending $400 million for stadium naming rights?
Posted by elswinger on November 24, 2008 at 6:00 PM
24
I'm looking forward to seeing how they bailout the upcoming collapse of the healthcare companies, since no one--especially the rapidly growing ranks of the unemployed--can afford their premiums anymore. How will they somehow let the healthcare execs get away with billions, while giving taxpayers nothing? Que emocionante!
Posted by Original Andrew on November 24, 2008 at 6:55 PM
25
my initial thought upon hearing about Citibank's potential bankrupcy was, Yipee! this will cancel out the small fortune's worth of debt I have stored up on my trusty Citi-card... right?
Posted by patrick on November 24, 2008 at 7:59 PM
26
The problem isn't just one bank...it's all of them. The banks run this country. The banks run this government. Wake up. Support HR 2755.

http://endthefed.us/why.php

http://endthefedusa.ning.com/
Posted by Mrs Lucky on November 24, 2008 at 8:33 PM
27
@18 THANK YOU.
infuriating. the reason we're in this mess is because things that are tangeable are considered massively less valuable than things that aren't.

They had the nerve to charge me 28% interest on a 30 day statement after 20 years of perfect payment history. And now I'll be giving more of my money for nothing. I wish they were treated half as poorly.
Posted by citisux on November 24, 2008 at 11:19 PM
28
I want that moneygrubbing, soulsucking armpit of a corporation that is Citigroup gone. DEAD.

/kick /kick /kick

DIE ALREADY YOU USELESS SACK OF SH**

ARGH
__________
Posted by Chris on November 24, 2008 at 11:39 PM
29
God knows that Citigroup deserves to die. It certainly deserves to.

But if it does, it'll bring down half the economy with it. And GM and Ford being allowed to go bankrupt will bring down the other half.

So, yes. It most certainly deserves to die. But not now. Not when we're already on the brink of disaster.

In any case, Treasury Dept should have gotten a heck of a lot more than 8% of the company for the $40 billion bailout, considering that with its current stock price, all of Citigroup is only worth about $40 billion today. In fact, tax payers should have bled that company dry.
Posted by Michael on November 24, 2008 at 11:52 PM
30
@15, @23, rename the new Mets stadium from Citi Stadium to Bank Bailout Stadium!

Or maybe something more federal government-y (like IRS Burger and Herschel J. Krustovsky's Clown-Related Entertainment Program from the Simpsons)?
Posted by Q*bert H. Humphrey on November 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM
31
Fuck you Citi. Die you heathen piece of shit corporation.
Posted by Chris on December 11, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy