I just returned from the Henry Art Gallery's opening party for the exhibition Adaptation, and it made me realize something: One of the reasons I love museums so much is that they are constantly rearranging their rooms. It's like a big game of interior-architecture charades in there.
Building and tearing down walls is expensive, so they don't do it all the time (some museums hardly do it at all), and the Henry, to save money, hasn't done it in a while. But when you walk into Adaptation, you notice it immediately (along with the soft, slightly harem-like fabric—that is a compliment—between rooms). Because this show is a bunch of videos, the museum itself had to adapt.
There are endless ways to show video, and the Henry has a bunch. There's the video-like-a-painting-on-the-wall approach, seen at the entrance to the show:

Not too exciting. There's the mirror-cinema-with-bench-in-center approach, seen (one half of it, anyway) in the next work you come across:

Also not the most thrilling. But then there is the heretofore unheard-of drive-in-movie-with-fake-lawn-and-hill-and-tree-indoors approach! (Credit for this one must be given to the artist, Guy Ben-Ner, because the presentation is part of the work.) This is two views of it, from behind the "hill" and and from the balcony above.


And THEN, in the way back of the museum, there's an enclosed multiplex with surround sound! It even has those rectangular panels on the walls. In this place it was impossible to take pictures because everyone was very quiet and rapt. But here is a still from the 87-minute film they were watching, Eve Sussman's Rape of the Sabine Women.

Movies movies movies movies movies. Movies!
Movies:

The only reason to see Bolt, says Megan Seling, is the hilarious hamster:
Rhino is fucking awesome. Rhino is probably the best fat sidekick in any Disney movie ever (because there's always a fat sidekick—Gus Gus, Flounder, Pumbaa, etc.), and he's the only reason you should even give a shit about this movie. Rhino is a fluffy hamster in a plastic ball who watches TV all day, and he's a big fan of Bolt's show. And wouldn't you know it, after a clumsy mishap takes Bolt off the set and into the real world, Bolt ends up in Rhino's trailer park. Rhino freaks the fuck out!
Paul Constant assesses Twilight (see below).

I really, really liked Slumdog Millionaire:
The film is exhilarating and gorgeous and contains the most sublime use of M.I.A.'s "Paper Planes" (not sick of it yet!) through which you've ever had the pleasure of whooshing. Little skinny-limbed boys navigate treachery and temptation and mountains of garbage, seas of garbage—their corner of Mumbai is all lurid colors and postapocalyptic beauty. Boyle's ambition is exhilarating—if he's going to fail, he's going to fail spectacularly (and the second half of the film is shamelessly melodramatic)—and Slumdog Millionaire is a crazy, blazing contradiction.
And Charles recommends Days and Clouds for Americans facing murky economic futures:
That's the moral core (the message) of this simple but pleasant film: Can the two recover from the ruins of their finances/marriage and lead a normal but severely limited life? We must not stop there, we must extend that question to all of America: Can we live and love with less wealth? The answer: If we are ever going to be happy again, we have to live and love with much, much less.
In my livejournal Concessions, I write a million words about Gregory Peck's eyebrows. Can you believe the nerve of me? 
At 4:30 in the morning, I woke up, rolled over to the computer that sometimes lives in my bed, and (true story) e-mailed myself some thoughts that, at the time, seemed important to remember: "Gregory Peck named his only two children Gregory Peck's Left Eyebrow and Gregory Peck's Right Eyebrow. This is absolutely true. The fact that he actually had five children, all with normal human names, remains Gregory Peck's greatest lament."
Aaaaand in Limited Runs:
Harvey is playing at the Grand Illusion, and Steel of Fire Warriors 2010 A.D. is their late night. Late night at the Egyptian is Labyrinth (———>). Central Cinema has some movie called In Search Of about people doing sex to each other. Sex!!! The Short Films of the Brothers Quay is at SIFF Cinema. And at Northwest Film Forum there's the usual Secret Sunday Matinee (last one, I think!), the much-anticipated Flaming Lips movie Christmas on Mars, and Obscene: A Portrait of Barney Rosset and Grove Press, of which Paul Constant says:
The story of Barney Rosset’s Grove Press—publisher of works by William S. Burroughs, Henry Miller, Jack Kerouac, and many other beat-era giants—is one of those miraculous adventures that can only happen in America. As a tiny independent press, Grove published books that inspired the American imagination, titillated the American groin, and roused American Puritanical indignation. Parts of this documentary, especially the interviews with literary figures like Erica Jong, Morgan Entrekin, and Gore Vidal, are fascinating stuff, although it should be noted that almost everybody here has a face that only the publishing industry could love. General audiences will probably be shocked to learn about the legal battles Rosset had to fight to keep his books from being banned, and lit fanatics will find a few interesting bits of trivia here and there. But even with sex, drugs, and a couple of bombings, the narrative drags, and all the cheesy computer animation of words rising off the page can’t save the documentary from its own funereal tone.
As The Stranger's resident squealing goth, I have decided it is my duty to keep on top of Twilight reviews. There's Metacritic, of course (56: Mixed or average reviews), but there's also the conservative movie blog I linked to a few days ago.
Here is what Mr. Red State Movie Watcher has to say about the Twilight, in an e-mail to a friend he posted online:
Dude, I’ve just come out of the most subversive film since … who knows when. This isn’t a vampire flick, it’s a total piece of cinematic propaganda disguised as a vampire flick and aimed right at your children. Only — get this - it’s subversively upholds traditional values.Not only is it a high school movie set in a small town filled with likable characters of different races where race is never mentioned but the whole film is about restraint and discipline; the teenage girls aren’t sexualized, the boys are chivalrous, and the parents caring and real.
Hell, the the good family of vampires even play baseball because it’s “the American pastime,” and on a shelf in a bookstore owned by an American Indian sits Rush Limbaugh’s first book.
We know none of this stuff happens by accident and I’m still processing it.
I noticed Rush Limbaugh's book in the movie—it's not actually on a shelf in a bookstore, it's a battered mass market on a bargain spinner rack in front of a bookstore—and I would've mentioned its presence if I thought anybody else would have noticed it. I've got a pretty sharp eye for books in movies—I can usually tell what a character's reading from just the spine.
(There's one scene in Zodiac where a modern-day Baker & Taylor book distributor box is clearly shown in a basement scene, even though the rest of the movie is pretty strict in strictly representing the 1970's period. That box fucking drove me nuts, but only one other person I've talked to has ever noticed it.)
But I agree with the Republican Gene Shalit: It's a conservative movie. It's a very conservative series. Bear that in mind before you go in.
I'm obsessed about this—but I haven't been writing about it because, uh, I've been obsessed about other, far more trivial matters. But Al Franken is closing the gap and may yet overtake GOP douchetooth Norm Coleman. Following the Franken/Colemen recount has me going to TPM and 538 every few hours—something people with real lives stopped doing on November 5. Gotta love this detail from 538:
The Uptake has video of 10 ballots identified by Franken that were challenged by the Coleman campaign simply because [the] voter voted both for John McCain and Al Franken! Uh, in case you were wondering, the campaigns are no longer leaving any stone unturned.The disincentive to challenge ballots is precisely this sort of thing—challenges that look so ridiculous that they'll weaken your ability to take the moral highground.
And it's too bad they didn't (or couldn't) do this in Florida in 2000:
...the Secretary of State is also taking under advisement a proposal to make all challenged ballots available for public viewing on a website.
"I think you guys should be nicer to Carl. He's new."
"I think we should take Carl out for a few drinks and then put him in a headlock."
Don't thank me, thank Nat.

It's always a pleasure when Kelly O drops by the books section, and this week, she brought along a giant penis...book:
The Big Penis Book is BIG. Twelve rock-hard inches. Well... it's 12 inches by 12 inches and rock-hard bound. It's really THICK, too. I'm sitting here, just holding it, all alone, in my apartment. God, it's so, so... so HUGE! It weighs almost, what, seven pounds? I can barely lift... oh man! Anyway, yeah, it's just me, a girl, sitting here with one very large book of penises.
You should read her whole review, which takes Seattle booksellers for task for underestimating straight girls' thirst for penises. It's about time to start planning for Christmas gifts, after all.

...and then again she might not. But, hey, anything might be happening. The Center for Sex Positive Culture might be spending your tax dollars throwing sex parties. They probably aren't but they might be and so long as "might be" is the standard KOMO and Ginter use to determine what news is fit for their 11 o'clock broadcast, we can use the same standard to determine what posts are fit for Slog. Personally? I don't think Marlee Ginter is [a damn fine journalist]. But we can't rule it out definitively. I mean, does anyone know where Marlee Ginter is right now?
But if someone out there does know where Marlee is right now, could you ask her to please read this? Because there's something I want to say to Marlee:
Welcome to Seattle.
According to your bio on KOMO's website, you arrived in Seattle in August of 2007. Before getting a job at KOMO you worked as a reporter and an anchor at television stations in Gainesville, Florida; Savannah, Georgia; Spartanburg, South Carolina; and Indianapolis, Indiana. Judging from your age and your resume, you've moved from place to place, never staying in one city for very long, before you finally wound up here in Seattle a little more than a year ago. So you're just another one of those rootless, itinerant teevee news reporters who comes and goes—and that's not your fault. That's how careers work in your business: a teevee news reporter starts out in a small market, moves on to slightly larger market, and gradually works her way up to a big market.
The downside—for you itinerant teevee news reporters, for us viewers in bigger markets—is that by the time one of you gets a job in a place like Seattle, a big liberal city, you've spent a great deal of time living and working in tiny towns, in churchy places, in markets where people don't have liberal views about sex or sexuality or much of anything else. Before KOMO offered you a job, Marlee, you spent most of your professional life in much smaller and more conservative cities—all but one of them in the South.
Now sex sells, even in smaller markets, and sweeps are sweeps. So teevee news reporters in smaller markets are expected to find and report stories about sex, stories that allow them to show steamy, suggestive video.
But a teevee news reporter working in a small market—where all teevee news reporters learn their craft—has to be careful to pitch her sex stories so that they play to the prejudices and hypocrisies of viewers in those smaller and more politically conservative markets. Oh, they want to watch sex stories for the same reason we all do—they're titillating—but they don't want to admit that they're watching them to be titillated. So sex stories in smaller markets are presented to the viewers only after they've been carefully wrapped in condemnation and outrage: "Look at this disgusting sex club/sex shop/sex haver—isn't this sex club/sex shop/sex-haver shocking and loathsome? Isn't this an affront to our community's values? Now let's look at this shocking thing some more, shall we? My goodness, isn't it indecent!"
In a small media market, teevee news reporters frequently file distorted, unfair, sloppily reported pieces about sex stores and sex clubs and people that get caught having sex. Why waste time with, oh, accuracy and fairness and ethics when the point of the piece isn't the sex toys being sold or the guys getting it on in the rest stops or the tax-exempt status of a sex-related social club. The point is boosting the ratings with a little titillating video and then moving on to weather and the sports. And in small markets teevee news reporters can get away with this, they can shit all over sex stores and clubs and havers with impunity, they beat the fuck out of people who are doing dirty, dirty SECKS!—because in a place like Savannah, Georgia, or Indianapolis, Indiana, it's extremely unlikely that someone, anyone, is going to come to that person's or that group's defense. Because, my goodness, they were doing the SECKS! And SECKS is dirty and shocking!
Welcome to Seattle, Marlee.
Seattle isn't Georgia or South Carolina. Seattle isn't just "the mountains and the water." And it's not just Starbucks and Microsoft and the Seahawks and the rain. Seattle is also Babeland and the Lusty Lady and “Savage Love” and amateur porn festivals and sex-positive community centers and nude bicyclists and one of the nation's biggest burlesque scenes.
When the city of Seattle passed a law crafted to put local strip clubs out of business—and throw local strippers out of work—Seattle residents voted overwhelmingly to repeal it.
People around here fall into two categories: they're either pretty progressive about sex, a.k.a. "sex-positive," or they believe that people who aren't bothering anyone else should be left the hell alone. If someone wants to open a non-profit club that offers sex education and hosts sex parties, no one around here really cares so long as the sex club is operating legally.
And the Center, which is operating legally, got on just fine for nine years before you got to town. If there was going to be an outcry about what goes on behind its closed doors—and about its non-profit status—there would've been one long before KOMO hired you.
You’re not in a red state anymore, Marlee. You're free to file sensationalistic stories about sex for KOMO. We certainly sensationalize sex here at the Stranger—but because we think sex is, or should be, sensational. What you can’t peddle here is sex-negative bullshit. And you can't lie about sex-related businesses or sex-related non-profits with impunity here. You can't beat up on sex clubs and sex shops the way teevee news reporters in small towns beat up on sex clubs and sex shops. And if you try that crap here, Marlee, you're going to get some blowback. Because there are too many people here who aren't embarrassed to be seen coming to the defense of sex clubs or sex shops or sex workers or sex havers. Make a note of it.
Finally, Marlee, I've heard through the media grapevine that you're upset about all this [damn-fine-journalist] stuff on Slog. So let's make a deal: KOMO has already yanked your story from its website—so why not officially retract the piece and issue an apology to the Center? On air would be great, but in writing would do. We'll probably yank our obnoxious YouTube videos, and pull down or re-title these posts, whatever you do. Because, hey, we've more than made our point. But I still think you need to do the right thing and apologize.
And again, Marlee, welcome to Seattle.

...taken by Damon Winter and published in today's NYT look fake? And not just like, cuz, they actually appear to be enjoying each other's company. What's wrong with the perspective, other than the camera being low? It looks like the final scene of Casablanca, with midgets as runway personnel and toy planes and everything.

Twilight opens today, to the collective squeals of goths across the land. It screened too late for our print edition, but our resident squealing goth Paul Constant wrote an excellent review, which you should read:
Look, fuck it: If you really liked the Twilight books, you’ll probably really enjoy the Twilight movie. Although your favorite line of dialogue, whatever it is, will probably not make it into the movie, and that will give you something to complain about on the message boards at www.bellaandedward.com for months to come. If you have no desire to read Twilight—or if you tried it and found the hackneyed dialogue and empty-headed plotlessness too offensive to continue—there is absolutely no reason for you to see this movie.
The excellent review also contains this extra-excellent sentence:
At first, as they snap and snark at each other, they appear mildly alarmed by their own budding puppy love, like a monkey who can’t quite stop touching an electric fence.
USS Mariner blogger Dave Cameron fell about 7,000 votes short of winning an online competition for a $10,000 college scholarship.
Cameron managed to pull in a whopping 13,000 votes, but it just wasn't enough to overcome the massive flood of traffic generated by Daily Kos for their own David Mauro, who ended up with about 20,000 votes.
While some Kos bloggers turned into giant fucking assholes during the competition, it appears the commie pinko political site is trying to make good, and has posted a link to USSM, which is now holding its own fundraiser to get Cameron a well-deserved scholarship. So far, USSM has raised about $500.
If you're completely baffled as to why anyone would give money to a sports blogger, check out a few of these comments left on my earlier post:
Uh, Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com was a stupid baseball blogger until this year. Now he's probably the most insightful and original progressive blogger on the planet. I don't even like baseball but I've been following Cameron and Silver for years because they're a couple of the best thinkers I've ever read.Posted by jrrrl
If you just ignore the content of the two blogs (for a sec) and consider what the two have accomplished, you have to go with Cameron. His analysis of the product the Mariners sell to their fans has made the very stubborn (and sometimes woefully dumb) franchise to change their ways (see Cameron's report on the coaching of Felix Hernandez a couple seasons back). In a way, he's somewhat like Ralph Nader leading a consumer's movement to install protective dashboards in cars(somewhat. don't go crazy). I can't think of anything the Daily Kos has been directly involved in any change towards what it writes about.Posted by Shoot me down, I dare you
The thing is, Dave Cameron is a really, really good baseball blogger, one of the best in the entire field, while David Mauro is an extremely pedestrian blogger on local Texas politics. Cameron has a much greater impact on the community at large; his readership is extraordinarily high, and (unlike Mauro) his entries generate hundreds of insightful comments. Mauro's entries typically get two or five comments.It also deeply annoys me that the Kossacks have taken a stupid joke about getting the Freepers and other right-wingers to vote en masse for Cameron as if it was a serious expression of Cameron's true fan base. That's ridiculous. I honestly have no idea where Cameron fits on the political scale, because he zealously avoids even passing mention of it — and he's deleted comments of mine at USSM that inappropriately brought it up. He was right to do so.
Cameron is actually advancing the state of the art at USSM, and making advanced ideas of analyzing baseball comprehensible to many, many people. He's made something like six thousand posts there, and with few exceptions they've been brilliant.
So, yeah: vote Cameron.
Posted by Fnarf

I got panhandled today by a handsome panhandler. A handsome panhandler! And I gave him a dollar. I put it right there in his pan. His panhand. Or whatever. I may have giggled.
I feel weird about this. If he hadn't been handsome, would I have given him a dollar? I don't know. I am a bad person maybe. What IS the appropriate criteria for deciding which panhandlers should get one of my dollars? "Handsomeness" should not make the list—I'm sure of that.
And it's totally not the prince you were thinking of.
Blurrily NSFW image after the jump.
Thank you, World of Wonder.

This week's Party Crasher is by news intern Aaron Pickus. I have to say, I'm in love with Aaron's Party Crashers. Two weeks ago, for Halloween, he injected Party Crasher with a little bit of Poe:
It is Halloween. I am passing alone, on foot, through a singularly dreary tract of Green Lake. The wind murmurs through a construction site across the street from a house with a red-lit porch. There is an iciness, a sinking, a sickening of the heart...
This week, he goes to a U District Sex-themed party, and he brings some de Sade along with him:
I know naught what will transpire in this nether place, but this I may say without doing my tale a disservice, that when the description of this party is given, the reader will react by discharging three times in succession....
You should read the whole thing.
A week ago, I sat in the front row of ACT's Falls Theatre, waiting for The Adding Machine to start and thinking: Why did I agree to come to this? Theater in your mind is always so much better than theater as it is practiced. Even if there are good people in something, or the director's good, or the premise of the show sounds interesting, as soon as the lights go down the regret sets in. You are at least two and a half hours and an intermission away from the end. You have been trained by YouTube to not have that kind of attention span, and by the presidential election to think of real life as better theater than makeup and lights.
Then a couple representatives of the newly formed New Century Theatre Company came out to thank everyone for coming to the first night of their first show, and for donating money and time and sweat to making it all happen, after all they're just a bunch of excellent established Seattle actors/designers/directors who didn't feel there was a theater company in town doing good enough, gutsy enough stuff. The NCTC representatives seemed so sincere and so nice and so thankful that I felt for sure the play was going to suck. Just a feeling I had. Nevertheless, Amy Thone is in this thing, I thought, and everyone knows Amy Thone is a genius. Please God let Amy Thone be in a lot of it.
The NCTC representatives left the stage, everything went dark, and someone in the ensemble wheeled a big light onto the stage, and then slowly scanned the crowd with the bright, bright light, so that you were blinded for a second as the opening scene materialized. ("The company couldn't afford to pay union stagehands to adjust the overhead lights. So, for the first half of the play, designer Geoff Korff instructed the actors to wheel glaring bulbs around the stage by themselves," according to Brendan Kiley's column this week. "The effect is a revelation in chiaroscuro, turning the play into an eerie stage noir.") If the lighting's stark, the domestic scene that materialized after we were all blinded was, like, post-stark: stark plus time, stark plus dread and decay and resentment. There, center stage, with the most terrifying household implements you've ever seen, was Amy Thone, playing Mrs. Zero (how bout that name?), standing over her husband, Mr. Zero, played by Paul Morgan Stetler. This publicity photo doesn't do the tableau justice, but it helps:

Not only is Amy Thone in this thing, Amy Thone is the first actor to speak, and she doesn't stop for, like, 10 minutes—a seething, terrifying, hateful blast of bile, startling in its wickedness, astounding in its depth. The asshole who was moaning inwardly about not wanting to be here in the front row at a show that's bound to be horrible because so much Seattle theater is horrible is suddenly the luckiest motherfucker on the planet, because he has first-row seats to, well, the best thing of its kind he's ever been privileged to witness. This dark, smoldering, insanely well written 1923 play kicks you in the face immediately, and under the stylized, morbid, ruthless direction of John Langs, your face pretty much stays kicked in the whole way.
After his wife's wicked mockery of him, Mr. Zero goes off to work, adding numbers in a nameless firm, and the psychic landscape—the this-is-a-soulless-place-to-work message—is so well conveyed, so beautiful in a way, you feel like you're watching something totally new even though it's such an often-depicted idea. Mr. Zero has worked here for 25 years, his job has never changed, and he has never missed a day. Nevertheless, you know what's coming; Stetler's incredible body language, jumpy and striving, tells you everything. His boss tells him he's going to be replaced by an adding machine, a machine so easy to use a teenage girl could do it, and that he's no longer needed, that he's out of a job. The next scene is a party scene, full of shrieking 1920s women and garrulous 1920s men and a raven-like Mrs. Zero and a stuttering Mr. Zero—a Mr. Zero who hasn't told anyone, not even his wife, he's lost his job. This party scene is burned into my brain, in part because it's the point when the whole play pivots—a cop knocks on the door and hauls off Mr. Zero to jail, whereupon we learn that Mr. Zero has murdered his boss—and in part because of how it's staged, how it comes together and comes apart (best exit ever: Amy Thone gets on the floor and rolls upstage while pieces of the set are whisked around above her). Then comes a bristling, angry, racist, hysterical monologue of despair from Stetler; whether this monologue is better than Thone's earlier one is a debate you'll enjoy having with yourself later.
And that is only, like, the first 20 minutes of the show—a show that never lets up, and goes in directions you never would have expected out of the source material; a show that is very aware that you are a preoccupied person who doesn't want to sit through bullshit and that (not unrelated) you fear death more than you wish you did; a show that, in further evidence that this theater company knows what they're doing, has no intermission. It's one straight shot. With your face kicked in, as I mentioned. And two of the best live performances you are likely to ever see, as I believe I also mentioned. You haven't been to the theater in a year, or two, or ever? This is the show to see. Tickets are $25. Take a date. It's playing tonight at 8 pm, and tomorrow night at 8 pm, and on Sunday at 2 pm, as well as next weekend and the weekend after. But seriously, go tonight. Go now. You can get tickets here (by clicking the date you want in that little calendar to the right) or by calling 292-7676 or emailing service@acttheatre.org. Brendan Kiley's proper review—we wrote about the show and the company in two separate pieces this week—is here. Shows like this are why you live in a city. You are lucky, and not dead yet.
Posted by News Intern Aaron Pickus
Yesterday at about 2:40pm, a University of Washington student was the victim of a strong armed robbery at a bus stop on the 4600 block of 25th Ave NE in the U-Village area. Details come from the UW Police Department:
Four suspects were involved in this incident, two males and two females. One suspect, a female wearing a black puffy jacket, blue jeans, and red shoes, took the victim's cell phone. After taking the cell phone, the female suspects left on foot, and the two male accomplices boarded a bus. The male suspects were later located on the bus and arrested by Seattle Police.
The two female suspects are still at large. No one was injured.
Stemming from an earlier conversation in the office.
The difference between the American mind and African one can be seen in this way: 
What Americans call "sloppy seconds," we in Africa call "brotherhood." For the American mind it's a matter of competition, of winning or losing. Can you believe it? Even here in bed, after a day of careering (in the original sense of that word), the Americans are back at it: FCFS. But for the African it's about a shared moment, about a bond of the bones. It's not a question of first and second place; it's the answer of being the together. We are the same man when we share this one woman. That's brotherhood.
"Wouldn't it be sad if the Mormons spent all their money sending out free copies of their book, and didn't have any more money to harass gay people?" writes Slog tipper Zoe. Yes, Zoe, that sounds marvelous.
So I can't guarantee this will work, but I just went and signed up for my free doorstop—err, Book o' Mormon—at Mormon.org, and my zip code wasn't a required field, but my address and phone number were (this suggests the Mormons don't plan to mail a package but they do want a gay dude's number). And when I finished filling out the form, it gave this message:
"Thank you for requesting the Book of Mormon from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. You should be contacted by missionaries in a few days."
Oh, sweet Joseph Smith prancing about in body drawers: They are sending Mormons to my house! And if you sign up, they will probably send real, live, magical-underpanted Mormons to your house, too! So, if all goes well, I'll get to recycle a copy of god's word and have a couple strapping "elders" in my living room, where I can turn the tables for once—holding Mormons as a captive audience, attempting to convert them to secularism, lecturing them for their church's insufferable bigotry, pushing them to take shots of tequila, and reading them passages from The Stranger—instead of me being stuck listening to their drivel.
This isn't based on anything more than conversations and inferences (and conversations about inferences), but it seems worth noting that I'm picking up something I haven't heard before in the Seattle media world.
In the past, most of the speculation about the Seattle Times vs. Seattle P-I death match involved scenarios in which the P-I eventually ceased to publish. This was especially true, of course, when the people doing the speculating were employees of the Times. (But not at all exclusive to Times-employed speculators.)
Lately, with word that the Seattle Times Company is selling off its Maine newspapers and cutting staff for the third time this year (with newsroom staffing expected to be down 25 percent year-over-year by the time it's all over), I'm hearing that people inside the Times are suddenly starting to consider a scenario they've so far failed to take seriously: that theirs will be the Seattle daily that ceases to publish.
That's not a prediction of what will happen in the future. But it is a sign that the balance of reportorial angst in the city may be shifting.
People seemed to think I was being unfair in posting an aerial view of Frank Chopp's elevated waterfront tunnel proposal. Commenters suggested that the surface/transit options under consideration would look just as bad from the perspective, with—as one put it—"a gigantic uncrossable highway instead of storefronts." First, let me reiterate that the "storefronts" aren't part of Chopp's proposal. ALL his plan pays for is a concrete wall. Chopp's proposal assumes that businesses are going to want to pay extra taxes for the privilege of moving under a freeway away from the city's retail core—taxes that would, after many years, eventually pay for some of the improvements Chopp envisions.
Second, it's true that I didn't include an aerial perspective of the four-lane surface/transit option. So here it is, along with the aerial view of the Chopp option for comparison.
Surface:

Chopp's elevated tunnel:

Let's look at them from the street level, too, just for kicks.
Here's the surface option, viewed from the Seattle Aquarium.

And here's Chopp's proposal (note: facade shown here would not be funded):

Here's the view from Pier 54 and Madison (Remember, again, that the flower boxes and big, open windows would be paid for by Chopp's extra tax on retail under the viaduct; all his plan builds is a concrete wall.)
Surface:

And Chopp's:

Finally, just for the hell of it, here are the views from Columbia Street (you'll have to erase all the facades, plantings, windows, and signage with your imagination, since Chopp's proposal wouldn't pay for any of them).
Surface:

Chopp's:

Fair enough?

Popsci.com informs us of Vavelta, which is a skin smoothing product made out of newborn baby foreskins. It works basically like Botox.
Foreskins have long been treasured by cosmetic dermatologists because they are rich in fibroblasts, tiny cells that play a crucial role in healing wounds and generating collagen and connective tissue. (One foreskin can be bioengineered into a piece of lab-grown skin the size of a football field.) The makers of Vavelta extract them by finely dicing the foreskins and treating them with enzymes. Then the fibroblasts are suspended in a proprietary cell storage medium and injected into "problem areas" with a fine gauge needle.
This week, National Geographic announced it would publish its first-ever video game: Africa. Sony released this photography game in Japan on the PS3 but thought Western gamers would have a distaste for its pacifism. Going on safari, looking at semi-realistic African wildlife, and not hunting it all to extinction with a rifle? A-hyuck.
Having been to Uganda, I have watched this title for some time, and I'm glad NG is taking the risk of bringing it Stateside. In many respects, Africa appears to get the experience right—the slowness, the waiting, the appreciation as time lapses and you realize the world around you doesn't need an animal sighting to be rich. (The above trailer doesn't reflect that, trying to make the game look tense. It's not, thankfully.) But while Sony has tried to tout the PS3 as the ultimate 3D machine, this game only goes so far. The environments and animals look fantastic on first impression, but once you try living in it, the vegetation looks digital, and the animals interact in a robotic way. But the hyper-realistic photojournalism genre needs to happen—call it lamer than the real thing, but it's more interesting as a game than another friggin' shooter—and I can only hope this game's release next year lays some groundwork.
In other news, Seattle's Penny Arcade turned 10 this week. Congrats. Since I'm cheap, here's your birthday gift: Your second video game is a little better than your first (reminder: I really liked the first), and I look forward to the time when I can actually sit down and play it.
Of course, same goes for Fallout 3 and Fable II, two titles that I haven't sat with much since their release. Wuz the holdup? My reviews (yes, I finally did 'em, get off my back) are after the jump.
It's been nearly impossible to keep up with all the back-and-forth leaking about this, but now, in one of the most solid-seeming leaks I've seen so far, two "confidants" of Hillary Clinton tell the New York Times that she's decided to accept the position of Secretary of State in the Obama administration.
A lot of this drama, it seems to me, has been about who's in control.
Is Obama calling the shots, making offers Clinton can't refuse, and getting everything he wants in terms of Bill Cinton's cooperation? Or is Hillary negotiating her own terms of employment, choosing what's best for her out of two good options (the Senate or SecState), and showing, with her somewhat public ambivalence, that she's overqualified for the post but happy to serve her country if treated appropriately?
Whatever the case, it sounds like Clinton's now on board.
Which means, inevitably, more drama for Obama. But—and I think this is what makes it worth it for him in the end—this also gives Obama a large measure of control over Clinton's political destiny. If the first Obama administration is a disappointment, she'll be partly to blame. If Obama needs to punish Clinton (or politically knee-cap her ahead of 2012), he can fire her or otherwise make her look bad. She'll have her fiefdom, but it will be in his kingdom—and she'll be serving, as every appointee does, at "the pleasure of the president."
Google has announced that they're shutting down Lively, which was their half-assed Second Life competitor. By 'half-assed,' I mean that Lively, which was referred to as a "3D Chat" program didn't allow people to create entire worlds like in Second Life. Perhaps most importantly, you couldn't have sex in it. Let this be a lesson to us all. Here is a video of Second Life sex:
This is why Second Life is the best thing ever. Or something.
UPDATE: The lame sex video above is from The Sims. Here, as an apology, is video of a lecture on sex and disability in Second Life: